There’s a terrifying article in today’s NY Times about John McCain’s near-hopeless efforts to improve his speaking style.
“Terrifying?”
Yeah. Terrifying because sooner or later the McCain camp is simply going to give up trying to compete with Obama in the “communicating a message” arena, and then they’ll begin the noble work of crapping on the very concept of trying to communicate a message. It’s effete! And elite! And here the son of an admiral who himself was the son of an admiral is going to become a real son of a bitch.
It’s happened before. You gotta admit.
The talk of “authenticity” will redouble, and people will be led to forget that if you’re NOT the son of an admiral or the son of a president, you may have to go that extra mile and get yourself some “polish” and “speaking skills” and “book-learnin’” and whatnot. Otherwise, you’ll never get in the door. Once inside, however, the guys who were born in there can make fun of you for talkin’ so fancy. ‘Cuz they never had to learn to talk like that. They were headed for Yale or the Naval Academy and they grew up with the easy knowledge that they were people of quality and didn’t have to go to any great lengths to prove it.
Which is fine, right up until the moment when you start calling the poor kid an elitist for talking so fancy. Then it becomes something else.
But hey, that’s just something I’m sort of saying, you know? I’m just typin’ here, not really thinking. Because I’m a plainspoken guy, and thinking out your writin’ before you type it, well, that’s for fancy people, and that sort of thing isn’t for regular people like you and me, right? I don’t think I’m better than you, not like some of those writers who plot and plan what they’re gonna say, thinking it through, manipulating how they want to come across… why, by the time you read it, those writers have been working on their stuff for so long that they know exactly what they’re saying and how they want you to interpret it! How can you trust that?
Not me. Maybe I’m not a “good” “writer,” maybe I don’t “communicate” my “thoughts,” maybe I can’t “get my point across” or “have a clear idea of how to say stuff.” But I’m writing to you from the heart. You can see that I mean what I’m saying, even if you don’t know what it is, and the fact that you don’t know what it is means that I’m not trying to manipulate you, or at least I’m not succeeding, which proves that I don’t think I’m better than you, which means that I’m just like you, see? And, like, if I was running for something, I think you can clearly see why I’d deserve your vote… for that… thing. Right. I’m not the type who’s going to look back at what I just wrote and fix it up. No no no, I won’t insult your intelligence by exhibiting any. Thank you is what I’ll say - thank you, and God bless America.
Posted by Adam Felber and filed in
General
You can
leave a comment by using the form below. Sorry, but pings/trackbacks are not allowed.





26 comments
Comments feed for this article
SharonHussein
July 7, 2008 at 5:55 am
1John Sidney McCain III is a angry tired old man who doesn’t use a computer, doesn’t know anything about economics or foreign policy, probably doesn’t know the price of a gallon of gasoline or a loaf of bread, but knows plenty about waging war on innocent civilians. He and Cindy need a nice long retirement.
Did I say that out loud?
SharonHussein
July 7, 2008 at 5:56 am
2John Sidney McCain III is a angry tired old man who doesn’t use a computer, doesn’t know anything about economics or foreign policy, probably doesn’t know the price of a gallon of gasoline or a loaf of bread, but knows plenty about waging war on innocent civilians. He and Cindy need a nice long retirement, starting as soon as possible. Say, Wednesday, November 5th.
Did I say that out loud?
Jim (OJNTNJ)
July 7, 2008 at 6:22 am
3I won’t insult your intelligence by exhibiting any.
This is one of the funniest and politically astute sentences I’ve read in a long time. Kudos Adam, you’ve managed to summarize the last eight years in one short phrase.
nato
July 7, 2008 at 9:37 am
4John Sidney McCain III is an American Hero who should be dipped in bronze and displayed in our nation’s capitol.
JR
July 7, 2008 at 10:38 am
5Adam?
Did you just throw your hat in the ring?
just plain Hussein
July 7, 2008 at 10:48 am
6I have to agree with Jim (OJNTNJ). That’s a good line.
I also think that McCain should begin his speeches by saying “Dear Friends” instead of “My Friends”. That would definitely lock up the oft time under pursued Firesign vote.
Steve
July 7, 2008 at 12:06 pm
7We’ll know that it’s happened the day McCain starts saying “nucular” (pronounced “nook-you-lur” for you latte sippin’ effite snobs).
