Tomorrow I’ll fly to Michigan. Because that’s the best way to get to Thursday’s “Wait Wait” taping in Ann Arbor. I’m glad that we’ve been invited back, especially considering how I trashed the place last time. Hopefully, they’ve cleaned all that up by now and the warrant’s been lifted.
After that, it’s off to Northern California for an ultra-secret activity. More on that when it becomes less secret (but no less ultra).
I’m sure I’ll check in from my journeys. Meanwhile, content yourself with mourning Jerry Falwell. I like to refrain from speaking ill of the recently dead… but Falwell himself never scrupled on that score. Hurricane Katrina, if you remember, was God’s punishment for us bein’ all gay and stuff. As a secular man, such pronouncements are hard for me, but I would venture that Falwell’s death is God’s punishment for being a big fat fatty. Apparently it was easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a red blood cell to pass through Falwell’s arteries.
I don’t know where Falwell’s going, not for sure, but I’m confident that the NBA league office is going to follow him there. By adhering to the letter of their laws, they spared themselves having to think things through. And though this rewards thuggish behavior and could make coaches around the league start contemplating making room for a Designated Asshole on their roster… well, the league’s hands were tied. It’s a rule.
And that’s at the heart of both of my secular damnations today. Deciding whether to follow the letter of the law, whether God’s or America’s or the NBA’s, is where the rubber meets the road, ethics-wise. Jerry Falwell saw a world where God had declared bein’ all gay or abortiony or feministy or stuff… bad. The case was closed for him, and there was no man, storm or colorful children’s character that could escape his wrath after that. The idea of extenuating circumstances, his own misinterpretation, or the possibility that God might’ve Made a Bad Call… those things weren’t on the table.
Maybe it’s a little grand (or even “nuts”) to link God’s law and morality with the offices of a professional sports league… okay, more than a little… but you fans will know what I’m talking about, and the principle’s the same: Human behavior is too complex and variegated to be governed by ANY absolute set of rules, whether those rules span the globe or a 94 by 50 foot rectangle of hardwood. Rules are the tools of judgment, not vice versa. And when you miss that vital point, fucked up things can happen. A player can be unjustly suspended for taking two steps when his friend is assaulted. A man can blame a flood on a couple of people kissing each other.
Okay, I’ve stretched the connection wayyyy too far just because I’m angry that the Phoenix Suns might be unjustly eliminated. But it’s my blog, dammit. And yeah, as a rule I try not to do that. As a rule, though…





54 comments
Sharon
May 15, 2007 at 5:51 pm
1I am so sick of the futility of trying to explain why being intolerant of intolerance is not the same thing as being intolerant of gays, lesbians, feminists, non-Americans, Pagans, and liberals.
So, while I’m not quite at the point of doing a Happy Dance, the world is a better place tonight. And assuming that Falwell’s followers really believe what they say, Falwell is in a Better Place, where there are only white heterosexuals like himself. I’ll reserve my Happy Dance for the day that W or Cheney bite the dust. Or January 20, 2009, whichever comes first.
gillian
May 15, 2007 at 6:24 pm
2Heather made me swear to bite my tongue re: Jerry Falwell (that mealy mouthed, homophobic, sanctimonious, flaming asshole!!!), so in other news…
Fran
May 15, 2007 at 6:44 pm
3Well gee, now that we’ve been blamed for Katrina, but somehow not for the tornado in Kansas, are we gonna be blamed for creating the stress that caused Jerry’s heart attack?
And can Lillian and I put that on T-shirts?
David
May 15, 2007 at 7:06 pm
4Jerry, my good man, you forgot your bosom buddy Pat. Left Behind is bad - just ask Tim LeHaye (I think that’s how you spell your last name, Tim). What a heavenly trio y’all would make.
Yes, Grandma, I know I’m not being nice, but those people, those people…
YLlama
May 15, 2007 at 7:07 pm
5Oh, come now. Didn’t Falwell represent just enough absurdity to relish in his existence as a foil for the sane-minded among us?
