WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democrat John Edwards and Republican Rudy Giuliani were abandoning their presidential bids on Wednesday, shrinking the field to two main candidates in each party.
And just when we’d all learned to spell “Giuliani,” too. Well, he ran a campaign engineered for a storybook ending, and that’s what he got. Although I’m pretty sure he didn’t anticipate that story being “The Tortoise and the Hare.” And yet he followed it to the letter, right town to the uncomfortable fact that John McCain looks disconcertingly like a tortoise.
Ground was broken in America’s Mayor’s candidacy, though. Just as Barack Obama couldn’t have hoped to get this far without Jesse Jackson’s candidacies, Rudy has paved the way for future Undead-American candidates. If we’re all pulling the lever for the Baron Vlad von Schmozenkreis in ‘24, that’ll be because of Rudy.
I’m not sure what to make of those who were left behind, though (which is the only fair way to characterize those who had the misfortune of not losing). Obama’s surging, but will people recognize him when they vote? Judging by every picture that’s been snapped of him in the past 60 days, most Americans probably think “Obama” is his first name. So when people get in that booth and can’t actually vote for “CHANGE,” what’s their next move?
That’s not just a cheap joke. The McCain/tortoise thing - that’s a cheap joke. [Though true - I just wanna feed the guy a cherry tomato and watch him retract his li’l head into his suit to munch it. Awwww… cuuute!] But I have been somewhat disturbed by how easily Obama has embraced the simplemindedness of national politics.
I’ll miss John Edwards, but I must say that I don’t buy the sudden conventional wisdom that he was hamstrung by the fact that he was white, or male, or a familiar face in a year of CHANGE. The simple fact, I think, is that John Edwards suffers from Jessica Rabbit’s Syndrome: He’s not fake, he’s just drawn that way. Somehow the candidate with the ideas most closely reflecting those of his party’s voters never managed to convince them that he was for real. Handsome self-made millionaire whose primary concern is America’s poor? Oh yeah? Prove it.
He couldn’t. Frankly, I don’t think we want to elect paragons anymore. They make us feel bad about ourselves. That’s why our last two Presidents have had big, friendly flaws. The tongue-tied, dopey George W. Bush. The hungry, horny teddy bear Bill Clinton. Nobody wanted to have a drink with John Edwards, and nobody wanted to be Rudy Giuliani’s drink.
Well, that’s that. Let’s not dwell on it. Let’s go feed the turtle!





45 comments
nato
January 30, 2008 at 12:34 pm
1I’m glad to see someone else is going to miss Edwards. Now that he’s gone, I’m going to have to go back to voting for Not Bush again, which is really hard without actually having bush on the ballot.
Allison in Santa Cruz
January 30, 2008 at 12:58 pm
2I’m with you, nato. Edwards was the last candidate I felt I could get behind. Maybe in time (hopefully by November) I’ll be able to vote in a positive way for Obama or Clinton, but not yet. My vote on Tuesday will be a strictly anti-Republican vote.
madbard
January 30, 2008 at 2:33 pm
3Of course Edwards withdrew: I sent in my absentee ballot (CA) with him as my candidate. Just like I sent in my ballot for Dean in 2004 and he promptly withdrew.
Alexander
January 30, 2008 at 2:36 pm
4Edwards was the first choice (or most popular, or selected by a plurality of, however you want me to say it) of self-described conservatives in one of the states, despite having the most progressive platform. He was the first choice of those wanting to stay in Iraq, despite wanting to pull out fastest/most.
But he was a white male. He wasn’t Clinton or Obama.
And that’s how voters vote.
Allison in Santa Cruz
January 30, 2008 at 3:01 pm
5The fact that he’s a rich white male certainly didn’t help him, either.
SeattleDan
January 30, 2008 at 3:06 pm
6Edwards did say he was ’suspending’ his candidacy. I suspect, that if the primary season produces no clear cut preference, he will allow himself to be nominated at the convention and see what happens from there.
Ann
January 30, 2008 at 3:08 pm
7Lobster Damn all those rich white men. Sure hope none of them ask me out. Rich men of any shade, actually.