It's Pat!
July 7, 2008 at 3:10 pm
8Antelope freeway one mile
Why do I get the feeling JSMIII is going to break into two when he smiles, like some weird object from Monty Python? And out will pop this black winged monster with thick jowls that will devour us all?
Eek!
I continue to think that BHO should not dumb down. The generation younger than me will vote him in as is.
SeattleDan
July 7, 2008 at 5:39 pm
9If you lived here you’d be home by now.
I dunno, but Plain-Speakin’ John McCain has that Harry S. Truman thing going for him, don’t you think? That is, if McCain knew something about anything.
When Sen. Obama gets to speechifyin’, well, I just don’t know what to think. It’s easier for me when President Bush and Vice-President Cheney tell me what to think. Then I can rest easy.
gillian
July 7, 2008 at 5:49 pm
10“Valley 90 condoms - if you lived here, you’d be home by now!” Pat, my oldest brother loved Firesign and would spend hours listening to those records with those big clunky headphones of his clamped around his ears. He was usually pretty wasted and thought everything they said was hilarious. Of course, Joel stayed wasted pretty much all the time after coming home from Nam. Three years ago, he finally checked into the regional VA hospital - PTSD. I wouldn’t say he’s cured, but he is better at dealing with the day-to-day BS and not smoking as much, which is an improvement.
Molly is in love. Well, at least for the moment, which is generally the way Molly operates - moment to moment. Jimmy gave her his custom framed and matted autographed photo of Sammy Swindell, a living legend in Winged Sprint car circles. Jimmy also went online and bought 2 tickets to the World of Outlaws Sprint Car race coming to Lebanon Valley Speedway in a couple of weeks. He offered to get me a ticket as well, but I said no thanks. Those cars scare the bejesus out of me. When you have twenty five of those monsters on a half mile dirt track, your seat in the grandstands vibrates, even when they are idling under the caution flag. Those bad boys go improbably fast, they’re loud and every second I’m afraid that one or more of them will crash and fly up into the grandstand, mowing down spectators like the grime reaper himself. It happens.
I also found out why Jimmy and Molly were watching the 2003 Italian Gran Prix. Molly and her asshole former husband were in Europe then and got tickets to the race. Molly was seated just in front of one of the cameras and as the cameraman was panning the top three cars as they came by his position, Molly stood up and flashed her tits to the camera. She wanted to see if that shot make it onto the broadcast. (It didn’t. Oh well, that was most likely her sole chance for immortal fame.)
gillian
July 7, 2008 at 5:53 pm
11OK, SeattleDan, that’s scary. Cut it out, dammit!
madbard
July 7, 2008 at 5:54 pm
12poor are the elite! we know the poor have it easy and the rich have it rough….
http://images.salon.com/comics/boll/2002/12/19/boll/story.gif
David
July 7, 2008 at 9:06 pm
13Love the snobbery of anti-intellectualism. One America’s most fascinating cultural phenomena. Sure glad the founders were anti-intellectuals.
gillian, a good friend builds and races outlaw sprint cars. Not a lot of car, but a hell of a lot of engine. He builds 350 c.i. Chevy engines for his machines. He is, by the way, deaf as a post. Just didn’t realize when he was coming along that failure to wear serious hearing protection was the kiss of death to his eardrums. It is damned exciting racing. Grime reaper is an interesting typo.
gillian
July 8, 2008 at 11:25 pm
14Whew! That was close, but I knew that Sparky would come through for us in the end. I just wish he had solidly and righteously kicked William Krystal’s ass. Or at least bloodied his nose.
http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2008/07/08/tomo/
just plain Hussein
July 9, 2008 at 11:21 am
15I hope all you good patriots out there called your Senators today and told them how you feel about telecom immunity being part of the FISA legislation. The first office assistant I talked to dutifully noted my position and thanked me for the call. The office of the other Senator had a twenty something true believer who really wanted me to understand why it was important to shield the telecoms because they thought they were within the law, since the president asked them to spy on us. I told her that yes, the President asked them to spy on us for the good of the country, but that the President was lying. She didn’t see how that was possible, but eventually agreed to present my misguided position to the Honorable Senator.
