I meant to just post an “open thread” for Election Day discussion. But I can’t stop my fingers from making one or two small points.
- Vote. It’s fun! And once you’ve voted, hang around the voting machine to enjoy a print-out of its interpretation of your choices. If the machine has a different set of choices, don’t get snippy. Remember that you’re human and therefore fallible, and you probably no longer recall who you voted for.
- If the Democrats DO manage to win a house or two, many of us will owe the Republican establishment a gigantic apology for alleging that their money-changing and machine-fixing ways had stolen our democracy. That apology CAN take the form of something like “I’m sorry I thought you were a lot better at cheating than you actually are.” Still, that does count as an apology. And I sincerely hope you get the chance to offer it.
- Ignore those exit polls. They had vast, reliable predictive power in the 20th century, but mathematical laws have changed since then.
- Despite this blog’s content, keep it positive. There’s a long, exciting day ahead of us. Vast conspiracies are very, very hard. Voting is easy.
—–
Finally, if you need a break from your fretting and stumping, please enjoy one of my recently-aired masterpieces from “Talkshow.” I’m very, very proud to bring you… “Horrifyingly Sexy Larry King.”





149 comments
dee
November 7, 2006 at 5:21 am
1I love the smell of Democracy in the morning!
I brought cookies for the little old ladies who normally staff my precinct, but they have been replaced by younger folks. I think the prospect of the new machines (with a paper trail!!!) was just too daunting. Or they all died. I don’t know but I left the cookies.
It’s raining here, which is not a good sign for the Democrats. By the time I normally vote I’m in the low 100’s; today I was 63. While the congressional seat will probably be retained by Virginia Everything-Is-Just-Grand-In-Iraq Foxx, there are some very tight local races for school board and county commisioner that would have a greater impact on people’s lives.
siobhan
November 7, 2006 at 5:23 am
2… that was scary …
m
November 7, 2006 at 6:05 am
3I haven’t been this excited since ‘92, and that’s pretty sad.
margaret
November 7, 2006 at 6:44 am
4As a candidate for office–the State Legislature–for me this is going to be one long day. At least it isn’t raining, and it isn’t cold. Being outside on your feet for hours and hours is the toughest part….
Confession: when my candidate group was tapping people to wait for results tonight at each of the polling places in our 3-town district, I kept my mouth shut. I don’t want to be hanging around school gyms or town halls.
I’ve got a hot date with my spouse and my television set, watching the national returns!
ice weasel
November 7, 2006 at 6:54 am
5In the midst of running around doing volunteer for the local dem committee I can say this so far, it’s slow. It’s cold but reasonably clear day here in Lancaster, PA this morning and the voting is not as brisk as I would have imagined. Generally, it’s heavier later in the day anyway. However, with rain forecast for this afternoon and this evening we’ll have to wait to see how that affects turnout.
I did have the chance to listen on some exit polling. In a region where waterfouler’s kin are king, I heard every person say something along the lines of, “I’ve never voted dem before but I cannot tolerate ______ from the republicans”.
Good. Very good.
Back to work.
cooper
November 7, 2006 at 7:06 am
6dee, I just finished voting myself. For the first time in our precinct, we’re using the ivotronics touchscreen voting machines (also, with the paper trail) and it was pathetic! My machine - immediately retired after I voted on it, because I raised such a stink about it - would, when you touched the screen to vote for a candidate, mark another candidate’s name 3 inches further down the screen. No butterfly ballot was ever this bad! Well, I did get the hang of it after a few minutes and managed to finish the ballot, but as I was scrolling back through to check my votes, one of the votes had been changed from the Democratic candidate to the Republican in that race. Before pressing the “Vote” button, I reviewed the paper record to make sure everything wound up being correctly marked. They folded the machine up and put it in the corner before I left. When I got to work, I called the Board of Elections to let them know of the problem with the machine and they said that they had already been notified and a technician had been dispatched (or not).
This is precisely what everyone is afraid of happening. The precinct workers knew there was a problem with that machine but continued to let people struggle through trying to vote on it. There was no line of voters, so shutting down the machine would not have slowed down the process. There just was no leadership in the building, apparently. Oh, and the patronizing woman down at the Board of Elections assured me that “Honey, your vote is valid, it will be counted and not purged from that malfunctioning machine, Sugar”. For some reason, I’m not that confident.
Better not let Sharon read this. She’s easily excitable about this topic and I’d hate for her to stroke out on account of me.
cooper
November 7, 2006 at 7:22 am
7Margaret, best of luck. When you win, go up to the capital in - wherever it is you live - and kick butt!
dee
November 7, 2006 at 7:49 am
8We are using optical scan machines here. The ballot is nicely designed, nothing confusing about it. cooper, I think I would be at the Board of Elections in person right now if that had happened to me.
Remember those nice lever machines — big heavy mothers with the curtain that automatically closed behind you? I bet they’re sitting around in a bunch of basements but with a little dusting and 3-in-1 oil would work just fine. It’s time to restore some gravitas to the whole voting process.
Levers in ‘08!!!!!!
gsny
November 7, 2006 at 8:14 am
9dee, here in Albany, NY we still get to use the old lever machines at least one last time. I’m all for progress, but that does not mean analog == bad! I love going into the booth and flipping those switches. And that “Kachunk!” when you open the curtains and submit your vote. Gravitas, indeed.
Harold
November 7, 2006 at 9:19 am
10I liked the ka-chunk from th old machines, too. But I was always worried that maybe I hadn’t pressed a lever down quite far enough and my vote wouldn’t register.
I didn’t have any problems with my ES&S iVotronic, but my model doesn’t do the paper trail thing. I didn’t even manage to knock it over and smash it like I was afraid I would.
That Larry King piece was definitely the most disturbing thing I’ve sen this side of Rush Limbaugh. And that entire episode was definitely the funniest one yet - I loved the paternity tests, and even that guy from Duckman (which rocked, by the way) was good.
Siobhan
November 7, 2006 at 9:31 am
11Optical scan in San Fran… My only problem was that I forgot to study up on the judicial races, so I didn’t vote in them. (I think it’s much worse to cast an uninformed ballot than to skip the vote entirely.)
Anonymous
November 7, 2006 at 9:38 am
12Interesting side note: I have it on good (and pretty direct) authority that a personnel agency within Department of Defense has been mobilized to provide information on all eligible DoD voters today.
One can only wonder what’s up with that.
I can hardly imagine that this is an entirely non-partisan “Get out the vote” push.
ice weasel
November 7, 2006 at 9:52 am
13Back in the home base for lunch and one thing sticks in my mind. If election reform isn’t an early priority of a potentially dem congress then I don’t know what to think. It’s ridiculous that in this country we struggle this.
There’s a ton of thoughts that go along with that. I’ll leave for another time.
The problems that I’ve seen and heard reported here are predictable. They’re no surprise. They take place in precincts you would expect them. It’s the usual, some poll worker won’t hand out paper ballots because they’re too difficult to deal with or problems with equipment.
