From The New York Times:
WASHINGTON, March 9 — The F.B.I. has improperly used provisions of the USA Patriot Act to obtain thousands of telephone, business and financial records without prior judicial approval, the Justice Department’s inspector general said today in a report that embarrassed the F.B.I. and ignited outrage on Capitol Hill.
I don’t think I’m alone in being shocked and horrified by this development. But the thing to remember here is that there are no bad guys here. Nobody saw this coming. When the Patriot Act was passed in 2001 and renewed in 2006, nobody foresaw that there would be any need to safeguard people’s privacy or civil liberties. Hindsight’s 20/20, as they say, and just because this took us all by surprise doesn’t mean we should go around pointing fingers.
After all, does anyone really want to go back to the Time of the Judges?
Remember “judges?” Not a lot of people do. But back in America’s early days, back before the era of mandatory sentences and signing statements and warrantless wiretaps, a creature known as the “judge” roamed the Earth. They would stride heavily from place to place, exercising “judgment” on everything: How a guilty person should be punished, how fair a law (or “Act”) really was, and how and when the government could look into your personal beeswax. Some say that at one time these “judges” actually comprised one third of our government’s power, but that’s never been verified.
Anyway, over time, sometime after the Clintonnic Era, the judges became too large and cumbersome to survive in their new environment. They became known as “activist” and were soon hunted to extinction. Some of their lesser descendants can still be found in government buildings to this very day, stamping bits of paper and begging for appointments.
Sure, some might say that this FBI outrage might not have happened if empowered “judges” still walked the Earth, but that’s just speculation. It’s not something we could have seen coming, and the judges’ time was over.
So again, let’s pull together on this one and look for solutions. I favor something called “Patriot III” which would make all non-governmental communication public property and thus make the “legality” of “wiretaps” moot. Let’s roll! To the Legichopper!





36 comments
cooper
March 9, 2007 at 4:01 pm
1“How could this happen?” Mr. Mueller asked rhetorically. “Who is to be held accountable? And the answer to that is, I am to be held accountable.”
Jeez, ya’ think FBI Director Mueller will be doing any time for violating federal law? If he does, I hope he realizes that Scooter already has dibs on the top bunk (Okay, I stole that one). And isn’t AG Gonzo (Oh and that one, too. I’m shameless, I tell you.) acting like he’s astounded that anyone would be tempted to abuse the Patriot Act?
gillian
March 9, 2007 at 5:15 pm
2A graphic example of Tom Toles brilliance. I just can’t get enough of this guy.
K. Trout
March 9, 2007 at 5:25 pm
3Watching the Democrats flail around in Congress reminds me of a book I wrote several decades ago titled “Chicken Soup”. It’s a novel about an Earthling named Delmore Skag, a bachelor in the neighborhood where everybody else had enormous families. Skag was a scientist, and he found a way to reproduce himself in chicken soup. He would shave living cells from the palm of his right hand, mix them with the soup, and expose the soup to cosmic rays. The cells turned into babies which looked exactly like Delmore Skag.
Pretty soon, Delmore was having several babies a day, and inviting his neighbors to share his pride and happiness. He had mass baptisms of as many as a hundred babies at a time. He became famous as a family man.
And so on.
Skag hoped to force his country into making laws against excessively large families, but the legislatures and the courts declined to meet the problem head-on. They passed stern laws instead against the possession by unmarried persons of chicken soup. And so on.
cooper
March 9, 2007 at 6:35 pm
4But this is okay, because they have oil…
gillian
March 9, 2007 at 7:08 pm
5I know how it looks - like I spend all my time reading the comics, but sometimes I do actually read chapter books. Really, I do.
siobhan
March 9, 2007 at 7:47 pm
6cooper, your link is too depressing (oh, wait - I meant infuriating) for words, so I think I’ll just move on and respond to gillian instead since we seem to share the same set of bookmarks. g, if you haven’t already visited the Comics Curmudgeon, you should do so soon.
