<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Neys Have It</title>
	<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/</link>
	<description>America's favorite blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22973</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22973</guid>
					<description>FA Elf, we appreciate your help. We may bitch when Fanny kicks our brilliant posts, but I remember when spam filled the comments and threatened to end this site. It's good to know what sends Fanny into action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FA Elf, we appreciate your help. We may bitch when Fanny kicks our brilliant posts, but I remember when spam filled the comments and threatened to end this site. It&#8217;s good to know what sends Fanny into action.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22940</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22940</guid>
					<description>Dale, I really like the idea of your dueling Harold for Ann's hand at Grouseland (or whatever body part y'all choose to focus on).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale, I really like the idea of your dueling Harold for Ann&#8217;s hand at Grouseland (or whatever body part y&#8217;all choose to focus on).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dale</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22927</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22927</guid>
					<description>You see, there's so much we have yet to discover about each other!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You see, there&#8217;s so much we have yet to discover about each other!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ann</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22922</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22922</guid>
					<description>Dale, I'm in Seattle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale, I&#8217;m in Seattle.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: siobhan</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22916</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22916</guid>
					<description>Clarification, please:  I'm assuming that the d-rugs that will trip the filter are not the illegal types that we reminisce about when discussing youthful adventure, but the types being hawked to Limbaugh et al?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarification, please:  I&#8217;m assuming that the d-rugs that will trip the filter are not the illegal types that we reminisce about when discussing youthful adventure, but the types being hawked to Limbaugh et al?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The FanAp elves</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22911</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22911</guid>
					<description>hedera, it was indeed the G word that tripped the filter ("gambling at Rick's").   

Now that I'm going to have to approve my own comment, I'll take the opportunity to mention some of the broader spam categories that will trip the FA spam moderation: gambling, loans, insurance, drugs, cigarettes, hotels, flowers (yes, flowers), cell phones, and of course, enlarging or shrinking parts of the body.  Many of the words that trigger moderation are related to those topics.

Every so often, a new spam favorite-of-the-month happens (anyone remember the fishing one a year or two ago?) and so those related keywords get added to the filter, and then after the particular attacks stop (and/or a lot of people start talking about that topic and start complaining about Fanny), then I'll remove the word.  I know moderation is tedious but unfortunately it's a necessary measure that really does help cut out spam. I do try to approve comments when I can, so although they might not appear right away, they usually will appear at some point.

All that said, we seem to be doing better with spam since I  installed a new spam killer a few weeks ago, and it's made sifting through the moderated comments and captured spam much easier. So far it's blocked 3,064 accesses in just the past seven days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hedera, it was indeed the G word that tripped the filter (&#8221;gambling at Rick&#8217;s&#8221;).   </p>
<p>Now that I&#8217;m going to have to approve my own comment, I&#8217;ll take the opportunity to mention some of the broader spam categories that will trip the FA spam moderation: gambling, loans, insurance, drugs, cigarettes, hotels, flowers (yes, flowers), cell phones, and of course, enlarging or shrinking parts of the body.  Many of the words that trigger moderation are related to those topics.</p>
<p>Every so often, a new spam favorite-of-the-month happens (anyone remember the fishing one a year or two ago?) and so those related keywords get added to the filter, and then after the particular attacks stop (and/or a lot of people start talking about that topic and start complaining about Fanny), then I&#8217;ll remove the word.  I know moderation is tedious but unfortunately it&#8217;s a necessary measure that really does help cut out spam. I do try to approve comments when I can, so although they might not appear right away, they usually will appear at some point.</p>
<p>All that said, we seem to be doing better with spam since I  installed a new spam killer a few weeks ago, and it&#8217;s made sifting through the moderated comments and captured spam much easier. So far it&#8217;s blocked 3,064 accesses in just the past seven days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hedera</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22910</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22910</guid>
					<description>I'm wondering if it was the word "gamb**ng"...  Fanny thinks I'm touting video poker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if it was the word &#8220;gamb**ng&#8221;&#8230;  Fanny thinks I&#8217;m touting video poker.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dale</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22909</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22909</guid>
					<description>Perhaps Fanny prefers THX Surround Sound?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Fanny prefers THX Surround Sound?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hedera</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22908</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22908</guid>
					<description>Fanny is having a snit fit again.  But why that post??  When you see the post about watching &lt;i&gt;Casablanca&lt;/i&gt;, you tell me why Fanny trapped it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fanny is having a snit fit again.  But why that post??  When you see the post about watching <i>Casablanca</i>, you tell me why Fanny trapped it&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hedera</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22905</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 04:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2007/01/19/the-neys-have-it/#comment-22905</guid>
					<description>Having recently watched &lt;i&gt;Casablanca&lt;/i&gt; again (and on the big screen with Dolby stereo too, the &lt;i&gt;only&lt;/i&gt; way!), I can say with confidence that Capt. Renault was only "Shocked!!" once at the fact that there was gambling at Rick's.  He didn't repeat himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having recently watched <i>Casablanca</i> again (and on the big screen with Dolby stereo too, the <i>only</i> way!), I can say with confidence that Capt. Renault was only &#8220;Shocked!!&#8221; once at the fact that there was gambling at Rick&#8217;s.  He didn&#8217;t repeat himself.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
