What does anyone make of this?
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - President George W. Bush’s call for bipartisan support on a range of domestic issues while sticking to his guns on Iraq played well in the TV ratings, at least compared with his last two State of the Union speeches…
The live, hourlong broadcast of Bush’s address on Tuesday night to a joint session of the newly Democratic-controlled Congress averaged nearly 45.5 million U.S. viewers, Nielsen Media Research reported on Wednesday.
That was up considerably from the 41.7 million who watched last year’s State of the Union…
So last year’s pre-electoral-bloodbath speech (AKA “Desperate Houseguys”) didn’t do nearly as well as this year’s (”Lost”). According to the article, the worst ratings were for 2005 (”Gilligan’s White House”). Why is it that after Americans have made up their minds that they’ve had it with this President, they suddenly want to watch him again?
Why?
Then again, to switch to a movie metaphor, “Titanic” did a lot better at the box office than “Superman Returns…”





76 comments
Mel in Vermont
January 25, 2007 at 11:54 am
1I don’t usually watch W under any circumstances, drinking game or no. But when I asked my hubby whether he wanted to watch this year’s SOTU, he said “With 28% approval ratings? You bet!” So that explains 2 people out of the marginal 4 million. And a bibulous time was had by all.
Harold
January 25, 2007 at 11:54 am
2Gosh, what could’ve changed from 2005 and 2006 that would’ve resulted in more people wanting to watch? Frankly, I’m puzzled.
I believe a better movie metaphor for this year’s speech - or at least its audience - would be The Return of the Jedi.
No, not really accurate. But, gosh, it was nice seeing the changes that have been made.
Carmel
January 25, 2007 at 12:07 pm
3There’s a bit of the “knitting at the execution” feel to the numbers of viewers for the SOTU. We probably wanted to see if he would cry as he begged for support for his escalation of the war effort. It would have been entertaining viewing indeed if W had sqirmed and jiggled his change in his pockets while coming up with reasons to prove that *this time* he’s got a plan.
RandyH
January 25, 2007 at 12:09 pm
4I don’t think just because more people watched that they are actually interested in his policies. Lately watching Our Leader is a bit like watching a train wreck in progress. People are instinctively drawn to catastrophes like car crashes, building implosions and the like. After his “surge” speech the week before, who could possibly miss it?
Personally, I watched to see the Democratic Response speech by Jim Webb afterward… and it was totally worth it. While Bush was on, I just yelled at the TV. I guess that’s good therapy too.
Stephen
January 25, 2007 at 12:36 pm
5I think it is good so many people watched. Hopefully they were saying to themselves, “We can’t EVER let this happen again!” I know I watch because it is good to see and hear what the idiot/enemy is saying. I am better able to talk to his followers intelligently if I know what he really said.
dee
January 25, 2007 at 12:39 pm
6I watched it because I wanted to see what Nancy Pelosi was wearing.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
January 25, 2007 at 12:48 pm
7I watched, but I didn’t get far.
When Bush said that he planned to “balance the budget,” my hand paused in mid-sip.
I don’t remember anything after his follow up statement, “and we’ll do it without raising taxes.”
So, I guess for me personally, watching the SOTUS was to have a valid
excusereason to “forget most of the address.”Oh, and also to necessitate a good cleaning of my abode the next day, and to buy a brand new television. (do they make screens out of plexiglass these days?)
Maximum Bob
January 25, 2007 at 1:08 pm
8It must be all of those people who saw The Passion of the Christ and developed a taste for bloody spectacles with speeches in Aramaic.
Ann
January 25, 2007 at 1:12 pm
9Dee, maybe you mistook this for the Oscars?
waterfowler
January 25, 2007 at 1:25 pm
10Stephen, I would’ve thought you and I agreed that the “enemy” is the people who would like to cut your head off. Saw another bumper sticker the other day. Y’all probably won’t enjoy this one as much. “W” -”Savin’ your sorry ass whether you like it or not”.