Zee Man
January 30, 2008 at 3:52 pm
8So, can a proud papa brag on this blog? My sweet (well, when she’s asleep) and talented daughter is having two of her short stories and a couple of her drawings published in a book this summer. She won a regional contest through her school and her teacher has a friend who has a friend with a publishing house. Anyway, they’re putting together a collection of creative writing and art. So, SeattleDan, save a few inches of shelf space for this one! WAHOO!!!
sharon
January 30, 2008 at 3:55 pm
9“The fact that he’s a rich white male certainly didn’t help him, either.”
By that reasoning aren’t the right-wing talking heads all admitting that they are not in the least concerned about anyone except those who are like them–the “haves” and the “have mores”? Why is it that only Democrats have to be poor in order to credibly lobby for the poor? Is this not yet another example of the way that the Repubs have managed to seize and frame the debates for the last 40 years? No one said that Robert Kennedy wasn’t sincere in his concern for America’s forgotten poor.
SeattleDan
January 30, 2008 at 4:16 pm
10Congrats, Zee Man! I’m looking forward to reading the stories!
And, Ann,.I’m hoping that none of those rich men of any shade ask me out, either.
Zee Man
January 30, 2008 at 4:19 pm
11I guess that last post of mine was a little off target. Sorry, but working in DC and living daily with that fetid pool of hypocrisy, back-stabbing, and money grubbing makes one a bit jaded on this subject. Carry on, don’t mind me.
Just Jay
January 30, 2008 at 6:08 pm
12Damn damn damn!!! Once again due to our screwy way of electing leaders, the candidate I really care about is out of the race before I get a chance to voice my opinion. Here in the soggy section we have the joyful prospect of both caucuses and a meanlingless primary. I’m not going to vote in the primary in protest of this colossal waste of time and money. My vote is far too valuable to waste on a meaningless election. I will go to the caucus.
By the way, I have never voted for a Republican for president, but a Clinton/McCain contest will make me think very very hard. In that case the best outcome might be a McCain presidency with a strongly Democratic congress, and Democratic leaders with backbones.
Slinking off my soapbox to the Lurker’s Lounge and hoping there’s bourbon.
Jay
David
January 30, 2008 at 6:25 pm
13So then “Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran” McCain will be our next president? Sure hope I win the lottery and realize my dream of being an actual ex-patriate from a country that can’t grasp just what a bad idea Republican presidents are, even when beaten over the head with that fact. But not before I get to cast at least one more vote for the party of FDR, RFK, the best ex-president in all of history JEC, and the overwhelming majority of good ideas for the civil body politic. I never want to call a situation hopeless, because that never leads anywhere worth going, but jeebus, McCain is a dyed-in-the-wool REPUBLICAN totally enamored by American unilateral devotion to military prowess and heavy-handed assertion of American will as understood by the party of the self-serving, short-sighted wealthy.
t.a. barnhart
January 30, 2008 at 6:31 pm
14i’m a little puzzled, after his words following his win in SC, how you think Obama’s gone simpleminded? he understands just how not-simple national politics is. that’s why he’s campaigning everywhere, because a true mandate is built nationally, not in dense enclaves of easy votes. his policies are not simple-minded, although any candidate’s policies are pointless efforts given how Congers will smuch them. it sounds like Adam’s settling for the cliche about Obama rather than actually listening to what he says.
The AnnFan Club
January 30, 2008 at 6:45 pm
15You know, for once in my life, I’m glad I’m not rich.
Yeah, me too. It’s good to be poor!
Gil, isn’t one of your relatives just rolling in dough? Bummer, man.
Very funny. You know my aunt has a bakery. Really sucky joke, by the way.
You know, we were so poor growing up, I couldn’t pay attention.
Yeah, I remember, Dick. I sat behind you in Algebra. You were pathetic.
And you had monster, anaerobic zits, as I recall.
Ha Ha!
Ha Ha!
(Numb nuts!)
(Dick wad!)
Gary
January 30, 2008 at 7:09 pm
16After 7 years of misery the one candidate that would openly commit to taking on the corporatacracy is gone. The corporate media camera people should be happy anyway — no more having to maneuver to keep John out of the shot.
