At least three. I mean, people were telling me I looked great.
Oh, we didn’t win, of course. Saturday Night Live did. But really, it was an honor just to be publicly disappointed at a primo table right near the stage in full view of most of the cameras!
Seriously, though, a great time. I’d never been to an awards show, unless you count the 1995 MTV VMAs. And I wasn’t nominated for anything there, though Steven Tyler did choose to sweat directly on me, which felt like something of an honor.
But the night was not without drama. See, I didn’t have a suit - haven’t had one in far too long, in fact. But I did have a Macy’s gift certificate. So Friday morning, on my return from “Wait Wait,” I stopped off, and with Jeanne found a terrific suit at a jaw-droppingly good price. God bless the fiscal meltdown!
So I pick up the freshly-cuffed suit yesterday, take it home and put it on a few minutes before our HBO-supplied car arrives. Jeanne already looks beautiful, and we’re goin’ in style… a Hollywood power couple, about to breeze down the red carpet…
Which is when I discover that something is wrong with my suit. It seems too small. It will not button, no matter how aggressively I pull at it, and I’d eaten kind of light all day, to boot. I pull and I struggle and I eventually have to face facts: This is not my suit. It is, in fact, upon inspection, 4 sizes too small.
I called Macy’s in a panic, and they went into a panic. 5 seconds later, the phone rings - our driver is here.
What could we do? I’m wearing a shirt, tie, dress shoes… and shorts. The driver takes us not to the awards but to Macy’s. By the time we arrived, the staff had determined that my suit had been mistakenly given to a “Mr. Strange” (no lie).
We raced around the store searching for a replacement, because there were no more of my suits available. Jeanne found one that seemed to fit, more or less. They called a tailor in for an emergency look, she did her thing with the pant cuffs, and we waited anxiously as she sewed and the awards show preliminaries ticked by. There were moments of comedy (in retrospect), as when Jeanne went to look for my misplaced belt, unaware that she was carrying my shorts with her, meaning I spent at least some of my Big Awards Show cocktail hour prowling around near the changing area of Macy’s in a shirt, tie, underwear, and dress socks, trying to attract Jeanne’s attention out on the floor in a stage whisper while semi-hiding behind clothing racks.
Soon, though, the tailor finished her rush job, I jumped into the suit and we were off.
And we got there before cocktail hour was over. The whole thing was a great time - we ran into lots of old friends, old idols (Carl Reiner was there, receiving a special award, introduced by his son), and lot of people, who, like me, were Honored Just To Be Nominated. A great time, and my equanimity had been restored. Although, if sometime during the evening I had been introduced to a man in a smart charcoal suit and a name like, say, “Doug Strange,” I’m pretty sure I would’ve punched him in the face.





51 comments
Graham
February 8, 2009 at 1:54 pm
1Adam, punching Doug Strange in the face would have been bad karma, dude. I mean he’s 4 sizes smaller than you for one thing, plus he’d be using both hands to hold up his pants. Hardly a fair fight. On the other hand, you are in Hollywood and worst things have happened and been overlooked there.
You’re wife is a real beauty. She looks vaguely familiar, somehow. I’m thinking PBS from my youth, for some reason.
I’m sitting on the edge of my favorite TV watching seat, waiting for the February 20th premiere of Real Time. I need my biting political humor fix and Keith Olbermann only takes me halfway there.
Zee Man
February 8, 2009 at 2:03 pm
2Lost out to SNL? Well, just your bad luck that Sarah Palin ran for Vice President and that Tina Fey had time to riff on her. In any other year, you would have been on the stage, collecting your award. Wait till next year.
BTW, when is WWDTM coming to DC anyway? Or Baltimore? I’d drive to Baltimore. Good show this weekend.
M. Short
February 8, 2009 at 2:11 pm
3Your suit is an Armani? Hmmm… I didn’t know Armani made navy blue suits. That may explain your good price. I’m just saying.
Pope Benny 16
February 8, 2009 at 4:16 pm
4Anselmo brought me the current Newsweek issue that has an article by Christopher Hitchens about me and the lifting of the excommunication of the four Holocaust-denier and anti-Semite bishops. In Mr. Hitchens’ opinion, my robe needs to be pulled down in back because my swastika adorned slip is showing. (I hate when that happens.)
