The Predict the Surprise Contest is in its last days, and so far the only surprise has been the complete lack of surprises. I’m surprised.
And the polls seem to be sliding further and further away from the GOP, creating a GOP Gap not seen since the 70’s. [Side note - why have there been no talented graphic artists creating “GOP” ads that look like “GAP” ads? Or have I just missed those?]
I can’t believe that the entrenched party is going to take this lying down. There has to be something beyond their customary “Get out and vote or gay immigrants are going to abort your baby” routine. But Halloween’s almost here and that much-anticipated Other Shoe is still hovering over the heartland. Those Rove-drones only have 9 more days…
…unless they don’t. Unless they have more time. Unless something is going to happen that actually delays Election Day. Think about it. More time could be bought and democracy will have to wait a few weeks as someone sorts out the terrorist threat or those faulty electronic voting machines or SOMETHING… while public opinion is wrangled and shifted… it’s so crazy it just might work…
Or something like that. The Contest continues below.





90 comments
dee
October 29, 2006 at 3:07 pm
1They don’t need surprises. They don’t need delays. Karl Rove knows THE math, which means the election machines have already been programmed. After the last two presidential elections anyone who complained about the rigged voting process was dismissed as a sore loser conspiracy freak. It will be ineresting to see how the media deals with it this time, since it’s pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain that the House will go Democratic by anywhere from 12 to 18 seats.
I wish I could be more optimistic, but I don’t put anything past these weasels.
No offense, ice.
SpottedDog
October 29, 2006 at 4:08 pm
2Rigged voting process?! You bet it’s rigged. And it’s done by those darn leftist Venezuelans. Just can’t trust those guys. They’ll have those Democrats in office and doing their bidding if we don’t keep a close eye on them. That’s right, if the Democrats win you’ll know it was all part of a leftist Venezuelan plot. I always knew they were up to no good.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/washington/29ballot.html?ei=5065&en= e0c8ab46eb7f870b&ex=1162789200&adxnnl=1&partner=MYWAY&adxnnlx=11621236 97-fGdgFeTtCKTTCxcnenqAsQ
George
October 29, 2006 at 4:13 pm
3Well put, dee. Like someone said here earlier, I am thinking the numbers are within the Diebold margin of error.
piglet
October 29, 2006 at 5:45 pm
4Wow, Rove and Crew certainly have made us skittish and wary, like those skinny, abused dogs on Animal Precinct. I hope we’re not beyond rehabilitation.
Murray
October 29, 2006 at 6:22 pm
5Yeah, it’s about time those Diebolt and ASSandS folks anti up. They got the contracts, made their commitments, now goddammit; it’s time for them to perform. The Right saw to it that we don’t have paper trails, so there is ALWAYS plausible deniability. Besides if the Dems get in they might screw up the entire deal.
Or we could have a terrorist attack. (They have had 6 years to plan this one).
Whichever.
siobhan
October 29, 2006 at 7:05 pm
6Well, for one thing that whole so-called “World Series” was a trick to make all of us left-leaning Tiger fans stay in bed with the covers pulled over our heads until Thanskgiving. I mean, doesn’t St. Louis play in something called Bush Stadium? (I’m going with pronunciation, not spelling, here….)
I’m just sayin’
Fran
October 29, 2006 at 9:28 pm
7I know I’d said bombs, and I still stand by that, but perhaps dee’s right, and the bombs are stealth bombs hidden in the voting machines so that every non-Republican vote gets “mysteriously” transformed into a Republican one. It’s underhanded and dastardly, and perfectly in keeping with the current administration.
Dale
October 29, 2006 at 10:20 pm
8I fear a November 2006-November 2008 surprise. The Democrats take Congress…and absolutely nothing changes. They all go Leiberman, or William Jefferson, or rip off their masks and reveal themselves to be Democrat-simulation droids created by Rove & Co…
dee
October 30, 2006 at 5:14 am
9Fran, you mean like this?
Debra A. Reed voted with her boss on Wednesday at African-American Research Library and Cultural Center near Fort Lauderdale. Her vote went smoothly, but boss Gary Rudolf called her over to look at what was happening on his machine. He touched the screen for gubernatorial candidate Jim Davis, a Democrat, but the review screen repeatedly registered the Republican, Charlie Crist.
That’s exactly the kind of problem that sends conspiracy theorists into high gear — especially in South Florida, where a history of problems at the polls have made voters particularly skittish.
A poll worker then helped Rudolf, but it took three tries to get it right, Reed said.
‘’I'm shocked because I really want . . . to trust that the issues with irregularities with voting machines have been resolved,'’ said Reed, a paralegal. “It worries me because the races are so close.'’
They don’t even bother to hide it anymore.
ice weasel
October 30, 2006 at 5:15 am
10Dee, oh Dee. Why, from you all of all people?
