So… an American veteran, former senator, and two-term Vice President has won the Nobel Peace Prize. The sort of thing that any patriotic American can be proud of, huh?
Oh, wait. He’s a Democrat. And he committed the unpardonable sin of running for President and getting more votes than the other guy.
So proud, loyal Americans on the right have spent their day bashing Al Gore even more vehemently than usual.
My advice is to stay away from the internets today, but if you need a taste of the righteous anger of understandably indignant armchair climate scientists to prime your own personal outrage pump… you might start here.
Me, I’m gonna take a shower.





44 comments
Ann
October 12, 2007 at 2:03 pm
1I’m afraid to click that link. I’d rather click a thousand ads instead.
nato
October 12, 2007 at 2:30 pm
2With my adblock in place, I don’t have a thousand ads to click. So, I clicked the link. And I guess now I’ve got a list of names for
whenif I ever snap and go on a Snapple-induced assault-rifle rampage. I could feel the stupid creeping into my room through the intertubes. I think I need a shower as well. On my own though, not with you, Adam. I may be living in Idaho these days, but I’ve still got a fairly narrow stance.SeattleDan
October 12, 2007 at 2:34 pm
3A friend of mine at another site, started a thread titled “Al Gore Wins Nobel Prize, High Court Gives it to Bush”.
Ann
October 12, 2007 at 2:36 pm
4Oh Dan, I could hug you for that! In fact, I will next time I see you!
tim
October 12, 2007 at 2:42 pm
5How ironic that Gore is getting pummeled on the Internet, which he invented! Ha! Man, I should start my own right-wing blog. Unfortunately, I still have a few pesky shreds of humanity left.
dee
October 12, 2007 at 3:08 pm
6Once my cursor hovered over the link and identified it as pajamas media, I knew it wasn’t anywhere I wanted to go.
Besides, I don’t have to leave here. WF should be around any minute to tell us what a fraud Al is.
Jack Back from Iraq
October 12, 2007 at 3:33 pm
7dee, I don’t know this WF guy very well, but wouldn’t it be great if his middle initial was “T”?
Jim (OJNTNJ)
October 12, 2007 at 3:40 pm
8Jack (welcome) Back from Iraq, I’ve often thought the same thing….usually after reading one of his comments.
Delighted David
October 12, 2007 at 4:01 pm
9Long after the toxic dose of rightwing caca de toro that is currently spewing forth from the braindead ranters has wandered off into deep space, where it could provide camp entertainment for more enlightened populations (grant me my fantasy here), the simple, elegant reality will remain that truth did out and in 2007 Al Gore received a Nobel Peace Prize for his unflagging efforts regarding global warming. And that’s a fact with which I intend to reinvigorate my spirits. I can ignore the hopelessly intellectually fraudulent right wing bloggers with honest-to-Lobster pleasure.
CONGRATULATIONS, AL! YOU DESERVE IT. YOU EARNED IT. I AM PRESENTLY GIVING YOU A STANDING OVATION.
Murray
October 12, 2007 at 4:13 pm
10The best I can guess is that EVERYONE realizes what a catastrophic mistake electing Bush was. Those on the right can only justify such a blatently stupid move by trying to prove that Al was worse. So there has been an unending crusade to discredit him. When he came out with “An Inconvenient Truth” they inflated his utility bills and attacked him for being an energy wasting hypocrite. Now they have an even bigger hurdle than an Oscar (and Emmy and Grammy) to bring him down from. It’s a big task to slime a Nobel Peace Prize winner, but who else could do it? Fresh from their disgusting attack on Graeme Frost (the kid who needs the health care that the President vetoed) they can devote their full attention to their favorite villain, a man who would have kept us out of…hell he just won the Nobel PEACE Prize.
It just dawned on me. They hate Peace, so any one who wins the prize is automatically the enemy.
Sorry Al.
Charter member of the AnnFan Club
October 12, 2007 at 5:33 pm
11Lucky dog, SeattleDan! Wuff, wuff!
David
October 12, 2007 at 5:38 pm
12You are correct, Murray. They really do hate peace. It does not serve their perceived interests, nor does it give them the Republicans-are-strong-on-defense mythology that they need to maintain power and enhance their “defense” stock portfolios. I mean even the notion of a peace dividend after the fall of the Berlin Wall sent them off the deep end.