And yes Sharon; apparently democrats are no longer credible if they have money — no matter what they say or what they do or how they got their money.
Incidentally (I guess) Edward’s net worth is $30 million while Romney’s net worth is $350 million.
sharon
January 30, 2008 at 7:25 pm
17Zee Man, bragging about literary and artistic success is never off target on this blog. Congratulations to your daughter, and be sure to give us the particular once you have them. I’ll suggest to the children’s librarians at My Place Of Work that they purchase a couple of copies.
Fran
January 30, 2008 at 8:39 pm
18I too was disheartened by Edwards stepping down, but I think it’s going to make for an interesting playing field by caucus time. We’ll see what Tuesday brings. It is intriguing that he’s “suspending” his campaign, and that he isn’t endorsing anyone.
Y’know, I look back at Giuliani’s campaign, and I can’t help but wonder if he didn’t get in just to be a spoiler of some sort. He’s made mistakes even a novice wouldn’t make, and he hasn’t seemed all that downhearted. I wonder if he wasn’t in there just to help push McCain into front-runner, and how that’s going to shake out for him later on, should McCain win.
I suspect there are forces in play here that we’re not seeing yet, but we will. Interesting times, my friends.
And CONGRATULATIONS, Zee Man! You’ve gotta be busting with pride!
Benjamin
January 30, 2008 at 9:15 pm
19What is it about Hillary that slightly turns the stomach of us democrats? Have the years of right-wing rumor and spin poisoned us against her or are we sensing her true nature?
I will have no problem voting for a Democratic administration with her at the head over John McCain leading a Republican one - no problem whats so ever. But I’d like to understand why I dislike her.
Here in the wilds of WA I’m caucusing on the 9th and I’m not sure who to caucus for now that Edwards is out.
>>> Adam - the John McCain-tortoise line made me laugh so hard spaghetti came out my nose, and I haven’t eaten pasta in over a week.
FSM
January 31, 2008 at 4:39 am
20… and I haven’t eaten pasta in over a week.
Glad to hear that, Benjamin. Maybe I’ll go easy on the human sacrifices for a while. Maybe.
cooper
January 31, 2008 at 8:38 am
21Vice President Dick Cheney is in town to speak to a select group of business owners today. I’m puzzled that my invitation hasn’t come in the mail. Maybe I’ll go home at lunch and check my mail for the tickets. I’m sure they must have been delayed in the mail.
BTW, Al Sharpton is in town today also, hoping to stir up a controversy involving our newly selected black sheriff, who is under investigation for fraud. Did someone paint a target on this city?
Ann
January 31, 2008 at 9:46 am
22Adam, do I need to take out some sort of restraining order against my “fan club”? It’s starting to worry me!
waterfowler
January 31, 2008 at 10:36 am
23Strange times. We seem to all be in the same boat, even if for different reasons. Y’all don’t have electable libs, but at least you have libs. I don’t have any conservatives, period. Either way, the libs win this one.
hedera
January 31, 2008 at 2:46 pm
24Hey, siobhan, good to hear from you again - we’re waiting for the details on the book.
cooper, it’s raining buckets - come and get it. Shipping not provided.
It's Pat!
January 31, 2008 at 2:53 pm
25Well, we might be in the same boat, but I think we have the paddles this time.
hedera
January 31, 2008 at 2:56 pm
26Oh, and by the way - I just ADORE the mental image of John McCain retracting into his suit with a cherry tomato in his mouth! (My sister has desert tortoises living in her back yard…)
cooper
January 31, 2008 at 3:28 pm
27I went home at lunch to check one more time for the Cheney invitation, but no luck. Oh well. I did discover however that one of my cats, who had been away for almost a week, had returned and boy was he hungry! And friendly! and affectionate! and playful! … but mainly hungry.
