Here I am with the new Juan Valdez! This picture was taken recently at a gala for Colombians and Colombian-Americans, in association with the Smithsonian Latino Center in DC. Eventually the Latino Center will be its own museum on the mall.
My mother is Colombian. (She became a US citizen about 10 years ago but maintains dual citizenship.) This gala benefit, held at the old Smithsonian castle, honored Colombians working in the media and arts in the US. Patricia Cardoso (director of Real Women Have Curves) was there, as was fashion designer Esteban Cortazar (featured last year as a judge on Project Runway).
My mother came with me. She’s very introverted and not really impressed by celebrities. So I was surprised when she leapt at Cristina Saralegui (Latin America’s Oprah) and screamed, “Cristina! I see you on TV!” Flat out lie. My mother watches baseball and Judge Judy.
Cheech Marin was hosting the event - which really made no sense, since he’s a Mexican-American. Why was he at an event for Colombians? (Okay, I’m really setting you guys up.)
Jeb Bush was there. He wasn’t very nice to me, even though I’m pretty sure I’m the only person there that knew that Florida’s state flower is the orange blossom. I told him that and he turned away. His wife Columba smiled, though. (I wonder if she was invited for her name.)
Anyway the new Juan Valdez (real name Carlos Castaneda) doesn’t speak a lick of English and he didn’t bring his mule Conchita. But he was super nice and there’s a chance our pic will appear in People en Espanol! (My tie is Brioni. I really like the color. The aviator glasses are something I’ve been trying out. Keep them or lose them?)





64 comments
Mo Rocca
November 4, 2006 at 5:32 pm
1DON’T BLAME ME FOR THE GIANT PICTURE OF ME AND JUAN VALDEZ. I spent all day trying to post it at a normal size. I left Adam TWO messages pleading for advice and I received none!
cooper
November 4, 2006 at 5:55 pm
2Jeez’ that took forever! - and I’m not convinced it’s the real Juan Valdez. Check out his non-coffee-stained fingers; obviously an imposter. Also, I’m not sure that’s Mo either - note the non-Trademark eyeglasses. Nice suit, though. If that is Mo, I’m certainly thrilled to see him in high spirits again after that high dollar rum soaked Babs Concert horror show.
dee
November 4, 2006 at 5:55 pm
3Muy grande.
Boomer
November 4, 2006 at 6:07 pm
4Yeah, I know what you mean, Mo. Adam doesn’t return my messages either. It must have been something I said. So, is Juan a Mo fan?
Rebecca
November 4, 2006 at 6:15 pm
5Gorgeous tie (I adore light blue), but I miss the awesome blue nerdy looking glasses (more adoration of blue). How much spanish was spoken between the two of you?
Mo Rocca
November 4, 2006 at 6:25 pm
6Okay, Adam just saved me by resizing the picture of Juan and me. Gracias! Now I’m going to back into the post and explain the scene.
don
November 4, 2006 at 6:25 pm
7That Juan Valdez has one really big right hand!
It is a really big Juan!
Gunney R. Lee
November 4, 2006 at 7:02 pm
8Hooah! D. Rumsfelt’s days as Secretary of Defense seem to be numbered…http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-2333360.php
SeattleDan
November 4, 2006 at 7:24 pm
9Love the tie, love the glasses, Mo. And congrats on the People in Espanol. The magazine is carried at the grocery store we shop at, so I’ll look for it. Buenos noches,y, buena suerta!
hedera
November 4, 2006 at 9:05 pm
10Ah, I see the Army Times editorial has hit the streets. It was announced yesterday in the San Francisco Chronicle, since Gannett released the story to the NY Times on Friday, and you know them - can’t keep a secret…
This fascinates me. The service Times sheets are published by Gannett, same as USA Today - hardly a hotbed of partisan politics. Middle America at work, in fact. My initial reaction was, this will lose them their contract, but apparently they don’t have a contract; they just publish, and service members buy the papers. (They have to get them onto the bases somehow, though.) They are the news source for the serving military. And this must mean that they are hearing this from their readers - the serving military, who will not publicly make statements like this themselves because of the rigid code which says we do not criticize the CinC.