Adam, I thought of you whilst reading the Chronicle Wine Section today - they had a recipe for the Marked Car, a Sidecar made with Maker’s Mark. I know, why crap up good alcohol with inferior mixers, but…
David
March 9, 2007 at 8:30 pm
7You gotta love Bush’s kingdom buds in action, cooper. Don’t they still on occasion stone women for driving? A friend who was in Saudi Arabia not all that long ago reported just such a stoning.
gillian, love those two links. Tom Tomorrow is one of my all-time favorites. GYWO became another as soon as I discovered it. Great comics take a back seat to nothing, I think because of that explosion of appreciation they trigger.
SeattleDan
March 9, 2007 at 10:57 pm
8And, lo, came the time of the activist Earl and he said unto the people, Separate but Equal was not the rule, that Seperate was not equal. And, again, it came to pass that Miranda was not read his rights, and was made to confess crimes that he may not have committed, and, lo, activist Earl, said no, forced confessions are not right. Later another unbenighted white woman wished to wed a man of brownish hue which was not allowed by ’state’ law, and Activist Earl replied that true love could not be constricted by ’state’ law and allowed said marriage to take place, much to the abhorrence of the state’s populace.
Thus, Should we have so many “activist” judges.
gillian
March 10, 2007 at 6:39 am
9Thanks, siobhan (that’s pronounced “Chevon”, right?) Oh, I just realized, you’re the one that Vinnie is carrying a grudge/torch for. You poor/lucky girl. Anyway, thanks for the link to the Comics Curmudgeon. Actually, that’s one of the ways I keep up with June Morgan’s hot new do’s and styles. I tell you I wish they looked like that when I was growing up! I would have come out much, much sooner.
David
March 10, 2007 at 7:12 am
10Yea and verily, Seattle Dan. Wondrous what villification of judiciary champions the enemies of progressive politics have wrought, and more wondrous the embrace of this villification by the civil body politic.
So much received, so little wisdom.
another Matt
March 10, 2007 at 7:37 am
11I’m sure many of you heard the WWDTM item about the Saudi pilot. She flies private jets around the world, but has to be driven to the airport by a man.
That second X chromosome can really screw you up in the Kingdom BushBuddies.
Boomer
March 10, 2007 at 9:31 am
12Alas, no “bestiality” jokes.
David
March 10, 2007 at 11:02 am
13Squirrel nuts on Wait, Wait, followed by CCR’s cover of “Cotton Fields back Home” on the 60s show on WMNF, Iran has talked one-on-one with the US regarding Iraq, my Gators have their mojo back, and now Van Morrison’s “I Want to Rock Your Gypsy Soul” on ‘MNF. Now if only some back door channel will deliver to Chavez our apologies for our short-lived military overthrow of their democratically elected president. Granted, we’ve left a smoldering cauldron of death-and-destruction in the wake of “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” but at least it looks like Iran has been able to prevent us from expanding the carnage and eradicating any hope of ever regaining the moral high ground on the world stage.
The 60s show is wrapping it up with Jackson Browne’s “Running on Empty.” Sumbitch.
Raymond
March 10, 2007 at 4:55 pm
14There you go again, you left-wing (squirrel) nut-jobs. Haven’t you heard the phrase “the exception proves the rule”? We can’t have privacy unless we go around violating privacy! Stands to reason. You should be glad that the government was checking on you, making sure you weren’t a terrorist, just to put your own mind at ease. I mean, do you want a terrorist living in your house, brushing his terror-filled teeth with your toothbrush?
David
March 10, 2007 at 5:46 pm
15Our most high, exalted president said he was satisfied with the FBI’s response. I also remember him saying he was satisfied with Dick Cheney’s explanation for how he managed to shoot Mr. Whittington in the face with his shotgun. It’s good to have a president with a satisfied mind.