Fran
May 15, 2007 at 8:05 pm
6David, it’s not just Pat. Let’s not overlook the Right Reverend Phelps or the equally far Right Dobson. Those four were/are enough to make anyone of reasonably sound mind want to throw something.
historyenne
May 16, 2007 at 1:58 am
7There’s a delicious irony in the fact that Jerry Falwell died of heart problems. According to the president (I believe) of Liberty University, he had “a history of heart challenges.” Ain’t it the truth.
jerry-the-conservatroll
May 16, 2007 at 6:18 am
8Fran,
I understand you would have disagreements with most everything James Dobson believes, but to lump him in with Fred Phelps is too much. No mainstream Cristian leader agrees with anything Fred-jackass-Phelps does. Whole segments of the “far-right” openly despise this man and take actions against him, the Patriot Guard being the best example. Phelps is one small church, comprised of mostly his family, who gets media attention way beyond his significance.
dee
May 16, 2007 at 6:29 am
9As the beloved Moms Mabley said of one of her late husbands, “They say you should only speak good of the dead. He’s dead. Good.”
And golly gosh I should have checked the WWDTM site to see that y’all we’re going to be in Ann Arbor, since I am also leaving for Michigan tomorrow. Sorry to miss the taping, but I’ve got my seat in Section 118 of Comerica Park for the first game of the series against the dreaded Cardinals on Friday night.
However, I AM free on Thursday night. I could be in Ann Arbor in 20 minutes for an Adam sighting. And I could wander through the Diag and the Law Quad, have a legal drink somewhere on State St…
Well now I’m just wallowing in nostalgia.
tim
May 16, 2007 at 6:34 am
10I made the pilgrimage to the Chase Auditorium last week for the Blount, Jr./Roberts/Provenza show. I was in Chicago on business, so it wasn’t like I had that far to go, but still. If any of you have a chance, you have to go. It’s so much funnier in person. They absolutely gutted the whole Brewers-give-out-rectal-exams bit, but I suppose that was to be expected. Roy’s best quote was, “I can’t believe that the only one of us who doesn’t have a prostate won this game!”
As for Falwell, he’s just another example of what one (in his case, bigoted, spiteful, self-serving, hypocritical, holier-than-thou) (and also in his case) man can do when he puts his mind to it. May his legacy be at least one decent, thoughtful, reasonable man or woman who is compelled to undo what he did and then some. Hopefully at least two.
Dale
May 16, 2007 at 6:38 am
11Off-topic…no, wait, on-topic, but there were a lot of topics: anyway, Adam–stop by 1812 Orchard Street and send my regards! Have they fixed the curtains? (As for the other topic, I can´t resist. Fallswell that ends well.)
Fran
May 16, 2007 at 7:16 am
12Jerry, you may be right, but if you look at it from the outside, and especially from the gay perspective, Fred is just as public, just as vocal and just as dangerous as any of the others. And yeah, some Christians have backed away from Fred, but not enough to shout him down. Approval by silence speaks volumes.
Steve
May 16, 2007 at 7:24 am
13jerry-the-conservatroll sez:
Perhaps. But the differences are in degree, not in substance.
Placing their belief sets side by side, it’s difficult to find much difference between them.
Maybe Dr Dobson and his organization don’t picket funerals of soldiers or murdered gay people with God Hates Fags placards but all you have to do is to read Focus on the Family’s Citizen Link pages, like here f’rinstance, and you quickly find that there is little distinction between Rev. Phelps’s and Dr Dobson’s philosophies at their core. They both would be the among first to pick up stones in fulfillment of the directive in Leviticus 20:13 should Christian Sharia ever become the law of the land.
