I’m heading to Chicago tomorrow for what promises to be an odd “Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me.” Finding funny things in the news in a week like this is… challenging.
Which brings me to the whole Virginia Tech thing. I’ve been trying to figure out a way to say this without seeming too nihilistic. But nothing’s occurred to me, ironically enough. So -
To me, those killings at VT don’t mean anything, aren’t a sign of anything, and there’s really nobody to blame who’s still alive. We’re used to our national tragedies having additional culprits - evil masterminds, fearsome ideologies, or at least bungling leaders. Even Columbine had the people who provided those minors with weapons.
Here, you’ve just got one batshit crazy young man. He was creeping out his fellow students and teachers, yes, but not to the point where you’d be able to lock him up. The police and the campus officials had no reason to believe - after the first murders - that a rampage was in the cards.
And then there’s the gun thing. Some people are saying that stricter gun laws could have prevented this, while others think that it was the campus’ no gun rule that kept a well-armed citizenry from defending itself. I don’t know that I buy either argument (even though I really do favor gun control), given the long-term planning of the deed on the one hand, and on the other the absurdity of thinking that anyone would choose to arm themselves for a trip to their campus science building at 9AM.
And yet those arguments are out there. Along with allegations that this is a symptom of the moral or religious breakdown of our society (somewhat contradicted by the killer’s rambling moralizing), that there was a terrorist connection or even an Islamic terrorist connection, and - of course - that liberals and/or conservatives are really to blame for this.
Nope.
To me this situation demands one thing and one thing only - grief. A tragedy has happened, there was probably no predicting or foreseeing it, but our poor brains, genetically and culturally programmed to be ceaseless cause-and-effect analyzing machines… just can’t handle it. Maybe when we learn more about it, we’ll see the root causes, maybe a key piece of information will be revealed… but my money’s on Not.
There probably are reasons why. Those reasons probably DO have to do with our culture, our laws, the killer’s life and the people around him, and lots of other factors including - who knows - diet, seasonal allergies, weather, and “American Idol.” And my guess is that we’ll never really be able to figure out what exactly we need to change in order to prevent this from happening again. [My guess is that it’s something weird and unknowable, like making General Mills return all those long-abandoned minor characters to the Cap’n Crunch boxes, which would set in motion some arcane and unlikely set of events that created total peace on Earth…] If we try we can figure out how to move economies, fix climates, cure diseases and end wars, but parsing how to stop things from happening inside the heads of random people… that’s a little tougher.
Yep, it’s going to an interesting “Wait Wait.” I’m off to read about whatever goofy stuff happened in the margins…





17 comments
Susie
April 18, 2007 at 12:36 pm
1Your sister? Wait, that’s me!! Love the cracking non-carbon dating investigation you did. Thanks Adam!
Ann
April 18, 2007 at 2:29 pm
2Thanks for making this point so clearly, Adam. We seem to believe that we can create a DisneyEarth, where everything bad is preventable. That there should be no accidents, no tragedies, no bad guys, no pain, no disease…
That’s just not possible.
Turd Blossom
April 18, 2007 at 3:43 pm
3But, but, evidently the way to avoid this particular tragedy was rather simple. I just heard on the news that the shooter lied on the application he filled out in order to purchase the guns he used. Having a system in place in which the facts of an application were checked before a gun is sold seems like a doable thing in the internet age.
Ann
April 18, 2007 at 4:04 pm
4But don’t you think that he would have found a way to obtain a gun, regardless of the regulations? You can always find a way to prevent the last tragedy, but you can’t prevent every tragedy. Until there is a way to prevent mental illness…
And then there will just be some other source of tragedy.
Fran
April 18, 2007 at 6:11 pm
5We’re noticing here in Seattle, where the oddball types are pretty plentiful, that the shooting has sent some folks even a bit farther off keel. I suspect there will be repercussions from this in greater and smaller ways for a long, long time.
waterfowler
April 18, 2007 at 7:24 pm
6I don’t think I’ve ever agreed w/ you more.
But, just to let y’all know what the wingnuts are thinking…
I don’t think I’ve donated to the NRA since ‘94 because they endorsed this man: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Brooks_(politician). I’m glad I helped vote him out. But because it is very obvious what’s coming from the likes of Reid & Pelosi, I not only re-joined the NRA, I sent in my first payment towards a lifetime membership.
It’s also a great day when we no longer allow an infant to be pulled halfway from the womb and have its skull crushed or brains sucked out.
It's Pat!
April 18, 2007 at 7:24 pm
7Yeah Fran, similar weirdness is happening in my neck of the woods too. We had a bomb scare today at the University of Minnesota, shut down several buildings. I do not understand the need for attention, or whatever it drives people, to do insane things. I don’t think we can figure that out.