Oh well, while I am all for diving into the delightful tin foil mad hatterness of talking about delaying the ‘08 election, but I think this one is not likely to be postponed. There’s really no question that the gop voter scare tactics are in full swing. We’ve already one gopper in California who was proud of his efforts to keep dusky liberals from exercising their franchise. There are, undoubtedly, many, many more.
By the way, Idiot Paparazzi-well done!
David
October 30, 2006 at 6:34 am
11Voter suppression/disenfranchisement has always been a useful tool. But Diebold gamesmanship adds a thick layer of icing on the election cake. Two things do seem to be requisite for widespread election manipulation of late: the governor and the secretary of state being from the same party, which in the case of the two poster states Florida and Ohio means Republican. Looks like Ohio is about to cleanse itself. Florida -no, except the party out of power is leading in two of the races just below governor.
There is no way in hell the national banana republicans will shy away from anything that will allow them to maintain a deathlock on political power. Be really refreshing if the will of the people is just too much for them, assuming such a phenomenon still exists.
Stephen
October 30, 2006 at 7:09 am
12Did any one listen to Shrub in his press conference last week? He was asked a couple times if he was worried about the Repugs loosing the Congress. I find it un-nerving that he just gave that little snicker of his and said “I’m not worried. I see more than you do.”
Sounds like the fix is in already.
ginny
October 30, 2006 at 9:42 am
13Ah yes, Shrub has been well and truly coached in The Math by his tutor, Dr. Karl.
I wonder how many Prezzie-treats(tm) it took for the training to take?
Mieke
October 30, 2006 at 10:35 am
14Ditto Dee. They aren’t worried because they know from experience they can steal the election and nobody will say anything, even if the exit polls are wildly off. As a drunk Republican Congressman Peter King said before the presidential election in Alex Pelosi’s documentary, “It’s all over but the counting. And we’ll take care of the counting.” They know the media and American public will actually buy “people lied” when it comes to exit polls. During the last election, a group of us was in contact with the president of the exit poll company in the days following the election. He refused to send us the exit polling data until, as he stated, the president was actually reinstalled by Congress and the election results were final. The only encouragement is that finally, after 6 years, the media are starting to report some mild, questioning reports regarding electronic voting. So maybe when the results don’t match the polls this time, they will do some more digging. Not that it will make a bit of difference this time around, because their candidates will be firmly installed in their positions as “investigations” get underway, which will either fizzle out, or prove, a year down the line, that perhaps their was some tampering, but it’s too late to do anything about it. Or, you, know, since they have Congress (with their stolen election), they just vote that it’s all legit, and turn away any enquiries (as documented in the short documentary at www.votergate.tv ). Surprise!
Dave Lifton
October 30, 2006 at 11:23 am
15You’re right. A GOP/GAP ad campaign is perfect, considering how often their members are trying to get into teenagers’ jeans…
tess
October 30, 2006 at 1:39 pm
16Hell, I was figuring that they’d decide to invade Iran by tomorrow.
Tom M
October 30, 2006 at 3:42 pm
17Stealing an election is easy thanks to all these modern labor saving computers! Just in case anyone’s not seen it can I highlight the “How to Steal an Election by Hacking the Vote” guide.
Lemuel
October 30, 2006 at 4:04 pm
18I will be needing some liquidity in my portfolio shortly to take care of a business opportunity in Venezula, so I’ve decided to put the “bust” of Osama bin Laden on the block. You fine people may have the first crack at this - yeah, I know, I’m such a sentimental softy, but I kinda like you guys for some reason, plus I smell some real potential in this crowd - especially if George Soros pops in, as he does from time to time. So bids are opening @ $3,750,000. If I don’t get enough response (ie. money) here, I’ll be forced to put it on Ebay. The bidding goes public @ 12:00 midnight EST. May the greediest live long and prosper. OBL’s head, BTW, is in the cryo box next to Ted William’s and Walt Disney’s heads; talk about history on the half-shell!
ice weasel
October 30, 2006 at 5:26 pm
19One other thing, it’s obvious but cannot be overlooked. Go vote next week. Encourage your friends to go vote. Shame them into it. Dare them to. Whatever. Get people to the polls. Vote.
hedera
October 30, 2006 at 8:43 pm
20As ice weasel said, go vote, dammit. (He was more polite than that.)
As for electronic voting, it won’t be safe until it’s done on open source software which produces an auditable paper trail, maintained and reviewed by the world volunteer computing community, and run only on Linux computers. We need to bring this to the attention of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. It won’t be absolutely safe then, but it’d be tolerable.
George
October 30, 2006 at 8:47 pm
21Thanks for the link, Tom M.