The trouble is, since the Shrub never was a member of the serving military, he won’t understand the seriousness of this. But it’s very serious. For those papers to publish this editorial, means that Rumsfeld really has entirely blown the confidence of the men who report to him; and they’re starting to talk about it publicly.
hedera
November 4, 2006 at 9:29 pm
11This is interesting. Curious about Microsoft’s latest gadget, Internet Explorer 7 (which is supposed to do tabbed browsing), I downloaded it today and am playing with it. And the comments which line up perfectly and are alternately shaded in Firefox, are misaligned and awkward. Also, the “open in new tab” choice doesn’t work - it defaults to “open in new tab in new window”. Back to the drawing board, Redmond - you haven’t convinced me yet. Better yet, back to Firefox…
SeattleTammy
November 4, 2006 at 9:36 pm
12Big hands…
Big Stuff.
I’m just sayin’.
don
November 4, 2006 at 10:08 pm
13I just started using IE7, too, Seattle Tammy.
And, as I was reading down the Comments I had noted the phenomenon you mentioned. I don’t recall things aligning that way when I was using IE6.xxxx.
I am glad that it apparently wasn’t the Margarita I am drinking that was the cause.
You don’t happen to be partaking of a Margarita, do you Seattle?
don
November 4, 2006 at 10:11 pm
14Just for the sake of clarity, My Comment above began with “I just started …”
This one with “Just for …”
This could get confusing — even without the Margarita.
SeattleTammy
November 4, 2006 at 10:33 pm
15OK- I dont know no stinkin IE7. This be a mac. To my perception the top of the picture looked ok. But the bottom half was about 1/3 larger proportion. ergo BIG FREAKIN hands ok? it’s not just me people!
No margaritas, don, sadly. But the Deschutes Cascade Ale is quite nice!
SeattleTammy
November 4, 2006 at 10:35 pm
16looked ok except for some one who never got told to leave the aviators in the seventies and walk away…
David
November 5, 2006 at 4:33 am
17The governor of my state acting like an asshole? I’m shocked, I tell you, shocked.
David
November 5, 2006 at 4:35 am
18Oh, yeah, ties, schmies. But do keep the glasses. And keep pissing off the Bushes.
dee
November 5, 2006 at 4:37 am
19Carlos Castaneda?
Really?
Um..Mo…did you happen to get any samples of those “coffee beans.”? And are you going to be in DC for a while because it’s only five hours up the road for me…
Boomer
November 5, 2006 at 5:33 am
20Carlos Castaneda? I was thinking the same thing, dee. “Don” Juan must be his grandson - that, or there is an age defying component of peyote that didn’t seem to work for some of our generation. I guess it’s never too late. Maybe the good shaman was smearing it on the outside of his body and not ingesting it like us crazy gringos. You think?
George
November 5, 2006 at 6:12 am
21Carlos Castaneda’s hand is out of proportion because he was beginning to shapeshift.
I like the glasses, Mo. Are you celebrity people allowed to have varying looks? Can you keep the stereotyping nerd glasses for certain events and do a hip change-up for meeting Governors?
Erin
November 5, 2006 at 7:50 am
22i miss your old glasses, but i’m all for progress. if you like them, mo, you should absolutely keep them.
another Matt
November 5, 2006 at 8:11 am
23Seattle Tammy: Looks OK on my mac.
Saw Juan Valdez at the Coffee Park (or whatever it is called in Spanish) in Colombia a few years ago, when I was down fixing los ninos on a medical mission. He doesn’t look a day older. How is his donkey holding up, Mo?
It's Pat!
November 5, 2006 at 9:19 am
24Actually, it’s Juan’s ring finger and pinky that seems the most oversized. That just means he can throw a mean sinker. Unless he’s left handed, then it just means he’s very good at shaking hands.
Both Mo and Juan have beautiful teeth. And Mo’s tie is tied perfectly.
Therefore, they both have all the qualifications necessary to be our next Secretary of Defense. Let’s put Mo in there, and change the name to Offense -
Mo Offense!! I like it!
Edith, Mother of all Felbers
November 5, 2006 at 4:00 pm
25My goodness! I watch Baseball when it’s on and Judge Judy whenever I can!
Is it a mom thing?
