I was sitting in a meeting with entertainment lawyers on Friday, and being a “creative type” I, of course, let my mind wander. Specifically, to this. It’s not that big a deal, in a sense: we knew all along this is what happened regarding post-war planning in Iraq. But there’s something so evilly intentional about it, now. I mean, I know my dog sometimes craps on the rug. He’s a pug, he’s high strung, it happens. But imagine if you came across a reliable report of your dog actively planning to crap the rug. Saying, “If anybody attempts to prevent me from crapping the rug, I will bite them.”
So the article raises, again, and rather sharply, the question: what were they thinking?
I think I figured it out.
The Bushies, we know now, not only didn’t have a plan to occupy Iraq, they actively discouraged anybody from even thinking about it. Nope, not necessary, we were going to go in, shock a little awe, get on out. They must have been thinking that Saddam would just slide off the head of the body politic, perhaps still talking, as villains sometimes do at the end of movies in which the hero is armed with some kind of cool laser sword.
And then what? Well, then, the Westernized, secular, educated people of Iraq would instantly convert to a pro-US democracy, or at the very least, a dictatorship with a sense of decorum, like Pakistan. It would be like a geo-political Transformer toy: couple of twists and presto bango, they’re having national elections with 30% turnout, just like us.
But how in the world could Bush and Co ever think this was possible? How could they imagine that a nation that even an occasional reader of National Geographic Kids knew was a pressure cooker of ethnic hatred held together by barbed wire and the threat of torture would just… bloom into an mid-Eastern Singapore?
I’ll tell you how. Because Iraqis wore ties.Check it out.
Even the heinous murderers of Saddam’s regime were neatly dressed in decent business suits. Or, at the very least, smart military wear. They looked like us. They looked like lawyers, in fact, which is why I thought of it. They looked like people who would very easily forgive you for invading their country, and get down to business. “The past is past,” they’d say. “Let’s have a working lunch.”
North Korea? They wear those weird Mao suits: clearly unstable. Iran? Check out those turbans! God knows what they’d do. Saudi Arabia, where almost all of the 9/11 hijackers came from? Anybody who wears those crazy robes would kill you as soon as look at you.
I’m tellling you. If Iraqis had just changed into Bedouin robes every time they went on CNN in the 90s, Saddam would be in power today.
You may think I’m crazy. You may think this is nonsense. You got any better explanations? The comments are open.





32 comments
dee
September 10, 2006 at 3:02 pm
1Looking at the “house of cards,” It’s not the ties I notice. It’s the berets. I think this administration had the Iraqis confused with the French, and you know what those Bushie frat boys think about the French — buncha limp wristed, white-flag flyin’, roll over and play dead puppies that those Nazis took out without breakin’ a sweat. So how hard could it be once we installed Iyad Allawi as our very own Marshal Petain?
Matt J
September 10, 2006 at 4:19 pm
2Sure, but what about those curtains?
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/images/020811_page21 .jpg
Any regime with curtains like that is obviously holding together a fragile group of lunatics.
I can tell, because they look just like the ones in my grandmother’s house in Queens.
Dale
September 10, 2006 at 4:40 pm
3I think the problem lies in a lack of basic education. I learned in first grade that “q” is always followed by “u” and anybody who says different is not worth getting mixed up with.
hedera
September 10, 2006 at 5:04 pm
4What staggers me in all this is Rumsford’s blinding arrogance. If I thought there was anything actually resembling thought going on under that dome, I would wonder about it. But the magnitude of this folly is mesmerizing.
No one in this administration ever seems to have wondered whether he might be wrong. Oliver Cromwell, not the most tolerant and open-minded of men, once exhorted the Elders of the Scottish Kirk, “I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible you may be mistaken.” The Scottish Elders didn’t listen to him, either.
cooper
September 10, 2006 at 5:08 pm
5What I noticed was the Saddam-lookalike must-have moustaches. I think even the woman has one, though the “X” goes across her lip & I can’t say for sure.
SeattleDan
September 10, 2006 at 7:35 pm
6I’m with hedera. I have not ceased to be amazed by the arrogance of Rummy and the rest of the crew that runs this joint. And the evil that comes with it. It is evil. There is no other word to describe the willing ignorance of history and culture of the rest of the world.
Glad I dont have a dog that craps on the floor. My cats have the good sense to use the kitty box, or go outside.