Has anyone heard an actual reason for not including a paper trail on all voting machines?
hedera
October 30, 2006 at 8:53 pm
22I’ve never actually heard anyone give a reason, but it wouldn’t surprise me to hear them spin it as ecologically friendly: wouldn’t want to waste precious trees by printing out something we can store electronically, would we, now? And you have to store all that paper in some way that makes it retrievable. I’ve been around too many computer equipment salesmen…
bramster
October 30, 2006 at 9:03 pm
23Trust me. I’m a polician.
bramster
October 30, 2006 at 9:05 pm
24I’ll try this again
Hedera
Trust me. I’m a politician.
hedera
October 30, 2006 at 9:28 pm
25“I’m from the government and I’m here to help you”… yeah, right, bramster. (They can’t spell either.)
There was a very interesting column in today’s San Francisco Chronicle on the peculiar relationship between the amount of money spent on political campaigns (rising exponentially) and the decreasing number of people who actually turn out to vote. Read this to be really motivated to vote: the people who spend all that money advertising, do not want you to vote. They only want a very small, dedicated band of zealots who support their position to vote; they want everyone else to stay home and watch Oprah. Read it and vote.
SeattleDan
October 30, 2006 at 10:19 pm
26The one November suprise I don’t want is SeattleTammy telling me” Oh, honey, the water turned blue”. Just what I need, a kid who’ll go to High School when I’m in my seventies.
I’m enough paranoid to think something weird will happen at the polls this year. I kinda expected it ‘04. And I fear it now when I know that Rove has The Math. And George looks at The Google. What’s with the definitive article adjective anyway? (Or the DAA, which includes The Internets and The Tubes).
Mieke
October 30, 2006 at 10:41 pm
27George, I believe they were claiming that a paper trail would be a huge waste of money and just not financially feasible. Pretty funny, considering Diebold makes ATM machines (oh yes, people, take a look at the brand on ATMs when you use them. I have noticed quite a few Diebold machines) and doesn’t seem to have a problem creating a paper trail for those on a daily basis, for millions and millions of people. It’s just absurd.
SEAGolfer
October 30, 2006 at 10:46 pm
28Is it time for the mandatory voting day? NPR reported Brazil does it this way, why not US?
Change Veterans day into voting to support Veterans day and make it a requirement to vote.
Maybe it would delute the affect of the special interest money some and we might see an actual realistic idea instead of the vacant headed dribble we get now.
A guy can dream at least….
dee
October 31, 2006 at 5:21 am
29The only trouble with mandatory voting is there are some people I know who have no business voting. They pay more attention to who’s winning “American Idol” than a candidate’s position on the real issues. We always hear the talk after election day about how sad it is that people can’t take the half hour on average that it takes to vote in order to have their voices heard. I can guarantee you that if they can’t take the half hour to vote, they sure haven’t taken the weeks and months of studying the issues to cast an informed vote. So keep them out of my polling place and let those of us who really give a damn get through the process faster.
siobhan
October 31, 2006 at 6:15 am
30Among the NPR top-of-the-hour headlines just now was “Cheney says that Iraqi insurgents are trying to influence the election”. I can’t believe he’s actually admitting that Rove is an insurgent.
re: paper trails for voting machines. One excuse that I heard offered repeatedly was that the printers were likely to jam and cause problems, so let’s not muck things up - simplify! In other words, we can’t make a reliable machine; rather than look for someone who can, just change the rules so that verification is no longer important. Say what you will about “The City That Knows How”, but the one thing they did right in SF was going for optically scanned ballots.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
October 31, 2006 at 9:27 am
31Siobhan,
We have a similar voting method in Oregon. A vote by mail system that allows one to carefully review the voter’s pamphlet, arguments, and editorials, while deciding which way to cast his or her votes.
No more standing in line at the voting place, while the person in front of you picks that moment to hem and haw over their selection.
Once the ballots are mailed (or dropped off), they are then optically scanned. Ballot drop off sites are open until the very last minute.
It’s not perfect, but I feel much better voting by mail than by paperless, receiptless, touch screen voting.
And Mieke, you’re correct, Diebold does make ATMs that provide a paper receipt. And I’ve never had the receipt jam in the machine.
Ann
October 31, 2006 at 11:53 am
32Dan, if you’re really worried—have the same surgery that my cat had!
And I love to vote in person, rather than by mail. It seems like such a great act of civic involvement! I get all mushy as I approach the doors of the local junior high school and see the flags and the “Vote Here” signs. It feels patriotic in the very best sense of the word. Participatory government!
Later, when the results come in, there’s the drinking…
SeattleDan
October 31, 2006 at 12:15 pm
33Ann, I think I’ll pass on the surgery. I’ll take my chances.
I know what you mean about the polling place. But I also like voting by mail…there is a real paper trail.
waterfowler
October 31, 2006 at 12:47 pm
34Y’all are scaring me again. I don’t understand how sane people can be so paranoid….am I in an asylum?