Doc Nagel
January 25, 2007 at 1:26 pm
11Isn’t it obvious? The ratings skyrocketed because everyone was playing the State of the Union drinking game.
In fact, we played the dual State of the Union/NHL All-Stars Superskills Competition drinking game, listening to the speech on the radio, with the TV muted. Sometimes it seemed like Bush was supplying play-by-play commentary, but that was after we’d played a few rounds, to be totally honest.
piglet
January 25, 2007 at 1:45 pm
12I’m with RandyH. It’s rubbernecking at the car crash. Why do you think that America’s Funniest Home Videos of Groin Hits is still on the air?
WF: Savin’ our sorry ass from what? Osama? WMDs? A balanced budget? French Fries? Properly spelled gerunds?
Maximum Bob
January 25, 2007 at 1:47 pm
13WF, we have the same bumper sticker in the Bay Area, only it’s missing the word “Savin’.”
Harold
January 25, 2007 at 1:52 pm
14dee, Ann, I am shocked that two of my three favorite redhead Felbernauts (let’s not forget George’s Sister) missed my in-depth analysis of what everybody was wearing!
http://anothermonkey.blogspot.com/2007/01/politics-of-incidental-detai ls.html
Dale, don’t get any ideas that just because I’m commenting on the symbolic use of color in the clothing worn at this address I am anything less than 100% Grade-A manly man. I’m not into limboing, but feel free to select any weapon for the duel! I shall meet you on the field of honor armed only with my wit, charm, and dashing good looks! (Oh…wait…if I do that, I’m so screwed…)
CJ
January 25, 2007 at 2:01 pm
15Hmmm … what’s changed - why I believe the answer is right in that li’l ol’ paragraph … “… the newly Democratic-controlled Congress …” Maybe people’s anticipation of Cheney’s mug at having to sit atop the proceedings with Madame Speaker was just too irresistible.
Ann
January 25, 2007 at 2:07 pm
16Is WF still getting mileage over the French guillotine joke? Try to keep up!
Harold, your wit and charm are more than a match for Dale’s manliness. Or not—I’m still a little fuzzy on the details.
I’ll go check out your site now. And there’s a new page up at Get Your War On. It features lots of blood, so you’ve all been warned.
David
January 25, 2007 at 4:44 pm
17Harold and Dale,
The duel is on? On the Plains of Grouseland? Does Murray have jousting cycles? Or will it be the Alexander Hamilton-Aaron Burr pistols? Inquiring minds and the designated best person want to know, especially if it is my duty to officiate the showdown for Lady Ann’s…uh…hand.
Adam,
Who the hell knows?
Mojo
January 25, 2007 at 4:44 pm
18This year’s speech was shorter than the past couple of years’ speeches and the American people really like hearing less from George.
Ann
January 25, 2007 at 5:06 pm
19Wait, is this a contest over me? It’s just getting more and more confusing. My alter ego is about to swoon. And since Harold has never declared his intentions, while Dale and I are more or less betrothed, it just seems so unlikely.
Although I’m sure that gay marriage leads to group marriage in someone’s fevered imagination, so maybe that’s what we should be contemplating. Harold, gown or tux?
As for the SOTU address, I’m sure that people who didn’t watch Dubya previously because they were frustrated about being in the minority (”This guy’s a moron”) are watching him now because they feel vindicated (”See, I told you he’s a moron!”). I just wish he’d quit doing that lip-protruding thing. Looks like the salt monster from Star Trek.
Dale
January 25, 2007 at 5:18 pm
20I’m with Ann, let’s just rush headlong down the slippery slope and make it a threesome. Or maybe something more like joint custody. I am no match for a man who can both put siding on a house and properly identify a sea-foam colored suit. In fact, I’m getting pretty excited now about marrying Harold myself!
Jim (OJNTNJ)
January 25, 2007 at 5:49 pm
21I’m sure the religious right wouldn’t have too much of a problem with group marriage since it’s allowed in the old testament.
Of course the group marriage would have to consist of one man and as many women as is
necessary to support his asswithin his ability to support.It appears that you three fit the minimum requirements. Masletov! (or however that’s spelled).