Boomer
October 12, 2007 at 5:38 pm
13For those of us who will miss her dearly, Wonkette is retiring.
http://wonkette.com/politics/the-long-goodbye-dept%27/i-have-never-bee n-a-quitter-310478.php
gillian
October 13, 2007 at 5:15 am
14Can we still Rage Against the Ditto Heads,too?
gillian
October 13, 2007 at 5:32 am
15Hey, look at this! Lose a spouse, get a presidential coin! Why didn’t they think of this during the Vietnam War? I guess with over 50,000 dead, it would have cost a mint (rimshot!). I bet if W had actually gone to Vietnam, he would have thought of it sooner. Or avoided the Iraq War altogether? Yeah, you’re right - probably not.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/12/open-thread-lose-a-spouse-gai n-a-presidential-coin/
Dave von Ebers
October 13, 2007 at 7:52 am
16Well, c’mon, ladies ‘n gents, it’s not like global warming is all that scary … I mean, it’s not like imaginary threats of terrorism … there’re no brown people to demonize; ya can’t jettison th’ Constitution in order to fight global warming; and who wants to give up their SUV’s, anyways?
See, we need to find a way to blame that climate change thing on th’ al Qaeda … or th’ Mexicans … or both!
Hey, now there’s a marketing strategy for ya!
gillian
October 13, 2007 at 9:36 am
17My, I’m being chatty today. Heather and I are off to Burke Mountain and if the weather holds, we’ll probably watch the mountain bike races down the Darling Hill Trail. We have reservations at a bed and breakfast in East Hatfield Four Corners, where this year’s apple cider is ready to be uncorked. I love the names of the towns up here; once you establish a name for a town, all others around it, as they are formed, are named after it. Example - Woodbury, South Woodbury, East Woodbury, North Woodbury. I’m waiting for a South South East Woodbury to pop up any day now. But that is the way things are done up here. Once you have something worth hanging onto, you keep using it until all the good is out of it - even town names, I guess. The leaves are fluorescent this week and a nip is definitely in the air.
Heather is all loaded into the car and she’s laying down on the horn, so have a good weekend everyone! Bye.
sharon
October 13, 2007 at 11:59 am
18Of course you know that Essex derives its from the East Seaxe or East Saxons, Wessex from the West Saxons, and Sussex from the South Saxons. Interestingly enough, there were no North Saxons, or else today we would have the town of … wait for it… Nosex.
Dale
October 13, 2007 at 3:43 pm
19Sharon, there were North Saxons but they mysteriously died out after a single generation.
Pope Benny 16
October 13, 2007 at 4:16 pm
20I hope you all saw where I declared the Vatican to be the first carbon neutral state on the planet. It seemed easy enough; we have no heavy industry burning coal and fouling the air. But I’ve still got to figure out how to do it. Maybe I could just say it’s carbon neutral. I’m the Pope, who’s going to say I am lying? Well, besides Cardinal Bernie, who’ll say anything that will get him in front of a TV news camera. He’s hard at work, re-inventing himself as a long suffering radical cleric. As you may imagine, he has a lot of work in front of him and a long row to hoe.
Well, it’s the weekend, which means I still have another 43,278 children, cripples, and alcoholics to bless before the Sabbath ends. Fortunately, they’ll all get herded into St. Peter’s Square tomorrow morning and I can do it all at once. That certainly makes life easier, but you cannot imagine the smell. Mein Gott!!!
Boomer
October 13, 2007 at 4:40 pm
21Adam, works for a funny guy. Or rather, Adam works to make this guy funny. Whatever…
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/13/new-rules-the-nonsense-of-lap elgate/
Not So Genial Genealogist
October 13, 2007 at 7:02 pm
22Pity the historically appropriate ancestor of Prescott, GHW, and GW Bush wasn’t a North Saxon (no animosity intended toward Jenna and Laura, about whom I have no particular attitude).
Lapelgate might set a new standard for mindless media shit. Once again, the title of Alexandra Pelosi’s take on the ‘04 election: WELCOME TO THE FLYING CIRCUS: HOW THE MEDIA MAKES A FREAK SHOW OF PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS.