Ice, good advice. I voted early and have encouraged all of my co-workers and friends to do the same.
Looks like Kerry might be our Oct./Nov. surprise. The gift that keeps on giving…
Murray
October 31, 2006 at 2:02 pm
35Yes Ann, afterwards there is LOTS of drinking.
I’ll be in a Halloween parade this evening wearing my Tony Barr for Congress shirt and holding a 34 YEARS = 2 LONG, TONY BARR sign.
7 days and we know our futures.
For those of you who aren’t familiar with Tony, you can see an ad on utube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-y0-3pkW-4
Tony has been getting endorsements from a lot of places and things look promising. If you can imagine a school teacher with a bunch of inexperienced volunteers, scraping together $40,000 going after an entrenched millionaire who along with his father have held the seat for 34 years. As a matter of fact the seat has been held by a republican for the past 146 years. The district is so red that everyone has been ignoring it.
Our opponent Bill Shuster has decided to not run a campaign. He has no accomplishments to run on and he is aware of the dissatisfaction with voters so he just hopes that Tony will go away and is expecting that his name will get him through.
Several of you have met Tony and know what a great guy he is. If you would like to help go to www.tonybarr2006.com
Other than that, please vote next Tuesday.
Siobhan
October 31, 2006 at 3:36 pm
36Fowler, glad to see you’re still hanging around.
Paranoid? How’d you be feeling if the situation was reversed? … if the head of the voting machine company had promised to deliver for Kerry in ‘04, if there was no paper trail, if there were regular reports of glitches that somehow always managed to favor the Dems. Maybe you’d rise above it, but I gotta suspect there’d be a fair amount of outcry from the right. There may be some paranoia, but I think there’s some legitimate cause for concern. As they say: just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean nobody’s following you.
dee
October 31, 2006 at 4:37 pm
37Ann, I know what you mean. I get a lump in my throat and when all those campaign workers descend upon me I always tell them “I’ve already made up my mind but thank you so much for being out here and working for your candidate.” (And yes — I say it to the Republicans, too) And the little old ladies inside who know my name. Since I’m alphabetically the last name in the precinct, our standing joke at 7 AM is “The last person has voted. We can all go home now”
I have to remember to take cookies.
George
October 31, 2006 at 6:06 pm
38MMmmm … cookies
George
October 31, 2006 at 6:11 pm
39I took one daughter to each of the past two elections so they could see how it works. The first one was funny because it was for the local school board and I had no idea who the candidates were. They aren’t classified as (R) or (D) or (I), and I didn’t do my homework. So we had fun just picking people with certain name-traits.
In both cases, each daughter said how she thought it would have been harder to vote. I took them on a whim and I am so glad I did.
Lemuel
October 31, 2006 at 6:53 pm
40A wealthy emir from Doha, Qatar is the proud new owner of the last evidence of OBL’s time on earth and I’m up a whopping $44,375,250. Hell’s bells, I can buy half of Venezula for that, plus the controlling interest in a certain voting machine cartel featured recently in the news. This conglomerate is making huge inroads into the American market. Now let’s see; who do I want to win the next election…?
Harold
October 31, 2006 at 7:07 pm
41Totally off-topic…Ice Weasel, did I just see a comment from you over at The Comics Curmudgeon?
http://joshreads.com/
For those who haven’t heard of it, The Comics Curmudgeon is kinda like a Fanatical Apathy for the funny pages, where every post is a prompt for an onslaught of comments. Posts plus comments become a sort of “group blog”.
Murray
October 31, 2006 at 7:44 pm
42Coop, you’re just too damn good. (Keep it up)
siobhan
October 31, 2006 at 8:06 pm
43Oh, crap.
Harold - Why did you have to introduce us to that. There goes more of my free time.
ps - those of you within earshot of KQED (or who might listen online): City Arts and Lectures has Geoff Nunberg and Deborah Tannen right now - it was a great talk in realtime and I’m looking forward to re-listening.
Joey Canale
October 31, 2006 at 8:21 pm
44Here’s a funny cartoon off youtube that pretty much sums up today’s Republican party. Maybe if they watch it’ll help them get a clue about how they’re selling this country out (but don’t hold your breath!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELfiVTTb5Jw
Dale
October 31, 2006 at 8:44 pm
45“Coop, you’re just too damn good. (Keep it up)”
What?: Lem….no! Could it…wait…no, no, no! There is a Lemuel, Virginia, there is a Lemuel!
waterfowler
October 31, 2006 at 9:59 pm
46Siobhan, I’ve been checkin’ in, just not commenting. Working lots of hours, going to football & baseball games. Yes, we’re still playing baseball. Tonight I heard the first “specks” (white-fronted geese) so far this year. That means fall has finally reached East Tree Stump. Sorry about your Tigers. Most ‘Stros fans are for anybody but the Cards, but I have to admit I was pulling for ‘em. My youngest has never laughed so hard as the first time he heard an announcer on TV say Albert Pooh-holes. He actually looked @ me and asked “What did he say?”