Just Jay
January 25, 2007 at 5:54 pm
22Off topic: I just finished the book George McGovern (Yes that George McGovern for those of us of a certain age) and William Polk wrote called Out of Iraq. It is a bit dated, but it contains a well thought out plan (what a concept) for how to extricate ourselves from Iraq without leaving a failed state. It also speaks to our responsibility to the Iraqi people, something that has been sorely missing from W’s definition of victory. Read it. Better yet, send a copy to your favorite congressperson.
Jay
Rockford IL Real Estate Agent
January 25, 2007 at 6:00 pm
23I think people watched out of shear fascination of what this guy is doing. Likewise the stakes seemed to be raised this year. Instead GW saying “stay the course”, it almost more of a “**** this better work or else were screwed” (in respect to 20,000 more troops)
Sharon
January 25, 2007 at 6:56 pm
24“played well in the TV ratings”
Interesting assumption that watching implies approval.
Dirk's Diary
January 25, 2007 at 7:03 pm
25January 25, 2007
Dear Diary,
Did you see who they had me sitting beside at the SOTU Tuesday night? Michael Fucking Chertoff. Mr. Personality, himself; and his breath - Sweet jesus, it would strip the varnish right off of a canoe paddle. Someone give him a breath mint. Whoa!
And Elaine Chou - What a bitch! Excuse me. What a B-I-T-C-H!!! Married to Rep Mitch McConnell, now there’s a couple. I bet their house pet is a feral wolverine and they keep a barracuda in their fucking fishtank. I can truthfully say those two deserve each other.
One interesting thing I learned in the last Cabinet meeting; Robert Gates can catch a fly - in flight - with his left hand. I wonder where that goes on one’s resume. That’s just the sort of parlor trick that would get W’s attention (for 15 seconds, at least). You don’t think that’s how Gates got nominated…. Nah, not even W would be that shallow, you think?
BTW, I got my official nickname from Bush today - “Ol’ Blue Eyes”. I’m not old, dammit! Of course I had to smile and take it gracefully, while the other yahoos, yes men, and brown nosers slapped each other on the back and rolled on the floor in feigned hysteria. Assholes. And these guys are running the country?!! Jesus. Running it into the ground, I’d say.
I’d better stop here. The boys in NSA won’t like it when they read this (and they probably will). No need looking for trouble.
Dirk K
cooper
January 25, 2007 at 8:01 pm
26MaxBob, “…a taste for bloody spectacles with speeches in Aramaic.” Good. I like that. Aramaic - is that anything like Bushspeak?
SeattleDan
January 25, 2007 at 8:17 pm
27Dale, Ann and Harold, I’d be happy to officiate a “group” marriage for you. But do we have to go to Utah for it to be official?
JJ, my congressman is McDermott. I think he’s probably already read McGovern’s book. But he might enjoy a good Aramaic grammar book.
siobhan
January 25, 2007 at 8:22 pm
28Dear God - please be true.
SeattleDan
January 25, 2007 at 8:45 pm
29Interesting, siobhan. Maybe the Scooter Libby trial will be more intriguing than I thought it would be.
ginny
January 25, 2007 at 10:17 pm
30I think a fairly large number of people tuned in just to see what happened if Bush raised a red flag issue (anti-gay marriage amendment or other “culture war” rally-base button-pusher).
Me, I was hoping for boos, groans, partisan acting out on camera, or even hissing. And that was if Bush appeared to be cutting his puppet strings and declaring himself to be a real President now.
Harold
January 26, 2007 at 4:25 am
31Ann, while I’m sure I would fill out a gown quite nicely, I believe I’ll stick with a tux. With a veil, in deference to all. (Somewhere out there there’s video of me doing a drunken rant while wearing a friend’s bridal veil. I think I have it.)
And I was so looking forward to a Most Dangerous Game / Man With the Golden Gun -style running duel/manhunt on the grounds of Grouseland, with Thicket the Owl being allowed to dine on the loser. The rope swing down at the pond would provide a dramatic moment to be sure.