Meanwhile, people are dying in Baghdad in numbers too large too comprehend, for reasons I can not fathom (and I’m trying, believe me!), with no answers/ways of changing things.
Good luck Adam, if you can find a way to make us chuckle, you’ll have earned your pay (they do pay you, don’t they??).
SeattleDan
April 18, 2007 at 7:58 pm
8But on the Right, they are drawing lessons. Very werid lessons. http://the-reaction.blogspot.com/2007/04/michelle-malkin-is-dangerous- idiot.html
This isn’t the only one coming from them.
hedera
April 18, 2007 at 8:43 pm
9From the Tao Teh Ching:
Stephen
April 19, 2007 at 5:54 am
10You know I’m not opposed to guns in general, I know several people who like to hunt, including WF, but do we really need to sell assault weapons? WF, do you own anything besides hunting rifles? Why do we need to sell weapons like that?
Murray
April 19, 2007 at 8:29 am
11Seeing the video made by Cho Seung-Hui lets you know that this guy was truly insane.
One editorial this morning said that the combination of misogyny and homophobia in men who feel inadequate is often released in violence. It’s their way of proving that they are men.
Crazy people do crazy things, and until they do, it is impossible to do much about it. There was a kid in the school I work in most who scared several teachers, occasionally talked about a gun and you could see that he had the potential to do damage. What do you do? He never did anything. There were warning signs but no action.
If guns were as unavailable as they are in England or Japan the violence would have to be expressed in other ways. But getting to that point would be next to impossible. On the other hand how many hunters need a tripod mount, grenade launcher, magazine with 15 rounds and a silencer to kill deer? (The assault rifle ban prohibits any gun with MORE than one of these).
Doc Nagel
April 19, 2007 at 8:44 am
12Adam reminds us that random shootings are just that. Retrospectively, we can interpret in whatever way we like, and it’s as unsurprising that those interpretations mainly boil down to self re-affirmations of preconceptions as it is surprising that a shooting takes place.
It may seem a little ghoulish, but one way I like to discuss events like this with philosophy students is to ask them whether the reason they haven’t committed a massacre today is that there’s a law against it, or that they don’t happen to have a gun with them today. It makes vivid just how out of the range of ordinary life the shooting is.
To get really dangerously close to overintellectualizing, this shooting truly is in a very important way meaningless - it’s an event that, not being there and involved, I can’t fit into my lived experience. There’s a boundary between my lived experience and the lived experience of someone who has gone “batshit,” and although we can try to translate the experience of being batshit, something is necessarily (and thankfully) lost in translation.
So instead, we get a media spectacle - not for shock value, but as shock treatment. Does it serve to hide our embarassment that human beings occasionally go batshit? Or that we can’t understand them?
waterfowler
April 19, 2007 at 10:55 am
13Stephen, I only have shotguns and as far as I know, they’ve never thought about shooting anybody. I’ve thought about maybe getting a concealed carry license, but my thoughts on handguns are pretty close to Lynard Skynard’s “Sat. Nite Special”.
Mel in Vermont
April 20, 2007 at 5:17 am
14In my pastoral corner of Vermont, a guy shot and killed his beloved wife of decades while she slept. He was suffering a blackout caused by a brain tumor. Predictably, the right wingers are howling about “personal responsibility.”
My heart goes out to Cho’s parents. When you don’t know who else to blame, it always seems to fall on the mother, eventually.
Murray
April 20, 2007 at 8:25 am
15In a tragedy like this, people want someone to take the blame. In other words they want something that can be prevented in the future. Random, crazy people doing something catastrophic doesn’t fit the picture. So then we have to blame the school, mental health professionals, police, parents, fellow students, ANYTHING so that we can prevent it from happening again.
David
April 21, 2007 at 3:40 pm
16waterfowler,
I’ll say this one last time and then I’ll let it go. When I was a youngster in the 50s, it was necessary to crush the head of the fetus of my Aunt Fay’s last pregnancy because the alternative was for my aunt to die in childbirth and leave five children without a mother. I do not know what was wrong with the fetus, except that it had an enormous head. No one is still alive who can tell me exactly what the reason was, but this Supreme Court ruling that does not make an exception for the health (or in this case life) of the mother is insufferably tyrranical. If you would choose to have your wife die in childbirth, fine. Just don’t celebrate the imposition of that requirement on people who do not share your religious ideology. It is genuinely un-American.
David
April 22, 2007 at 3:28 pm
17Tyrannical, dammit. What is it with laptop keyboards and spelling?