YLlama
September 10, 2006 at 8:43 pm
7Huh. Suits. That may be right. I’d always thought the lack of planning simply indicated Bush and company wanted Iraq to turn into a shit storm to make America look better by comparison. You know, even if we had numerous terrorist attacks every year here, and we started to resemble Israel. Bush was thinking he could deflect the loss of thousands of American lives on native soil with the loss of thousands of American lives (and tens of thousands of Iraqi lives) on foreign soil.
David
September 10, 2006 at 9:39 pm
8“It is evil.” Amen, Seattle Dan.
Sienna,
This makes much more sense than most of the stuff your pug leaves on the floor, only to be offered way too often in too much of the media as informed commentary instead of as the excrement it is.
Maximum Bob
September 10, 2006 at 11:04 pm
9“So the article raises, again, and rather sharply, the question: what were they thinking?”
You might as well wonder what your dog was thinking when he crapped on the rug.
That’s the nice thing about navigating solely on faith: if you’re convinced you’ve got a pipeline to the Almighty, thinking just slows you down, particularly if you don’t have much practice doing it. As the late, great Ted Williams said, “If you don’t think too good, don’t think too much.”
Harold
September 11, 2006 at 4:14 am
10I always thought that the post-invasion plan involved Jesus and the Final Trump. Babylon, you know.
Caught a few seconds of Jimmy “Crocodile Tears” Swaggart on Sunday morning. (Does anyone else think that with that headset microphone he looks kinda like Pietro “Quicksilver” Maximoff, formerly the resident jerk in The Avengers comic books, begore his sister Wanda’s devastating breakdown and the “House of M” incident? Does anyone else have the slightest idea what I’m talking about? Anyway…) He was going on about Armageddon, and how the predictions will be coming to pass VERY soon. Now, preachers have been calling for the End Times since Day 1 (one of the biggest embarassments for the early Christian church was trying to spin that whole “this generation” thing to mean something other than “this generation”), but Swaggart seemed to be talking on a timescale of months, not an indefinite “soon”. We’re dealing with a bunch of whackos/registered voters who really and truly believe that Bush’s Discretionary War is the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy. And if such things are Divinely pre-ordained, would it not be the height of hubris to overlay merely HUMAN plans on top of them?
Steve D.
September 11, 2006 at 6:54 am
11Great stuff. Sadly, it’s just as plausible as any other theory on what we planned on doing after “Mission Accomplished.”
-Steve D. (lazycomic.blogspot.com)
David
September 11, 2006 at 7:24 am
12Glad to hear Jimmy the Lusty Loins for the Lord Swaggert is still on top of things.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
September 11, 2006 at 9:26 am
13Did anyone else note the one glaring omission from the “offensive plan?”
As summarized from the article: go in, remove the regime and get out.
What? No finding and destroying the huge stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction?
And of course, with no long term post-occupation plan, we really have no need to get right out. The lack of a plan predicates that we stay to correct whatever unforeseen contingencies may arise. After all, we are really there for entirely altruistic reasons. Right?
(Psssttt, don’t mention oil. They might start calling you names like “unpatriotic” or “conspiracy theorist”).
DouglasG
September 11, 2006 at 11:27 am
14I wish I could be that incompetant and retain my job! Rummy “you da man” in that regard.
Ann
September 11, 2006 at 11:27 am
15Harold,
I always thought Pietro was hot. I fervently hope that Swaggart wasn’t wearing a Quicksilver costume!
Harold
September 11, 2006 at 12:41 pm
16Damn, Ann. This sounds like a job for Photoshop.
Sienna's pug
September 11, 2006 at 1:11 pm
17“You might as well wonder what your dog was thinking when he crapped on the rug.”
She leaves me to go to work at her fancy-schmantzy job, she spends her time at home writing satire instead of rubbing my tummy, and she feeds me cubes of brown gook while she dines her way through Zagat’s.
The injustice stops here. I’m taking this carpet hostage and Operation I’m Innocent and Just Highstrung begins now.
Maximum Bob
September 11, 2006 at 4:34 pm
18Don’t get me wrong: I thoroughly respect your dog. At least he had an exit strategy.
tess
September 11, 2006 at 4:52 pm
19Ann,
Damn you! My imagination now has Swaggart wearing skin-tight and revealling clothing.
*shudder*
Now I need to bleach my brains.