SeattleDan
July 9, 2008 at 3:36 pm
16Proud to say that my two Senators, Murray and Cantwell, both voted no on both cloture and the FISA bill. Not so proud of my Presidential candidate who voted yes on both.
cooper
July 9, 2008 at 4:22 pm
17SeattleDan, I followed jpH’s advice and called my Senators to vote against the FISA. What a grand waste of time that was - both Burr and Dole were foursquare behind the President on this one (and why should this vote be any different?). You’re right, Barack has some ’splainin’ to do, starting with his FISA vote.
Hope you, Tammy and Tony are settled somewhat in the new home. If it’s any consolation, we moved into the house here 20 years ago and I still have boxes to unpack. And I know I will, too….someday soon.
LAmom
July 9, 2008 at 4:37 pm
18(lifted from a comment I made on another blog about Obama’s speaking skills):
It’s an interesting case of the logical fallacy called Poisoning the Well.
Usually people try to poison the well against their opponents by pointing out negative things about them. But what opponents want to say about Obama is: “His biggest flaw is that he gives fabulous speeches. Remember, the more you like what he says, the more you need to reject him as a candidate.”
Samuel
July 9, 2008 at 6:43 pm
19I tell you, they’re just not paying me enough. Not only do I explain the “dismal science” to McCain and the campaign staff, I do so without putting them to sleep (mainly by making it up on the fly and by throwing in a few one-liners from Georgie Jessell’s Joke Book from the mid-fifties “Low-Dive Tour”. The old guys just love it and remember, if you’re laughing, you ain’t sleeping!)
Anyway, now they got me writing a couple of new jokes for the candidate everyday. So, how did you like the death to the Iranians joke about the cigarettes? Huh? It kills, right? Cindy McCain was standing right behind John when he made the crack about the cigarettes/Iranians and I got to tell you, he’s lucky she wasn’t holding an icepick at the time. She gave him such a shot - a knuckle to the L5-S1 vertebra - that he damn near fell onto the elderly and crippled extras I’d hired for the day and had lined up on the front row. Now we’ve got to run all the jokes by Cindy first. What a buzz-kill. I’ll have to compensate for that bad news by hacking the system and doubling my salary again.
You know what? I feel better already.
ZeeMan
July 9, 2008 at 7:04 pm
20If you’d like to know how your Senator voted on the FISA Act today -
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_c fm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00020
David
July 9, 2008 at 9:27 pm
21I don’t like Obama’s vote, but I understand it. You will be able to judge him on this issue once he is president. We understand the issue. The average American voter does not. And Karl Rove would have had a field day if Obama had done other than what he did, which was to state that passing an “improved” bill was more important than seeking to block immunity for the telecoms. And any attempt to sue the telecoms for doing something the president instructed them to do is a loser. The only culprit there is any point in going after is the instigator, the president. And since impeachment of Bush is off the table, the November election is the only way to change things on this issue. McCain will be Bush III. Obama understands and honors the Constitution. You tell me which of these two men is more likely to restore the Constitution and the rule of law - if elected.
The overriding philosophical issue for me is that when anyone or any entity violates the law at the behest of the leader, you are on the way to a tyranny. We aren’t there yet, but we have some of the ingredients and some trends which must be reversed. But it is the leader which must go, and must be replaced by a leader who respects the constitution and the rule of law on behalf of a population which grasps these basic principles.
Other major problem - now AP has endorsed and is shilling for McCain. AP is a wire service, a source of news for the news outlets. This is beyond insidious.
Amina
July 10, 2008 at 5:03 am
22For an interesting perspective on Obama’s FISA vote, check out Keith Olbermann’s Special Comment from June 30.
Video: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/30/olbermann-special-comment_n_1 10114.html
It’s a little long (almost 12 mins), but worth watching. Part of his point is similar to one David made — Obama has/had to vote “yes” in order not to alienate a less-informed portion of the voting public.
Olbermann also points out a loophole in the telecom immunity portion of the bill — it offers them civil immunity, not criminal. Therefore, Obama could (and did) vote “yes” to the whole thing now, and later go after the telecoms on criminal charges at a time when he is (I hope) president or (frighteningly) doesn’t have to worry about votes for a few more years.
Of course Olbermann says it better, I was just giving a preview to entice you to watch it
Steve
July 10, 2008 at 5:50 am
23David:
I guess you have to start wondering who really is running for a Bush third term now.
