I’d like to take a break from the big issues for a moment. Let’s change the world in a small but significant way. It won’t even be too hard.
If you’re like me (and who isn’t, am I right!?), then you spend a lot of your day on the internet. And a portion of that time is spent, increasingly, silently fuming about obtrusive advertisements. You know, the ones that balloon out or pulsate or make noise when you touch them even if you didn’t mean to touch them…
Those ads.
And you’ve thought, briefly, “I’m gonna write an angry email or do…something else… that will make them regret… that they ever annoyed ME!” But of course you didn’t, because what can you actually DO, really?
A lot. I have a plan.
Let’s start with today being Click An Annoying Ad Monday. And then let’s do the same thing on Tuesday. That’s right: See an annoying ad, click on it, instantly dismiss the new window, make a silent promise to yourself to avoid the offending company if possible, and get on with your life. Maybe a millisecond of your time has been consumed, and you’ve helped save the world.
“Whoa, Adam, wait,” you reply. “How is clicking on the ads that annoy me going to make less of them. That makes no sense at all.” Well, my hypothetical friend, you’re not seeing the big picture.
Here’s the thing. Forward this post around. Email it to your friends. Soon, lots of people will be clicking on the most annoying, obnoxious, intrusive ads that the Web has to offer. Soon, we will bring the bell-and-whistle crowd to their knees.
It works like this: At first, The Corporate Guy is elated - his new ad is getting lots of clicks. But not too much later, he catches wind of a rumor, and summons the Web Ad Guy into his office. The ensuing conversation goes like this.
Corporate Guy: Hey, great work with that ’screaming siren expanding pop-over ad.’ Apparently, it got a lot of clicks.
Web Ad Guy: Yes sir. We’re pretty proud of it. Our data shows that -
Corporate Guy: -only, it might not be real clicks, right?
Web Ad Guy (nervous. he has anticipated this moment but hoped it would never come): Er… what do you mean?
Corporate Guy: Well, there are these “Click An Annoying Ad” people. Have you heard of them?
Web Ad Guy: Um… uh… “No?”
Corporate Guy: Yes you have. Someone forwarded me an email. These people are purposefully clicking on the most annoying ads on the web AND vowing to avoid the products responsible. How do we know that your terrific “numbers” aren’t merely counting the people who actively hate us?
Web Ad Guy: Well, we calibrate the obtrusiveness ratio with the factorial of the gerundic placental delta which allows us to calculate the fractional contusifer of th-
Corporate Guy: That’s just a lot of science-y bullshit right there, isn’t it?
Web Ad Guy: Um… yes sir.
Corporate Guy: So I’m left thinking that I can’t know if my ad is actually losing customers for me, and therefore I’m inclined to ask you to make a new round of advertisements that do not expand, whistle, scream, hoot, pop-up, rotate, or involve spurious dancing silhouettes. That way, I can be sure that these “clicks” are people who are actually interested in my product, and not people who’d like to see me dead. Does that make sense to you?
Web Ad Guy: Well, I -
Corporate Guy: Say “Yes.”
Web Ad Guy: Yes.
Corporate Guy: Good.
See? It’s that easy. Think of it as completely free activism that you can do without getting up. And who doesn’t love those terms?





39 comments
dee
October 8, 2007 at 6:10 am
1And can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day clickin’ on an ad. And friends, they may think it’s a movement
(with apologies to Arlo)
Dave von Ebers
October 8, 2007 at 6:53 am
2C’mon, now, if ya wanna end the war ‘n stuff, ya gotta click real loud …
Oh, sorry, Dee. Didn’t meant to steal your joke.
historyenne
October 8, 2007 at 8:21 am
3If only Corporate Guys really did think that logically . . .
nato
October 8, 2007 at 8:31 am
4You see ads on web sites? Bummer days, dude. As an official Godless Liberal Hippie-Freak, I use Firefox and AdBlockPlus (a free Firefox plugin), which means I miss out on the ad-rich content that you so enjoy. Well, if I ever get a new computer, I’ll join the clicking revolution for a bit.
Sioux
October 8, 2007 at 9:50 am
5Being a wet blanket isn’t the role I like to see myself in, but my area of real work (e.g. paid) responsibility is computer security as it relates to threats and attacks (viruses, spyware, spam, etc.) and I have to add a warning here.
I love the idea of a grass roots attempt to make annoying ads less effective, but a lot of these ads take you to sites that will silently download malicious code. I won’t belabor the details here. If you’re interested, there are many security related sites and blogs on this topic.
And for those of you who start to sputter “but I have pop-up blockers and don’t allow ActiveX controls and run security software and firewalls and all that so I’m protected…”, don’t fool yourselves. Those things are all necessary, but they are not unlike condoms - they offer a safer but not totally safe internet experience. The first rule of surfing safety is to only go to sites you know. So beware clicking unknown ads, however much I wish otherwise to further this cause.
