So, yeah, we’re on strike. I’ll tell you all about it. But first, let me give you a quick idea of what’s at stake:
Yes, that amazing project from 1962 may now never get made. Talk shows and wormholes are both very complicated things, but trust me, I had high hopes of getting this little project on its feet in the coming months. And, of course, 45 years ago. It’s complicated.
What’s not nearly as complicated is the strike. Here is a quick primer to What’s Going On.
What’s Going On?
In the 30’s screenwriters gave up “copyright,” which means exactly what it sounds like - ownership of their material. The right to copy, a right still enjoyed by novelists, songwriters, playwrights, and… well… other people who write. But not us.
It was the agreement that helped build the industry. In return, writers got a fancy new thing called “residuals.” A share of the profits.
Yeah, but what’s going on?
Bear with me. In 1988, during the last strike, the Writers Guild made a terrible mistake. They assumed that home video sales would never amount to much. So in order to get everyone back to work, they agreed to a deal that gave the studios 80% of the revenues from home video before calculating the writers li’l 1 or 2 percent.
What!?
Yes, that’s right. The assumption was that it would take the studios that 80% to recoup production, packaging and advertising costs. So the writers’ tiny percentage came from the remaining 20% of revenues.
But… but…
I know. Nobody saw how cheap and profitable the production of DVDs was going to be. Billions of dollars are being made, and writers see less than half a percent of it.
So that’s what the writers are fighting for. A bigger cut of DVD residuals.
Sort of. But as of Sunday’s negotiating session, the writers were even willing to let that stand.
What!? But - but - but…
Believe it or not, right now the writers are more worried about not letting this happen again with all the new methods of distribution and revenue, like the internet.
But with the studios enjoying record profitability and the amazing sweetheart deal they got on DVDs and the fact that the “production costs” for electronic media are so obviously LESS than making and shipping discs and cardboard boxes, shouldn’t this be an easy thing to resolve?
Yes.
…
I know.
But the producers say that you writers are rich and greedy. That you average, for instance about $200,000 a year.
Uh huh. There’s a lot of those bullshit numbers out there right now, and they’re coming directly from Bullshit Central. That particular number, for instance, is an average taken from the approximately 1/3 of the Guild that is employed at any given time, pretending that the non-working members don’t exist. AND that number includes the top-tier multi-millionaires.
The truth is that at any given moment, the vast majority of Hollywood’s writers aren’t employed. That’s okay. That’s how the system is designed, unfortunately. That’s why we need residuals, so that when our work makes money, we make money.
Well, maybe I’m just a rhetorical device that you’ve set up to make your point… but I’m convinced! How can I help?
The usual. Spread the word. Make some noise. Link to this post. And for godsakes, if you’re in Hollywood or New York and you’re driving by a strike location, honk. After one day, I can guarantee you that it helps.





55 comments
It's Pat!
November 6, 2007 at 12:16 pm
1Well, I’m in Minne-so-gray-ta. So….
“Honk”. I hope that helps.
Sue
November 6, 2007 at 12:23 pm
2And a “honk” all a way from Bawlmer, hon.
ChrisB in SEA
November 6, 2007 at 12:48 pm
3And a spastic flurry of caffeinated honks from Seattle…
Steve
November 6, 2007 at 1:03 pm
4Uh, was that suppose to be amusing or an example of what teevee would be like if there were no writers?
Just askin’.
historyenne
November 6, 2007 at 1:18 pm
5Honk.
And now, while I’m really not trying to distract from Adam’s situation, I respectfully beg leave to direct the Comments’ attention towards another labor dispute, one that’s had a lot less (read:no) coverage from the American press.