Just Jay
January 31, 2008 at 6:05 pm
28Benjamin (18)
I can’t speak for you, but I have two main reasons for disliking Hillary, one is entirely her fault, one she has no control over and is very unfair. The one that is her fault is that she spent her entire Senate re-election campaign denying any interest in running for president, and then shortly after she won announced her candidacy. To me that means she is a politician who will say what she thinks will win the election, which means that I don’t trust any position she takes, and have no idea what she will do if elected. The unfair one is that I don’t think she will be able to govern effectively because she will, from day one, have to spend considerable time and energy defending herself from the right wing noise machine and every smear and legal assault they can muster. It’s nothing she can control and, as I said, it’s terribly unfair, but it’s also a fact of modern political life that she has extraordinarily high negatives that can and will be exploited. I have not heard her address this.
Jay
cooper
January 31, 2008 at 6:37 pm
29Mr. wf, I agree with you 100%. These are strange times.
Keith Olbermann did another of his Special Commentaries tonight, so be on the lookout for that one being up on the net soon. If Bush weren’t so stupid and hapless, I would fear for Keith’s safety.
just plain Jack
January 31, 2008 at 7:41 pm
30It’s up. Enjoy. http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/01/31/countdown-special-comment-on- fisa-and-telecom-immunity/
Benjamin
January 31, 2008 at 8:42 pm
31Just Jay,
Thanks for your comments. I strongly agree with both your points.
My dilemma; Is Obama any better in either of those areas?
Can we trust his positions? I don’t know his record well enough and I haven’t read any detailed analysis to assess his willingness to say what we want to hear. I keep hearing mention of the numbers of times he missed votes or simply voted “present” so his actual voting record seems too small to speak for him. I don’t remember him really putting himself out there an any large issues like Dodd has done with FISA.
Will Obama’s be too hindered in the general election and/or as President by the rumors of him being a Muslim or some thinly veiled racial attack? Is his tough enough or skilled enough to fightback (at least better than Kerry did)?
Allison in Santa Cruz
February 1, 2008 at 1:05 pm
32Good last point there, Benjamin. I think it’s part of the whole “electability” quotient — which candidate will better withstand the inevitable nastiness that recent presidential elections have become?
Murray
February 1, 2008 at 2:13 pm
33Just Jay, I disagree. The ruthless right wing noise machine will go after which ever democrat is in the White House. The only difference is that Hillary has has experience in this department and Obama hasn’t. He also seems to take things personally. It may be a while before he is able to deflect the inevitable barrage of false charges. And thanks to that great MSM who are too timid to call false charges lies, on the front page or at the top of the hour news, the idiotic public will just think that democratic presidents are scandal ridden.
I would have voted for Edwards, but it’s not as if he didn’t have problems too. He voted for the war and ran against it. He voted for No Child Left behind and ran against it. He voted for Immigration reform and ran against it. His campaign was mostly, “My Bad”.
I’m probably going to vote for Barak, but I’ll be fine with Hillary. One thing I’ve been angry about for a long time is that Democrats are Gutless. Well, Hillary is willing to hit back. It looks bad in the primaries but neither Al or Kerry were able to do it in the general election. I’m willing for a Democrat to win using Republican tactics rather than see us be kind and gentle and never win.
nato
February 1, 2008 at 2:36 pm
34Just Jay, when exactly do we plan on electing Democratic leaders with backbones to stand up to President McCain? The present group seem content to acquiesce to the Republican minority.
In the meantime, anyone want to join me in my write-in campaign?-
Fonzie 4 Prez 2008!
Fonzie
February 1, 2008 at 4:48 pm
35Wokka Wokka Universal Health Care Wokka!
Jim (OJNTNJ)
February 1, 2008 at 5:51 pm
36Murray, you’re correct that the Murdoch/Aile’s right-wing noise machine will go after whichever Democrat is chosen in the primary. It’s what they’ve done ever since Rush Limbaugh learned how to oversee “reasoned” debates from Morton Downey, Jr.
However, I am heartened this election cycle by the fact that the left wing now has a voice in the main stream media in Kieth Olbermann, Dan Abrams, and my hero, Rachel Maddow. These folks are watched and are very good keeping the conversation on-topic and in debunking some of the ridiculousness from the right.