DouglasG
October 8, 2007 at 10:07 am
6I’m with Nato. I haven’t seen an annoying ad is ages! I only remember that there are ads on a site when I use another computer.
On the other hand, one of the possible side benefits of this click an annoying ad movement is that the advertiser generally pays by the click. If they are getting a lot of clicks, they are paying a lot of money. If this does not correspond to an increase in revenue, then they lose money. Thus, the ad would be seen as a loser, and then they would perhaps learn. However, it would likely cause an increase in annoying ads at first…
Jim (OJNTNJ)
October 8, 2007 at 11:37 am
7Sioux,
Surely you aren’t advocating “abstinence only” computer usage.
If so, where else could we get our daily dose of frolicking Felbers and web snark?
Jim (OJNTNJ)
October 8, 2007 at 11:41 am
8After rereading Sioux’s comment I stand corrected;
“The first rule of surfing safety is to only go to sites you know.”
It’s not abstinence only, it’s the polyg*mous cyber version of mon*gamy. It looks like Adam and company will be hearing more from me after all.
Steve
October 8, 2007 at 12:27 pm
9Yea and verily, nato has it right. Firefox is your friend and AdBockPlus is your best buddy.
Internet without ads, amen.
Steve
October 8, 2007 at 12:30 pm
10By the way, Adam, what you’re proposing is essentially a "Click Farm".
There are zillions of these sleazeballs out there already and most webvertizers already know and discount such bogus clickery.
Zee Man
October 8, 2007 at 3:37 pm
11I don’t know, Adam. I think I liked it better when we were talking politics and saving the world.
Pope Benny 16
October 8, 2007 at 5:36 pm
12Das new Nicaraguan abortion law, passed last November which criminalizes all abortions, regardless of the circumstances. There are no exceptions; not for rape, not for incest, not for threats to the life of the mother. All I can say is “YEAH, BABY! THAT’S WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT!!!”
OK, so 82 Nicaraguan women have died as a result of this law. Sehr traurig; it was God’s will.
Pope Benny 16
October 8, 2007 at 5:47 pm
13May Gott im Himmel send down a bolt of lightning and smite the evil rodent!! “Moderation Queue”, mein butt! I am God’s voice on earth, do not you forget!!! Fanny Roborat - Ich take your name, ich kick your butt.
Gary
October 8, 2007 at 5:49 pm
14Just because s/he “seems like a nice site” doesn’t mean you can’t catch a CTD. Man, you just can’t win…
Just Jay
October 8, 2007 at 6:49 pm
15Hi All,
OK this is way off topic, but so rich in irony I feel compelled to share. I was watching the tube last night and a commercial came on from an organization called CASA (The Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse) encouraging parents to eat dinner with their children. A noble cause I’m sure, but the add started with an appearance from the Shrub joking about his mother’s cooking skills. Then came fuzzy pictures of the Bush family and then, this is where it gets good, on comes Barbara saying that eating dinner with your kids helps reduce the risk of drug and alcohol abuse. Say what??? Didn’t our feckless leader have a serious alcohol problem at some point in his life? Weren’t there also accusations of a cocaine habit? And this is supposed to be a shining example of what happens when you have dinner with your kids? Well I’ll be hornswoggled. If more W.’s are going to result, then we need to immediately start a movement to get the kids out of the house and having dinner anywhere else.
By the way GO STEELERS! Super Bowl XL wasn’t a gift from the officials after all!
Jay
SeattleTammy
October 8, 2007 at 6:49 pm
16I know you can click on some ads and drive up their costs, but I’d be afraid of the ones the would steal your info or insert malware.
I just saw a cool thing from the bookseller’s association, Oct 15 is blogging for the environment day. They have some 7,000 blogs signed up so far, and the website has youtubes and links and a place to register your blog. Then you pick your favorite environmental topic and post on the 15th.
David
October 8, 2007 at 10:16 pm
17I’m pretty sure I have been fractionally contusifered at least a couple of times. At least I think that’s what it was. Damned exciting, I must say.
Just Jay, Jeb needs to watch the ad, what with his daughter’s substance abuse problems. Actually, I feel sorry for his daughter, given what I know of Jebbie’s wife.
Actually, I’m trying to figure out how any of the Bushes could make that ad with a straight face - except maybe Laura, who isn’t a Bush, just married to one - unless the primary motivation was a sense of guilt. And while Bar is just married to a Bush, she is an insufferable bitch. OK, enough judgmentalism. I apologize in advance for anything I got wrong.
piglet
October 9, 2007 at 11:32 am
18The proliferation of these ads and the election and reelection of the aforementioned recovering alcoholic should remind you of the predilection of the majority of your fellow countryfolk to shiny objects and big belt buckles.