David
November 7, 2006 at 10:01 am
14I’m with you, dee. Nothing since is an actual improvement over the lever machines. And it was absolutely the most satisfying way to vote. Optical scanners are my second choice, but there is no tactile or aural satisfaction or sense of the gravitas of the event.
DoD will make sure all service personnel vote, and vote “correctly.” Who says you can force democracy?
Murray, your experience borders on justifiable homicide, at least in relation to the machines. Time to do to them what Earl Long did to that goddamned lawn mower.
And my favorite quip: this is not an election, this is an intervention.
Siobhan
November 7, 2006 at 10:19 am
15So, I’m embarrassed to admit that I don’t know more about this: Are Elections Boards generally elected or appointed or ??? Because after watching this unfolding, I definitely feel like I’d like to be more involved in the process in the future. I would guess it varies from place to place; it sure seems like an important place to start mobilizing.
Doc Nagel
November 7, 2006 at 10:24 am
16I don’t understand what all the complaining is about. So a few machines are unreliable and some of them don’t provide a paper trail. Big deal. None of them are lethal! It seems that very few of them even electrically shock people!
waterfowler
November 7, 2006 at 10:51 am
17Frozen Sea Skunk, after 2 years of Pelosi, they’ll remember why they never voted Dem.
Let the drinking begin.
Ann
November 7, 2006 at 11:04 am
18I voted here in Seattle this morning, where it’s been raining hard for days. (Yes, really!)
We have the optical scan ballots, which I like because I’ve always been good at machine-scored tests. I can fill in those ovals with amazing precision! I like to think that I get extra credit for neatness.
But the old levers were nice. We don’t even have curtained booths now, and people were just scattered around the room, filling in their ballots where everyone could see!
Harold
November 7, 2006 at 11:19 am
19Our ES&S iVotronics have little privacy wings on them, which do pretty much nothing when people are shouting out the problems they’re having voting for this candidate or that party.
Once they start updating it, we can all track Tony Barr’s progress here:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/PA/H/09/district .html
David, did you mean “cooper” when you said “Murray”?
It's Pat!
November 7, 2006 at 11:50 am
20Optical scanners in Minnesota, we’ve been using them for twenty years, no issues. Nice weather, big turnout so far. Done voting, now waiting for 8 PM to roll around and start feeling good.
Landis
November 7, 2006 at 12:04 pm
21In Contra Costa County (SF East Bay) we’ve also got ES&S Scantron style machines. You still get to fill in the the ovals and have a paper record of your vote, but the scantron tallys your vote in the precinct.
Sonoma, the last county that I lived in (and actually worked the polls) we also had scantron style ballots, but they did the tallying back at the Registrar’s office.
What’s the problem with scantron voting again? Why the hell do we need these machines that can’t seem to get the touchscreen stuff right? Even in the precincts that are required to have touchscreens (for the blind, multi-lingual, etc) they have machines that are touchscreen, but print out the scantron ballot which is then tallied just like everyone else’s vote.
Siobhan, as for the judges, there was no info on them at all - at least none included in the official state information guide. I tend to also skip those types of things for the same reason. How should I know if this person deserves to keep their job or get their hat handed to them?
And if by election board, you mean the people at the precinct - it can vary by county. But I think it’s almost uniformly volunteer (it is in Sonoma and CoCo). You get paid about $75 as a normal worker and work from 0600-2100 (or later). The Inspector (one in charge - that’s what I used to do) would get a whole $25 more and no real breaks). It’s really the only thing that saved me from being entirely depressed about the whole state of affairs with voting in this country. To actually be a part of Democracy in Action™ was a wonderful thing.
And even though I’m fairly liberal in my politics, all of that stops when I show up for duty. I had an extremely conservative Bush voter working for me at the ‘04 election and we got along wonderfully. I even had to confront a few electioneers for both sides and felt no qualms about that - whether I agreed with them or not.
My advice: if you can hold your tongue for a day and be absolutely non-partisan, volunteering as a poll worker (not pole) will be one of the best things you ever do to make you feel like this country is still worth fighting for, no matter what happens today. Do it.
Siobhan
November 7, 2006 at 12:11 pm
22Fowler, keep with the Northern California theme since Pelosi is sending you on a multi-year bender. Some nice full-bodied zins and pinots will do you right, pal. Hell, they’ve helped me endure the last six years. (And they go well with duck.)
Landis
November 7, 2006 at 12:14 pm
23And, yeah, Cooper go to the county registrar of voters in person today and make sure they are aware of what the heck happened to you. That’s really not right. I don’t mean go and yell at the people because chances are they aren’t personally responsible, but make sure that your situation is perfectly clear. And then make sure to warn people going in to vote about what happened to you.
It’s not about stealing an election, it’s about the *principles* of democracy. And that’s more important to fight for than anything else.
Today I don’t care who you’re voting for, I just want everyone to take ownership of the process and get out there and vote!
Jim (OJNTNJ)
November 7, 2006 at 12:19 pm
24David, I disagree with your comment about the lack of tactile and aural satisfaction when using optical scanning machines (post #14).
You forgot about paper cuts and the sudden hissing intake of breath that goes along with them.
David
November 7, 2006 at 12:52 pm
25Oops! I did indeed mean cooper. I posted a comment to Murray on one of the other threads regarding Tony’s race, and apparently my fingers and my brain were on different pages with that comment.
Our optical scanners are fairly quiet, and the paper stock is thick enough that I was unable to inflict any bodily harm on myself, but there was the satisfaction of two false starts, then the successful insertion of my ballot and the machine’s acceptance of same - sort of like when the vending machine finally accepts your dollar.
Fowler,
You guys haven’t a clue what a leftist is. Nancy Pelosi is a Jeffersonian centrist who gets categorized as leftist because the right is so damned far right that the current notion of the center is about midway down the conservative side of the scale. And John Murtha, who works very well with Nancy Pelosi, will be the next majority leader in the House. Do follow Siobhan’s advice, and do enjoy. We all need a little ethyl alcohol to see us through this grand experiment. Wish I could share in some of the duck. It’s been a good 40+ years since I did any duck hunting.
Dale
November 7, 2006 at 12:54 pm
26Optical scanner, schmoptical schmanner. Ka-thunk!
Another reason to live in NY!
benihana
November 7, 2006 at 1:06 pm
27Hi Everyone- In keeping with the peaceful theme, I want to share some hope…. Remind us what is truely important in democracy, a society founded upon higher ideals… This is red sate blue state harmony, I applaud you all on embracing your civic responsibility!! Namaste, B
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwXDeVKjdYA&NR
George
November 7, 2006 at 1:08 pm
28I noticed a difference in the political adverts on my drive to the polls, then on to work today. I saw a bunch of signs for Allen and Drake (both Virginia (R)s) and zero signs for Webb and Kellam (our (D)s). Apparently, some signs were recently removed and others were put in their place.
While clearly distasteful, I am not sure if that behavior is illegal. Anyone have any ideas?
waterfowler
November 7, 2006 at 1:39 pm
29Amen to your advise Landis.