If anything, Reverend Phelps is useful to the Religious Right in that they can point to him and his spiritual brothers and sisters, say “see, we’re not as crazy as they are“, and pretend to be mainstream.
jerry-the-conservatroll
May 16, 2007 at 10:13 am
14Steve,
I think you miss a major difference. Phelps’s “God Hates Fags” is inherently different than Dobson’s approach of “God loves you and it grieves him that you commit sin.”
Phelps’s theology of hate is about people. It takes the stance that because you act a certain way you are a thing to be despised, a person without value. Dobson’s interpretation is everyone is a unique creation of God with intrinsic worth. If you commit sin, as everyone has and does to a person except Christ, your thoughts and actions are wrong but that does not negate your uniqueness and worth as a human being.
Evangelicals, the vast majority of Prostestants and Catholics (both East and West) differ on several subjects and whole fields of study are focused on explaining those differences. Some theologians devote their entire careers trying to either convince one segment of the correctness of their interpretations over others while others look for ways to bridge those gaps. But one thing they all agree on is God loves all of us and Christ was sent to atone for our sins, large and small. Though they struggle on how to implement that believe, some more successfully than others and all agree that Phelps’s interpretation is heretical.
You can believe there is no God. You can invoke the name of the Great Lobster. You can disagree over whether or not homosexuality is a sin. You can’t lump Falwell and Dobson into the same group as Phelps. In fact, it would be safe to say that Phelps and his small band are not, in fact Christians.
Steve
May 16, 2007 at 10:31 am
15jerry-the-conservatroll:
Has Dr Dobson repudiated Leviticus 20:13? I missed the memo.
As long as Dr Dobson, Reverend Robertson, et al, profess that The Bible is the inerrant and literal Word of God, to be followed in all things, it is difficult to separate them from the putative “extremists”, such as the Reverend Phelps and his brood.
siobhan
May 16, 2007 at 10:59 am
16Steve, I think it’s important to be fair about lumping everyone on one side of an issue with the extremists on that side. Doing so causes the lumpees to discount any other point you might make, however valid.
As an example, I consider myself to be pretty strongly in the environmentalist camp. It is my number one issue when choosing a candidate, and it affects my views on pretty much every other issue. I work hard for the cause, contribute money, walk the walk, etc. On the far extreme of the environmentalist spectrum are those like ELF who will torch Hummer dealerships and property developments that they don’t like. Though I may appreciate the sentiment, it’s absolutely wrong to do what they do and it pisses me off when their extreme tactics used to tar all environmentalists.
I distinguish Christianists from Christians. Even by that standard, I think it’s wrong to include Phelps with run-of-the-mill Christianists. Just because he wants to be considered one of them doesn’t mean that he should be.
dee
May 16, 2007 at 12:18 pm
17In the words of Moms Mabley, speaking about one of her late husbands, “They say you should just say good things about the dead. He’s dead. Good.”
And coincidentally, I, too, am leaving for Michigan tomorrow. I wish I had checked out the WWDTM site and gotten tickets for the taping. I guess I could wander up to Ann Arbor on Thursday evening…stroll across the Diag and through the Law Quad…have a legal drink somewhere on State Street… linger outside that little flat on South University where I…
But I digress…
Instead I shall have to content myself with my first vist to Comerica Park on Friday night, when the dreaded Cardinals will be in town for a rematch of last year’s World Series against the brave and plucky Tigers (currently in first place in the AL Central Division). I shall have a beer (or two) for all of you.
dee
May 16, 2007 at 12:19 pm
18Somebody feed that damned rat already so she doesn’t keep eating my posts.
Ann
May 16, 2007 at 3:06 pm
19On the topic of extremists, I’d like to pedantically point out that on any issue for which there is a spectrum of opinion, by definition there will be “extreme” opinions. If not for Phelps, Falwell would be the extreme. If not for ELF, Greenpeace would be the extreme. (There may certainly be gradations between these pairs, of course. I’m just presenting broad examples.)
A hundred years ago, votes for women was an extreme position. Now it’s not even controversial (at least in the US). “Extreme” is strictly a relative term, not a condemnation.
