This morning I awoke to find these headlines as my Yahoo homepage’s four “Top Stories:”
West can’t abandon Iraq, says deputy PM
Iran won’t retreat from atomic rights: president
Diplomacy but still no end to Korean crisis
Taliban leader warns of fierce fighting to come
Jeepers, I thought, though I didn’t use the word “jeepers.” Look at that. Those stories have something in common. Something familiar. Something that links them all…
Nearly five years ago now, at his first State of the Union, President Bush assured a still metaphorically shell-shocked nation that the recently literally shell-shocked nation of Afghanistan was under control and that we were ready to take on the remaining bad guys…. the Axis of Evil.
These days, some people are saying that calling them an “Axis of Evil” actually caused them to become an Axis of Evil, that in that moment Bush had created something more than a perennial contender for future punk bands looking for a name. I don’t know. Still, when you identify three enemies and then immediately take out the first on your list, the other two are bound to start signaling for the check and nervously fingering their valet stub (see B. D. Julien’s, “The Global Bistro - the Restaurant as Colorful but Overextended Metaphor for World Politics,” Halfass Press, 1998).
But what’s important here is that whether or not the Axis was a self-fulfilling prophecy, of those enemies identified in that speech fiive years ago, those four of “One Down and Three to Go” fame… all four of them are still dominating the headlines as gigantic and yet-to-be-solved problems. We’ve got angry diners at all of our tables, and the parties whom we thought had paid and gone already are still lingering in their seats, ordering coffee and perusing the dessert menu again, threatening to still be there when the dinner service begins in half an hour (ibid).
Rotten metaphors aside, it’s worth pointing out that five years after Pearl Harbor, the guys who really earned the Axis moniker, the ones who didn’t need an “of Evil” to make it cleat what their team jerseys were getting at, were out of business. Finito, Benito.
What if the world had looked like this five years after Pearl Harbor? All due respect to the Greatest Generation, but our problem might not be our collective Will to Fight in this global restaurant. It might have more to do with our feckless head waiter.
So, though I’m hoping that this weekend’s meetings went well, you have to wonder - what exactly is an “axis,” according to the Administration? I think at the moment they’ve got it down as “that thing that you spin on.” Which is right, of course, technically. Technically.





18 comments
Kip W
October 23, 2006 at 10:00 am
1Stiff the little bastard, and tell him to split it with the cook.
Edith, Mother of all Felbers
October 23, 2006 at 11:18 am
2Oh, Adam, you do have Such a way with words!
good blog.
though I’d say “chef” and not “headwaiter.”
headwaiter seats you and listens to complaints, and tries to make you happy.
The chef cooks it up, and comes out with a cleaver if you complain.
(in the comics, anyway)
Steve
October 23, 2006 at 1:14 pm
3Bravo!
dee
October 23, 2006 at 3:11 pm
4A boy’s best friend is his Editor.
George
October 23, 2006 at 6:36 pm
5Is it a coincidence that Edith begins with edit?
bri
October 23, 2006 at 7:47 pm
6Dang! That’s twice this week Jorge lost his fecks.
Dale
October 23, 2006 at 9:13 pm
7“Oh, Adam, you do have Such a way with words!
good blog.
though I’d say “chef” and not “headwaiter.”
headwaiter seats you and listens to complaints, and tries to make you happy.
The chef cooks it up, and comes out with a cleaver if you complain.
(in the comics, anyway)”
Look! I’m a copy edith-er!
(Very off topic, but can any of the Tiger fans out there please help me calibrate my moral response to Palmgate?)
SeattleDan
October 23, 2006 at 9:59 pm
8Whether pitchers load up, or hitters cork their bats, (or cowboy up with ‘roids!), it’s all part of the game, unless you get caught. Seems that there are some Cardinal pitchers who also use lubrication, so La Russa didn’t make a big deal out of Rogers…only to say, don’t be so obvious.
George
October 24, 2006 at 12:20 am
9Kieth Olbermann strikes again.
http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Countdown-SC-GOP-Fear1.wmv
If that link doesn’t work, take a trip over to Crooks and Liars: http://www.crooksandliars.com/
Murray
October 24, 2006 at 10:46 am
10Edith, mother of all Felbers,
My business partner and chef at the Elkridge Furnace Inn www.elkridgefurnaceinn.com is more than ready to chase around customers who want their Beef Wellington well done, or want Shiraz with Chicken and herbs.
Considering the mess the country is in, I would ascribe W to the garbage collector who recycled the waste back onto our plates, Or perhaps the plumber who redid the sewage pipes and……
mastmaker
October 24, 2006 at 11:54 am
11Absolutely. It bothered me a little when NOBODY ever took up Dubya on the ‘Axis’ part of the ‘Axis of Evil’. There is no way you could convince me that Iraq and Iran were planning ANYTHING together. Or Iraq and North Korea…..or Iran and North Korea. I am not so sure now. Talk about ’self-fulfilling….’
tess
October 24, 2006 at 4:25 pm
12Truthfully, I wouldn’t trust the gang in power with the kitchen. They’d do more than just spit in our food if we complain — they’d probably lace it all with arsenic before doubling the price on us.
It's Pat!
October 24, 2006 at 5:50 pm
13I think Adam’s analogies are good. To be a chef, you have to know some recipes. This dude doesn’t even know where the friggin’ cookbook is. A waiter has to take orders. I think he does that very well from Karl and Donnie and DICK.
David
October 25, 2006 at 4:00 am
14I’ve been unable to come up with anything to say except that a simple listing of stark reality is, in this case, devastating. These people and their policies are fucked up beyond even what I expected of them.
On the other hand, Keith Olbermann is checking in at a far more competent, articulate, insightful, intellectually honest level than I ever expected from anyone in the msm - and a journalist from sports broadcasting to boot. Moyers/Olbermann ‘08.
David
October 26, 2006 at 6:19 am
15Oh, Lobster,
W’s co-dependent Laura is coming to Western North Carolina to stump for Charles Taylor, who is on the verge of being unseated by Heath Shuler. The woman is an enabler for the worst presidency in American history - and a pretty high bar has been set by some of our past prezers. I’m sure she means well, but please, Laura, open your eyes. Your grandchildren will also have to live with the debacle your worse half is inflicting on us all.
tess
October 26, 2006 at 11:58 pm
16Her grandchildren?! David, do you really want either of the Bush twins’ popping spawn out of their hoo-hoos? We don’t even know where they’ve been or if they’ve had al their shots!
David
October 27, 2006 at 8:23 am
17tess,
Matriarchial Bar will make Little Bar and Jen the Younger understand that progeny are not optional in a dynastic family with delusions of royalty. The twins have three presidents as forebears, and while neither of them is likely to ever be president, one of their male (don’t kid yourself that in the Bush clan women go to the head of the line - that has never been their place) children will be expected to receive the presidential mantle. Jeb’s children fall one presidential forebear short, and are only half blueblood. I suspect Little Bar has been more correctly trained to the role, but Jen could just as easily wind up delivering the goods.
None of the foregoing is to be taken literally, of course. This is, after all, a free form website, not a think tank treatise.
David
October 27, 2006 at 8:28 am
18Make that an entry on a free form website, not a treatise in a think tank tome.