Siobhan, I think your wines are probably a little easier on the liver than my preferred whiskey. BTW, I saw a bald eagle the other day just south of East Tree Stump. I’ve heard rumors of them on the big lakes up north, but not around here.
David, I’ll take your word for it. If Pelosi’s not a leftist, I don’t know one. ‘Cept for maybe you and the ACLU. Next time I come through the Green Swamp, I’ll try to bring you some duck. For the record though, it does need help to make it edible. Wine, whiskey, garlic, or bacon…
Harold
November 7, 2006 at 1:39 pm
30Adverts? ADVERTS? George isn’t one of us! He mut be BRITISH! Throw him in the harbor!!!
Siobhan
November 7, 2006 at 2:11 pm
31Fowler, didn’t you mean wine, whiskey, garlic and bacon?
SeattleDan
November 7, 2006 at 2:38 pm
32We voted by mail. Our ballots should arrive today. I like voting at the polling place, too. But for the past couple of elections, we have sat at our red table with our friend Paula, who has only started voting recently; she’s in her mid-40’s and is now a proud voter.
For us, it’s kind of a no-brainer election. We didn’t vote for the ex-Safeco ceo; and our congressman (for life) is Jim McDermott.
fowler, I’ve heard it said of us here in the bluest of blue cities that Seattle would vote for Che Guevara for Mayor if he were alive and running. And it’s probably true.
Ann
November 7, 2006 at 3:03 pm
33I know I would—he’s so handsome in that movie!
And speaking of film, that Larry King bit was truly disturbing. “His” figure was outstanding, but dancing skills, not so much.
sjelly
November 7, 2006 at 3:06 pm
34I hope this won’t cause a fuss, but I wonder: I’ve read numerous stories of electonic voting machines changing votes for Democratic candidates to votes for Republicans, but not the converse. Does anyone out there know of any states, districts, or precincts where this has been reported? Thanks.
sjelly
November 7, 2006 at 3:09 pm
35Also, I agree with Ann that the Larry King bit was disturbing (to say the least!), but disagree about “his” figure. “He” needs to eat more. I was afraid “his” twig-like body would crumple under the weight of “his” mighty silicone breasteses.
Landis
November 7, 2006 at 3:25 pm
36I’m really confused about this Larry King thing. I watched that video and didn’t see anything about Larry King besides the strange soundtrack. Was it because she had suspenders on her bikini? I thought that was strange but …?
cooper
November 7, 2006 at 3:44 pm
37Harold, no George just lived over in that jolly old land for a while. I find when I spend more than 2 weeks in Maine that words like “A-yuh” and “Goo-Ud” start popping up in my usual blather. I say we cut George’s Sister’s brother some slack.
sjelly, or under the weight of Larry’s fat head.
Ann, raining hard in Seattle for days on end - that’s so surprising.
Landis
November 7, 2006 at 3:58 pm
38Whoa…. Never saw the head.
Adam Felber
November 7, 2006 at 4:00 pm
39Heehee.. Very perceptive observations about Larry, everyone (except Landis).
It’s supposed to be disturbing, to say the least. That’s the “horrifyingly” part. It’s sort of designed to make your brain hurt a little. And yes, as Ann noted, our Larry is a model and not a dancer.
But in our star’s defense, Sjelly, she appears to be a bit more “twig-like” than she is because of the giant Larry King head we put over her own head, and there isn’t any silicone involved.
As for me, if the only mark I leave on the world of television this year is Larry King uttering the line “George Takei - was 9/11 preventable?”… I’ll feel like I’ve served honorably.
David
November 7, 2006 at 4:05 pm
40Yes, Fowler, I am a leftist, although as a progressive Southern Democrat, I am actually a leftist by default because of the current nature of the American political spectrum. In France, I would be a centrist, I suspect. Mostly, I’m Jeffersonian, except no black slave for a mistress. I do know some real leftists, and believe me, Nancy Pelosi is no leftist. She’s a progressive centrist.
You’re right about how to enjoy duck. And I think the conversation would be fun, too, especially half way through a bottle of Jim Beam.
David
November 7, 2006 at 4:16 pm
41Damn, Adam posted simultaneously, so I had not read his when I posted mine. This is just to explain the utter disconnect between his and my post. Adam, you serve honorably as a way of life, as all Felbernauts know and for which we love you, yes we do, Mother Felber’s gift to us all.
GW
November 7, 2006 at 4:20 pm
42Wow, the Internets sure are slow tonight, takes forever for a page to open. It must be those new young voters all over this great land of ours checking out the election returns on this new media Mr. Gore invented. Too bad he couldn’t invent a better personality on the campaign trail. He might be in White House today. Naaaahh. Not with Turdblossom in charge of the counting. Heh, heh. Well let’s see what kind of magic he can work tonight. Buenos Noches. Heh, heh.
Rebecca
November 7, 2006 at 4:31 pm
43Checking in from Minnesota Suburbia. I voted about a half hour ago, and with 2 hours left to vote, I was #1,546 to vote out of about 2,700 registered voters at my voting place. That’s roughly 57% voter turnout (for my area), and it was hella busy. Perhaps my little chunk of suburbia can surpass 60%, which would be more than I’ve ever seen turn out for a presidential election. Also, like “It’s Pat!” noted, yay for optical scanners in good ol’ Minnesota.
I thought I’d never be for cautious optimism again (my entire 4 person apartment nearly had a mental breakdown in ‘04), but… maybe this time.
Ann
November 7, 2006 at 4:56 pm
44I don’t watch the suspendered one, but I was quite puzzled by the George Takei reference. Does Mr. Sulu have a theory?
dee
November 7, 2006 at 5:15 pm
45Well now it’s going to seem like I’m sucking up, but I thought the George Takei line was the best thing in the clip.
It still creeped me out though.
Mieke
November 7, 2006 at 5:59 pm
46What a nailbiter, peeps. But Adam, tsk tsk, you think if they don’t steal this election then the fix isn’t still in? Then they’re saving it up for ‘08. Can’t raise TOO many eyebrows and still keep your evil plot running covertly. And who knows. Maybe the Diebold “fixers” are like, “Dang it. We thought we’d only be hated 10% more. Shoulda punched in 15%.”
I do find it interesting that in places like Denver, with the malfunctioning of voting machines, an extension was asked for and rejected by the powers-that-be on the grounds that they didn’t have the authority to do so. Strange that in other states they were able to do that.
That said, so far, we are kicking some booty, y’all! Woohoo!
(Oh please please don’t make me read this comment and cringe tomorrow morning. Please please please).
Kat Bennett
November 7, 2006 at 6:00 pm
47What head?
~Kat
(Landis’ Wife)
Dale
November 7, 2006 at 6:04 pm
48Dee, thanks for the idea about cookies to poll workers. I had already voted, but I went back (admittedly with store-bought goods–I support democracy, but not enough to bake). They were very happy.
tess
November 7, 2006 at 6:23 pm
49This is as good a reason for absentee voting. I’m glad I got to just fill in the bubble with a black pen instead of struggling with some sort of buggy POS at the polls — though I missed out on getting a free bonsai if I brought one of those “I Voted” stickers to the university plant shop.