Sienna's pug
September 11, 2006 at 10:49 pm
20Thank you for understanding, Max Bob. Also note that I entirely avoided the fan.
hedera
September 15, 2006 at 9:36 pm
21I’m perfectly well acquainted with Quicksilver (whom I associate more with the XMen than the Avengers, since Magneto and his brood were the XMen’s favorite villains; I collected the XMen for something like 30 years), and I can’t even begin to imagine Jimmy Swaggart looking like that. You’re hallucinating, Harold.
You are, however, right about the people who are convinced that we NEED war in the Middle East because it’ll bring on Armageddon (which is, by the way, in Iraq - the plain of Megiddo). There are actually some idiots in Texas trying to breed a red heifer, whatever that is, because the prophecy says that one has to be sacrificed before it can be the End of Days.
And of course he’s talking on a scale of months. You can’t get people all het up and giving you money over something that’ll happen in a thousand years - or even a couple hundred.
Harold
September 15, 2006 at 10:31 pm
22D’oh. You’re right. Wanda was in the Avengers, but Pietro wasn’t. That’s what I get for kibitzing on the whole “Avengers: Disassembled” storyline.
There are apparently while bulls being born in record numbers. (By that, I’m pretty sure I heard there are TWO of them.) If we can cross the red ones with the white ones, will we get pink cows?
hedera
September 15, 2006 at 11:09 pm
23Well, it depends on where the bulls are. Every picture of sacred cows in India that I’ve ever seen had white cattle wandering the streets, so India must be full of white bulls. But then I suppose those are Hindu bulls and can’t contribute to Christian bullsh*t…. and I don’t know about pink cows but you’re making me think of pink elephants.
David
September 16, 2006 at 5:57 am
24Maybe they can substitute a physically robust young lady Maoist for the bovine red heifer.
The whole Armageddon thing is a madcap cartoon that resulted from John the Revelator ingesting rye mold, isn’t it?
hedera
September 16, 2006 at 10:55 am
25Rye mold is certainly one of the top possibilities…
Harold
September 16, 2006 at 6:04 pm
26Umm, I think I meant to say white buffalo are being born. Or bison. Or something like that. Can they even be cross-bred with regular cows, especially pure red ones? I seem to rememberthat you’ll get something nicknamed a “beefalo”. Mmmm, beefalo.
antiflake
September 16, 2006 at 8:58 pm
27“How could they imagine that a nation that even an occasional reader of National Geographic Kids knew was a pressure cooker of ethnic hatred held together by barbed wire and the threat of torture would just… bloom into an mid-Eastern Singapore?”
Everyone knew that? Boy, I must be dumb. I didn’t. I didn’t know anyone who did, either. Where were all the geniuses in December of 2002?
hedera
September 16, 2006 at 9:36 pm
28The unfortunate truth is that, in 2002, the majority of Americans didn’t know squat about Iraq: and I certainly include the “geniuses” who planned the invasion. They could barely find it on a map. They didn’t speak the language, or understand the history. Sienna may be right in her assumption about the ties; I hadn’t thought of that one. The Americans who did understand about the ethnic and religious rivalries being held down by Saddam’s heavy hand were in the minority and were not making the plans for action. The majority of Americans not only didn’t know, they didn’t care.
What you don’t know can hurt you, even if you don’t care.
antiflake
September 17, 2006 at 4:41 pm
29“What you don’t know can hurt you, even if you don’t care.”
OK, from now on I will make every effort to stay up to date with National Geographic Kids.
Harold
September 17, 2006 at 6:58 pm
30You can start by listening to NPR on your way to and from work. That’s where I heard them talking about Osama bin Laden (remember him, the guy we used to have a task force specifically looking for, before we disbanded it last year?) quite some time before September 11, 2001.
antiflake
September 18, 2006 at 1:03 pm
31Harold, actually I listen to NPR as you recommend. But OBL was not the issue. Rather it was the inevitability of failure in Iraq due to ethnic hatred.
For the most part, I think NPR was in the same mode as the other media, who feared to challenge the Administration. They weren’t about to queer a war that meant so much for ratings/contributions.
Strobel and Landay of Knight-Ridder were the ones we should have been listening to.
David
September 19, 2006 at 10:40 pm
32antiflake,
I’m with you on these comments, except I don’t think the second sentence of the second paragraph is correct. I do think the first sentence is pretty much dead on. And nobody in the major media came close to Knight-Ridder for journalistic integrity and courage, along with a real quest for insight.
The new kid on the block, in my estimation, is Keith Olbermann.