Sharon
March 11, 2007 at 6:58 am
16Seattle Dan, I’ve been enjoying your book reviews at the blog Jesus’ General. I have not read V For Vendetta, but I liked to movie. Hugo Weaving is remarkable.
David
March 11, 2007 at 7:33 am
17Fitzgerald is the bad guy, Libby is the innocent victim. What on earth was I thinking? I’ll go slink back into my misguided liberal closet, now that Bob Schiefer has given me a good dose of right thinking. Thank you, Fount of Received Wisdom.
Just Jay
March 11, 2007 at 8:31 am
18Slightly off topic, but I thought this group would appreciate this. Netscape’s new homepage has a series of tabs across the top. These tabs are for pages with a group of stories about a single topic. Yesterday morning, the first three tabs had the following text:
Abducted Chavez Attacks Bin Laden
Now we know the real reason Bush went to South America. It’s his new stategery in the GWOT!
Jay
David
March 11, 2007 at 8:55 am
19I love it, Just Jay. Gotta go with the admittedly imperfect, earthy, indigenous South American to take out the effete jihadist mental case. Maybe we can get WWF to develop a steel-cage death match.
Rabid Gator
March 11, 2007 at 11:13 am
20Mojo back at my man Waterfowler. Go ‘Horns - put it on Kansas.
SeattleDan
March 11, 2007 at 11:27 am
21Thanks, Sharon! We finally got around to seeing V last night, and liked it. Hugo Weaving impresses me more and more every time I see him.
Cotton Mather
March 11, 2007 at 4:35 pm
22Twas a good and proper verdict for “Scooter” (how doth one get burdened with such a vane and foolish name?). I trusteth the court vouchsafed the use of “spectral” evidence. We foundeth visions, dreams, and rumors to be most helpfull in Salem when we were charged with the driving out of demons. Several hours in the stocks and then off to the flaming, purifying wood pile.
becca (and brian)
March 11, 2007 at 9:37 pm
23I know it’s probably old news now and at this point I shouldn’t be surprised or outraged at anything but how does Halliburton moving its HQ to Dubai not raise more eyebrows?
Karen Tumulty’s blog on Time.com raised some interesting points including:
“Is this about tax breaks? Getting beyond the reach of congressional subpoenas? And what about all that sensitive information that Halliburton has had access to? At a minimum, reincorporating in Dubai would mean that Halliburton will be paying less taxes to the U.S. Treasury, even as it collects billions from government contracts.”
Maybe it’s all just business as usual and no different than any other corporation incorporating in more tax-friendly geographies but it makes me grumpy.
back to lurking (and doing the cross-country commute. MN here I come (again)…)
Becca (and Brian)
Oh…and on the subject of things that make me the opposite of grumpy: Saturday, driving down I-5, giggling listening to Adam and co. in CO. Thanks for bringing a smile.. (And I thought Tom was funny too)
David
March 12, 2007 at 3:49 am
24Fascinating move by Halliburton. Thanks for posting that tidbit,
B (& B). I am inclined to suspect it also has to do with when the new oil laws are put in place in Iraq.
Murray
March 12, 2007 at 7:31 am
25I believe that the problems with Judges started with Ehud, the left handed Judge. Seems that early in the process of screening for weapons, they only checked a man’s left side, knowing that he would pull the weapon out with his right hand. This worked fine until Ehud showed up for work one day with his weapon of choice on his right hip. He scooted past the security screeners, drew his knife with his left hand and proceeded to plunge it into his adversary’s chest. The administration held hearings and proceeded to tighten up security, but the damage had been done. I guess that, in this case, being sinister paid off.
Vinnie
March 12, 2007 at 8:07 am
26Yeah, I found being sinister usually woiks, but any sap can tell ya’ dat being left handed was Ehud’s real advantage. And talk about stoopid names…
The Brushman from Crawford
March 12, 2007 at 3:35 pm
27Gotta watch your Baracks. There was your Ehud on the right, your Obama on the left, and me stuck in a muddle with Saud.