That wacko, ultra-conservative Tridentine Catholic Hutton Gibson and his equally deranged actor son, Mel, called last week to congratulate me on my decision. Anselmo suggested that maybe I should not take the call, but I get so little praise for anything that I do these days. I wanted my happy time. Hutton suggested that the next move should be to renounce Vatican II and return the Church to its glory days during the Middle Ages, when men were men and Latin was the only language spoken in Mass. Women weren’t so uppity back then either.
I don’t know what’s going on these days. I’m just a confused old man, pulled this way and that by the chilling political currents of Church infighting. Maybe I’ll sleep with Archbishop Bernie Law’s sawed-off shotgun under my pillow tonight. And bring back that Tamil slave boy as my food taster. Like I’ve said here before - The Holy See is awash with treachery, long knives, and now, maybe arsenic.
Adam Felber
February 8, 2009 at 4:26 pm
5Graham - Jeanne was in fact, a featured played on PBS’s “Wishbone,” playing Juliet, Maid Marion, Joan of Arc, and many others. Not coincidentally, that was my first TV writing job as well…
M. Short - my suit is neither blue nor an Armani. But Armani (which this isn’t) does in fact make navy blue suits (which this isn’t). Please note that none of these facts mean that I DIDN’T get ripped off.
dee
February 8, 2009 at 6:22 pm
6Awwww…if they gave and award for Cutest Couple (and they should) you two would have won. Love the coordination between your tie and Jeanne’s dress.
piglet
February 8, 2009 at 6:26 pm
7You guys are not just IN style, you’re riding style on matching purple Vespas.
cooper
February 8, 2009 at 7:25 pm
8dee, you know, I saw the same thing going on between Adam’s tie and Jeanne’s dress, but I just assumed it was just me being a clueless guy.
Jake
February 8, 2009 at 7:40 pm
9Adam, seems like I remember a Rockford Files episode, where Jim won an award from some detective association. On the way back home, he and Angel and his dad got into an argument about how the nomination was really the award and to prove it, as they were driving home, Jim threw his trophy out the car window. He came back the next day (and the day after that and the day after that) walking through the weeds by the edge of the road, trying to find the trophy. But really, the nomination is truly the award. Congratulations.
ceolaf
February 8, 2009 at 9:19 pm
10My wife is shocked that you don’t own a suit. You must have gotten married in a suit, she says. And she knows you got married not THAT long ago, because you got your bath mats from your registry after we moved to the the neighborhood.
(bath mats: the funniest wedding present.)
So, did the bath mats make it to CA? Or, are they with your marriage suit in a landfill somewhere?
SallyMutant
February 9, 2009 at 12:09 am
11This great true story proves that truth is Doug Stranger than fiction.
Chris Harlan
February 9, 2009 at 2:14 am
12Wait Wait was wonderful, with Adam in fine (not rare) form. Many hoots from Russian pilot through Pride and Prejudice and Zombies all the way to the Prediction. I almost never laugh at the Prediction, but the GOP jab about the missing day was right on.
Congrats on the nod, wish it was a win. As to the Strange adventure you had prior to the event, I smell pilot!
tim
February 9, 2009 at 5:45 am
13Doug Strange was a utility infielder for the Rangers (and others) in the early 90’s. He works in the Pirates front office now. Maybe he was in LA recruiting Manny Ramirez, and needed a suit to impress him. I wonder if Manny’s agent is thinking, who was that little guy from the Pirates swimming in that huge suit?
Harold
February 9, 2009 at 7:45 am
14Are you sure they didn’t give your suit to Adam Strange?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Strange
Or, possibly, Dr. Stephen Strange?
In either case, it would probably be a bad idea to punch them in the face.
Zee Man
February 9, 2009 at 7:52 am
15Or Curtis Strange, for that matter. He’d probably whale you with his 3 iron.
Graham
February 9, 2009 at 10:12 am
16“Wishbone”! Of course! I remember what a warm and loving impression I had of the characters she played. I felt she was talking only to me. OK. I had a mad crush on Jeanne, I admit it. But by 15, I was past that; skate boarding and Rubic’s cube took up my TV time.
I guess I should hate you, Adam. I’m trying not to. I have to admit you’re a very funny and charming guy and you would have won out in the end. That plus, I guess I’m maybe 6 - 10 years younger than Jeanne. Please give her a very chaste and proper kiss on the cheek for me. I certainly don’t want to be the cause of any trouble between you two. All my best to your family.
Graham Strange
Chris Harlan
February 9, 2009 at 10:26 am
17Graham Strange, the doctor? In love? No it can’t be. That would be M.A.D.