Rusty
November 7, 2006 at 6:28 pm
50Santorum is unseated!!! That’s all the news I need tonight. Starting to look like Rove’s election “math” was cut from the same thread as Bush’s Iraq “plan”.
I too pulled a Landis. Kind of underlooked the head…
Was that thing actually on television?
piglet
November 7, 2006 at 6:33 pm
511. It’s interesting that there are no comments on YouTube about the Larry King thingy. I think it stuns its viewers for a moment. Very effective, stoner-wise.
2. Watch it there with the duck recipes. I’m a Duck (Go, Nike-sponsored University of Oregon, in your most fashionable football uniforms ever! We are hoping that someday there will be a Heisman for that.)
3. Santorum’s going doooown (at least in early polling with an incredibly small percentage of the vote in)!
Nicole
November 7, 2006 at 6:49 pm
52Coming out of lurking to post this article - apparently, some of our precincts in MA actually ran out of ballots and voters claim they were turned away…
http://www.boston.com/news/local/politics/blog/2006/11/_voters_are_rep .html
margaret
November 7, 2006 at 7:08 pm
53I actually won.
My 3-town, 4-representative district suddenly and unexpectedly turned 100% blue.
Having just got off the phone with the press, now I must start paying attention to the rest of the country.
Kimberly
November 7, 2006 at 7:42 pm
54hello from Oregon-
with mandatory vote-by-mail, we got our ballots a few weeks ago, perused them while looking at the state voters’ guide; campaign materials; and those lovely negative ads, and voted last week. Dropped the ballot off at the elections building yesterday (my husband delivered his to the library the other day). I have to say, it’s a great way to vote. Considering the rain and flooding problems, it’s worked out pretty well!
well- back to lurking
Kimberly
benihana
November 7, 2006 at 7:46 pm
55Congrats Margaret-
The only color i like more than purple, is blue…. Will you please autograph my mouse!?!!?!?! (F.Y.I. Santorum’s giving a concession speech….)
Dale
November 7, 2006 at 7:51 pm
56Super congratulations, Margaret! So when do you start handing out lucrative no-bid contracts to your Fan Ap friends?
sjelly
November 7, 2006 at 7:54 pm
57I retract the silicone comment because I just noticed the HEAD! I get it now, duh!
Sharon
November 7, 2006 at 8:16 pm
58Dee, I voted on a mechanical lever machine this morning here in CT. A few precincts are trying out some optical scanning machines, but if and when they are deployed, I will refuse to use them and will request a paper ballot.
Cooper, some of the excuses that I’ve read today about the evoting machines are laughable. “It hadn’t warmed up yet.” “The touch screens slip out of calibration with heavy use.” “Poll workers couldn’t get the machines to start properly.”
As we used to say in the software biz, “Giveth me a break.”
siobhan
November 7, 2006 at 9:18 pm
59YEA!! San Francisco Values take charge!!
(sorry Fowler, but I’m psyched… try any of the Claudia Springs pinots or zins; they’ll do the trick, I promise.)
SeattleDan
November 7, 2006 at 9:22 pm
60Margaret, many congrats. SeattleTammy and I looked earlier at your blog and as we are bookpeople, we should talk. Not that we’re angling for one of those no-bid book contracts that Haliburton holds in Iraq.
But now you are charged for doing good things. We wish you the best of luck. And thank you for being willing to serve in you fair state.
YLlama
November 7, 2006 at 9:29 pm
61As a Seattle resident, I didn’t care about all these national referenda and whatnot. All I cared about was Seattle Referendum No. 1, which had to do with whether or not the City takes my lap dances away, and Seattle Charter Amendment No. 12, which had to do with whether appointed (rather than elected) councilmembers get to vote on amending the city charter. Local politics is where it’s at.
hedera
November 7, 2006 at 9:38 pm
62I was out early this morning to vote, right after the polls opened; I wore my “I voted” sticker proudly all day. Our county is using optical scanners: you take a black pen (which the poll worker politely reminded me to return to her) and fill in the spaces to complete a black arrow pointing at your vote. Then you put the thing in the optical scanner, which makes a satisfying “sssssshhhhPPPPP!” sound as it sucks the paper in.
If they ever go back to touch screen, I’ll go permanent absentee, although, like several other people, I really find voting at the polls satisfying. Voting absentee, I would have missed the young man with the 7 month old baby in a sling, generally agreed to be the youngest “voter.” (I’m starting to think about retirement, and when I do, I think I’ll become a poll worker.) I won’t really trust electronic voting machines until the software is completely open source and maintained and scrutinized by the world community of geeks.
I always thought the lever machines sounded like a great way to vote, but like many computer types, I’m a gadget freak.
hedera
November 7, 2006 at 9:40 pm
63Oh, yeah - local politics - I voted FOR the library bond, thank you!
SeattleDan
November 7, 2006 at 9:52 pm
64Ylama, I voted in support of your right to lap dances. Enjoy them!
SeattleTammy doesn’t let me go to those places anymore.
Murray
November 7, 2006 at 10:00 pm
65I just stumbled in, it’s 1:00 and it took almost 2 hours to drive from the party due to the fog (including the fog outside). I spent most of the day walking door to door, to put a post-it note and Tony lit on all of the Democrat houses in 2 precints who hadn’t voted by noon. Then headed to HQ and cheered as more and more news came in Dems victories all around. At 9 we headed to the Democratic victory party in Altoona.
Everything looked fabulous until they got to the PA 9th.
Bill Shuster 58%
Tony Barr 42%
If I weren’t so heavily invested in this one race I would be elated with the results so far. As it is I’m just kind of numb.
David
November 7, 2006 at 10:03 pm
66Definite congratulations to Margaret.
Jim Webb just pulled ahead of Senator Macaca. That one will go to a recount, I reckon. Since the governor of Virginia is a Democrat, it won’t be a Florida or Ohio situation - just the normal, probably legit double checking of the results. The bizarros have happened only in states with a Republican gov and sec of state.
The sweep in the House is exactly what Larry O’Donnell said last week that Democratic professionals and Washington news folk were privately expecting. This level of turnaround in the House is downright exhilirating. And I predict here and now that Nancy Pelosi will wear her newfound power with grace and judgement that Denny Hastert didn’t even bother to consider, let alone practice.
One bright note in Florida: the second most powerful post, that of chief financial officer for the state, went to Alex Sink, a DEMOCRAT and a WOMAN. We’re talking what was assumed when it was created by the Republicans four years ago (I think it was four years) to be a white Republican male gimme. I promise you there are a lot of stunned Republican power brokers tonight.
Meanwhile, I’m drinking Anchor Steam tonight in honor of the lady from Maryland who moved to California and is now set to become the first woman speaker of the house of representatives of the United States of America, a very smart, very competent lady, and a progressive centrist Democrat to boot.
If we either take the Senate or draw even, that will be major icing on the cake. Thank you, Karl Rove, for thinking the manufactured flap over John Kerry’s misstatement was a good idea.
And let the draining of the swamp begin.