Nearly a year ago, I moved to Japan to work for NOVA, the country’s largest English language conversation school. Everything was great at first, NOVA payed well and they had taken care of my visa for me, plus I and many other teachers were living in accommodation that the company had arranged for its employees, eliminating the need for us to negotiate rental agreements by ourselves in Japanese. However, last June it was revealed that NOVA had been running some television ads that were misleading to students, and the company was forbidden by the government to sign any new long-term contracts with students for a period of 6 months. The board and the president assured us that everything would be OK, that we had plenty of students, plenty of money, etc etc. However, a few months later that turned out not to be the case. In fact, by September it was obvious that NOVA was having serious cash flow issues. Pay for the Japanese staff had been late in August and was late again in September, and in September pay was also late for many foreign instructors. In October, no one was paid. At all. And we still haven’t been. It turns out that the president had been running the company at a loss for the past few years, even as he’s been paying himself millions of yen (hundreds of thousands of dollars) a year, allowing the company to pay for his luxury suite in our office building, fleecing students who buy necessary equipment from an affiliated company he owns, then pocketing that money, and now he’s under investigation for not having paid his employees when he allegedly could have. Last week, the board of directors kicked him out, and reported that NOVA is 43 billion yen (430 million dollars) in the red, with no means of repaying its debts, including the back salary it owes to the Japanese staff and foreign teachers. Even after all of this, they have not filed for bankruptcy, which would allow us to claim immediate unemployment benefits, and to file claims with the government to recover some of our unpaid salary. Instead, the new board has requested protection from creditors and are currently searching for a “sponsor” company to step in, pay off their debts, and try to get NOVA back on its feet. They’ve asked us to wait while they look for a sponsor, even though many of us weren’t paid in September, and none were paid in October. If we quit now, we’re not eligible for unemployment for another three months, and most people’s savings are exhausted by now (my boyfriend has had to draw on his overdraft from his English bank so that we can eat) so we can’t afford to pay our bills or feed ourselves, but we can’t afford to go home either. Thousands of us are waiting as requested, in the hope that we will at least get immediate unemployment if NOVA finally declares bankruptcy. We’re all looking for jobs, of course, which means the market is flooded and nothing is available. The people still living in NOVA accommodation are being evicted because the company hasn’t paid their rent, and our medical insurance has just been canceled.
It’s a terrible situation, but some people have reacted very well. My Japanese friends are deeply ashamed that foreign teachers could find themselves in such a situation in their country, and they’ve been helping me find some private lessons to bring in a bit of cash. The Australian, British, New Zealand and Canadian consulates are offering job-search assistance as well as discounts on tickets home. Now, finally, here’s the point I’ve been getting at with this whole long discourse—The American consulate has done….nothing. Not a thing. Thousands of Americans are out of work and stranded in a foreign country, possibly facing months of complicated legal struggles in a foreign language just to recoup money that they worked hard to earn, and (to my knowledge) this isn’t even a blip on the media’s radar.
So, what I’m saying is, honk for us too. And maybe write to your local editor.
For more information go to the Japan Times website, it’s a free English newspaper. Search for NOVA, and read on.
Thanks for your attention.
Boomer
November 6, 2007 at 4:09 pm
6Historyenne, wow. So are you stuck in Japan now? This situation sounds like a complete nightmare. Keep us posted, will you?
piglet
November 6, 2007 at 4:32 pm
7Historyenne - The (Portland) Oregonian did run a story on this, as there is at least one teacher from this area dangling there with the rest of you.
It sounded like an awful and powerless situation to be in.
Best of luck to all of you.
gillian
November 6, 2007 at 6:22 pm
8Historyenne, what a great career you’re in, helping people to master another language. Boy, I could have used someone like you when I first moved to Vermont!
Yes it is Tuesday, so gather the kids around the monitor and enjoy this new adventure from Tom Tomorrow. http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2007/11/05/tomo/
Doc Nagel
November 6, 2007 at 7:17 pm
9Astounding. And I thought the California State University administration was bullshit central. I mean, Chancellor Charles Reed has said the audit report criticizing CSU’s executive compensation policies (which include paying executives who aren’t working for the CSU) affirms those policies, but stuff like the $1000 a month car allowance each of the 23 CSU Presidents get is peanuts compared to the fantastically efficient way studio heads extract compensation from others’ creative labor.
Woof. Solidarity. Honketty-honk-honk.
We’ve written to our cable provider, suggesting we may have little motive to pay them if they don’t pressure studio bosses to pay you.
becca (and brian)
November 6, 2007 at 7:19 pm
10Honk! Honk!