Dale, I’ve never put siding on a house, though I have painted a porch a lovely shade of blue.
Condoleezza as VP? That might explain the look on her face during the address, when it looked like she was trying to make someone’s head explode with the power of her mind. But whose? Was she trying to telepathically remove Cheney? Silence Bush before he could commit her to anything? Destroy Pelosi for getting to be so close to her husband?
Dirk's Diary
January 26, 2007 at 4:35 am
32January 26, 2007
Dear Diary,
I didn’t hear any boos, groans, or hissing, but Ms. Chou did break wind at several strategic points during the speech. I assumed it was from the brussel sprouts she had at dinner (I assiduously avoided them), but maybe there’s more to Elaine than I’ve given her credit for. Time will tell.
DK
David
January 26, 2007 at 7:11 am
33siobhan,
Sure would help explain John McCain’s open attacks on Cheney. McCain/Rice ‘08? Wonder how that would poll both with R primary voters and in the general election. Rice does represent the ISG group, and though she is a neocon Vulcan, and essentially incompetent in every administrative position she’s held, as well as an incomptetent sovietologist, she is a slick political animal.
Clinton/Obama v. McCain/Rice? A very high profile shootout with all kinds of story lines for the press maw. And celebrity does trump everything. Just ask the Donald.
Harold,
Most Dangerous Game for Lady Ann’s alter ego? I like it… if I get filming rights. Have to see if Murray will allow Cheney rules and winner has to shoot loser in the face (you’d both have to dress as grouses). He might limit it to paintball (ooooh, the palette).
Harold
January 26, 2007 at 7:27 am
34Condolezza Rice: Why all this dicussion over the firt woman President or the first black Prsident when you can have BOTH AT ONCE? Uh-oh…
I’m thinking the climax the Fight for Lady Ann will be a duel on bicycles on the abandoned stretch of turnpike, culminating in a battle of nerves in the total darkness of the air ducts of the second tunnel. (If you don’t know what I’m talking about, visit Murray’s site!)
David
January 26, 2007 at 7:43 am
35Harold, I really like it. We’ll go infrared for the battle of the nerves.
Everybody, hold a good thought for B.B. King, who’s been hospitalized at the University of Texas medical center in Galveston. Waterfowler, send as much Texas mojo as possible.
Stephen
January 26, 2007 at 7:49 am
36WF,
Idiot/enemy. Bush is the idiot, other people are the enemy. However, I would say that the idiot has created more enemies than he has saved my butt from. Does that make him an enemy? I’ll have to think about that one…
Maximum Bob
January 26, 2007 at 8:46 am
37They’re similar, Cooper, but the main difference between Aramaic and Bushspeak is that there was a time when people understood Aramaic.
Dale
January 26, 2007 at 9:45 am
38I haven’t ridden a bicycle in fifteen years. Hopefully I’ll remember how. They say it’s like…well, you know.
redscorpse
January 26, 2007 at 9:55 am
39i’d like to think it’s because the public wants to make sure he knows that he’s our bitch and not the other way around.
Murray
January 26, 2007 at 9:57 am
40Come to think of it, this was the first SOTU that I have watched in several years. As Tom Friedman of the NY Times says today, “The Nation fired Bush in November and we are watching him clean out his desk.” Knowing that the tide had changed made watching the Bullshit bearable.
What happens at Grouseland stays at Grouseland. We’re a pretty laid back bunch here and we agree with Jefferson who was OK with anything that “doesn’t break my leg or pick my pocket”.
You want a contest for the priceless hand of Ann? OK with me. You want to all join hands and sing Kum by Ya, fine too.
Julia
January 26, 2007 at 10:26 am
41I was temporarily dumbstruck by the idea of a SOTU speech where the figures sitting behind the president were both female. Even though I’m not fond of Condoleeza Rice, the image is sort of breathtaking for someone who accurately predicted the outcome of the King/Riggs game in 6th grade.
Of course they’d still be standing behind a white male; that made my eyes focus again.