Ann, I’m w/ you on voting in person. ‘Cept for the “mushy” part.
SeattleDan
October 31, 2006 at 10:04 pm
47fowler, are both Pettite and Clemens going to retire? Andy sounds very tired. The Rocket seems like he could pitch forever. God knows, maybe he can.
Keith
November 1, 2006 at 6:20 am
48I was able to absentee vote a couple weeks ago, so Diebold won’t be able to flip the switch on my ballot. I had the pleasure to be able to vote against both Rick Santorum and Curt Weldon. Fowler, you’ll be happy to know I went with the Republican for the state Senate seat
Interestingly, Weldon’s campaign material referred to him as an “Independent” and the word “Republican” only appeared in the fine print - paid for by the Republican National Election Comittee. Weldon’s campaign material also attacked his opponent for not living in our Congressional district for the past 15 years, but neglected to mention that it was because he was serving in the US Navy - way to support our troops.
Regarding the “November Surpirse”, I believe the surprise this year will be that the Karl isn’t even trying to win this one. During the week I was at home, I received two (pre-recorded) calls from Bubba and three from Democratic PA Governor Ed Rendell, but not a single one from any Republican. I think Karl is throwing in the towel in sort of a lose the batlle (’06), win the war (’08) strategy. Or maybe I’m just hoping that at least somebody in this administration had some strategy to win some war.
Iraq is a quagmire that isn’t going to get fixed in two years no matter who is in charge in Congress. Housing prices are starting to fall, but mortgage payments aren’t. The DOW is setting records, but incomes are falling for the middle and lower classes. It’s just not a good time to be the party in power.
My guess is Karl writing off ‘06 and already working on the campaign literature for ‘08 about how we were just about to turn the corner in Iraq before the Democrats took over Congress and how the economy began to crumble in ‘06 (while glossing over the fact that the Dems really didn’t come to power until ‘07 after the economic pendulum had already begun to swing).
SeattleDan
November 1, 2006 at 3:48 pm
49I didn’t mean to kill this thread, honest, I didn’t.
Siobhan
November 1, 2006 at 4:28 pm
50Dan, you didn’t kill it. It’s just that everyone is slow to recover from their post-Halloween hangover/sugar coma.
George
November 1, 2006 at 5:06 pm
51SeattleDan, aka “Threadkiller”
Murray
November 1, 2006 at 5:07 pm
52So it appears that the November surprise is John Kerry. (Leave it to him).
For those who are new (and not sick to death of this) my mantra is:
Republicans are ruthless
Democrats are gutless
Americans are idiots.
Kerry may or may not have botched a joke = Lying to get into a war, 2800+ soldiers dead, torture, total incompetence, 2 Billion a week down the drain, FOREVER! Protecting sexual pedophile predators, no health care for up to 30% of the public, no energy policy so high gas prices, (I’m too tired to fill in the numerous problems that this administration has screwed us with, but you get the idea).
So, overwhelming problems = botched joke.
Now the idiots will vote Republican.
Murray
November 1, 2006 at 5:12 pm
53You know what else is in Bush’s favor? The 3000th dead soldier will come after the election, problably in December. We make a big deal of numbers and this is one we will mull over after it is too late to do anything about it.
Just Jay
November 1, 2006 at 6:32 pm
54The real problem with a paper trail is that the receipt is essentially meaningless. A machine can be programmed to print exactly what the voter entered, but record an entirely different vote. So, assuming there was some kind of machine ID on the receipt, to prove that votes were miscounted you would have to track down every single person who used that machine, hand tally their receipts, and then compare that total to the total the machine recorded. If the hacker is smart, only the minimum number of votes necessary to change the result will be changed. So it will be hard to detect fraud, and even harder to prove it, even with a paper trail. A bank receipt is an entirely different matter because there you only have one person and one account so the paper receipt is easy to compare. The only way to work around this problem is to use carbonless duplicating paper, where one receipt is given to the voter and another kept on a roll in the machine. I still think that smart fraud will be very hard to detect.
Hot Tub Tommy
November 1, 2006 at 7:21 pm
55So, you want a November surprise? Well, I’ve got one for you. I paid Lemuel my pound of flesh for the Cayman Island bank accounts, got the codes from our double secret drop-off location, went on the “Internets” and guess what? Not a nickel left in any of them. No surprise there.