Dale
November 6, 2007 at 7:20 pm
11Huge honks for Historyenne and Adam. And, ecologically superior and immunologically inferior New Yorker that I am, those honks are me blowing my nose, no cars involved.
Speaking of internatinal calamities that have not gotten media attention, this is the worst cold ever.
Doc Nagel
November 6, 2007 at 7:24 pm
12And I don’t mean that to diminish in any way the unspeakable situation at NOVA. I just can’t contemplate it.
Kjell Mikkelsen
November 6, 2007 at 7:46 pm
13Is true. Did as you will know we inne Norge spell “Honk!” the same way in as you do Engelske.
So “Honk!” “Honk!”, Adam. Ha ha ha ha!! “Honk!” “Honk!” “Honk!” That is as a Hummer “Honk!”, not a girly Saab or Volvo “Beep”. Those Svenske are so dum! Ha ha!
SeattleDan
November 6, 2007 at 7:50 pm
14More honks from Seattle for both Adam and Historyenne.
If you’re over at the youtubes, you might want to look over Ada Meft’s fine selection of videos. Just sayin’.
hedera
November 6, 2007 at 9:50 pm
15Honk honk to both of you, although I’m not sure how much good I’ll do Adam, since I haven’t watched television regularly since I think 1983.
Historyenne, my GOD. I am APPALLED that the State Dept. is sitting on whatever it’s sitting on. Good luck and keep us posted.
David
November 7, 2007 at 5:45 am
16Link to a commetary on the strike:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robbie-baitz/dread-certitude-notes_b_713 77.html
Sadly, corporate greedheads are well on their way to rewriting the definition of America, should the general public fail to get the picture.
Bits
November 7, 2007 at 6:05 am
17“HONK HONK” from Utah (alas, where Joe Hill breathed his last)
waterfowler
November 7, 2007 at 7:34 am
18From all of the “honks”, I’m thinking Christmas goose.
Godspeed Adam.
David, the aclu has been rewriting that since it’s inception.
Off topic as usual, but maybe y’all can pass this along to the rest of the tree huggers. Ethanol production actually uses more oil to produce than gasoline. So, we are actually paying our tax dollars to buy more oil than we actually need. It’s a lose/lose proposition. If we could convince enough of the greens to understand this, maybe we could have a sane energy policy.
http://www.slate.com/id/2122961/
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/18138/
Dave von Ebers
November 7, 2007 at 8:01 am
19Adam, for what it’s worth I’ll link to this post. There gotta be, what, four or five people who might read it? Seriously, though, this is a real issue – unlike when baseball or football players strike. (The funny thing is, though, I usually take the players’ side just out of habit.)
The nonsense about averaging $200,000 per year really chaps my ass (and not just because my dad used to teach statistics). This is the same kind of crap that Republicans and conservatives use over and over again. It’s one thing to cherry pick statistics to support your position, but it’s another thing altogether to intentionally deceive (yes, I split my damn infinitives … what about it?! See, I’m in full-on Teamsters mode …) the public.
Friggin’ bastards.
Oh, and another thing … I’m gonna use this line where ever I can: “Another Cutty Sark. Let’s go …”
Landis
November 7, 2007 at 8:15 am
20Ok, so I rewired the horn in my car to just be permanently on in solidarity. Any chance there’s a lawyer in the house who can help me respond to this eviction notice?
Good luck Adam! I don’t watch broadcast television, but I’ve got a healthy addiction to Netflix and since I installed Parallels on my MacPro I can now watch the Netflix online. Been working my way through Heroes. DVD’s, online viewing, downloading are definitely the way of the future.
I think I can safely say that my habits are the point the writers are trying to make.
Jack Back from Iraq
November 7, 2007 at 9:09 am
21waterfowler, I agree that with you that ethanol made from corn is a losing proposition (except for the corn farmers), but made from switch grass it makes sense. Now the scientists and engineers need to figure out how to make ethanol from kudzu (I smell a Nobel Prize here), sage bush, octillo, and scorpions.
margaret
November 7, 2007 at 9:32 am
22Honk, honk, honk.