SeattleDan
October 13, 2007 at 7:20 pm
23Thanks, Boomer. New Rules was terrific.
The one thing that really bugged me on the show was Tucker Carlson talking over everybody. Didn’t his Mom teach him how to share? I can’t remember a thing Krugman, a far more interesting and intelligent man, had to say, as Carlson was projecting as if he wasn’t wearing a mic.
Pope Benny 16
October 14, 2007 at 6:08 am
24What?!! More scandal - not only the priest in Argentina getting convicted last week in the deaths of seven prisoners during the “Dirty War”, now we have the Italian TV network La7 using secret cameras to catch Monsignor Tammaaso Stenico in a sex sting with a gay boy. I thought all the closeted homosexuals were in the Republican Party in the US. Wait, maybe Monsignor Stenico joined the Republican Party last year when he was doing his sabbatical @ Notre Dame. I’ll have to get Cardinal Bernie in on this to spin it just the right way. Of course, I’ll now owe him a dispensation. Gott knows what that will cost me…
Sympathetic Saved Heretic
October 14, 2007 at 9:09 am
25Ah, Benny XVI, the burdens of the papacy. You might want to reconsider your role as the highest earthly manifestation of the presence of God in man in favor of some Great Lobster bisque, a bowl of which guarantees earthly peace and eternal salvation, not to mention also being a repast non pariel, especially with a sanctified goblet of Sister Soulja’s finest altar wine.
Dave von Ebers
October 14, 2007 at 1:45 pm
26Seattle D, I had precisely the same reaction watching Real Time last night. Tucker Carlson is not a very intelligent person; he’s constantly making inapt analogies — e.g., if the NYT can hire private security for its handful of employees in Iraq, why can’t the State Department hire Blackwater to do a job that used to belong to the Marines? (Duh, because one is a private company and the other’s the U.S. friggin’ government, dipshit) — and not seeing obvious hypocrisy — e.g., if Bill Maher thinks there’s nothing wrong with a man playing with his, er, “little soldier” on his own time, why does he criticize a right-wing “Christian” anti-gay nutjob for wrapping himself in multiple layers of rubber, inserting a plastic object up his you-know-what, and playing with his “li’l soldier”. As to the latter, Carlson kept saying, “I don’t get it Bill; I thought you wanted him to masturbate.” Um, no, shit-for-brains, we don’t want stupid right-wingers to do anything; we want them to leave the rest of us alone and stop telling us what we can and can’t do — especially if they’re going to do the very things they tell everyone else not to do.
Seriously, why is Tucker Carlson so incapable of understanding (a) the difference between private action and government action; and (2) the obvious hypocrisy of right-wing Christian conservatives doing the very things they preach against. Why don’t those synapses fire in his brain? I mean, really … it says a lot about the guy’s character that he genuinely does not understand these things.
Lemuel
October 14, 2007 at 6:30 pm
27Ok, I have to start this story off by swearing an oath that I am not now, nor have I ever been, a safe cracker. I simply got lucky.
Several years ago, when I was working for Mr. DeLay at his house in Sugar Land, TX, my first assignment was to set up a security system. It was a rather low budget arrangement, but I was able to install cameras, infrared motion detectors surrounding the house and the perimeter of the property, and had just enough money left over to lay the bare minimum of land mines. Once all that was in place, my job was to maintain the equipment, patrol the grounds, and do a twice a day sweep of his office for electronic eavesdropping devices. I normally did this during his naps and during the evening meal, to keep from disturbing him while he was working. I found the wall safe on my very first day. It was behind a black velvet painting of …wait for it… Elvis!!! I made it a habit to check the handle to make sure it was locked and secure during every sweep. One evening it was unlocked. I slipped on my latex gloves and carefully opened the safe. I was interested to see if there might be the odd bearer bond or blood diamond that would not be missed. I found three large, shrink wrapped bundles of cash totaling several hundred thousands dollars, a large temptation I will admit, but I put it back as I found it. There was, towards the back of the safe, what looked to be a road map. I pulled it out & unfolded it. Curious. It was a survey map of the compound with random lines going off in all directions. I laid the map out on the desk and took out my 9.5mm Minox spy camera. Several dozen pictures later, I folded the map up and put it back into the safe.