So with that in mind, I welcome extremists. Extremists give us room to explore issues comfortably. The farther out they are, the farther I can push my positions without being “extreme.”
This works in the nonpolitical realm, too. As long as Britney Spears is around, for example, Lindsey Lohan is not the worst-behaved drunken slut in Hollywood! As long as Ken is my co-worker, I’m not the laziest!
How can you make this concept work for you?
Just Jay
May 16, 2007 at 4:30 pm
20I’m in Falwell country (Norfolk, VA) this week, and so his passing is large font front page above the fold in all of the newspapers. Personally I will not miss his bigotry nor his attempts to force his way of believing down the rest of our throats through political power. NPR’s profile of him had a clip from one of Uncle Ronnie’s inaugurations praising Ronnie as the greatest president since Lincoln. Guess that whole FDR out of the Depression and winning WWII bit never happened.
Jay
Sharon
May 16, 2007 at 4:58 pm
21“But one thing they all agree on is God loves all of us”
Jerry, as much as I’d like to believe that, Falwell’s own words sent a different message:
http://www.boingboing.net/2007/05/15/falwells_stupidest_q.html
dee
May 16, 2007 at 5:31 pm
22I’m not sure what Fanny didn’t like — my Moms Mabley citation or my news that I, too, am heading to Michigan tomorrow. They were very clever posts, too, though I think the second was better than the first, in that I took the time to revise.
dee
May 16, 2007 at 5:31 pm
23Or perhaps the rat is just jealous that I’m going to a Tigers game on Friday night.
dee
May 16, 2007 at 5:32 pm
24That wasn’t it, either. Screw it then.
SeattleDan
May 16, 2007 at 5:39 pm
25Go Tigers!
Sadly, I’m not traveling anywhere this week, but to all of you on the road, a safe journey and have fun.
cooper
May 16, 2007 at 6:08 pm
26dee, have a great time back home.
An interesting little bit of trivia involving James Dobson. As any baby boomer can tell you, the guy with the sweetest and most pure jumpshot, dribbling and ball-handling magic on the court during the late sixties and throughout the seventies was Pistol Pete Maravich. He played college ball at LSU (He still has the NCAA scoring record, averaging over 44 points/game, before the three point shot) and in the NBA for about 10 years, retired, and got stupid (alcohol, born-again fundamentalist, etc.). He died at age 40, playing a pick-up game in a church gymnasium. James Dobson was on the court, in that game, when Pete had heart failure and died. True story. Why would I bring this up? No particular reason, but if people around Dobson start dropping like flies in the future, I’d say we should put him under the lights and sweat a few answers out of him. And be sure to ask about that pick-up game with Pete.
Steve
May 16, 2007 at 6:14 pm
27siobhan:
The lumpees are going to discount any point I make, no matter how I couch it. Since they believe, without any evidence of note, that the Bible is the inerrant word of God, there is no argument to be made.
When you’re dealing with a sect whose fundamental mode of argument is “God said it, I believe it, that settles it” then what more is there to be said?
True, but bear in mind that there is not fundamental text upon which the environmental movement philosophically rests which deigns the tactics of the ELF to be the inerrant word of. . . who? John Muir?
You don’t have to believe in burning down condo developments and blowing up Hummer dealers to be an environmentalist.
To be a fundamentalist Christian, you must accept every word of the Bible to be literal and true.
Environmentalists can argue about tactics and eschew the violence inherent in the ELF philosophy and still be environmentalists.
Bible-believing fundamentalists can perhaps similarly argue whether it is useful or productive to picket the funeral of Matthew Shepard but they cannot refute the proscription and penalty in Leviticus 20:13 without destroying the underpinnings of their faith.
There are, of course, other flavors of Christianity which pick and choose those passages of the Holy Bible to which they wish to adhere and those which they wish to repudiate. A religion based wholly upon the Sermon on the Mount, for instance, is one to which I could perhaps readily subscribe.
siobhan
May 16, 2007 at 6:28 pm
28steve… no energy to respond… but I’ll agree with your last point wholeheartedly.