For Adam, and all the striking writers. (I’m soooo in solidarity with you…though I do a non-unionised form of wordsmithing.)
And Historyenne.
And anyone else who needs really, really loud supportive and enthusiastic honking.
Dave von Ebers
November 7, 2007 at 10:53 am
23Okay, I’m sorry for the shameless blog-whoring, but I did post a piece about the writers strike, complete with a link to this post.
Oh, and … “Another Cutty Sark. Let’s go …”
dee
November 7, 2007 at 10:56 am
24Honks from North Carolina, that hotbed of union activity.
WF, it ain’t the “Greens” pushing for ethanol from corn. It’s the corn farmers and their Congress critters. Puts lots o’ cash in their pockets, even though it may bankrupt their pig-farming neighbor down the road and cause more degredation to the soil and the water table. I’ve known for a long time it’s stupid to put all our energy policy eggs into one ethanol basket. Brazil is having success with producing it from different sources, but it still needs to be ONE PART of a total energy policy, which we are sorely lacking.
hedera
November 7, 2007 at 11:31 am
25I’m with dee, the greens generally know that ethanol from corn is stupid and is a threat to the world food supply.
On the subject of ethanol from other sources, I heard a broadcast yesterday on All Things Considered about a new plant in Georgia that Vinod Khosla is investing in. It’s called Range Fuels and he claims it can competitively make ethanol from - just about anything that contains cellulose. Switchgrass. Cornstalks. Wood chips. Yard clippings. Vinod Khosla has made a LOT of money as a venture capitalist; he wouldn’t be investing in this if he didn’t think he could make money from it. Think of a local ethanol plant that took in everybody’s yard waste: solves 2 problems at once…
hedera
November 7, 2007 at 11:34 am
26Actually on the subject of corn in general - one of these days we’re going to get a mutated virus or fungus that just adores the single corn cultivar that fills all those silos in the midwest, and then we’ll have to do a SERIOUS rethink about how we feed ourselves…
dee
November 7, 2007 at 1:09 pm
27In between applying band-aids and lighting up $2000 cigars with $100 bills (you writers!), maybe you could play with this page a bit so we can have some of those kewl sound effects like Peter has. I hate to admit how many times I’ve clicked on all of those. I’m working on a dance mix.
Fran
November 7, 2007 at 4:26 pm
28Here’s another blog that’s supporting you writers. HONK!!
http://www.nakedauthors.com/
sharon
November 7, 2007 at 6:53 pm
29WF, I can’t believe that we finally agree on something! Ethanol is not a solution to our problems. Nothing, but nothing, is going to keep us in our Happy Motoring ways. Burning ethanol is just going to raise the price of our food even faster. We need much bigger solutions, and we need to start beefing up our passenger rail and other mass transit systems NOW, while we still have the resources to do it.
Ann
November 7, 2007 at 7:06 pm
30More honking from Seattle. Historyenne, I taught ESL in Japan many years ago, and we foreign employees always knew how tenuous our positions were. The Japanese legal system just doesn’t work the same way ours does, and dispute resolution is drastically different. You have my sympathy!
I do miss the okonomiyaki.
SeattleTammy
November 8, 2007 at 12:01 am
31I’ve posted Dan’s post onto all our blogs!
see you kids tomorrow!
David
November 8, 2007 at 4:38 am
32As you can see, waterfowler, it is not we liberals who don’t get it regarding ethanol. Also, the ACLU has as one guiding principle: adherence to the Constitution of the United States of America. Your perspective on this subject is simply wrong, dead wrong. Also, it was none other than Roger Williams who articulated the primacy in a free society of the wall of separation between church and state. I mention this because it was a seminal Baptist who understood this.
http://www.constitution.org/bcp/religlib.htm
The ACLU is, if anything, originalist on this, certainly on the clear language of what Roger Williams articulated, and an unrelenting champion of the spirit of our founding documents, in particular that bane of all impulses toward tyranny, the Bill of Rights. At some point your progeny will have occasion to look back and say, “Thank God for the ACLU.”