SeattleDan
February 9, 2009 at 11:02 am
18What a fine looking couple!
And I will always hold Doug Strange well in my heart. He worked a bases-loaded walk against Dave Cone to tie game 5 of the 1995 Divisional series, setting up the dramatic 11th inning come back by the Mariners. I can still see Griffey racing from first to home on Edgar’s double down the left field line, and beating the throw to the plate. I remember because I was there, the ticket a birthday gift from SeattleTammy. Halcyon days, I tell you.
Rob Allen
February 9, 2009 at 11:07 am
19There’s a guy on the comicbookresources.com forums who calls himself Doug Strange, although that’s not his real name. I wonder if he named himself after the baseball player.
Dale
February 9, 2009 at 11:21 am
20I thought Doug Range was a utility infielder for the Strangers.
D Quayle
February 9, 2009 at 8:12 pm
21Right you are, Mr. Pope. And as I said back in 1988 - “The Holocaust was an obscene period in our nation’s history. I mean in this century’s history. But we all lived in this century. I didn’t live in this century.”
Zee Man
February 10, 2009 at 4:44 am
22Ah yes, Mr. Quayle, and every bit as meaningful today as it was that first time you uttered it. I had forgotten those words of wisdom. Thanks for sharing. (And Adam, you thought Sarah Palin was מָן - [that’s “manna from heaven”, for all you goys and non-practicing Jews.])
Roadstergal
February 10, 2009 at 11:05 am
23If you’re nominated for writing on a comedy show, can’t you just show up in a grass skirt with a rubber chicken?
Now that would show them you were Honored To Be Nominated.
(BTW, I haven’t been able to watch SNL in many years, but I eat up Real Time.)
It's Pat!
February 10, 2009 at 6:05 pm
24You can buy Doug Strange for $.78
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001MHXT5I
Jerry, The King of Comedy!!!
February 10, 2009 at 6:50 pm
25Yeah, Pat, I also noticed that the $.78 Doug Strange baseball card cost $3.52 for shipping. Jesus! How much are we paying Americans to address and stamp an envelope? And where do you sign up for that job?
The strip is only mildly amusing this week, but you’ve all come to expect it, so - http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2009/02/10/tomo/
cooper
February 10, 2009 at 7:43 pm
26If you have a few minutes and would like to learn a little background on Peter Sagal, click on the link below and read the post “Instead of Three Tenors…”
http://petersagal.com/wordpress/?p=208#comment-12766
Chadwyke
February 10, 2009 at 8:15 pm
27I still haven’t been able to connect with my colleague, Sam, who is the expert on false identities and disguises. He is supposed to give me a new persona, so until we meet up, I’m still going by “Chadwyke”.
Anyway. You think just because the H5N1 avian flu has disappeared from the headlines, we have no worries? Read this and weep or lose your ability to go to sleep at night or kick your cat or soak your shorts or whatever it is you do to deal with a disease that has a 63% kill rate.
http://www.physorg.com/news153482126.html
D. Strange
February 10, 2009 at 9:04 pm
28You bastard.
All Macy’s would tell me is that some poorly-dressed schmo named Feinberg ran off with my new suit and I was going to be stuck walking - make that tripping, face first into the flower girl - down the aisle in some voluminous Armani knock-off. Seriously.
Maybe if you’d at least laid off the cheese fries for a few months poor little cousin Laura Mae wouldn’t have gotten stuck with 12 stitches and an ankle brace just for wanting to toss a few peonies at Aunt Lulu’s wedding.
And guess what? I LOVE SNL.
Dale
February 11, 2009 at 3:29 pm
29Adam, no matter what suit you wore, at least you didn’t piddle with all the cameras on you.
http://video.westminsterkennelclub.org/player/?id=1008741#videoid=1010 681 (21 minute clip, it’s about 3 minutes in)
Pope Benny 16
February 11, 2009 at 7:26 pm
30Anselmo finally got in touch with Guido and Vincente and requested that they return to the Vatican from their seaside hideaway in Uruguay. Anselmo said he could not get in touch with them at first because they had no bars until they got high up into the mountains. I’ve been to Uruguay. They had plenty of bars - easily one on every corner in the capital. Anselmo said the bars he was talking about referred to cell phone reception. I do not understand this new age technology. Perhaps Mel Gibson was right - I think I would feel more at home in the Middle Ages.
It will be good to have those two fine Christian lads once again at my side and covering my back. I slept horribly last night and at 3:30 I finally took Archbishop Bernie’s sawed-off shotgun out from under my pillow and leaned it against the nightstand. I slept better after that.
