President Bush reiterated today that we’re a-stayin’ in Iraq until “the mission is complete.” It’s been pretty well-documented that although our leader claimed that “We’ve never been ’stay the course’” before the election, he’s was being pretty darn stay-the-coursey up until that moment.

And now I’m trying to figure out how “staying until the mission is complete” is different from “staying the course.” I’m pretty sure that the best explanation would turn nautical, and that if I spent an afternoon with an old-timey neocon pirate captain (as I do from time to time), he’d explain it this way:

See, if yer sailin’ somewhere, laddie, you have what I’ll be callin’ a destination. The place yer goin’. So ya sets yer course and off ya go.

Now let’s say ya see an uncharted island in front of ya. Or a reef. Or a continent. Or a floatin’ sign that tells ya you’re goin’ the wrong way. Or ya notice that you’ve accidentally dropped anchor and haven’t actually moved in a couple o’ months. Or ya hit some sort o’ gigantic insurgency. Somethin’ like that. It happens alla the time, lad. Doon’t look at me like that, ya dog. Navigation’s not a science, y’know. It’s an ART.

Well when you’ve run afoul o’ one o’ those obstacles, that’s when you’ll be a-changin’ yer course, understand, though yer destination be the same. And that’s what we be a doin’ right here…

See? It sort of makes sense in the mouth of Captain Con.

Until you start pointing out that the current course deviations have been tiny and that if our destination is “peace and freedom in Iraq and the entire Mideast,” then we might want to jigger the route a LOT more than that. Because right now our route is about as effective as Columbus’ original course to India. And I should point out that Columbus never actually made it to India. And that then, as now, the main obstacle to getting there was America.