Harold
March 12, 2007 at 4:07 pm
28I am wondering if the same folks who went apeshit over Dubai Ports World will now have a similar reaction to Halliburton Dubai. Hmm, how long will it take to sever all national security-sensitive ties to this foreign company? And to wipe the memories of all the Halliburton folks who were privy to sensitive information?
siobhan, gillian, glad to know you’re fellow ‘mudges! Someone named Ice Weasel popped up there a while back - it may be our very own!
And if anyone’s been wondering where I’ve been lately, just scan the comments there.
David
March 12, 2007 at 7:29 pm
29OK, Harold, what’s a ‘mudge? Sounds like it ought to be some kind of medieval tourney implement.
M.J. O'Brien
March 12, 2007 at 8:56 pm
30Politics and the legal system are hardly strangers, but the Bush administration seems unable to distinguish the two. With congress investigating, Paul Krugman notes in his NY Times column on Sunday that “Donald Shields and John Cragan, two professors of communication, have compiled a database of investigations and/or indictments of candidates and elected officials by U.S. attorneys since the Bush administration came to power.”
Bottom line concerning this study: Of 375 investigations or indictments of candidates and elected officials, only 17.8% involved Republicans. Either the process is rigged, as Krugman charges, or Republicans are 5.6 times less likely to be corrupt than other politicians. I wonder which it is…
To access the whole Krugman article, you need to be a subscriber to the newspaper or TimesSelect. But the full Shields/Cragan study is online for free at e Pluribus Media.
David
March 13, 2007 at 6:13 am
31Recent historical note: back when George HW was president and South Carolina still had a Democratic legislature, the Justice Department vigorously went after corruption in same, with several black South Carolina legislators being taken down. I don’t remember the various charges, and I imagine there was corruption to be investigated, but I thought at the time that it was an effective way to change the makeup of the legislature and at the same play to Reconstruction-era prejudices still alive and all too well in the South. Blacks are aware of those games, which probably helps explain the defiance of Louisiana blacks in re-electing William Jefferson.
Racism has been a lynchpin of the rise of the Republican Party in the South, and I think what HW’s justice department did was just a variation on Nixon’s “southern strategy.” I also think the Republican machine was so taken with their success that use of the justice department for blatant political purposes should come as no surprise. I also suspect that John Ashcroft got canned because he just didn’t have the stomach for what is perfectly appropriate conduct to Alberto “Butt Boy” Gonzalez.
hedera
March 13, 2007 at 8:31 pm
32Oh, come now. Halliburton moved its headquarters to Dubai for a perfectly obvious reason: no corporate income tax. They should never get another contract from the U.S. government. The new oil laws in Iraq are a side issue.
Whoever is channeling Cotton Mather needs to bone up on the King James Bible. For one thing, the word for Scooter’s nickname is “vain” not “vane”. For another, no one as versed in Elizabethan English as the Mather family was would ever have said “I trusteth” (I trust; he trusteth) or “We foundeth” (we found; I don’t believe anybody ever foundeth). The rest of the comment isn’t bad. The “eth” verb ending was generally used only in the third person singular.
David
March 13, 2007 at 9:21 pm
33And getting to hang with Michael Jackson, don’t forget.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
March 14, 2007 at 8:09 am
34Hedera, what if they were founders? Would the proper usage be “he/she/it foundedeth the Pythian brothers Portland chapter?”
Go easy on Coo…er, Cotton. At least after all these centuries, he’s finally learned to use the letter “s” rather than “f.”
Harold
March 14, 2007 at 1:29 pm
35David, “mudges” are commentors on The Comics Curmudgeon website. At least that’s my term.
David
March 14, 2007 at 6:48 pm
36Thanks, Harold. I really like the word. Has a wonderful ring to it.
I’m thinking maybe a broader definition could encompass all truly appalled progressives (TAPS for short, which is what should be played every time the War on Iraq is mentioned).