(and yes - them is nice glasses - and that is truly a Big Hand!)
cooper
November 5, 2006 at 4:11 pm
26You can certainly smell the Repug desperation - http://movies.crooksandliars.com/MTP-Dole-Dems-Content-Losing.mov
hedera
November 5, 2006 at 6:00 pm
27Cooper, what I actually see in that clip is an appalling level of incivility on all sides. If all they’re going to do is sit and yell at each other, nothing will get done. Nancy Pelosi says she wants to return to a culture of civility and it’s very clear why she feels she has to say that.
Don, I’m the one with IE7, not SeattleTammy. I don’t know why you thought that was she. I do agree with her about Deschutes Cascade Ale.
Dale
November 5, 2006 at 6:08 pm
28I can see how it all happened. Some well-meaning American emcee, an inexperienced translator, a rousing call to the audience to “give a big hand to Juan Valdez”…(And perhaps he acquired Concha under similar circumstances, when a gringo host suggested where he could find a nice piece of ass?)
George
November 5, 2006 at 6:26 pm
29Very funny Dale
slackferno
November 5, 2006 at 8:05 pm
30Thumbs down on the new specs. Stick with the hipster frames. Nice tie though!
historyenne
November 5, 2006 at 8:49 pm
31You look very distinguished, Mo. May be the tie, may be the glasses. Light blue is your color.
tess
November 5, 2006 at 11:00 pm
32I have to agree with slackferno — the frames far too large for your eyes. You don’t need bifocals yet, do you? If not, stick to the thick-framed glasses. Otherwise, I like the cut of your suit.
David
November 6, 2006 at 4:11 am
33Mo,
You seem basically irrepressible. I suspect you are one of those lucky people who can get away with any style that strikes your fancy. The tie does appear to be a pointer (and a Tarheel tie, to boot).
Harold
November 6, 2006 at 4:35 am
34I just realized what was bugging me about Juan Valdez’s enormous right hand! Not that it gives him an unfair advantage in coffee bean-picking contests, but…
He’s an ALIEN!!!
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0611975/
Specifically, the extended pinky on the right hand was a telltale sign that an otherwise normal-appearing person was actually an alien in the TV series The Invaders.
Run, Mo!!! RUNNNN!!!!!!!
Carlos
November 6, 2006 at 6:17 am
35I attended the Colombians and Colombian-Americans gala. Now,
Nada peor que el blog a menos que los comentarios del lector. Poste Bueno. Apoyo el bloggers compañero y lo guarda libre patnox.com
Benjamin
November 6, 2006 at 9:57 am
36I’m glad to see I’m not the only one suffering the confusing effects of switching to IE7.
Mo, The tie is beautiful and elegant. The glasses though… To me you look an exec. from Microsoft. May I suggest something more John Lennon-ish? Some small gold-rimmed specs, perhaps?
Sharon
November 6, 2006 at 2:18 pm
37Muy hermoso!
And you, too, Mo.
As for the glasses, wear whatever is comfortable for you.
Boomer
November 6, 2006 at 4:28 pm
38Harold, you don’t seem old enough to have seen “The Invaders” first run. I guess you’ve wasted your youth (and Saturdays) watching reruns. Whichever, good of you to point that out about the finger - quite humorous, actually. And Harold’s right, Mo - RUNNNN!!!!!!
Murray
November 6, 2006 at 5:05 pm
39Mo, when I first saw the picture, I thought, “That might be Mo, but how can it be without the “Mo” glasses?”
And immediately this came to mind.
What do Stevie Nicks, Leon Redbone, Pee Wee Herman, Tom Wolfe, and Pope John Paul (Now Benedict I suppose), have in common?
They are prisoners of their wardrobes,
prisoners of their cloths,
if they changed the outfits that they wear, no one would stop and stare,
they’re prisoners.
There is a fine line between a groove and a rut,
between eccentrics and people who are just plain nuts.
(Christine Lavin)
Change your glasses and I don’t recognize you.
cooper
November 6, 2006 at 5:05 pm
40Off target, but if you still desire or need more political spin doctors spewing their bile…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EplxM9LLqhw
BTW, the interviewer (or referee in these case) is Rita Crosby, who used to grace our local news. I always thought of her as being all face and no brains.
cooper
November 6, 2006 at 5:08 pm
41Murray, tomorrow’s the day. Good luck to Tony. Now, get some sleep.