I had hopes for Senator Obama at the start of all of this but it’s beginning to look and sound as if we’re in for another four years of “compassionate conservatism”, no matter how the election turns out.
What with Senator Obama pandering to the religious conservatives with his proposal to escalate “faith-based” programs or pandering to the social conservatives by going all Bill Cosby this last Fathers Day, it’s beginning to look as if we have virtually no choice between McCain and Obama other than skin tone.
One begins to suspect the only reason why Senator Obama didn’t vote for the Iraq war was because he wasn’t in the Senate at the time.
Maybe he’ll pick Joe Lieberman for his running mate and complete the package.
Jake
July 10, 2008 at 8:25 am
24Steve, good luck making your choice between Obama and McCain. Perhaps listing a few characteristics of the candidates will help you with your choice.
1. Has the candidate ever been censured for conflict of interest and been caught up in a fraud scheme? McCain - 1; Obama - 0.
2. Has the candidate ever abandoned his wife after she had a disfiguring automobile accident and no longer resembled a beauty queen. McCain - 1; Obama - 0.
3. Has the candidate ever cheated on his wife before divorcing her because she no longer looked like a beauty queen? McCain - 1; Obama - 0.
4. Has the candidate ever changed his position on an issue in order to pander to a particular group of voters? McCain - 345,601; Obama - 1.5.
5. Has the candidate confused Shia with Sunni or Al Qeada with “extremist groups” from Iran? McCain - 53; Obama - 0.
6. Has he confused them this year? McCain - 49; Obama - 0.
There are many other questions you can use in place of these. It certainly appears that McCain has an impressive and commanding lead so far! I hope this helps you with your decision.
Jake
Steve
July 10, 2008 at 10:34 am
25Jake:
It’s not so much a choice any longer but rather just being back in a position of holding my nose while in the polling booth.
Perhaps I’m just a victim of my own delusional optimism after living through these past seven and some odd long, ugly, depressing years but I hoped for better from Obama. When he said that one of his first acts as President would be to sit down with his Attorney General and go through all the Bush Administration’s Executive Orders and toss out the ones which are unconstitutional, I damned near danced on a table.
Now, I’m guessing that the meeting will be rather short.
Yeah, I’ll vote for Obama but only because the alternative is so much more vile. Not because I expect anything much better.
Senator Barry Goldwater once famously ran for President as “a choice, not an echo” and while I disagreed with most of what Goldwater had to say, it was a nice turn of phrase and I always hoped that my party would someday take that spirit up as its own banner.
What’s the matter with perhaps a little “audacity of hope”?
David
July 11, 2008 at 7:50 pm
26Steve,
I think your frustration is clouding your view. He did not pander with his Father’s Day speech - he made some legitimate points any number of other blacks have made.
Also, read (or re-read if you’ve already seen it) the entire text of his speech on the faith-based initiative. Certainly here in the South, and even more so in the cities, churches can be very constructive partners. Obama minced no words on the Constitutional separation of church and state or on the fact that any government funded activites must be strictly secular, and that there can be no discrimination in any hiring with federal money. One can debate whether or not Southern Baptists can be trusted to adhere to the guidelines, but that is a different issue. But such partnerships can be a godsend for the inner cities.
I can understand being upset with his pandering to AIPAC. That I thought was pandering, but AIPAC currently owns the US portfolio for the Middle East, and Florida goes through AIPAC. But Obama has made very clear his commitment to negotiations, and Iran is more than willing and ready to negotiate with anyone not committed up front to bombing them and/or overthrowing their government. And they are not going to attack Israel unless they are attacked, so there is no plausible need to “protect Israel from Iran.” The reverse, on the other hand…and it might involve Russia and China. Not pretty.
On Obama’s promise to have his attorney general review every executive order for its constitutionality, that will happen, especially since I expect John Edwards to be the next attorney general, and because Barack Obama probably already knows which ones are unconstitutional. That was not an idle promise.
Do not despair, Steve. Obama has too much of what we value going for him and in his makeup for him to morph into a Cheney/Bush or McCain, and he does not suffer from LBJ’s Texas anti-communist foreign policy disorder, or its modern incarnation. And as I have had to remind myself, he is running for President of the United States, unlike GWB, who has been exclusively Crony President for $pecial Interests and Religious Extremists, the mantle John the Phoney Maverick McCain is clearly committed to assuming if he can.