Here’s where the surprise comes in. Lemuel’s airplane that he chartered for his flight down to Venezula, disappeared from the radar screen over the jungles of Panama. My associate, Jimmy Jack Bethune, aircraft mechanic extraodinaire, inserted a remote controlled shut-off valve into the fuel line of each engine; also placed a GPS transponder in the baggage compartment. Another associate, Alejandro, tracked the flight from his shrimping boat positioned off the coast. As that little shit and his black-eyed broad, Rocio, flew over the god-forsaken jungles of Central America, Alejandro pressed the button on the remote, they developed “engine trouble” and spiraled into the tree canopy. No survivors were detected. Such a shame… Lemuel had a number of endearing qualities; I may actually wind up missing him in the end. But he never should have strayed from the dark side of the Force. Christine has been unconsolable ever since. Fucking women! Who can understand them?
siobhan
November 2, 2006 at 6:21 am
56Just Jay, I don’t have first hand experience with electronic machines that do produce a papertrail, but I’ve heard two types described:
One produces a continuous roll printout which appears behind a sheet of plastic, and allows you to view the result before accepting it. You enter your choices on the machine, they appear on the screen, you verify that those are correct, and then it prints the result so you can see those. If the printed version that you see doesn’t agree with your choices, you call over a poll worker, I guess.
The other version prints out a “receipt” that you then deposit into a ballot box, where it is available for recounts if needed. If you walked off with your receipt, your original vote would still count, but if there was a recount your vote wouldn’t be there to verify.
Harold
November 2, 2006 at 8:46 am
57Can we Google-bomb “botched joke” to point to something relevant to the Bush Administration? They’re the REAL botched joke. And it ain’t at all funny.
At least Kerry’s follow-up was a little bolder and clearer, expressing fury at GUTLESS COWARD CHICKENHAWKS like Bush, Cheney and Drugbaugh for trying to hijack the comments made by a FUCKING VIETNAM VETERAN FOR CHRIST’S SAKES and twist them to suggest that he was implying that only uneducated losers will be sent to Iraq. Dubya? FUCK YOU. Republicans? FUCK YOU.
Election Day is coming, brothers and sisters. Let’s dump all those bastards.
waterfowler
November 2, 2006 at 10:22 am
58Threadkil…er…Seattle Dan, They’ll both file for free agency, but who knows if they’ll play again. I could see Andy taking a year off, unless Rocket decides to pitch next year. I don’t think either will pitch anywhere other than Houston. Friends, family, and “who needs the money?”. Must be nice…
Thanks for the enlightenment Murray. Your brilliance has convinced me that I’m an idiot.
Oh, and Harold, same to ya’. Didn’t y’all spit on those vets when they came home?, but now we’re supposed to respect him for his service? I remember, you only spit on the ones that served thier full tour, didn’t injure themselves for Purple Hearts, and refused to lie to Congress about their buddies. Harold, SAME TO YA’.
Harold
November 2, 2006 at 10:27 am
59No, I didn’t, waterfowler. I was born in 1968. I might have spit up on a few vets, but that wasn’t intentional.
Waterfowler, and any other Republicans with sufficient brains and balls to be reading this site: you have an opportunity to atone this coming Tuesday. Don’t blow it.
Siobhan
November 2, 2006 at 10:44 am
60Harold, I vote for Google-bombing W’s “hilarious” performance at the press correspondents’ dinner a few years ago - you know, the super funny “no weapons of mass destruction here” video. Everyone really yukked it up over that one, if I recall.
Fowler, a small number of stupid people 35 years ago treated vets badly, and those people were on the anti-war side. However, the vast majority of those who opposed the war did not behave that way toward vets. I don’t see how the actions of those few poeple should preclude all of us from criticizing the people who brought us this war, and from pointing out that most of them never served, and of those few who did serve, few saw combat.
Ann
November 2, 2006 at 11:28 am
61Harold, has anyone ever told you how beautiful you look when you’re angry?
Harold
November 2, 2006 at 11:58 am
62My mommy always says that I’m handsome AND smart.
Harold
November 2, 2006 at 12:02 pm
63And, my dear Ann, has anyone ever told you how beautiful you look regardless of whether you’re angry or not?
waterfowler
November 2, 2006 at 12:50 pm
64Sorry Harold, I blew it, I voted early. If only you and Murray had gotten to me earlier…
Siobhan, criticize Bush & co. all you want, I’ll give you that, but don’t expect the wingnuts to NOT criticize Kerry because he’s a vet, when it’s obvious that most ‘Nam vets can’t stand him. He proudly proclaims that he did his duty, but the ones that actually did refuse to talk about it. I was a child during Vietnam, but I do read, and I fully understand that Kerry is not the average ‘Nam Vet. He’s practically John Fonda.
Harold, you and Ann should “get a room” and quit slobbering on Adam’s page.
