Though I wish they’d release it all at once, Article II was worth the wait.
–
Article II
Section 1
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the even more powerful Vice President, chosen for the same Term but not technically part of the executive “branch,” be elected, as follows:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to yadda yadda yadda something about electors and elections.
Section 2
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, but HE is the decider. He shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. Again: Reprieves and pardons. Suck it!
He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States.
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
Section 3
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, except involving matters that may be too Sensitive for the Congress to hear because of their utter Secretudiness. He shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed to the extent that they do not Interfere with his Vibe, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.
Section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. get to do judging and lawmaking too. It’s true. It’s a rule.





42 comments
Sharon
July 5, 2007 at 9:41 am
1Is it still Article II? I thought it got promoted to Article I and Article I moved down to Article III.
Article IIIArticle II, Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court, or unless that person happens to be the President or the Vice President, in which case they are exempt from the provisions of this Section. As we all know, if the president or vice president do it, that means it’s not wrong.The
CongressPresident shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture except during the life of the person attainted.Ann
July 5, 2007 at 12:39 pm
2Wow, my Con Law professor really got it wrong. Prof. Corker, shame on you! Turns out the Constitution is much simpler than you thought.
Harold
July 5, 2007 at 2:17 pm
3It’s just a goddamn piece of paper, as the Appointee-In-Chief allegedly once said. And it can mean whatever he wants it to mean whenever he wants it to mean what he wants it to mean, especially during wartime, when the President reserves unto himself all the powers and authoritay that he damn well pleases. (Responsibility for failure, however, falls upon anyone who opposes him.)
Bits
July 5, 2007 at 4:40 pm
4So, do we just sit here and keep taking it?
I just got notice that I’ll be on call for jury duty next month, which is really inconvenient. I’m thinking maybe I’ll skip it, and ask them to just let the governor decide. (Or does the throw-out-the-verdict power only exist at the federal level?)
Boomer
July 5, 2007 at 5:23 pm
5Look, they didn’t have to go to all that trouble re-writing the Constitution, all they need is one of these.
Dirk's Diary
July 5, 2007 at 6:11 pm
67-05-07
Dear Diary,
Just a short note tonight. I’m still really pumped - I was on Countdown tonight!!! Well, not really on the show, or interviewed, or, to be honest, not even mentioned by name, but they showed a clip of me reading my speech on delisting the Bald Eagle. “The eagle has returned!” (*Dirk Kempthorne, July 5, 2007) will supersede “The Eagle has landed” as the most historically significant governmental use of the word “eagle” in a sentence. Patricia helped me with my speech and it was a real corker! She (and The Girls) started a petition for a statue commemorating the removal of this majestic bird from the Endangered Species List. The Girls thought a bronze statue of the Bald Eagle rising like the Phoenix from it’s close brush with extinction. Patricia and I were leaning more towards a life size marble statue of me giving my oration, with the wind blowing though my hair. These things take years to hammer out and often are decided by committee, which probably means the statue will wind up looking like “Gumby and Pokey at the Opera”. But I looked good on TV, I really looked good.
Dirk
SeattleDan
July 5, 2007 at 7:25 pm
7Well, that clears that up. I won’t be doing anymore vetching about the President’s extra-constitutional escapades. I have always valued clarity, cause then I don’t have to think. Thinking is hard.
Dale
July 5, 2007 at 8:37 pm
8I tip my hat to the new Constitution…
(Abner: Who said that? Costello: I don´t know, who? Abner: Yes…)
Dale
July 5, 2007 at 8:38 pm
9Nuts. I meant Abbott.
SeattleDan
July 5, 2007 at 8:56 pm
10Who won’t get fooled again?
Increase Mather
July 5, 2007 at 11:51 pm
11Oh, this “Constitution” thing looketh like big trouble. What will King George sayeth when he sees it?
David
July 6, 2007 at 5:30 am
12Who’d a thunk The Decider would channel a friggin’ Frenchman, especially since “L’etat, c’est moi” is a bit too Ivy League snooty for the Cookout King. And “I am the decider” is just so much folksier, as is “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper.”
tim
July 6, 2007 at 6:48 am
13When you really examine it, the only amendment in the Bill of Rights that makes any sense in these trying times is #2. The rest of them look like they were written by Al Qaeda. Freedom of speech? No unreasonable search and seizure? The right not to incriminate yourself? The right to know the evidence against you? No cruel or unusual punishment (pfft, what does that even mean?)? I think we all know that’s just what the terrorists would want.
Katie
July 6, 2007 at 7:04 am
14Boomer - Great cartoon, and so fitting, since they treat our economy like play money and manipulate anything that prevents them from obtaining what they want. Me, I’m hiding out over here on Baltic Ave, hoping I won’t be noticed.
Katie
Reggie
July 6, 2007 at 11:16 am
15Adam- I love the blog! - But did you see the new hilarious Giuliani ad - it was up on Wonkette this morning. It’s called “Real Balls” - the only question is who put it up there?