When my shift was over, I worked late into the night developing and printing the pictures. The next morning, I drove into town and made an enlarged copy of the best picture of the map. I folded the copy just as the map had been folded & dropped it into my briefcase. Over the next several weeks, I took the map out, whenever I was alone and studied it for clues. The random lines were just not making any sense. And why would you keep a common survey map in your safe, if it didn’t have some sort of value? I admit I was stumped and put it away for a week or so.
Then, late one night I was watching a movie on TV - a half decent film, “Romancing the Stone” - and it came to me. I pulled out the negatives, examined them closely with a magnifying glass and bingo! There it was!…
SeattleDan
October 14, 2007 at 6:48 pm
28Thanks, Lemuel. Good luck and looking forward to the next installment.
And thanks, Dave vE. Here is the overtime for Realtime, where Tucker continues his obliviation:
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/real_time_ot_101207.mov
waterfowler
October 15, 2007 at 9:29 am
29You don’t have to look very far, Dee.
Steve
October 15, 2007 at 10:16 am
30Considering that Henry Kissinger also won a Nobel Peace Prize, I consider it that much of an honor.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
October 15, 2007 at 11:42 am
31One of the problems with “pundits” like Tucker Carlson seems to be that they are more interested in winning the debate, rather than being right.
When facts and reason aren’t enough to sway their audience, they then rely soley on volume and bluster.
Sadly enough, this seems to be an effective method for reaching their target audience.
David
October 15, 2007 at 12:04 pm
32Yeah, the Nobel for Dr. Kill-the-Villagers-in-Neighboring-Countries-in-Very-Large-Numbers-with -Carpet-Bombing Kissinger is a major black mark against that honor. Awarding him an honor held by Martin Luther King, Jr. made me sick at heart.
WF, the vitriolic right dusted off the anti-Martin Luther King, Jr. playbook for their scripted assault on Al Gore for daring to speak truth on behalf of humankind. Oh, yeah, and King also spoke out against an immoral war. SS, DD (Different Decade).
waterfowler
October 15, 2007 at 2:40 pm
33David, I’m not vitriolic & I’m too young for the MLK reference. It’s very simple. Does Gore live in a mansion? does he fly in a gulfstream? Yet he wants me to change my behavior?
Classic puke. “Do as I say, not as I do, because I know what’s good for you and you’re too stupid…” I’m starting to feel some of that vitriol.
sharon
October 15, 2007 at 4:09 pm
34At this point, changes in individual behavior are probably not going to affect much of anything.
I thought Paul Krugman did a pretty good job today of explaining why the rightwingers went apeshit over the Nobel Peace Prize award. I hope you can read this without having to register anymore.
SeattleTammy
October 15, 2007 at 5:14 pm
35I didn’t want to high-jack the new thread so I’m high-jacking this one! I just got my hands on the funniest book, The Book of Vice: Very Naughty Things (and How To Do Them)! I was laughing out loud on the bus and getting some very strange looks from fellow passengers, but how to explain?
Adam, when you talk to Peter, tell him I’m going to do my Book Report on Vice this Saturday over at the General’s. That crowd will love it!
Jackson Street Books is going to have to create a special Wait! Wait! author section.
Sharon, that was a great one from Krugman. I loved that WSJ managed to not mention Gore in their article about the people who should have gotten the award.
David
October 15, 2007 at 7:34 pm
36WF, I’ve never thought of you as vitriolic, but the right wing noise machine that kicks in on cue certainly is. Rush and his ilk have banked a fortune off of vitriol, often misleading if not downright erroneous.
I was a senior in college when MLK, Jr. received the Nobel Peace Prize and remember well what was said.
Living in a mansion is not an issue. How green that mansion is does matter. But regarding the private jet, how else is he going to travel? The question becomes why have we not pushed hard as a society on developing and incorporating the least harmful technology possible. Al Gore is incredibly valuable as a spokesperson for the green world we must do everything in our power to achieve, and the more he travels carrying that message the better.