I just popped over to say that Murray’s friend Tony Barr has a good diary up at DKos. Any members oughta pop over and recommend…
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/5/16/212155/495
Sharon
May 16, 2007 at 6:34 pm
29A religion based wholly upon the Sermon on the Mount, for instance, is one to which I could perhaps readily subscribe.
Amen!
In my experience, Buddhism perhaps comes closest.
David
May 16, 2007 at 6:56 pm
30Anyone who preaches that homosexuality is a sin, and therefore a human state condemned in the eyes of their god, is aiding and abetting a crime against humanity. To lump homosexuality with those human acts that actually are sins, like invading Iraq, pretty much lumps all Bible literalists into an anti-human group. Some preachers are virulent, some are “kindly,” but like with slavery and with apartheid, those preachers, however well intentioned, are advocating for an essential crime against humanity. May I remind everyone that the Southern Baptist Convention came into existence so that Baptist preachers in the South could continue to support slavery, and it was the Southern Protestant churches that continued to support segregation. As a childhood friend’s mother, a dear lady in every other respect and a very good Baptist, said to me while I was still in high school in the late 50s, “Where I come from it rhymes with chigger.” Sorry, but on the issue of homosexuality, they are all of a piece, and they are both abominations to the spirit of the Jesus presented in the New Testament and enablers of an evil perspective.
siobhan
May 16, 2007 at 7:41 pm
31To clarify, I didn’t mean that I thought Falwell, Robertson, Dobson and the rest of that lot were/are swell guys. They are wrong on a lot of issues. I simply meant that Fred Phelps is in a class by himself. He’s not just wrong and hateful, he’s also fucking delusional and insane.
siobhan
May 16, 2007 at 7:42 pm
32Wow, the rat didn’t bite that one.
Maximum Bob
May 16, 2007 at 7:49 pm
33Let us mark the passing of shonda-for-the-fundies Jerry Falwell with the words of Hank Williams, Jr., taken from the song “American Dream:”
“Now there are some preachers on TV
with a suit and a tie and a vest.
They want you to send your money to the Lord
but they give you their address.”
Steve
May 16, 2007 at 8:35 pm
34siobhan:
One can, of course, argue that belief in an invisible guy in the sky with absolutely no objective evidence to support that belief is delusional and insane, as well.
But that’s just me.
Boomer
May 17, 2007 at 3:45 am
35Okay, since no one has speculated about what that means, it’s time to start internet rumors. Is Adam off to:
Save the Whales? http://www.sacbee.com/static/newsroom/maps/whales/
Singlehandedly solve the crime spree in the Pacific Northwest? http://www.newnation.org/NNN-news-norcal.html
Check out the beavers? (Relax, boys.) http://www.sacbee.com/204/story/183218.html
Boomer
May 17, 2007 at 3:55 am
36What’s with the rat these days? Do we need the up the voltage? Feed the ugly bugger? Here, Fanny. Momma’s got some nice warfarin tablets for you. Come here, sweetheart! Take your medicine. That’s a good girl!
siobhan
May 17, 2007 at 10:43 am
37Steve, part of a longer message I posted elsewhere recently:
I’m an atheist; born and raised Roman Catholic, lost my faith in that particular religion, then realized that I don’t believe in God. From my early religious indoctrination, I did take away a few good things in terms of moral compass - do unto others, whatsoever you do to the least of my brothers, blessed are the peacemakers, etc.
I’m not a militant atheist; I don’t think people foolish for believing in something that I can no longer believe in myself.
Steve
May 17, 2007 at 11:36 am
38siobhan: It appears that our atheological paths are quite similar. I’m not especially evangelical myself with respect to my atheism: I would generally not go out of my way to either “convert” someone to my belief or lack thereof, generally avoid religious discussion altogether, and am vaguely uncomfortable with those whose atheistic zeal is such that they feel they must confront religion at every turn.