Rebecca
November 6, 2006 at 6:30 pm
42Hey Mo,
Saw the video of you with Norah O’Donnell on MSNBC today - it was very awesomely funny! And you had on completely different glasses that I had never seen before (and I liked them). I apologize for being weird and noticing your glasses, but you did start the discussion of them on this blog, after all…
And for anyone else who didn’t see this video with Ms. Norah, who wants to see it, and who has IE, here’s the link.
Harold
November 6, 2006 at 6:48 pm
43Boomer, my corruption came through literature. MAD Magazine did a parody of The Invaders which was reprinted in a Super Special a few years back. I assumed they made up the pinky thing, but no, according to the IMDb it appears that it was part of the TV show.
GOOD LUCK TONY!!!!!!
Murray
November 6, 2006 at 6:58 pm
44Coop and others.
I spent Saturday and Sunday going door to door campaigning. This is something that Tony enjoys, and I find to be the most stressful thing I know. After several hours, I have an exhaustion that even riding a century (100 miles) can’t touch. It’s even more draining than a day subbing with pre schoolers. Today we merely did a Democratic lit drop. (Leaving Tony literature at Democrat’s houses). It’s shocking how much information there is on these people. I know their addresses, names, and ages, (according to Tony, the Republicans know much more, including what they had for breakfast and last sexual partner)
.
Tomorrow early, I vote and put up some signs at several local polling places. We can’t put out the signs beforehand because Shuster’s idea of campaigning is to take down Tony’s signs. Virtually all of Tony’s signs have disappeared. Shuster has done almost nothing else. Then I will head for headquarters and schlump folks to the polls, schlump literature around, etc. Then off to the post election party. (Hopefully afterwards I can make it the 70 miles home). This is a huge district, 9500 sq miles, the second largest this side of the Mississippi.
Either goodness will triumph, or once again, the evil ones prosper.
This will either be a victory or a dress rehearsal for 2008. With 2 years to set up the committees, contact unions, recruit volunteers, fund raise, put together a dynamite web site, etc. we will be in a powerful place to send Shuster back to selling cars.
We will probably know by this time tomorrow.
It’s unusual to have everything in your life changed in one known upcoming moment. People’s lives are changed all the time in a single moment but you almost never know it’s coming. Here at an appointed time we will know if our life’s goes one way or another.
History.
Two weeks before the May primaries in PA the Dems failed to field a candidate for US congress. Tony stepped up and naively said that he would take on an entrenched millionaire congressman, in a district that has been Republican for the past 146 years. He mounted a winning write in campaign to get on the ballot, and has hardly slept since. His school refused to give him leave, (probably politically motivated), and he worked on his campaign from 5 AM till he left for school, and from 3:30 when school let out till late at night. Weekends were solid campaigning. If Bill Shuster had to keep up with Tony for 2 days he would die of a heart attack.
Tony has knocked on thousands of doors and talked to hundreds of groups.
No national or state Democrat organization has helped him out. He hasn’t received any money from any of them because they assume that it’s a lost cause and don’t want to waste their cash. Even Jack Murtha who has the district next to ours hasn’t helped out.
In the age where a house seat costs about a million, and incumbents are returned at a rate of 90%, with challengers winning only when they can seriously outspend them, Tony’s $40,000 and novice volunteer staff, would make this look like David and Goliath, (if you break David’s arms first).
We have no idea where things stand.
We have not seen a poll. All we know is that there is very strong dissatisfaction with Washington, and with Shuster in particular. He hasn’t campaigned, and most everyone responds to “34 years for one family in power is too long”. A mock election in one high school (not Tony’s) gave Tony a 60% win. Who knows what that means?
Tomorrow will tell. (If we win you are all invited to join Tony and me in DC for the inauguration).
siobhan
November 6, 2006 at 7:10 pm
45Murray, Tony - Kick some elephantine ass tomorrow! Good luck.
Murray
November 6, 2006 at 7:21 pm
46If Tony wins, we’ll hire Adam as a speech writer. (Part time) (His consession speech in ‘04 make a pretty big splash).
SeattleTammy
November 6, 2006 at 8:45 pm
47Murray, much good luck. What a stunning victory it would be if Tony did win.
OT, here is a link I got from Jesus’ General, and completely sad story no matter how it’s spun.