Remember, the right-wing machine are the guys that eat their own, as evidenced by their treatment of McCain in the 2000 primaries (i.e. McCain’s “illegitimate” black child). And they’re going after him again now for not being conservative enough (WTF?!!! - emphasis and overuse of punctuation mine).
Let’s hope they jump the shark.* if they haven’t already.
*Not a allusion to Fonzie Gromit Felber.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
February 1, 2008 at 5:56 pm
37One more thing to keep in mind, Murray. A Democrat could win without being kind and gentle AND without using Republican tactics. It’s known as brutally calling them on their bullsh*t.
The AnnFan Club
February 1, 2008 at 8:39 pm
38Oh, Ann! A restraining order? Now that hurts! We’re harmless … for the most part.
Gordon’s right. We’re all law abiding citizens…for the most part.
Just ask any of the police depts. in North Dakota, Montana, or Idaho. We’re clean.
Frank, um, there was that flying string cheese incident in Minot….
OK, but we’d been driving through the night, coming back from the Menudo concert, jacked up on Jolt Cola.
Oh Lord, I’ll never do that again!!!
Albert shouldn’t have asked the constable if his refrigerator is running. He had to catch the bus out of town the next day; hated to leave him like that, but he wouldn’t quit laughing and the cop seemed to be getting more and more pissed. I didn’t care for the rest of us to become collateral damage that night.
To this day, Albert just doesn’t seem to know when to stop pushing buttons.
Well, he does have that touch of Asberger’s, which never helps in stress filled social situations, especially with authority figures.
Didn’t Jimmy spend a few nights in the slammer in Choteau, Montana for firing his 8 foot rocket from the town square on July 4th? Now, there’s God forsaken wilderness for you - and COLD?!!! Jeez!!!
Uh… I got busted in Post Falls for drawing Groucho glasses on a Dirk!!! For Governor!! campaign poster back in 1999, but I was still young and stupid in those days.
So, now you’re old and stupid.
I guess we should mention Todd, don’t you think. I mean it’s only fair….
Granted, there is Todd. But he’s been staying on his meds these days… for the most part.
I did say it was a stupid idea to tell Ann about the camera drones.
Indeed! Harmless fun, and now she wants to slap a restraining order on us?!!
Slap, Chuck? Come here!! I’ll show you slap!!!
Dork!
Douchebag!
gillian
February 2, 2008 at 7:59 am
39Since I been self-promoted to the “Doyenne of Funny” around here, I think you may enjoy this Top Ten List from Late Night.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/02/01/the-late-show-top-ten-things- overheard-at-dick-cheneys-birthday-party/
Boomer
February 2, 2008 at 9:54 am
40Adam, that is so much like you to take the young Luke Burbank under your comedic wing. “…fair and unbalanced. Did you see what I did there?” It’s heart warming moments like that that keeps us coming back to FA. Well, that and the free pizza and beer. BTW, you got any pizza with no anchovies?
piglet
February 2, 2008 at 2:37 pm
41Oh, and don’t think we didn’t know that you created an entire sea-life-in-the-pool story just to be able to say “confused manatee.” Because we know.
And did I mention Joey Harrington is an Oregon Duck? Because he is.
Zee Man
February 2, 2008 at 3:24 pm
42Was, piglet…was an Oregon Duck.
siobhan
February 2, 2008 at 6:11 pm
43You mean “And just when we’d all learned to spell “9iu11ani,” too.”
piglet
February 2, 2008 at 6:49 pm
44Once a Duck, always a Duck, Zee Man.
I think once you decide that your desire to go to the University of Oregon is stronger than your desire to NOT be called a Duck, then you are a Duck ’til you die.
Actually if you live in Oregon and don’t have private school money, you have two choices: Duck or Beaver.
I believe I (we) chose wisely.
David
February 3, 2008 at 2:38 pm
45Good one, piglet. I happened to luck out and have the mascot of my preferred public institution of higher learning (private school money was not even on the radar screen) be a big, obnoxious, mud-loving lizard that is know to eat its young. What can I say? Southern boys can be obnoxious, love mud, and can be kind of brain-challenged, especially during mating season, but at least mostly we don’t eat our young. Ducks, on the other hand…