Murray
October 9, 2007 at 11:39 am
19With dial-up and not all that much time to spend on line it’s kind of a big deal to wait while a site I don’t want to go to loads up.
Fortunately I too have Firefox. I discovered that your site Adam didn’t like it when I used Explorer and after each post it would give an error message if I tried to go to another page. That all ended when I started useing Firefox.
(I also like the spell check).
The Bush Family strikes me as the Anti-Family Values Family. One son was part of the Savings and Loan fiasco, another was an alcoholic druggy who went AWOL and is now busy destroying America, another had serious problems with his wife and drugged out daughter. W’s kids are no examples of virtue. On the other hand reality was never a strong suite of this family.
David
October 9, 2007 at 1:42 pm
20Thanks for the confirmation, Murray. Not sure why I was in whatever mood I was in. You described it the way I see it.
The AWOL coke-head really is destroying America: Constitution, long-term fiscal well being, position of influence (especially any positive influence) in the world, you name it. Would that this were at least a little bit hyperbolic, but I don’t think it is.
It is reversible, of course, if someone with at least a smidgeon of good sense had a grip on the pilot wheel. ‘Course that requires having a grip on reality…
gillian
October 9, 2007 at 3:15 pm
21Wait a minute. You mean I can blame my drug, alcohol, internet gambling, porn and animal hoarding addictions on my mom? Great! See, Mom, you really did screw me up! I knew it! I just knew it was you!
gillian
October 9, 2007 at 4:01 pm
22All right, who’s in charge of tweaking the rat? Whoever it is, you’ve got her electrodes glued on backwards or some such offense. Twice in the last two posts she’s eaten my comments. It’s not like I have a potty mouth or anything. Curb your rat, Adam!
Jim (OJNTNJ)
October 9, 2007 at 4:24 pm
23Is it possible that our host is testing our irony meters by:
1. postulating that we click on annoying ads (a likely way to be targeted for spam); and,
2. amping up Fanny’s anti-spam detection apparati to the point where our witty and/or pithy comments are automatically consigned to the spam dumpster?
Nah, he wouldn’t do that to us, would he?
gillian
October 9, 2007 at 6:06 pm
24In the interest of this comment actually getting past the rat - here, gosh darn-it!
http://www.salon.com/comics/tomo/2007/10/08/tomo/
Jim (no not "Acronym Jim" or the other one either)
October 10, 2007 at 3:34 am
25Wow! Tough censors! Even the Pope can’t get through? Oy Vay!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_ main.html?name=Toles&date=10092007&type=c
Jack Back from Iraq
October 10, 2007 at 3:56 pm
26In Round One of this historic fight to the finish, Jimmy Carter leads with a shiv to Cheney’s rib cage. And what a blow it is! Dick’s on the ropes and staggered!…
And the crowd goes wild!!
Major JEC Fan
October 10, 2007 at 5:27 pm
27Ain’t no ropes, JBfI, this is a steel cage match, and the country boy with the section of loggin’ chain in his hand don’t plan to be the one stretchered out. Cheney better hope one of the corn squeezin’ sluggin’ hardcore rural progressives in the front row don’t confuse him with a quail.
Pope Benny 16
October 10, 2007 at 5:32 pm
28Ho-kay… Another day, another 37 official Papal blessings. One of them today was for the third division Ancona soccer team to go forth and prosper, after declaring bankruptcy in 2004. I have no idea what that whole production was all about; something Cardinal Bernie came up with and I suspect some money may have changed hands there. Gott im Himmel, release me from this Amerikanisher schweinhund known as Bernard Law!
David
October 11, 2007 at 6:11 am
29Two paragraphs from John Cusack interviewing Naomi Klein (today’s Huffington Brief):
Klein: That’s exactly right. And once you understand this - that a parallel, privatized state has been built for the elites with public money — it makes Bush’s so-called bungling look a lot more sinister. Maybe the construction of this parallel state, and the starving of the public one, is the real “mission accomplished.” When the Blackwaters and the Halliburtons and the Lockheeds are looked at as a whole, what you see is a fully articulated state-within-a-state that is as muscular and capable as the actual state is frail and feeble. And of course, as creatures of the new economy, these companies are weightless and stateless. If Blackwater wanted to make like Halliburton and move to Dubai, there would be nothing to stop it.
We need to understand that what we glimpse in these contractor scandals goes well beyond corruption. It’s another model of government. War and disasters are being used to advance a radical agenda of corporate rule where the idea of universally accessible public services goes extinct. That’s why I wrote The Shock Doctrine — this thing is way bigger than Bush. Bush isn’t an aberration, he’s the natural culmination of a 25-year campaign to hollow out and privatize the state. He is the perfect mascot of this movement: if government is unnecessary as anything other than an ATM, who better than Bush to lead it? What is more fitting than having a hollow president to head a hollowed-out state?