Richard Dawkins makes my toes itch and Sam Harris outright scares me, especially in that, in my opinion, he makes a call for some sort of antijihad against Islam (or something very near to it — read his book The End of Faith and tell me that his jeremiad is anything less).
Nonetheless, how else can you characterize the insistent belief in an epistemology that by all objective measures is at the very least has a tenuous relationship to reality? Isn’t that the very definition of delusional?
As for “insane“, I admit that often insanity is in the eye of the beholder.
Linkmeister
May 17, 2007 at 11:53 am
39“insanity is in the eye of the beholder.”
Or the mote in one’s own eye.
Sorry, couldn’t resist.
Vinnie
May 17, 2007 at 3:12 pm
40Yo, dee, welcome back to da neighbahood! I hear ya have red hair dese days. Terrific! I don’t care what they say, redheads are a helluva lot more fun than blondes any day. So maybe I’ll see ya at da game tomorrow night. If I see ya, da beers are on me, sweetheart. Go Tigers!
David
May 17, 2007 at 6:02 pm
41“We all owe God a death.” ‘Bout the only useful notion of God I am aware of. I’m with siobhan, except I don’t classify myself as an atheist, or any other -ist except a humanist, nor do I hold any absolutist views of any kind about death onward or about why this all started, as it apparently did at the moment of the Big Bang.
I just don’t see where it makes any difference whether a misguided view that informs one’s life is articulated virulently or gently. Condemning homosexuality is no different for me than condemning integration, and doing it for faith based reasons is particularly reprehensible, as are any number of other things adhered to in the name of “holiness.” Perhaps one important consideration is that there are some with whom one can interact peacefully in spite of their homophobia, but they are still hurting a portion of humanity by their beliefs, just as the majority of Americans hurt both Iraq and the United States by their misguided belief that a war of aggression was something to support, and as they do now behind the mantra “Support our troops,” which is proving to be a death grip on our national psyche, since it does not include extricating them immediately from what is an abominable mission, regardless of the good hearts, the good intentions, or the good efforts of countless American soldiers, and I do consider our soldiers among the most decent in recorded history, and certainly the noblest on balance in WWII, which war sadly included the fire bombing of Dresden, and Fat Boy and Little Joe (or whatever those godawful weapons were named).
Go, Mets!
cooper
May 17, 2007 at 6:51 pm
42Apparently this has been out for a while, but if you missed it, here is a short interview with the lovely, charming, and talented Edith Layton from Susie’s blog.
http://felberfrolics.blogspot.com/2007/04/breaking-my-mother-not-morni ng-person.html
And if you drill down into the “behind the scenes photos”, you get a wonderful picture of Grandma with Hugo, humanity’s hope for the future.
S. Clemens
May 17, 2007 at 7:00 pm
43I’m as much of a free-thinker as the next guy (well, to be honest, much more so than the next guy), but all this atheist/agnostic/secular humanist claptrap has given me the fantods.
Ann
May 17, 2007 at 10:14 pm
44Funny, I feel that way about religious claptrap! Now run along and fetch me a julep.
R. Clemens
May 17, 2007 at 11:34 pm
45I’m as much of a free-thinker as the next guy, but pay me $28 mil and I´ll think whatever you want every five days.
S. Fetchit
May 18, 2007 at 6:56 am
46Yes, Miss Ann, one julep coming right up. Would that be in a silver chalice or a pewter chalice, ma’am?
It's Pat!
May 18, 2007 at 7:08 am
47By the way, I am not the Pat referred to in the postings way up towards the top. I am the Pat who is left handed. red haired, and kinda short. That description was bestowed upon me by my brother a long time ago, and it pretty much sums me up. Just wanted to clarify that.