Wonkette’s Giuliani ad
- Carlson
waterfowler
July 6, 2007 at 12:26 pm
16I think Section II, paragraph 3, was written & perfected by y’alls’ Billhilly himself.
Y’all keep screaming about freedom and rights and privacy and against government stepping on our toes or sticking its nose in our business. I’m w/ you there. I’ll fight for your rights. It seems though, that it is only important to y’all when it has to do w/ GW. Where were you when US murdered people @ Ruby Ridge? What did you have to say about the slaughter @ Waco?
Has any one of you actually had the gov’t infringe on your rights during this admin.? How so? If they want to infringe on mine, I’ve got the 2nd Amendment to back me up. I’ll also back up all of you.
Mr. Cooper, we’re finally going to try to send you some rain. I’ve had enough. I’m not even where it’s been flooding, but I’d really like the Carolinas to have the rest of it. Hopefully, you’ll take the mosquitos too???
cooper
July 6, 2007 at 3:27 pm
17wf, I’ll take you up on the rain, pero el mosquito usted lata guardar.
Dirk's Diary
July 6, 2007 at 5:54 pm
187-06-07
Dear Diary,
Patricia says she’s worried about my mood swings - one day I try to get fired by the president; the next day I get really, really stoked about being on Countdown and don’t go to sleep until 4:30 AM. She’s scheduled a doctor’s appointment for me and, in the meantime, I’m to go back on my topamax & effexor diet. I really don’t like the way those drugs make me feel, plus they make me very, very slee…ZZZZZ
David
July 7, 2007 at 3:35 pm
19cooper,
According to the Weather Channel, you got rain with a vengeance today. Hope nothing blew away (or into your house or onto your car).
cooper
July 7, 2007 at 4:23 pm
20David, all is well. We lost power for about 4 hours, which was great because it is my turn to vacuum the floors and I got a nice little reprieve.
dee
July 7, 2007 at 4:56 pm
21All rain is to extend only as far as I-95 starting tomorrow, because I’m off to the beach for the next week to beautiful Topsail Island, the undiscovered jewel of the Carolina coast. And we’d like to keep it that way, thank you, so forget I mentioned it.
I hope everyone is enjoying themselves at Grouseland this weekend. That swimming hole would be pretty inviting.
Pope Benny 16
July 7, 2007 at 8:06 pm
22Cardinal Bernard Law (may his soul rot in Hell for eternity!) sidled up to me last night after supper and strongly suggested that I decree that the old pre-1960’s Latin mass be reinstated. He hinted if this could happen maybe he could forget about my special “friendship” with Heinrich. Listen that’s all it was - Jeez. My old nemesis, Rabbi Yehuda Abramiwitz, criticized the revival of the prayer for the conversion of Jews, saying the old text was “insensitive … insulting”. He’s right, of course, but I felt I was trapped and had no choice. Cardinal Law wouldn’t even be in my life if it weren’t for his tacit approval of man-of-God-on-boy-acolyte sex back at his former Archdiocese in Boston. The Church is still paying for that one (tens of millions, so far) and my cross to bear is this Amerikanisher putz, “Bernie”, is now residing in the Vatican. I wonder if the Diocese of Thule, Greenland still needs a drunken priest…
David
July 8, 2007 at 7:13 am
23Very readable analysis by a former prosecutor of Bush’s commutation of Libby’s minimum guideline sentence:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/070607A.shtml
Ann
July 8, 2007 at 10:51 am
24Was this blog around in the early ’90s? Somehow I missed it.
This year I have a courting pair of hummingbirds at the feeder. They hover above my indolent cat, Joxer, and scold him. He doesn’t even lift his head.
cooper
July 8, 2007 at 1:31 pm
25Ann, your cat is using the oldest sucker move on the planet. Don’t move, don’t even acknowledge the birds, let them cop an attitude, say whatever they want, until they get within range. Then the lightning-like reflex swat and dinner is served (sorry, siobhan, but that’s life and death of the planet Earth.). I have 5 cats and I’ve seen that so many times.
Another example of fortuitous cat ownership, I was too busy (or perhaps lazy) to put the usual bird netting over the blueberry bushes this year. In the years before the cat invasion, this was necessary to get any blueberries at all. This year, with the swarming, marauding pack of felines, no birds, no worries. I can harvest the blueberries at my leisure.
dee, have a great time at the not-to-be-mentioned beach. We’re going down to another of the Carolinas’ unnamed ocean paradises on Friday. Save some sun and seafood for us.
your pal, cooper
Rabbi Yehuda Abramowitz
July 8, 2007 at 2:07 pm
26I strenuously criticize the revival of the Catholic prayer for the conversion of Jews. The old text was “insensitive … insulting”. Wait…did I say that already?
Ann
July 8, 2007 at 3:49 pm
27My cat is indeed devious, but I assure you that he couldn’t catch a bird. His reflexes are more USPS-like than lightning-like.