SeattleDan
November 7, 2006 at 10:10 pm
67Murray, you and Tony had such an uphill race, I think 42% is something of a victory. Keep fighting the good fight, gentleman.
David
November 7, 2006 at 10:12 pm
68Murray,
42% against Shuster, while being laced for you and the rest of Team Tony with the bitterness of defeat after that much work, should make the national organization sorry it didn’t help out. As Howard Dean keeps saying, it is a mistake to ignore races those on high don’t believe are winnable. Your race has to be recategorized as one that really could have turned out differently if it had had some meaningful help. If Tony runs again, plan on a donation from me. Did you guys finish in the black, or are there debts still to be retired? Inquiring minds care.
SpottedDog
November 8, 2006 at 1:30 am
69I voted this afternoon in Idaho. A husband and wife, both looked to be in their late seventies, stooped and somewhat feeble, were voting together in the booth next to mine. The husband was reading the ballot to his wife. When he got to the amendment banning same sex marriage I had to smile when she said, “ooh, no…”and he said “I think we want to vote for the husband and wife marriage…”
Harold
November 8, 2006 at 4:12 am
7040% of the votes in a district that has been Republican for 146 years, waging a low-budget grassroots campaign that was ignored by the local media and unsupported by the national party? 78,952 people said “I want Tony Barr!” Schuster should be terrified.
Congratulations, Tony. You fought a good, clean fight. Next time for sure.
Sharon
November 8, 2006 at 5:16 am
71In Connecticut, Joe “I {heart} Bush} Lieberman defeated Democratic challenger Ned Lamont, with a lot of help from Republican voters. Lieberman’s spokesperson vowed that he would continue to caucus with Democrats. We’ll see.
[Wow, the internets pipes are still slow this morning!]
In my district, Democrat Chris Murphy ousted 12-term Congresswoman Nancy Johnson. Yes!
Two other fiercely contested House races are still undecided.
GW
November 8, 2006 at 5:32 am
72Well, I guess the bloom’s off the Turdblossom. Heh, heh. Well, you can’t steal these elections forever. Just 2 more years and I get to go back to the ranch and seriously deal with that brush clearing situation. Here, Barney, let me show you a new trick I learned watching the Animal Planet. Come here, boy. It’ll just take a minute and then I have to write crib notes on my sleeve before I meet the press this morning.
dee
November 8, 2006 at 5:35 am
73My friend Elizabeth got a seat on our school board, which is still dominated by Republicans who think gay kids are not harrassed in school. Elizabeth will beg to differ. Often.
Murray, you and Tony need to take a nice long rest and then you can look back on a campaign that both of you should be proud of. People like Tony and Elizabeth who take the risks and put themselves on the line are the real heroes.
And in a bit of a self-serving message, may I say it’s JUST what I wanted!
cooper
November 8, 2006 at 5:54 am
74dee, you’re Sagittarian? I’m not surprised. We do have a certain cachet about us. If I might be so very familiar - Happy Birthday, darling! Congrats on your friend’s victory.
Murray, if this is any consolation, we have a Tony Barr-like race here in our Congressional district that pits the multi, multi-millionaire incumbent Republican Robin Hayes against ex textile worker and current teacher Larry Kissel. Larry got absolutely no help from the Democratic HQ and last week had $35.56 in the campaign war chest. Hayes is leading by 470 votes out of the 120,000 cast, with provisional votes yet to be counted and most of those are from heavily Democratic turf. We shall see. Hopefully today. I sure hope my vote counted after that touchscreen SNAFU yesterday.
Margaret, good for you! May you serve with distinction and grace.
cooper
November 8, 2006 at 5:59 am
75Oh yeah, and Maragret, kick their butts!
siobhan
November 8, 2006 at 6:07 am
76Pombo went down! LA la la la ti da….
The worst anti-environmental asshat out there now has to seek some sort of legitimate job. (Good luck on that, maybe his buddy Abramoff can offer a hand.) On the ActBlue pages, I mostly gave to worthy longshots but had to put my biggest contribution behind McNerney just to get rid of Pombo. Did I mention he went down? DOWN!!!
…damn, it’s hard to type while you’re skipping around the room…
Lilyfern
November 8, 2006 at 6:26 am
77Happy to report that here in Wisconsin we re-elected Democratic Governor Jim Doyle. Bush Toady Mark Green, Rep. 8th District, had vacated his seat to challenge the governor, and toady State Rep. John Gard was annoited to fill it. Incidently, the 8th District has only had 2 Democratic representatives in living memory…wait, make that THREE! Allergy doctor Steve Kagen whooped him after one of those nasty knockdown fights you’ve been hearing about, where both sides dumped a bazillion dollars into assaulting us with campaign advertising.
So nice to know that 2 toadies are looking for jobs.
David
November 8, 2006 at 6:41 am
78Correction: Hoyer, not Murtha, will be new House majority leader. Gotta check, but I think majority whip is what Murtha is seeking.
Allen is going down in Virginia, and McCaskill won in Missouri. And my guy in WNC, Heath Shuler, buried Chainsaw Charles Taylor. Meanwhile, siobhan, I drank one beer for Pombo crashing and burning. Gaia was obviously fed up with the sonofabitch. Plenty of jobs out there, so long as Pombo likes slinging hamburgers.
gsny
November 8, 2006 at 7:47 am
79siobhan, you absolutely made my day! Well, the voters in California district 11 did, but you broke the news! Thank you. You’re right, it *is* hard to type when you’re skipping for joy
Harold
November 8, 2006 at 7:57 am
80Happy Birthday, dee!
Rick “Man-on-Dog” Santorum and Don “The Strangler” Sherwood both went down here in Pennsylvania. Soon both of them will now be forced to take jobs as highly-paid low-public-exposure Republican lobbyists or consultants. Oh, crap.
Well, at least they’re out. Or will be, once Casey and Carney are sworn in.
Siobhan
November 8, 2006 at 10:02 am
81BTW, in my message about Pombo, I didn’t mean to imply that being a representative isn’t a legitimate job. It’s only when someone like him fills the slot that it loses its luster.
I will take a swipe at one Dem - I can’t believe Cold-Cash Jefferson is in front in Louisiana. Appalling.
Harold
November 8, 2006 at 10:03 am
82RUMSFELD JUST RESIGNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
cooper
November 8, 2006 at 10:05 am
83dee, my bad - you’re not a Sagittarian after all. Ah heck, I like you anyway. Happy Birthday.
Well, we knew it was just a matter of time… I just heard a talking head on NPR refer to Nancy Pelosi as the titular leader of the House.
cooper
November 8, 2006 at 10:07 am
84Again, Harold?
Harold
November 8, 2006 at 10:10 am
85http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/08/rumsfeld.ap/index.html
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, architect of an unpopular war in Iraq, intends to resign after six stormy years at the Pentagon, Republican officials said Wednesday.
Officials said Robert Gates, former head of the CIA, would replace Rumsfeld.
The development occurred one day after congressional elections that cost Republicans control of the House of Representatives, and possibly the Senate as well. Surveys of voters at polling places said opposition to the war was a significant contributor to the Democratic Party’s victory.