(Wonder where State’s rumblings about no longer using Blackwater in Iraq is headed?)
dee
October 11, 2007 at 10:23 am
30David, that scares the hell out of me. Five years ago I would have dismissed it as tin foil thinking, but now it’s a quite plausible explanation.
And the funny thing is, the Malkins and Limbaughs and Coulters who have been carrying their water for the last decade are in for a rude awakening. They are no more welcome in that elite state than a fart in a perfume factory. But they do well to keep the masses outraged by distractions.
cooper
October 11, 2007 at 2:50 pm
31Chris Regan has finally come up for air.
http://www.masshistoria.net/?p=235
Dirk's Diary
October 11, 2007 at 3:51 pm
3210/11/07
Dear Diary,
Touchy, touchy, touchy! Whatever you do, don’t mention the genocide of 1,500,000 Armenians by the Ottoman Empire around anyone from Turkey. Even if you’re a national hero and Nobel prize winning author, casting any aspersions about past Turkish indiscretions will get you time in the slammer. Just ask Orhan Pamuk; well, ask him if he ever gets out of prison. Those raging Liberals in the House really stepped in it today, passing that resolution to call the killings a genocide. Turkey is threatening to invade the Kurds in Iraq (that’ll show Congress!) and hinting at revoking flyover privileges by US planes on their way to Iraq. Cheney’s definitely pissed and railing against this latest threat to his dream of World-Wide Hegemony, starting in the oil rich Middle East (naturally). Laura came into his office told him to STFU; that she couldn’t hear her soaps with all of his belly-aching. He stopped yelling and left the office. Cheney headed down to the bunker, but he wasn’t going there to sit around and sulk. He got the names of a couple of hot-shot musclemen from Tom DeLay and he knows just how he wants to use them.
Dirk
SeattleDan
October 11, 2007 at 4:12 pm
33Dirk, I sure hope Orhan’s out of the pokey by next week when he’s scheduled to speak here in Seattle.
David
October 11, 2007 at 4:35 pm
34Yeah, dee, I’ve also been reluctant to embrace some of the analyses of what’s afoot - still am as far as the certifiable tin hat conjecture goes, and being from the South, I’ve got more than a couple of relatives who might as well be wearing tin hats. A couple of relatives now deceased thought the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion was a history text rather than a Tsarist hoax.
Naomi Klein does her homework and has the creds, so when she speaks, I have a tendency pay close attention, especially when it squares with other credible sources.
You are dead on regarding the rabid right water carriers.
Joe Beats
October 11, 2007 at 6:29 pm
35Hello everyone, this is Joe Beats WX12 Chicago.
FLASH!!! In a daring daylight prison break, Orhan Pamuk busted out of Istanbul’s Glorious Ottoman Empire Penitentiary today and is rumored to be heading to….Seattle, Washington?!!! What?! Who wrote this copy?! I’ll kill him! I wanna see the AP wire! This can’t be right…… Well, sonovabitch! It is right. More on this as the story develops! Back to you, Walter.
Jack Back from Iraq
October 11, 2007 at 6:36 pm
36Racism…it’s just not for inbred, mouth breathing, poor white Southern trash anymore.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/11/noose-hung-on-columbia-profes sors-door/
Mudhead
October 11, 2007 at 9:09 pm
37Joe, thanks for the update. Good to know we will be able to see Orhan. As long as your here, I have a question:
Say, what chance does a returning deceased war veteran have for that good-paying job, more sugar, and the free mule you’ve been dreaming of? Well, think it over. Then take off your shoes. Now you can see how increased spending opportunities mean harder work for everyone, and more of it, too! So do your part today, Joe. Join with millions of your neighbors and turn in your shoes!
Commercial Voice:
For INDUSTRY!
shoes for industry, compadre.
Zee Man
October 12, 2007 at 8:56 am
38Mudhead, I guess we finally learn that you are holding. And, Porgie, don’t give me that “Oh no, not yet. But soon, heavy industry will make it possible for all the people to have whatever it desires in a free marketplace” bullshit.
I love Firesign. I’m glad you guys do, too.
The Mill
October 12, 2007 at 11:52 am
39I used to work for an internet popup company. Not kidding. Allow me to apologize on behalf of the entire industry. But also, I’d like to mention that the success of certain ad campaigns are measured mainly by click-thru rate. So, as a few folks have already suggested, this “Click Like Crazy” movement could actually result in more ads at first. Only once the advertisers realize how much money they’re losing, are they likely to cut back. And for some deep-pocketed businesses, this could take years. Are you willing to fight the good fight for as long as it takes? Will you train your children to take over for you after you’re gone?