David
November 2, 2006 at 1:06 pm
65Fowler,
Sounds like your reading list might be a bit too constricted regarding the Viet Nam War. I was an active protester, we NEVER in any way disrespected any veterans. In fact, we fought a hell of a lot harder for the well being of the vets than either the government or the two-dimensional “patriotic” supporters of what John Kerry so correctly described for the Senate. Sorry, Fowler, but Team Bush is a gaggle of chicken hawks. Kerry demonstrated real courage in
Viet Nam and real patriotism when he came back. And criticize Kerry to your hearts content for any real transgressions on his part, but please, this distortion of Kerry’s intent with all it’s phony outrage over a nonsensical claim that when Kerry botched the joke, he was belittling the soldiers is an example of truly cheap political horseshit by a bunch of cowards. The only people who can be excused are the military and military families who did not realize the Republican machine was lying through its bunghole about the point Kerry was trying to make, that an intellectually incurious, poorly educated President has our military bogged down in an utterly botched occupation of a nation who wants us the hell out of there.
Siobhan
November 2, 2006 at 4:37 pm
66Fowler, conservatives can feel free to critcize Kerry. Hell, I do. I wish he’d had a spine when he voted to authorize this damn war.
I just can’t stomach the chickenhawks who are so eager for war - as long as someone else is fighting it, and as long as their taxes don’t have be raised to pay for it. It’s the same sort of hypocrisy that leads all of these closet cases to loudly denounce gays while practicing all of the very acts that they condemn.
cooper
November 2, 2006 at 5:51 pm
67Hey, can you guys hold it down? Hugo’s trying to sleep, and so is Mommy/Susie. Just take it outside, will ya? Jeez….
BTW Harold, I must agree with you. Angry or not, she is a most attractive young lady. Are we embarrassing you yet, Ann?
David
November 2, 2006 at 5:59 pm
68Fowler,
I was clearly pissed - no other explanation for all the typos/grammatical errors in post #65. Not at you, just at the fact that such misconceptions have gained such a foothold. I was most enraged by a government that exploited patriotic impulses, lied their asses off, and treated the Viet Namese as expendables (there was a good reason that Jane Fonda hated the bombing raids over Hanoi, as did Joan Baez and legions of other people who had figured out the realities of the Viet Nam War - you can quarrel with how she chose to express that anger, but at least take a comprehensive look at that war, and at the dessicated quagmire we have now thrown our military into).
cooper
November 2, 2006 at 6:33 pm
69How’s this for a November Surprise? Of course, this is just example of the Liberal Media (you know, General Electric - NBC, Walt Disney - ABC, Viacomm - CBS) trying to cheapshot a fine upstanding Christian leader of the flock. Baa-aaa-aaa-aaa.
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Haggard-Scandal.mov
siobhan
November 2, 2006 at 6:39 pm
70Cooper, we did take it outside. You should hear the volume up close.
And that was just the story I was referring to in my post. I was just too lazy to link. The best quote from Jones: “I felt I owed this to the {gay} community. What he is saying is we are not worthy, but he is.”
David
November 3, 2006 at 4:29 am
71So Ted Haggard gave in to what St. Paul apparently struggled with and wrote about, at least indirectly. Haggard should just own up, seek “forgiveness,”, and write some book-level letters to some churches. Who knows what those epistles might become in a couple of centuries.
Harold
November 3, 2006 at 8:57 am
72David, are you suggsting that Paul’s “thorn in the flesh” was actually a “boner in the cloak” every time he saw some hot young Corinthian boys?
Ann
November 3, 2006 at 11:17 am
73Fowler, you clearly don’t understand the special bond that’s shared by veterans of Felberpalooza. It’s just like you conservatives to spit on us returning Felbernauts.
Harold
November 3, 2006 at 12:49 pm
74The latest on Kerry’s “botched joke”:
The Associated Press has misrepresented the “stuck in Iraq” comment in an article on a mocking banner created by some troops as a response:
“MINNEAPOLIS (Nov. 2) - A group of Minnesota National Guard soldiers in Iraq has made a comically misspelled sign mocking Sen. John Kerry’s recent comments about the education level of troops, and their handiwork is getting plenty of attention.”
Kerry’s comments were never about our troops or their educational level. The fact that AP has made this statement suggests that they have been taking their cues from Karl Rove.
Intentional or not, their statement is false.
Time for the AP to issue a retraction and apology.
cooper
November 3, 2006 at 3:51 pm
75Yeah, Harold, time for AP, Fox, Limbaugh, et al. But don’t hold your breath waiting.
Murray
November 3, 2006 at 4:20 pm
76Fowler, always glad to point out the obvious.