Ironically, GWB’s ranch, as I understand it, is environmentally responsible, but he followed Dick Cheney’s inverse dictum that conservation is a personal virtue, not a government policy, which is exactly the wrong direction to go if you are the chief executive of the most powerful, most consumptive nation on earth. I applaud personal environmental virtue, but just as I drove a 33 mpg VW and had no measurable effect on the environment because the society of which I am apart chose to believe it could continue on its profligate ways, so GWB’s ranch has no measurable effect on environmental well being, but the impact of Al Gore as ecowarrior very well could. So focus not on the messenger so much as the message. Tell me where what he is championing is wrong, not whether he has to fly in a Gulfstream and has a very large house.
To whatever extent you have sound reasons to reject Al Gore’s message, fine, but calling someone courageous enough to call the Iraq War what it is when to do so brought down howls of scorn even from the MSM and a committed enough citizen to dedicate his time and energy to a cause of this magnitude and import a puke just doesn’t make sense to me.
Peace, dude, and remember what Gibran said: “Our children do not belong to us, we belong to our children.” To that I would add “and our children’s children, and their children and beyond.” These are the people I think Al Gore is championing.
SeattleDan
October 15, 2007 at 8:22 pm
37Well said, David. Thank you.
Childless Dale
October 15, 2007 at 9:37 pm
38¨remember what Gibran said: “Our children do not belong to us, we belong to our children.” To that I would add “and our children’s children, and their children and beyond.”
And/or our pets, other people´s children, and other people´s children´s pets.
waterfowler
October 16, 2007 at 7:11 am
39It is the messenger, David. I’m completely open to a man-made global warming message. I just haven’t been convinced. From all I’ve read, I lean toward solar cycles, but I’m not certain of that even. And if ACF really believed what he said, how could he possibly have such a large foot.
Gibran has it right. That’s why I send money to Duck’s Unlimited, the Coastal Conservation Association, and the NRA, for my children. AlChickenFoot sends his money to a company he owns to buy carbon offsets for his polluting ways while enriching himself.
Steve
October 16, 2007 at 11:04 am
40David sez:
Commercial, like the rest of us? I realize he has security issues with which to deal but still. . .
Ann
October 16, 2007 at 3:25 pm
41Yeah yeah yeah, and Phyllis Schlafly still won’t stay home and shut up.
If we don’t take action on global warming until every last idiot is convinced, it will be too damned late. At some point, smart people rely on experts. Al Gore is smart, and he relies on experts. His critics neither are nor do.
I’m quite certain that if Al Gore were wearing hemp, driving around in a human-powered eco-mobile, living in a tent, and giving environmentally sound presentations by drawing in water on a black rock, no one would pay him the slightest attention. He would be dismissed as a loonie, a tree-hugging hippie. No one would even notice his example, let alone follow it. As a matter of fact, I’m quite certain that hundreds, maybe thousands, of people are setting that example, and being soundly ignored.
Mr. Gore does not say “Do as I say, not as I do.” He recognizes and acknowledges his environmental impact and does what he can to alleviate it. If he also makes money, why the hell would a conservative criticize him for it?
Jim (OJNTNJ)
October 16, 2007 at 4:34 pm
42Anne,
It’s probably because they didn’t think up that particular racket* first. They’re jealous.
And they can’t figure out how to gain a monopoly on wind and sunshine.;-) Yet.:-0
*and no, I don’t believe that Al Gore considers his work in focusing attention on global warming to be a “racket.”
sharon
October 16, 2007 at 5:30 pm
43“And they can’t figure out how to gain a monopoly on wind and sunshine.;-) Yet.:-0″
Give them time. Give them time.If they can do it with bottled water….
David
October 16, 2007 at 6:13 pm
44WF, sportsfolk are an important component in conservation. In fact, were it not for sports hunters, the deer in Florida would have been wiped out in the 20s, I think it was. I was a member of the NRA in the late 50s and into the 60s, but they took a turn I could not embrace (as also happened with Bush Senior). I’m not sure what they have to do with children’s well being at this point. But the sports conservation organizations, oh, yes, and a tip of the hat for supporting them.
Steve, I don’t think commercial is a practical alternative for what he needs to be doing at the moment. And I think that for whatever carbon footprint that leaves, it is one of the highest current uses of private jets.
Ann, not only are you a FanAp heartthrob, you do a magnificent job of not mincing words on this issue. Thank you.
Oh, Childless Dale, ’tis a pity. You do strike me as someone a child would be really lucky to own.