historyenne
November 8, 2007 at 9:07 am
33Thanks everyone who honked! I’m feeling all warm and fuzzy now. Piglet, I’m glad to hear that at least one newspaper had some coverage of the situation. There’s new news, but it’s not exactly good. NOVA has found a sponsor, if you define “sponsor” rather loosely. That is, a company has agreed to purchase some of NOVA’s assets, namely about twenty schools (out of seven hundred) with the eventual goal of taking on about 200 (out of seven hundred). They won’t be offering refunds to students who had bought expensive long-term lesson packages from NOVA, nor will they be paying instructors’ back wages. Instead, we have to file with the government to get the money we’re owed, and that could take upwards of six months. Meanwhile, the sponsor company, G.education, claims that they will hire back any instructor who wants to apply, which is clearly impossible. 4,000 instructors are out of work, and G.education will be opening only 20 schools. The general consensus among instructors seems to be that we’ve gone out of the frying pan and into the fire. Nobody is sure how all of this will affect our eligibility for immediate unemployment benefits if we don’t get rehired, and even if we do choose to become a part of what the blogsphere has dubbed G.nova, then we likely won’t see a paycheck for another six weeks. Of course, the unemployment offices are so backed up that it may be that long before we get a check from them either. The worst part is that nothing has been communicated to us directly, the only information that we have comes from newspapers and from what our Japanese friends see on the news and translate for us. As for me, I’m hoping to stick around long enough to find out how to file my claim with the government and make sure that they (eventually) send me my money, then I’m going to have to leave. I had planned to stay another year, but now it looks like I’ll be gone by the end of January. Which means that in addition to everything else that’s happened, I’m suddenly sad because I won’t be able to do all the things I was looking forward to in my second year, things I didn’t do in the first one because I thought I’d have plenty of time. There’s lots of okonomiyaki that won’t be getting eaten, at least not by me.
empirecookie
November 8, 2007 at 2:04 pm
34Can you hear the honking from Toronto?!
Ann
November 8, 2007 at 6:17 pm
35Historyenne,
You really do have my sympathy. I had planned to stay for just one year but ended up staying three. I thought I was just going to make a bucketload of money and get out, but Japan—incredibly frustrating though it is—was very hard to leave.
The first year I spent so much getting set up in an apartment of my own that I didn’t make much money. So I stayed another year to finally start making money, and then I stayed the third year so I could really start to do all the things I wanted to do!
If there’s any way you could tough it out through this awful period, I think you should. You’ll really kick yourself later if you don’t get to do the things you had hoped to do.
hedera
November 9, 2007 at 9:13 am
36Off-topic but pretty important:
We haven’t heard from siobhan in quite a while, and I don’t know what she’s up to right now, but I’m pretty sure she’s a very sad lady as she looks at all the oil-soaked birds. In case you missed it: Wednesday morning, in dense fog, a containership nicked a Bay Bridge support, tore a 10-foot hole in its single hull, and spilled 58 thousand gallons of fuel oil into San Francisco Bay. It’s oiling beaches inside the bay and out; it’s gotten out to the Farallones; it is a major ecological disaster for the Pacific Flyway. Not to mention those of us who live here and love the seabirds…
Hasn’t been a very good week, has it?
Sharon
November 9, 2007 at 1:41 pm
37Hedera, there hasn’t been a very good week in the past 7 years. Well, except for a few days after the 2006 elections.
David
November 9, 2007 at 3:00 pm
38Damn, hedera, I experienced momentary nausea when I read your comment. There is no gd excuse for that container ship nicking a bay bridge support - none. And when the consequences are this severe, I’m personally in favor of public floggings for everyone involved, including upper management of the shipping company - after a fine that borders on bankrupting the bastards. There are times, and situations, in which error is inexcusble.
hedera
November 9, 2007 at 6:31 pm
39David, I couldn’t agree more; I get sick just thinking of it. If you want to follow the story, it’ll be the lead on http://www.sfgate.com for awhile…
Part of the problem, as you’ll find if you read some of the other articles linked at the site, is that it’s very hard to tell who owns the ship, as opposed to who manages it, and who charters it, and who crews it… I understand the San Francisco city attorney is contemplating a lawsuit if he can figure out whom to name.