David
November 3, 2006 at 5:09 pm
77Harold,
A boner by any other name….
cooper
November 3, 2006 at 5:43 pm
78Keith Olbermann seems to be absolutely fearless. For those who haven’t seen the special comment on White House Campaign Tactics - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kq7JUi1lQc4
David
November 4, 2006 at 4:44 am
79I really don’t know how anyone could make it any plainer, any clearer, or any more compelling. I am especially heartened that Keith put John McCain and Laura Bush into clearer political perspective. Character indeed. I have felt contempt for McCain, courageous when a pow but cowardly as a United States Senator/presidential hopeful, for some time now. I don’t know who Laura Bush once was, but I think it is now pretty clear who she has become. She owes an apology to Michael J. Fox’s mother, senora a senora.
Thanks for the link, cooper.
Bill C.
November 4, 2006 at 6:26 am
80Oh! Right! Now the true believers of Rev Ted Haggard are buying the “I did not inhale” defense. What’s with that?! And has anyone else been enjoying the way the White House faith-based community liasons, flack catchers, spin doctors and other assorted cockroaches have been running from the light, heat, and wretch-inducing hypocricy generated by this scandal? Especially when it was revealed that Rev. Haggard spoke weekly with the White House? This is really fun!
nato
November 4, 2006 at 4:31 pm
81Isn’t it a bad sign when even R. Perle is saying the U.S. screwed up on this whole Iraq thing? Sounds like the November Surprise is working in reverse:
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/15929013.htm
hedera
November 4, 2006 at 9:16 pm
82I noticed those comments from Richard Perle too. Wasn’t he one of the original architects of this?? Actually, I guess not - I just checked the “Statement of Principles” on the Project for the New American Century site and he didn’t sign it. He was just one of Reagan’s brain trust; according the the Mercury News, though, he was buddies with Paul Wolfowitz, who did sign the PNAC statement.
David
November 5, 2006 at 4:53 am
83Pity more people in Florida aren’t aware that it was Jeb, not George, who signed that demonic document. Shame RP didn’t, since it would have made possible “Nit wit, Perle two.”
Mieke
November 5, 2006 at 1:27 pm
84It’s November 5, and I am wondering if one Saddam Hussein death by hanging November surprise cancels out one Ted Haggard homosexual prostitute sex November surprise…Hmmmm…
David
November 5, 2006 at 8:22 pm
85Being unable to stomach the news cycle any more, I am losing some touch with the daily winds. Tuesday I will pay attention and will get drunk, either in celebration or in writing off America as civil body politic to be taken seriously anymore. The apartheid South was a sick joke, but at least we came out of it - sort of. If the current political moron monolith is rewarded with victory Tuesday, please excuse me for viewing the majority of voters as a bad joke. At the moment I confess to optimism, at least on the House side, and a close call on the Senate side, so I’m generally anticipating cause for celebration. And I’ve been celebrating Keith Olbermann for some time now. Maybe the darkest hour really is just before dawn, and people like Keith and Bill Maher are the first rays of a new day.
SeattleTammy
November 7, 2006 at 8:14 pm
86Oh Migawd!
there is a November surprise. Sadly, it came too late to affect the polls.
Brittny is dumping the KFed!!!!
I feel sorry for the children. Like I always did.
David
November 7, 2006 at 10:39 pm
87Tammy,
I have a sneaking suspicion the kids will be ok. Don’t ask me why, but it won’t surprise me if Britney winds up being a good mother. And she does need to get away for the hyperjealous control freak, although it hardly qualifies as something that should take up national airtime. She also needs to move up to a richer, more substantive musical career, if that is a possibility, and while she’s at it, recognize Bush for the geopolitical putz he is.
The November surprise is currently driving Karl Rove to whatever his favorite chemically-induced escape is. Hope it’s something that takes him far, far away. America has had more than enough of Rove-directed political dreck and offal.
Have you really barred lap dancing for Dan, or is it just that you are better, and he consequently has no reason to go to a “gentleman’s establishment” for a lesser treat?
OK, I’ll stop now. Admittedly, I’m so stoked it is hard to give it up for tonight. Do wish the good lady from Missouri could pull it out against the incumbent Republican and his nauseating co-schmuck Rush.
SeattleDan
November 7, 2006 at 11:30 pm
88David, as a citizen of SEATTLE I keep Dan on a strict 4 foot rule. Makes ya creative- knawhattimean?
Kids always rebel, see Francis Cobain. she’s turning out ok.
Things are lookin nice tonight.
And we are so happy about Margeret’s victory! Keep in touch girlfriend! Mark your bookmark people!
SeattleTammy
November 7, 2006 at 11:32 pm
89thought I changed that.
but you could tell it was me right?
David
November 9, 2006 at 6:36 am
90Yes I could, Seattle Tammy.
It’s Thursday morning, and I still ain’t comin’ down. McCaskill in Missouri and onward for stem cell research! That is the sweetest of the three we needed, although they were all sweet. Embarrassed for the state of Tennessee, where racebaiting still works.
Oh, yeah, NC 11 is now represented by a Democrat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!