But…I’d hate to be the cartoonist trying to figure out how to preserve good taste while indicate the presence of a puppeteer’s hand…
Murray
January 26, 2007 at 11:02 am
42On the Daily Show they had a contest to see who would blink first. Nancy or the Dick. With in a minute they had Nancy at 40 and the Dick at 1. I wondered if she had something in her eye or was just reacting to the sulfur in the air. Steward pointed out that for the Dick, blinking was an exertion that could bring on a heart attack.
I’ve heard the rumor about Condi for close to 2 years now. It makes sense but time will tell. I see her as having all of the problems left over from the Bush mess and not being comfortable to white male morons. Ms. Mushroom Cloud would be an easy opponent.
waterfowler
January 26, 2007 at 12:35 pm
43David, a prayer (or a toast, or a good thought) for B.B. and also for Molly. Though I’ve never agreed w/ her, she is in a class w/ Ma Richards and most of my aunts. It’s still yes ma’am / no ma’am.
Harold
January 26, 2007 at 1:30 pm
44WF, I didn’t know about Molly Ivins. Thanks for clueing me in.
David, ditto about B.B. King.
Ann
January 26, 2007 at 2:30 pm
45Oh, I adore Miz Molly. She’s brilliant. And I’ve always agreed with her! Lobster bless her big ol’ heart.
piglet
January 26, 2007 at 5:33 pm
46OMG, I just heard on the radio that the Prez got great ratings because he followed American Idol on the east coast.
We shoulda known.
hedera
January 26, 2007 at 5:36 pm
47Lobster bless Miz Molly and bring her through again, we need her.
Google News tells me that our Fearless Whatever has learned a little more English: he now says that he’s “the decision-maker”, no longer “the decider”… Chicago Tribune, today
gillian
January 26, 2007 at 7:53 pm
48I just hope we can all sleep tonight:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_ main.html?name=Toles&date=01232007
David
January 26, 2007 at 8:35 pm
49Waterfowler, your comment about Miss Molly, Ma Richards, and your aunts is one of the great things about being born and raised in the South. Certainly it’s not exclusive to us - there’s a whole world of people in New Jersey I knew when I was there that the rest of the country appears to be unaware of - but it is one of the great things the South is about.
Lobster look over these two national treasures. Also, absolutely no objections from me for prayers for these two good people. I like the idea of a toast, a prayer, and a good thought.
David
January 26, 2007 at 8:43 pm
50I didn’t realize Molly was born in California.
SeattleDan
January 26, 2007 at 9:21 pm
51Thanks to everyone to alerting us that Molly is ill. All our best thoughts are going her way. She is a national treasure.
cooper
January 27, 2007 at 5:23 am
52David, I married a native Tarheel. I fear my tombstone will read:
Born in California - November 30, 1949
Moved to NC in March, 1950
Died 20XX
“He was almost one of us.”
(Okay, I stole that one from Tim Sample, but he stole it from someone else - you know he did.)
David
January 27, 2007 at 8:16 am
53I can relate, cooper. I was born in Kentucky to a mother who was a resident of Florida who went back up to Kentucky to have me, then retruned home to Florida, so I am an asterisked Floridian.
hedera
January 27, 2007 at 12:16 pm
54I have a childhood friend from Kansas, not generally considered part of “the North” in the old feud. (Yes, I know it entered the union as a free state. It still took a month and a half to get there from New England, before the railroad. You don’t expect this to make sense, do you?) She married a fifth-generation Texan, and he and their sons (now sixth generation Texans) all refer to Mom as “the Yankee.” Go figure.
This all reminds me of an old joke about Mainers - it’s too long to repeat here but you can almost construct the whole thing from the punchline, which is, “If your cat had kittens in the oven, would you call ‘em biscuits?”
Personally, I am that rare bird, a native Californian who has never lived anywhere but the San Francisco Bay Area. I’m only first generation, though.