Before you nail the shipping company, also, remember that the ship was actually under navigation by a bar pilot, who has been doing this for 25+ years, but whose record is “in the upper half for frequency” (of incidents) - he ran a ship aground last year and was reprimanded. In his favor, this happened during an extremely dense fog (less than quarter-mile visibility); on the other hand, he had to get a 131-foot-wide ship through a 2,210-foot-wide channel without hitting anything, and he blew it.
siobhan
November 9, 2007 at 9:35 pm
40I just stopped by to say “solidarity, yo!” to Adam.
(but, yes, Hedera… it’s a bleak weak)
David
November 10, 2007 at 5:58 am
41Yo, siobhan, you have been really, really missed. Wish the entire FA contingent could be out there helping with rescue efforts. Any chance of meaningful regs to make sure this never happens again? There is simple bumper technology that I suspect would have kept the support from ripping a hole in the ship.
Murray
November 10, 2007 at 6:48 am
42WF, this is at least the 3rd time you have pointed this out and gotten the same response from us. We know that ethanol is not green but the product of Arthur Daniels Midland, headed by Duwayne Andreas a close friend of the president. Between his being able to make more millions, supporting right wing politicians, and the fact that any presidential candidate has to bow down to Iowan farmers, this is a particularly strong lobby force.
Try to keep up.
hedera
November 10, 2007 at 9:49 am
43Fanny, what’d I do?? I thought that last post was entirely inoffensive…
YLlama
November 10, 2007 at 5:12 pm
44Honk!
David
November 10, 2007 at 10:27 pm
45Fanny is the font of the fickle finger, hedera. You know that. Hell, we’ve all experienced the fickleness of her highly charged, utterly random finger.
hedera
November 11, 2007 at 10:21 am
46I know that, David, but this one’s been in the queue for 2 days now, which seems excessive even for Fanny. What is she, on sabbatical??
David
November 11, 2007 at 12:55 pm
47Yeah, at Bob Jones University on a Salvation Sabbatical - either that or she’s off on a weekend adventure with Bill the Cat.
James Sigrist
November 14, 2007 at 9:27 pm
48The Donny Ripple show thing was amazing! I was screaming with laughter. It was excellent. When will this be launched as a show?
Best thing I’ve seen in a long time. All power to the writers!
James Sigrist
November 14, 2007 at 9:35 pm
49Ok, It’s the Donny Riffle Show. Not Ripple. Sorry about that. Well, it’s fucking great!!!! I watched it a second time and I laughed just as hard. The potato chip collector bit was my favorite. A total scream.
Production must start on this show right away!!!!! There’s not a moment to lose!!! Best thing I’ve seen in a long time.
James Sigrist
November 14, 2007 at 9:37 pm
50All the actors were great. I loved the sidekick guy. Brilliant. Make the show and make sure you get a very hefty percentage because it will be a major hit.
James Sigrist
November 14, 2007 at 9:42 pm
51Ok, I’m reading all these comments and no one seems to even notice this show. What kind of dullards do we have out there? You’re not gonna tell me that people actually think it’s a clip of an old talk show are you? What it is is a totally brilliant idea! This must be made!!!!
SeattleDan
November 14, 2007 at 10:00 pm
52Uh, James, welcome to FA. While we may be old and we may be slow, we’re old and we’re slow. I think all of us watched the clip, thought it funny, and didn’t really have anything to say about it. I hope if you hang out here enough, you won’t find us so slow to make our opinions known. We’re actually pretty verbose!
That is, when we’re not out saving birds from an oily death, or trying to save the world in other ways.
But, I, for one, am glad you found us, and hope you stick around long enough to get to know us, and we can get to know you. Welcome!
Dave von Ebers
November 15, 2007 at 7:11 pm
53Hey, Seattle D, I was all over that Cutty Sark line. It’s still my favorite line of the entire month of November.
“Another Cutty Sark. Let’s go!”
SeattleDan
November 15, 2007 at 7:52 pm
54I’m with you, Dave. Let’s go!
David
November 16, 2007 at 1:53 pm
55Definitely hang out with this crowd, James. You won’t regret it.