President George W. Bush was expected to announce Rumsfeld’s departure and Gates’ nomination at a news conference. Administration officials notified congressional officials in advance.
Allison
November 8, 2006 at 10:12 am
86Yaay! It’s official — Rumsfeld’s outta there!
Edith, Mother of all Felbers
November 8, 2006 at 10:18 am
87Rumsfeld quit?
oh wow - off to the TV to verify
(not Margaret’s win - that’s etched in gold!)
(and gsny - forgive please, I indvertantly used your “ke-chunk” analogy in another post, another place.)
WHATTA DAY!
Harold
November 8, 2006 at 10:25 am
88There’s your birthday present, dee!
Ann
November 8, 2006 at 10:36 am
89I’m just giddy! Elections went incredibly well AND Rummy is out, not to mention Dee’s birthday! Happy birthday, Dee!
The victory would have been much sweeter had Tony won, but his numbers were truly impressive. I do hope he runs again!
dee
November 8, 2006 at 11:05 am
90Oh gosh, this is all too too much! The Evil One, gone less than 24 hours after the elections! And the girls at work just gave me chocolate cake and bourbon fudge and a bottle of kahlua.
This is the BESTEST birthday I’ve had for a long time
Mieke
November 8, 2006 at 11:06 am
91Ding dong, the witch is dead! Rumsfeld resigned, the House is ours, and the Senate is one seat away from being ours. I assume that one will be a drawn out, Florida-style battle. But: Woohoo! By the way, dumb question, but how do they figure Lieberman into those Senate balance charts they show on TV with the Republicans having 49 seats and the Dems having 50?
I’m in California, and while sort of happy, disappointed in Arnold Shwarzenneger’s reelection, disappointed that the cigarette tax proposition went down, very disappointed that the alternative energy proposition went down, thanks to big oil company’s efforts.
But all said, very pleased!
Allison
November 8, 2006 at 11:15 am
92Happy birthday, Dee! I’m glad you got some good news on your birthday.
P.S. I’m a Scorpio too. Uppity women unite!
Landis
November 8, 2006 at 11:17 am
93Yes, Happy Birthday Dee! The only thing that could make it better is if maybe Larry were to dance at your party…. Ok, maybe not (it just can’t get much better, no?)
Should somebody go check up on WaterFowler and make sure that he isn’t contemplating “cleaning his gun” or drinking more moonshine than his liver can handle? The red wine really is better for you - ask the mice. And don’t worry about Ms. Pelosi, she’s not nearly as bad as you’ve been led to believe (she’s not nearly as much as many of us liberals would have hoped).
Mieke, Lieberman and Sanders are both officially Independents who are being counted as Democrats in those totals as they promised to ‘caucus’ with the Dems. Even if Lieberman is a DINO, he’s absolutely needed for a D majority.
Steve
November 8, 2006 at 11:30 am
94When do you thing martial law will be declared?
Mike Z
November 8, 2006 at 11:33 am
95Ok, so I’m confused. Rumsfeld just resigned even though W had expressed nothing but glowing support and an intention to stick with him through the rest of W’s term.
It’s almost like W was lying for public relations purposes, then switched as soon as switching became politically convenient, (aka “the timing was right”).
p.s. After the last election, I (and many FanAp regulars) expressed a deep-felt disconnect with America that often came out as “Am I really that out of touch with how stupid Americans really are?” Now I feel a little more relieved. I’m no democrat lover, but at least I am reassured that the voters are not *completely* blind.
waterfowler
November 8, 2006 at 11:36 am
96Congrats lefties. Nancy & Harry just made the top of the prayer list.
benihana
November 8, 2006 at 11:53 am
97Do you think we can get “Lord of the Flies” and “Lord of the Rings” as required reading for our elected leaders….? More thinking before “duh-ciding”… Always a good thing. Fowler, I’ll keep a candle going for Madame Pelosi!
YLlama
November 8, 2006 at 11:54 am
98Mike Z, I always wondered whether the issue is simply that not enough people vote often enough. That two years ago, when the election results were so painful, it was because a certain group of people voted and a certain other group didn’t. This time around when the results make a little more sense, it is just because the group that voted last time did not this time around, and the group that stayed home last time came out this time.
Of course, I also wonder whether the optical scanner readers are simply more conservative than the touch screen machines.
Siobhan
November 8, 2006 at 11:56 am
99Fowler, that’s a good thing. They’ll need help from every corner.
Seattle Dan/Tammy or any other locals - What is the delay in the Darcy Burner race? Last I looked there was only 30-something % of the results? Is it something related to all of the horrendous weather? (And hoping you all came through that okay, by the way.)
SeattleDan
November 8, 2006 at 12:12 pm
100Siobhan, they’re still counting and the race hasn’t been called. I’ll try to keep you posted. It would be very sweet if Burner beats Reichert, who ran a rather despicable campaign.
Fortunately, it dried out some yesterday. A couple of polling places had to close in the Cascade foothills because of flooding, but otherwise I think voting went smoothly here.
dee
November 8, 2006 at 12:43 pm
101All that Republican scare talk about how if the Democrats gain the house they would immediately start impeachment proceedings was just such a pile of drivel. Impeaching the Smirking Putz leaves us with…President Cheney.
Of course, one little electrical blip in his pacemeaker now leaves us with…President Pelosi.
Oh my.
Harold
November 8, 2006 at 1:04 pm
102Maybe Cheney can resign next.
Waterfowler, at least you have ben spared from the wrath of Kinky Friedman.
Sharon
November 8, 2006 at 1:07 pm
103Say with me kids…”Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.” I just want to say it over and over again. What a beautiful, beautiful sound.
And with the
ousterresignation of Donald Rumsfeld, George W. Bush can at last begin to fulfill the promise he made at the firstcoronationinauguration, that is to restore honor and integrity to the White House.nato
November 8, 2006 at 1:51 pm
104Rumsfeld may have resigned, but is Gates really that much of an improvement? Well, I guess he does have prior experience with Iraq . . .
Siobhan
November 8, 2006 at 1:53 pm
105Dee, actually we’d have to get past President Rice before we get to Pelosi.
YLlama
November 8, 2006 at 2:00 pm
106Siobhan, the Secretary of State is actually fifth in the chain of succession. The Speaker of the House is number three. So after Pelosi is formally elected to the position (and assuming she is, although that seems to have become a foregone conclusion), she’d be in line before Ms. Rice. See Wikipedia for more information.
Sharon
November 8, 2006 at 2:03 pm
107Really? I, too, thought that the Speaker was third in line. Wait, let me get my pocket Constitution….
Yep, it’s President, VP, Speaker, President pro tempore of the Senate, then Sec. of State followed by the rest of the Cabinet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_line_of_succes sion
Murray
November 8, 2006 at 3:11 pm
108“Yep, it’s President, VP, Speaker, President pro tempore of the Senate, then Sec. of State followed by the rest of the Cabinet.”
What? President of the senate? Sheesh. Can’t they get anything right?