I should never have listened to Archbishop Bernie Law about lifting the excommunication of those four Holocaust-deniers. Now I can’t get a minute’s peace. I wish that Franco Zefferelli would talk to me. I’m sure he would have given me better advice than Bernie has. Franco still won’t take my calls since I denounced raw carnal homosexual fornication in one of my homilies last month. Perhaps I should send him another bouquet of roses and a card. Bernie says that sounds so gay. Is he saying I should send them or not send them? I don’t understand anything anymore.
Aunt Sam
February 11, 2009 at 7:52 pm
31Thanks for the Peter Sagal link cooper. Great story- that nice blend of humor & gut twisting poignance.
David
February 11, 2009 at 9:09 pm
32Yes, thanks cooper.
waterfowler
February 11, 2009 at 10:48 pm
33This weekend, http://www.birdcount.org.
Zeke
February 12, 2009 at 4:22 am
34You know, when waterfowler is talking about almost anything except politics, he seems like a normal, likable guy, don’t you think? Or is it just me? Thanks for the reminder, wf.
Dale
February 12, 2009 at 8:41 am
35That´s how they get you, Zeke.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
February 12, 2009 at 5:17 pm
36Zeke and Dale, I’m guessing wf feels the same way about us liberal lefties.
Chadwyke
February 12, 2009 at 6:30 pm
37What are the chances that two satellites will crash together in low Earth orbit? Well, it’s not zero…
http://www.physorg.com/news153649979.html
waterfowler
February 12, 2009 at 9:39 pm
38David,
you’re the lawyer, right?http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles/09/TheHell WithOurConstitution.htm
Zee Man
February 13, 2009 at 4:34 am
39It’s Pat!, and Kjell too, I guess. Now that he’s out of office, he can sell dope and grow his hair like this again!
http://www.vetocorleone.com/2009/02/norm-colemans-yearbook-photo-is-yo ur.html
Kjell Mikkelsen
February 13, 2009 at 5:06 am
40Who dis girl, Zee Man? Wot is dope? I t’ought you born with dope or smart. Can you sell smart, too? Yumpin’ Yesus, wot a country! I buy some smart right now! Ja sure!
It's Pat!
February 13, 2009 at 5:31 am
41Zee, it’s not so much the hair as is his sneer that infuriates me. Obviously the person taking the picture was beneath this young man. I will never forgive the St. Paul political machine for allowing him into their midst. He is one of the most opportunistic back stabbing politicians I know.
Kjell, dope is the Scandinavian’s best friend. However, if you feel that you should investigate alternatives, please go here.
http://www.fanpop.com/spots/scandinavia/picks/results/29308
At least you will feel more comfortable in a crowd of Ole’s and Lena’s.
cooper
February 13, 2009 at 8:22 am
42dee and all other UU’s, not to re-open old wounds, but more info on the Knoxville Church tragedy.
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/we-can-see-why-bernie-goldberg s-book
hedera
February 13, 2009 at 7:44 pm
43waterfowler, I tried to look up the document you mentioned to David, but the link you put in seems to be broken. I changed “.htm” to “.html” and it still doesn’t work. Can you recheck the link?
Zee Man
February 14, 2009 at 7:27 am
44Oh sure, waterfowler. NOW! the wingnuts are suddenly very, very concerned about defending the Constitution, after cheering on Bush and Cheney for buggering it the last 8 years. Can’t you just stick to birding?
hedera, if you must, the link is - http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/wew/articles/09/TheHellWithOu rConstitution.htm - but let me warn you, it’s more of the same from our buddy, waterfowler. It is written by Walter E. Williams, who occasionally guest hosts for The Comedian, Rush Limbaugh on the days when Rush has eaten too many Vicodin and just can’t quite make it into the studio for his show.
David
February 16, 2009 at 10:30 am
45I’m a retired community college instructor (comp, Am lit, theater), waterfowler. My interest in the Constitution is from a citizen’s perspective. My anti-reactionary mindset was probably triggered by the intrusion of “under God” in the pledge when I was in 4th grade, although at the time I was a conventional Southern Christian with hints of liberalism who just didn’t understand why the federal government was screwing with the pledge. My fascination with the Constitution is apparently genetic through my mother from my grandfather, who was a county judge.