Increase Mather
January 27, 2007 at 3:10 pm
55I toldeth my son to not playeth the loud souless songs of the New Heathens. I despised the thought of listening to all of this noise in order to separateth the wheat from the chaff. Now I don’t haveth to. Pastor Donnie Davies hath made up a list of “Bands to watch out for” to avoid the homsexually persuasive lyrics of this “music”. Cotton, listeneth not to these abominations:
* Scissor Sisters
* Rufus Wainwright
* Ravi Shankar
* Wilco
* Bjork
* Ghostface Killahs
* Cole Porter
* The String Cheese Incident
* The Grateful Dead (AIDS)
* The Doors
* Phish
* Queen
* Morrissey(?questionable?)
* Metallica
* Judas Priest
* The Village People
* The Rolling Stones
* David Bowie
* Frankie Goes to Hollywood
* Kansas
* Ani DiFranco
* John Mayer
* George Michael (texan)
* The Indigo Girls
* Velvet Underground
* Madonna
* Barry Manilow
* Indigo Girls
* Melissa Etheridge
* Eminmen
* Nirvana
* Boy George*
* The Killers
* Lou Reed
* Wilson Phillips
* Ted Nugent (loincloth)
* kd lang
* Frank Sinatra
* Nickleback
* Clay Aiken
* Red Hot Chili Peppers
* Elton John(really gay)
Now if I mightst only slippeth these band names past the rodent…
siobhan
January 27, 2007 at 3:11 pm
56I’m a relative newcomer to the Bay Area, having just celebrated my 25th anniverary (moved here 1/2/82).
My husband is third generation SF native on his mother’s side. He vowed that he will never live east of 19th Avenue. We do visit his mother on the other side of that Great Divide - on 18th Avenue - in the house that she’s lived in for 74 years. (There can’t be too many people in SF who’ve lived in the same house for that long.)
SeattleDan
January 27, 2007 at 3:44 pm
57Pastor Donnie is a ‘reformed’ homosexual, doing the Lord’s work. You can visit his ‘list’ at: http://www.lovegodsway.org/GayBands
I’ve lived in the state of Washington for thirty years now, and some folk still will never let me forget that I’m a native Californian.
David
January 27, 2007 at 4:51 pm
58And my favorite ‘monst Floridians: “Hell, we’re pretty much all from somewhere else.” This even includes the Seminoles. And my favorite pop Florida license tag: Alienated Native.
hedera, did you know Maryland is “down South”? I didn’t until I student taught in New Jersey and was told by a school counselor that he was working on getting a football scholarship down South for one of the players who was not academically strong enough for a New Jersey school. When I asked where down South, he said Maryland.
Murray
January 27, 2007 at 5:00 pm
59Well Coop, I mean I. Mather, at least we agree on the Indigo Girls.
A friend of mine, who also grew up in western Michigan as a repressed Calvinist, also got his masters at Michigan, who also left the faith, and then spent the last 20 years as a professional environmental advocate, died yesterday.
Bill was my kind of person, an odd duck, but passionate, intelligent, driven, and devoted entirely for the good of the poor, and the underdog. Bill named the Pike 2 Bike (www.pike2bike.org), and was its secretary/treasurer. Most of what I know of the trail I learned from him. He spent his life driving from Bedford to Harrisburg to Washington to advocate for clean waterways, bike trails and the environment. In mid December only a couple of miles from his place (he lived up the road from me) he flipped his truck. He told me that he had forgotten to put on his seat belt and was going to do so at the stop a half mile further. He broke his pelvis and vertebrae in his upper back. He was making progress but then yesterday had a coronary attack and died. It will be difficult to work on the Pike 2 Bike with out him.
siobhan
January 27, 2007 at 7:02 pm
60Murray -
:-(
SeattleDan
January 27, 2007 at 7:15 pm
61Ditto to siobhan. People like Bill are gifts and treasures in our lives.
cooper
January 27, 2007 at 7:41 pm
62Murray, sorry to hear about your pal, Bill. Here’s to eccentricity; may it reside in and inspire us all.
hedera
January 27, 2007 at 10:02 pm
63Murray, so sorry to hear about your friend. Not much else one can say…
David
January 28, 2007 at 6:53 am
64May the causes Bill championed be his enduring memorial.
z man
January 28, 2007 at 8:07 am
65May the games begin.
cooper
January 28, 2007 at 11:33 am
66You think this is one of the enormous successes Cheney was trying to point out to Wolf last week?
cooper
January 28, 2007 at 11:47 am
67Gosh darn it, let’s try it the old school way - http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/01/28/iraq.main/index.html
cooper
January 28, 2007 at 11:49 am
68Old School - 1; href - 0.