Those of us old enough to remember Al Haig and his “I’m in charge here”, and then his informing America, that it was the President, Vice, then him, only to be corrected publicly, will always know the correct line of succession.
OK.
It’s hard to be depressed (despite my natural inclination) on a day where the news (with one kind of major exception for me) is excellent and keeps getting better.
I talked to Tony today and he is disappointed but satisfied with his showing. We all have ideas on greatly improving our methods, effectiveness, and overall outcome, and will meet after Thanksgiving to map out our long term strategy.
I believe that this is now a seat that we can convince others, is ours for the taking in 08, freeing up money to do the job right. We will also have 2 years to fund raise, recruit and train volunteers, point out Shuster’s miserable record in detail, and build democratic organizations to build up our base and get out the vote.
Thanks to all of you who contributed money, and gave words of encouragement to us.
I’ve learned a lot.
Up close I’ve seen the best in politics to reaffirm my faith and hope in our system of government and I’ve seen the worst, to make me even more cynical than before. I also have another example for my “overwhelming things”. I often tell others (who still pretend to listen) that there are a number of things so overwhelmingly consuming by their very nature that they cannot be comprehended with out going through them yourself. Having children, having teenagers, building your house by yourself, starting your own business, going though a divorce, and now, running for congress. Others may have further examples like, writing and publishing your own novel, or producing your own TV show, etc.
Well my printer is silent, (10,000 Tony brochures), I’ve retrieved the one Tony sign that Shuster’s minions haven’t take down, and now can return to my normal business at hand. Uhh….. Oh yeah! Biking, fighting little kids, pontificating on a blog, and biking!
I’m going to go for a long ride with Tony on Saturday.
Harold
November 8, 2006 at 3:19 pm
109Murray, I was wondering if Tony would say “Next time? Next time you run, and I’ll manage!”
Siobhan
November 8, 2006 at 3:27 pm
110Murray - wishing you two the most perfect crisp autumn day imagineable.
Thank Tony for trying - just by running, he changed it from a coronation to a contest. It’s hard to make your voice heard in this climate, but you’ll never be heard if you don’t bother to speak up. I’m grateful for everyone who said ENOUGH.
K. Rove
November 8, 2006 at 3:35 pm
111Anyone know a good math tutor?
SeattleDan
November 8, 2006 at 4:01 pm
112Karl, remember the Tom Lehrer song “New Math”? See, you were working in base ten when you should have used base eight.
Linkmeister
November 8, 2006 at 4:32 pm
113Hmm, reading that Wikipedia article, I think I’ve been wrong in my understanding. I had the impression that the succession had been changed to put elected officials (those who had had to face voters) ahead of Cabinet members, on the theory that “the people” had picked the successors rather than the President doing the picking. The Wikpedia article doesn’t address that. Now I wonder whether I’m right and Wikipedia is just remiss, or whether I’ve been wrong for all this time.
Happy Birthday, Dee (mine was Saturday; yesterday was the nicest b-day gift I’ve gotten in six years).
cooper
November 8, 2006 at 5:09 pm
114Linkmeister, Wikipedia is pretty good but not infallible.
The first six in line:
The Vice President Richard Cheney
Speaker of the House John Dennis Hastert
President pro tempore of the Senate1 Ted Stevens
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice
Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld
(nt) Pete
November 8, 2006 at 5:56 pm
115Not really anything other than trivia, but that one tiny (383 registered voters) delinquent precinct in Isle of Wight, VA is 5 miles from where I live. Fortunately, for my sense of “my vote isn’t widely dismissed as can’t-make-a-difference-now” it’s not my precinct (by about 1/2 a mile).
David
November 8, 2006 at 6:54 pm
116BOTH HOUSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!
GW
November 8, 2006 at 7:06 pm
117Yes! CNN has called the Va. Senate race for Jim Webb. Okay, now what do we do?
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/08/election.main/index.html
My local Congressional race is still too close to call. The Repug candidate is ahead by 460 and we’re still awaiting the provisional vote count.
nato
November 8, 2006 at 7:56 pm
118CNN may have called the VA race, but at last check Burns and Allen were both still refusing to concede defeat. Anyone else have the urge to shout “Say goodnight, Gracie!”?
siobhan
November 8, 2006 at 8:02 pm
119Okay, if you’re serious that you don’t want corrupt slimebags on either side of the aisle:
Jefferson from Louisiana is being forced into a runoff. It’s insane that he’d get 30%, especially given Louisiana’s recent experience with government officials concerned more with their own well-being over the general public. Fortunately, there is an alternative, Karen Carter. If we’re serious about cleaning house, we’ve got to hold our side to the same higher standards.
You can support Karen here via ActBlue.
Linkmeister
November 8, 2006 at 9:40 pm
120Right, cooper, thanks. What I meant was that I remembered the impetus for changing the succession from Cabinet officers to elected officials was as I suggested above, but Wikipedia doesn’t mention that. Not a big deal, but I seem to recall a discussion about that in my (long) lifetime.
siobhan
November 8, 2006 at 10:03 pm
121I love this pair of editorial cartoons from Tom Toles:
Sunday, October
followed by….
Thursday, November 9
ice weasel
November 8, 2006 at 10:13 pm
122From the beating a dead horse category comes this question. How many times did NPR characterize the victories last night as “conservative”?
Answer, way more than they needed to.
Mr. rove thanks you and your check is in the mail.
It would appear that the media is still on message.
Mieke
November 8, 2006 at 10:30 pm
123On CNN, they said that Allen didn’t want to drag this out and will most likely concede tomorrow, nato. He knows the chances are slim to none that a recount would shift votes more than a couple hundred, and he lost by over 6000, so it would be a bad PR move for the Republicans. Seems they have decided to resign themselves to this loss across the board, reassure their ex-supporters that they “get it” now (in the hopes that they can win them back in two years) and slink off to lick their wounds. They are clearly trying to stay in (or get back into) the good graces of conservatives by being “good losers”. Bush joking around about their “thumpin’”, Santorum’s kids weeping as their dad encourages his supporters to give a round of applause to his worthy opponent, Rumsfeld bowing out. I highly doubt Allen is going to start kicking and screaming now.
Mieke
November 8, 2006 at 11:14 pm
124Nothing could kill my buzz right now, but did I just hear Bush say, “I hope they can overcome the temptation to divide this country between red and blue”…? (Clearing wax out of ears) Is he serious? Is he SERIOUSLY saying that with a straight face?
Harold
November 9, 2006 at 4:04 am
125And to top it all off, Britney Spears filed for divorce on Tuesday, making her eligible to become my bride. Not that the Catholic Church really recognizes her godless heathen civil union anyway (or any other marriage outside of the Catholic Church), but still, it does clear up a legal hurdle. (Britney, honey, we’ll start the RCIA proceedings as soon as you’re back from ice skating.)
Perhaps we will invite Donald Rumsfeld, Rick Santorum, and Don Sherwood to the ceremony. For they have all helped make this a banner week.
David
November 9, 2006 at 6:29 am
126siobhan,
Thanks for the Tom Toles links.
Harold,
Take a ticket.