I do reject the “originalist” views of people like Scalia, and I also reject original intent as anything more than historically interesting. It is what those words can legitimately be interpreted to mean, both by people keenly conversant in the language (which is not the exclusive province of lawyers, although the best constitutional lawyers are) and conversant in genuinely common understanding of the concept of justice. I do think there are reasonably universal concepts of justice, but they can usually be found only when one is freed from constricting ideologies or religious doctrines. I think it tends to be accidental when religion and universal justice intersect.
Haven’t yet clicked on the article. Have to deal with some of the many nuisances of life at the moment, but I will, and will offer a response to whatever it says, although I just saw Zee Man’s comment, so I suspect I will disagree with it. But I will read it.
Chris Harlan
February 16, 2009 at 3:17 pm
46Hey there, waterfowler! I’n not sure what your point in posting that was, but I found the article to be made up of vague, unsupported assertions, which were then used to argue an unsupportable and equally vague position.
If I’d turned in a similarly constructed paper, while a freshman in college, I would have received low marks–not for subject matter, but simply for poor argumentation. Hard to believe that this was written by someone with professorial status. The number of straw man arguments in those few paragraphs could stuff a mattress.
Of course, the poor quality of subject matter is a problem, too. My favorite bit would be Roosevelt “emasculating” the Supreme Court by threatening to pack it, so that “the Court capitulated to where it is today giving Congress virtually unlimited powers to tax, spend and regulate.” The reality is the Roosevelt failed to pack the court, and that it was Roosevelt’s administration that suffered because of it. The statement that Roosevelt’s notedly failed attempt led to emasculation of the Supreme Court is absurd on its face. I can’t even begin to figure out how one might logically proceed from the other.
David
February 17, 2009 at 8:22 pm
47A couple of points, waterfowler. One is that the Federalist Papers are the quite interesting output of a framer, not the framer. There is no father of the constitution. It was not given by God to a prophet up on a mountain. It is the collective insight of several founders, drawing from both enlightenment European and Native American influences.
The Constitution does not prohibit government intervention. It charges the government with maintaining and protecting the common weal. Each generation must decide what that means in terms specific to the time, and the crisis, but without violating those amendments which were crafted as a protection against government infringement on the essential rights of the individual within the context of the common weal.
FDR’s biggest mistake was in not doing enough, and only the enforced military version of Keynesianism set us on the path to recovery, but not before the post-war hangover, war being the least efficient and most short-sighted form of Keynesian urgent care.
Obama’s biggest mistakes will be if he, too, does not do enough, and if the bastards who got us into this mess are allowed to determine the course correction rather than helping steer the ship to the extent that they know how to operate the gear, but without being allowed to set the course, since they have already proven they haven’t a clue where we ought to be going. We need whatever expertise they possess, but God spare us their vision.
Lack of respect for the Constitution? No one has even come close to Bush/Cheney on that score, and to suggest that because he was frustrated by SCOTUS obstructionism FDR was trashing the Constitution is absurd. Yes, he wanted to pack the court. He failed. He did not defy the Supreme Court, he did not become a law unto himself, and in fact it was FDR who first proposed term limits for the president lest the president become a quasi-dictator.
That article misses on most all counts, I’m afraid. And the notion that the economy will rescue itself from a debacle of this magnitude, and at the hands of the people currently at the top of the economic pyramids, defies logic. It is a glib article by a professor with too much ego and too little insight.
Chris Harlan
February 18, 2009 at 10:42 am
48David says: We need whatever expertise they possess, but God spare us their vision.
I say: Hear, hear!
Jim (OJNTNJ)
February 18, 2009 at 12:20 pm
49From WF’s linked article: Search the Constitution as long as you like, and you will find no specific authority conveyed for the government to spend money on global-warming research, urban mass transit, food stamps, unemployment insurance, Medicaid, or countless other items in the stimulus package and, even without it, in the regular federal budget.”
From the preamble to the Constitution of the United States: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
From article 1, section 8 of the Constitution: “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States
Granted, no specific authority is granted for the author’s list of perceived grievances, but that’s only because the framer’s weren’t fortune tellers and seers.
Roger
March 3, 2009 at 10:31 am
50Amen and amen to Acronym Jim. Well done, my friend.
BTW, I know they weren’t fortune tellers or seers, but could any of the Founding Fathers tell the future by feeling the knots on people’s heads? It seems someone here recently mentioned some sort of government grant they had for investigating just that. But now that I think of it, that all might have gone out with Bush.
Richard Harland Smith
April 2, 2009 at 5:57 pm
51So… what happened?