David
January 28, 2007 at 3:50 pm
69Just one of many, cooper, one of many. I can just hear Jesus now: “Way to go, Dick ‘n George. I love carnage, and nothing does carnage better than the dogs of war. That’s why I said, ‘Damned are the Peacemakers…’”
David
January 28, 2007 at 3:57 pm
70If you liked the Iraq War, you’re gonna love this one:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines07/0128-05.htm
Dirk's Diary
January 28, 2007 at 5:58 pm
71January 28
Dear Diary,
Well I had a chance to stop over in the home state this weekend on the way back from Hawaii. (God, I’m glad there’s government land on Maui & I can see it’s going to require a lot of in situ, hands-on work this winter.) While I was in Boise, I heard rumor of a rather disturbing grassroots movement that’s taken hold. It was started by some malcontent in Post Falls and named “Take a Bullet for Bozo”. Here it is in a nutshell. I’m now often in close proximity to the President. Should an assassination attempt occur while I’m present, I’m to throw myself in front of W and take the bullet. If I am seriously injured or die, my family would get the fund. I started another rumor - “Save your goddamn money! That’s just not going to happen!”
There is a palpable fear out there of “Cheney in Charge” - ergo, the fund. Little do they know, he’s been in charge from the get-go. I simply didn’t have the heart to tell them.
Dirk
siobhan
January 28, 2007 at 6:08 pm
72David…
Ugh.
I have to go find my old Todd Rundgren album (as in vinyl) and play “Don’t You Ever Listen? (Don’t You Ever Learn?)”
SeattleDan
January 28, 2007 at 6:19 pm
73z man, coop and David, your links made our heads explode. But thanks.
SeattleTammy
January 28, 2007 at 10:21 pm
74We were reminded of this song tonight. Sing it with Stevie:
‘Cause like I been to, y’know, Paris, Peru, y’know, I mean, uh, Iraq, Iran, Eurasia… y’know I speak very, very, um fluent Spanish — ‘Todo ’sta bien chevere’ — you got that?
Foxy Mama: Chevere…
David
January 29, 2007 at 7:29 am
75Honest bumper stickers would have read Cheney/Satan ‘04 (Cheney being the chief administration architect of this madness).
My current favorite: Impeachment - It’s not Just for Blowjobs Anymore. Problem, of course, is that it is the VP who has to go. Hope Fitzgerald’s prosecution of Libby winds up bringing down Dick Vadar. Remember when the panel of federal judges gave Fitzgerald authority to force the journalists to testify because, in their view, Fitzgerald had presented evidence to them of crimes so significant that they trumped the press’s right to protect the identity of sources. What crime, or crimes, would have that effect on a panel of federal judges, one of whom clearly stated that he was predisposed to protect the principle of anonymity of sources? My own personal reaction: treasonous conduct on the part of the OVP in outing a CIA agent and destroying a CIA asset front company, along with all the other repercussions of such an outing.
May the Force be with Patrick Fitzgerald. Of course, the perfect way to totally change the subject and insulate the executive branch is to start another war, this time with a country that does have nuclear ambitions, regardless of the probability that Iran can be contained without a war that could be the 21st century equivalent of the one associated with the assassination of that duke.
Nucking futs is an entirely too gentle aspersion to caste at these homicidal bastards.
Ann
January 29, 2007 at 12:58 pm
76Murray, I’m sorry to hear about your friend. He did good work.
Pike2Bike was one of the high points of my year, and inspired me to actually acquire a bike for the first time in 25 years.