Mieke,
That was just white noise. Keep on buzzin’…
George
November 9, 2006 at 7:07 am
127Why G. Allen will concede:
It would be worse to instigate an investigation into the election process.
Harold
November 9, 2006 at 7:25 am
128Shout-out to Ice Weasel on Morning Edition today! They read the Matt Groening quote that gave birth to your name! See, they want to get back in your good graces!
Jim (OJNTNJ)
November 9, 2006 at 9:32 am
129Regarding post #117:
GW are YOU flip-flopping now?
Boomer
November 9, 2006 at 6:33 pm
130Damn, Elightenment, maybe you should get out more.
The FanAp elves
November 9, 2006 at 7:46 pm
131“Enlightenment” was spamming the same long message in multiple comments, so the duplicate ones have been removed. Any future spam from this person will be fed to Fanny.
hedera
November 9, 2006 at 9:05 pm
132I thought I heard that Senator Macaca (I like that) had conceded because it wasn’t possible to recount - they use electronic voting machines with no paper trail… Seriously, I heard his concession speech quoted on NPR this evening, and he actually sounded statesmanlike. “Nothing in his office became him like the leaving of it,” with apologies to Bill Shakespeare.
SeattleDan
November 9, 2006 at 9:34 pm
133Thank you FanAp elves. If I had wanted to read strange one paragraph essays, I’d have gone elsewhere.
Hedera, what I heard about Sen. Macaca is that a recount may have brought out lots of voter “irregularity” that the good Sen. didn’t want to be indicted for. Lots of reports of voter intimidation in Virginia, and He still lost.
waterfowler
November 9, 2006 at 11:02 pm
134SeattleDan, where are the reports of voter intimidation? If someone tried to “intimidate” me or mine, it’d be “game on”, and I expect it’d be the same w/ you.
David
November 10, 2006 at 4:55 am
135Fowler,
We’re white and central to the historically enfranchised. Voter intimidation occurs in predominantly black precincts. I have never experienced any form of intimidation any time I have ever voted. Blacks in Tampa and Jacksonville have seldom not faced some form of voter suppression. Not sure where it would have happened in Virginia, since the governor is a Democrat. Used to be that would have guaranteed suppression of blacks in Virginia, but the Democratic Party in Virginia has come a long way, baby. Not so Senator Macaca and his brand of contemporary Republican. My guess is you are viscerally non-racist, like a lot of contemporary Southerners of all political stripes. Not so older establishment Southern Republicans, unfortunately.
Sure glad blacks are still willing to play football for my Gators, which they’ve only been allowed to do since like 1967. Side note: there can never be too many kudos for Texas Western 1966.
nato
November 10, 2006 at 12:18 pm
136Fowler,
Here are 4 randomly selected reports or voter intimidation (or the investigation of voter intimidation) from a quick Google (http://www.google.com) search for the following:
voter intimidation +virginia
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7005447359
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6455612
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1162378347908&pagename=JPos t%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2006/11/2875_evidence_of_ lat.html
I realize that at least two of those sources are probably suspect in your mind due to their liberal biases, but surely that’s at least slightly offset by the inclusion of the almost content-free Faux News link below?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,227823,00.html
nato
November 10, 2006 at 12:21 pm
137Stupid Fanny Roborat! Hates my posts, but loves my hair. Well, in case my previous post doesn’t make it through, Fowler, try doing a search for “voter intimidation” +Virginia. You’ll find a plethora of reports on the subject.
SeattleDan
November 10, 2006 at 1:16 pm
138Fowler, here is one link. As nato points out, if you google Virginia voter intimidation, you’ll find some stories.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1162378347908&pagename=JPos t%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
nato
November 10, 2006 at 1:28 pm
139The post Fanny refuses to let through has a Fox News link (as well as one from Mother Jones and one from NPR, although those two might be a bit too liberal for Fowler’s tastes). And if you want to make my company happy, you could always search via one of our services:
http://www.blinkx.com/results?query=voter%20intimidation%20%2BVirginia
waterfowler
November 12, 2006 at 7:38 am
140That doesn’t seem too intimidating. Plus, if anyone falls for that kind of crap, they shouldn’t be allowed to vote. They’re obviously uninformed and gullible and would probably vote Dem.
dee
November 12, 2006 at 1:50 pm
141What a difference two years makes! I only wish we still had access to the comments for this, but a glimpse at the Trackbacks will give those of you who weren’t around back then and idea of the responses it generated.
So may I be the second to say “Felber in ‘08!”
nato
November 12, 2006 at 3:27 pm
142You’re so right, Fowler. Hey, I have an idea — let’s require a literacy and basic skills test before letting people vote. We’ll need an exemption for the President, of course. This whole democracy thing just gets in the way of good government for you, doesn’t it?
waterfowler
November 12, 2006 at 9:43 pm
143nato, he did get better grades than the one you voted for in ‘04.
Stephen
November 13, 2006 at 7:00 am
144I would have to say that intimidation is in the eye of the beholder, or in this case, the one being intimidated. While these things wouldn’t intimidate me either, that doesn’t really matter does it? What matters is that there are still people who feel that others are not “smart” or “informed” or “educated” enough to vote.
Before you go crazy over that, I think the only good electorate is a well informed and well educated one. However, who decides who is well enough educated? Who do we get to enforce those kinds of vague guidelines? It is well known that the founding fathers did not want the “rabble” to decide who was President, note the Electoral College, but I like to think we have come a long way since then.
Murray
November 14, 2006 at 1:25 pm
145Harold (#109), Tony Barr is an electable name, Murray Schrotenboer is not.
WF. I’m sure you wouldn’t be intimidated at the polling place and I’m sure you don’t think about race. You don’t have to. If you applied for a job but didn’t get it, you would assume that they hired someone more qualified; if you are black you assume they hired someone white. When you shop, store security doesn’t follow you around. When you drive through an affluent neighborhood the cops don’t stop you to find out why you would be there. You probably don’t have a great uncle who was lynched for not getting off the sidewalk when an important white person walked by. Your parents probably didn’t tell you stories about Tuskegee experiments. If you are white, you don’t think about race, if you are black you can’t not think about it. So if there is a police car at the polling place and he is checking everyone’s ID, you might assert your rights, but your aunt Fay might rather just go home and not take any chances.
They aren’t looking to intimidate everyone, just enough to make a difference.
siobhan
November 15, 2006 at 9:58 am
146In a similar vein, electronic voting machines in Florida appear to have eaten many thousand votes in a close house race (FL-13). Legal action appears to be forthcoming to freeze the machines for inspection; further challenges may be on the way. More info on DKos. (additional background here.)
Dale
November 15, 2006 at 2:38 pm
147Oops, I misread siobhan’s post and thought that electronic voting machines appeared to have eaten many thousand voters.
It’s a nice image, though.
David
November 15, 2006 at 8:50 pm
148myflorida.voterfraud - belongs right there on our license plates.
FANNY PLEASE HELP!
December 7, 2006 at 6:40 am
149How the heck did THAT make it past Fanny and the moderation queue?