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/pressingissues_display .jsp?vnu_content_id=1003345862
David
November 7, 2006 at 10:09 am
48Murray,
I will be donating to Tony ‘08, hopefully for re-election, but either way, I really admire the guy’s attitude. If you guys are willing to bust your asses for a little democracy, the least I can do is send along whatever I can afford. Tony’s campaign really is an inspiration.
Sharon
November 7, 2006 at 10:12 am
49Good luck to us all. May democracy prevail.
David
November 7, 2006 at 12:58 pm
50Sharon,
Make that “May democracy return to this grand Jeffersonian experiment, and may Benjamin Franklin also be once again pleased.”
Katie
November 7, 2006 at 6:43 pm
51Murray - OMG! I was thinking the EXACT same thing! I adore Christine Lavin, and have just about everything she’s done.
Mo - Love the tie, love the suit. Actually, I love the glasses, too; I just had to take a sec and think, “Whoa! New Glasses! Niiice!” I also like the suggested Lennon-esque glasses….. fwiw.
Cheers!
Katie
Katie
November 7, 2006 at 6:46 pm
52Damn. That last comment made me sound bubbly, brainless, and blonde!!!
Katie - cynical, smart, and redheaded
David
November 7, 2006 at 10:23 pm
53Katie,
I know a cynical, smart blond woman. However, I don’t know any bubbly, brainless redheads, for whatever that’s worth. As it turns out, my very smart sweetie is a redhead. And as Bruce Springsteen sings, you haven’t been loved till you’ve been loved by a redheaded woman.
Cheers all around to all the good women from the complete spectrum of hair color. Brainpower knoweth no hue, tint, or degree of saturation, hair or skin.
Katie
November 8, 2006 at 6:27 am
54David -
I was not in any way trying to insult blondes. I come from a family of intelligent blondes.
I was merely referring to the (inacurate) stereotype ‘dumb blond’ that bounces and giggles and puts white-out on the monitor to correct typing errors. The one that is immediately recognized as satire; unless of course one is referring to the Hilton sisters or Jessica Simpson, and then it is recognized as sad and pathetic….
Katie
David
November 8, 2006 at 6:48 am
55I knew that, Katie. I was actually playing along, and, of course, so stoked about the sweep in the House that I had to write something, anything, and your post just gave me a point of Anchor Steam assisted departure. I honestly never thought you were insulting blondes. The only down side to the written word is the challenge of indicating tone of voice.
Yeah, the Hilton sisters are a sad story.
Susie
November 8, 2006 at 6:10 pm
56Mo,
I like the large photo.
Why apologise for a large photo?
That is madness — madness I tell you!
As for the glasses, a) Yer hot and b) I never give fashion advice to thoses with more style than me.
So basically I give fashion advice to none other than the occasional invertabrate. And even they snicker at me.
ta!
Susie
shannon
November 16, 2006 at 1:58 pm
57maybe it’s just me, but i think the glasses are kind of heinous. i like you anyway though.
David
November 18, 2006 at 4:19 pm
58shannon, shannon…
Heinous? Nah. They’re cheerfully upbeat and somewhat retro. They also say unassuming brainiac who will intellectually eviscerate any unsuspecting reactionary.
Scott Mercer
November 19, 2006 at 10:22 am
59If a horse had hands, that’s how big they would be.
That’s a handsome man.
cooper
November 25, 2006 at 7:34 pm
60BTW, the November 22 Oddball segment on Countdown with Keith Olbermann has the changing of the guard from the old Juan Valdez to the new one pictured above with our pal Mo. Sorry, I couldn’t find the link for that one, but you can start here and drill to it. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/
cooper
November 25, 2006 at 7:42 pm
61BTW, the Oddball segment from the 11/22 Countdown with Keith Olbermann has the changing of the guard ceremony from the old Juan Valdez to the new Juan pictured above with our pal, Mo. I don’t have the exact link by you can start with this one and drill a bit to get to it.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/
cooper
December 3, 2006 at 7:48 pm
62Whoa, how’d that happen. Maybe Fanny is feeling bad about the many posts of mine that she’s eaten over time & this is the best she can do at this point.
Lauren
December 4, 2006 at 5:50 am
63I love the tie, but I miss your thick frames. The Geek look is the way to fly, always.
Buckminster
December 29, 2006 at 1:46 pm
64Dear Mo, the old Juan Valdez was cooler, and so were your old glasses. Loose the aviators, dude.