And although that would indeed be “life and death of the planet Earth,” domestic cats are an invasive species on this continent, and they shouldn’t be allowed to maraud at will. (Unless they’re after other invasive species, such as English sparrows and grackles!)
But I’m afraid Joxer couldn’t handle those, either. He didn’t even wake up when a hummingbird got into the house last year, even though I was running up and down the stairs and climbing on furniture to catch it. He did catch a bee once, to his great dismay.
Boomer
July 8, 2007 at 5:26 pm
28Ann, I had a cat 30 years ago that would catch blue jays, take them into the house through the cat door and let them go, so he could play with it all day long. I would come home at night, open the front door, and be attacked by a completely insane and slightly damaged blue jay. I did seal the cat door, in case you’re wondering.
gillian
July 8, 2007 at 5:43 pm
29Did someone say something about monkeying with the Constitution?
Dale
July 8, 2007 at 6:09 pm
30¨pero el mosquito usted lata guardar¨
A lata is a can, like a can of beans. Do you really want WF to can mosquitoes? That would be uncanny…
cooper
July 8, 2007 at 6:59 pm
31Yes, Dale, waterfowler should can all the mosquitoes in Texas and then come up to NC and can those too. (Meanwhile I’ll be docking the exorbitant wages of my practical joking illegal immigrant gardener/translator, who fancies himself as the next Mexican Henny Youngman.)
A sampling of the great master - King of the One Liners - for the chronologically challenged in our midst:
1. I’ve been in love with the same woman for 49 years. If my wife every finds out, she’ll kill me!
2. My wife and I went back to the hotel where we spent our wedding night. Only this time, I stayed in the bathroom and cried.
3. My wife and I went to a hotel where we got a waterbed. My wife called it the Dead Sea.
4. My wife got a mudpack and looked great for two days. Then the mud fell off.
5. “Doctor, I have a ringing in my ears.”
“Don’t answer!”
6. A drunk was in front of a judge.
The judge says “You’ve been brought here for drinking.”
The drunk says “Okay, let’s get started.”
7. A bum came up to me saying “I haven’t eaten in two days!”
I said, “You should force yourself!”
8. Another bum told me “I haven’t tasted food all week.”
I told him “Don’t worry, it still tastes the same!”
9. A car hit a Jewish man.
The paramedic says, “Are you comfortable?”
The man says, “I make a good living.”
10. A guy says, “I’m so old that I forgot how old I am.”
An old woman says, “I’ll tell you how old you are. Take off your clothes and bend over.”
The man does this.
The woman says, “You’re seventy four.”
The man says, “How can you tell?”
The woman says, “You told me yesterday.”
David
July 9, 2007 at 5:09 am
32That one’s just too good, gillian.
cooper, you’d be in violation of a county ordinance in Lake County, Florida, for having more than 4 cats (or 4 dogs). If you get reported, they take the excess from you. Our neighbors would never report us, and 7 (all are spayed and neutered) are indoor only, while the other 6 (all females are spayed - the three toms are a really odd assortment who do not roam) are yard cats who took up residence because we fed 2. One yard cat is blind, believe it or not, so she leaves birds alone. And adjoining wetland provides protection for the birds. No bird feeders in the yard, of course. Cats are hard on bird population, but at least they don’t bulldoze habitat and build/pave over everything. Meanwhile, no more rats in the garage or mice in the house.
cooper
July 9, 2007 at 7:45 am
33David, “Cats… at least they don’t bulldoze habitat and build/pave over everything.” Oh, I am so sure they would do all that - and much more - if only they’d evolved opposable thumbs.
Ann
July 9, 2007 at 9:45 am
34Not to mention using the can opener. And they’d probably open that can of mosquitoes! They’re like that!
Meanwhile, back on topic, how ’bout that Constitution? Read any good amendments lately?
Landis
July 9, 2007 at 10:37 am
35I saw this one proposed:
Amendment XXVIII
Section 1. The amendments to the Constitution of the United States are hereby repealed.
Section 2. Yes, even Amendment II (you’re not a terrorist, are ya?)
Jim (OJNTNJ)
July 9, 2007 at 4:37 pm
36So, Landis,
Would this new amendment allow the imbibing of booze, or not?
Dale
July 9, 2007 at 6:35 pm
37Jim, as I understand it, it would be mandatory.
SeattleDan
July 9, 2007 at 7:09 pm
38Ok by me, then. Of course, the whole history of this administration has put me into a stupor.
David
July 10, 2007 at 4:29 am
39The United Stupor of America?
Jim (OJNTNJ)
July 10, 2007 at 9:07 am
40Thanks David for the excellent descriptor of the last six years. It’s
hightime that those of us who haven’t been drinking the kool-aid get those who have, to sober up and clean up their mess.I want to go back to recreational, rather than mandatory, stupority.
Murray
July 11, 2007 at 8:24 am
41In addition to being a separate branch of government, I wonder if Chaney is also a separate branch of Humans.
David
July 12, 2007 at 1:19 pm
42Murray, Cheney has a dorsal zipper.
Jim, happy to be of help in the matter of the New Dark Ages.