I do not wish ill on the dead, they are gone and will not cause any more pain by their utterings. And it’s my feeling that the best way to combat prejudice (like positions taken by fundamentalists) is by refuting it when you hear it. Things do change step by step, one on one. That causes changes slowly (my guess generationally - like every 30 years). But things are changing, we just have to keep at it.
I sure wish I had the wit most of you folks have. But it’s too nice up here in Minne-so-green-ta to be thinking. I’m just going to go back to weeding the garden now.
David
May 18, 2007 at 1:40 pm
48Ooh, the fantods. Time for a recitation of “Ode to Stephen Dowling Bots.”
Yeah, you’re right, It’s Pat, except the cycle seems more like 100 years to me, although the thirty year baby steps principle does seem to apply.
Ann, make that mint juleps for three on a park bench, with extras for anyone under the bench.
Hot Tub Tommy
May 18, 2007 at 3:57 pm
49Okay, sportsfans, check out the suit and tie I wore for my interview with this famous late night conservative talk show host. It was hand tailored of the finest Italian silk and custom fitted with the latest computer driven body scan technology sent via satellite from Andre’s Salon in Houston to the world famous Enzo’s Proprietario di una Merceria di Amore’ in Milan. It feels like I have three dozen twenty-something women with their hands all over my naked body. The suit took six months to complete and cost $27,415 - worth every penny. Take that all you do-good-and-help-the-downtrodden -have-the-life-they-were-meant-to-have-if they-weren’t-so pathetically-lazy-and-stupid, bleeding heart sociology graduates working for $8.50 an hour.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/05/18/colbert-nails-a-clueless-tom- delay/
So, where’s Lemuel been keeping himself anyway? Do call me if you see him - there’ll be a few bucks in it for your touble. I also have a couple of private dicks joining the hunt. This shouldn’t take long at all to roll the little bastard up.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
May 18, 2007 at 4:14 pm
50“It feels like I have three dozen twenty-something women with their hands all over my naked body”
- Hot Tub Tommy
Tommy…Ewww…just….Eww. Forget the gerrymandering and campaign finance shenanigans. You need to be indicted just for invoking that visual.
Tom Cushing
May 18, 2007 at 5:30 pm
51Saw you on WWDTM in Ann Arbor last night. Great show (except for that 1st 3rd, when we couldn’t here ya’ll at all).
So, as I understand it, Buick can’t market a car call La Crosse, because, in French, it’s some sort of sexual euphemism. And yet, here in the good ol’ U S of A, they still sell Hummer’s by the thousands.
How can this be?
Rashid
May 18, 2007 at 6:17 pm
52Whoa! Stop it Mr. Toles, you’re killing me here. Well, not really killing me - like in Iraq, but… you know what I mean.
Murray
May 22, 2007 at 8:33 am
53I too was in AA, but a week earlier.
Just passing through, on my way to put my mother in assisted living. She has fallen down 3X in the past 18 months and each time needed hospitalization and could have been fatal. After she recovered from a broken pelvis falling down in her bedroom we set up a beautiful place for her in Grand Rapids. Unfortunately her dementia and stubbornness kicked in and she refused to go. Now we have to figure out what to do with an 85 year old woman who can’t take care of herself and won’t let others do it for her.
One option my son who is a nursing home administrator suggested was that he become guardian and that he place her in care against her will. That would require my 3 brothers to sign off on it, and I’m not sure that that will happen.
Oh yeah, Ann Arbor still is beautiful. We stopped in to see the married student housing on campus that had been our home back in the mid seventies. That part of the trip was fun.
Murray
May 22, 2007 at 9:35 am
54Siobhan,
Thanks to the link to Tony’s diary. We had a campaign meeting on Saturday and started to map out our strategy for the next election. We should be in a good position to get the money needed to attract the attention of the DCCC and get on the map. Our do-nothing-dad’s-boy congressman looks to be even more vulnerable this time around.
I have made the same voyage you have regarding faith to freedom. Not easy in a minister’s family.