None of us will forget where we were when we heard the news that airplanes had struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. And thanks to total media saturation concerning the upcoming fifth anniversary of 9/11, I imagine none of us will forget where we were the day we got sick and tired of total media saturation concerning the upcoming fifth anniversary of 9/11. Today is my day.
There have been the films. Oliver Stone has given us “World Trade Center,” which imagines the horrors of the day as seen through the eyes of Nicholas Cage, whose “NewYawkeeze” sounds like he’s speaking through the voice of Ralph Kramden. “United 93,” was initially shown at a special screening for President Bush and victims’ family members, who kept shushing the President every time he’d loudly ask, “When does Saddam come on?” This film has tastefully been released to DVD this week, so you can get your 9/11 fix in case the Discovery Channel’s “Why the Towers Fell-A-Thon” is blacked out in your city.
But MSNBC.COM has taken the cake, as far as I’m concerned, in regards to being irritatingly exploitative. The site has abandoned its wall-to-wall Lohan/Federline/Hilton format, and now offers link after link of 9/11 retrospective. The worst is an absurd, interactive 9/11 “Where Are They Now?” feature, so you catch up with your favorite victims and power players.
Wonder what happened to America’s Mayor, Rudolph Giuliani? Well, he gave a speech at the RNC where his constant mentions of “9/11″ suggested he was either trying to launch a new drinking game or suffering from some form of Terror Tourette’s. How about Andy Card, AKA “The Bush Whisperer?” And what about Ed Fine, whom MSNC.com sensitively refers to as “The World Trade Center Dust Man?” (Hint: He eventually took a shower!)
As I read this, I thought to myself, “How funny would it be if Bin Laden were on this list?!” And lo and behold, MSNC.com has put Bin Laden in the “Where Are They Now?” category. Scroll down–he’s there! The terrorist mastermind now dwells in the same category as “Cousin Oliver” and The Gin Blossoms.
MSNBC.com reports that Bin Laden is currently enjoying his lower profile “in a variety of locations, including Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sudan or Saudi Arabia” and notes that the CIA unit whose mission to hunt Bin Laden was disbanded in 2005. (I smell comeback!)
So there you have it–the man who was once “Wanted: Dead or Alive” is now a trivia question, as relevant as a pair of Uggs. I plan on ignoring all the 9/11 anniversary coverage from here on in, and just sit around and silently ponder why the men who vowed to get Bin Laden, “Dead or Alive,” have not themselves been relegated to the “Where Are They Now?” bin.





71 comments
Kip W
September 7, 2006 at 11:12 am
1By revealing that Bin Laden is in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sudan or Saudi Arabia, you’re only helping the terrorists! That information is for the use of our president, when and if he ever gets interested in it.
Ann
September 7, 2006 at 11:14 am
2I’ve been reading a lot of complaints about ABC’s planned “documentary” about Sept. 11. Rumor has it that the film is not entirely committed to the facts.
SeattleDan
September 7, 2006 at 11:29 am
3Not that facts have ever been required by this administration.
dee
September 7, 2006 at 12:06 pm
4We can’t live in fear, but we should be eternally vigilant. Osama is the greatest villain the world has seen since Hitler, but he really doesn’t matter. We don’t condone torture by the DOD, but whatever the CIA has to do to get information is okay. We’re winning the war in Iraq, but we need more troops.
It would be entirely appropriate to observe the anniversary of 9/11 by making an appointment with your chiropractor for that whiplash you’ve developed over the last five years.
piglet
September 7, 2006 at 12:27 pm
5The outrage over this ABC “docudrama” propaganda piece is so hot right now that my computer can’t reach thinkprogress.org anymore. The Daily Kos and the Huffington thingy are also abuzz over it.
Check it out. It looks pretty heinous.
Scooby
September 7, 2006 at 12:29 pm
6As Bill the Cat used to say… ack!
YLlama
September 7, 2006 at 12:36 pm
7MSNC.com? Typo?
Dale
September 7, 2006 at 1:10 pm
8Yeah, most Americans would love to go to that chiropractor…if they had health insurance.
siobhan
September 7, 2006 at 1:51 pm
9Scholastic has announced that they’re dropping the classroom guides originally distributed to go with the docudrama. They took a lot of heat over this.
Harold
September 7, 2006 at 1:52 pm
10MSNBC should have spent every day since January 20 recapping the day’s news out of Washington, D.C. from five years ago, to help us remember what the priorities were for the first 234 days of the Bush administration. I think they can be summarized as disposing of that pesky budget surplus that the Clinton administration left behind, establishing tax breaks for the wealthy, and solidifying an isolationistic foreign policy. MSNBC wouldn’t have had to spend any time on the Bush administration’s pre-9/11 concerns about terrorism, because except for that crazy hair-on-fire Clinton leftover Richard Clarke, there weren’t any of significance.
cooper
September 7, 2006 at 2:05 pm
11Scooby, you need a spellchecker - it was acckkk!!
Chris, welcome back! Terror Tourettes - that’s good! Isn’t Ed Fine Larry’s grandson? I think I saw that somewhere.
siobhan
September 7, 2006 at 2:17 pm
12Before you get completely and totally sick of 9/11 stuff, take a moment to watch Ze Frank’s take on it.
(Someone from FA introduced me/us to Ze, and I just gotta say thanks once again.)
Scooby
September 7, 2006 at 7:39 pm
13Speaking of MSNBC.com, an excellent article from Michael Hirsh.
Basically 5 pages to say “acckkk” (thanks coop!)
Hirsh: Bush’s Terror Rhetoric Lacks Clarity - Newsweek Michael Hirsh - MSNBC.com
Harold
September 7, 2006 at 7:46 pm
14Off-topic: Pictures and stories from Day 2 of Felberpalooza (Part 1, Grouseland) are now on my blog - including more pictures of your fellow Felbernauts! See ‘em before I get served with a court order to take them down!
http://anothermonkey.blogspot.com/2006/09/felberpalooza-day-2-part-1-g rouseland.html
cooper
September 8, 2006 at 4:26 am
15siobhan, thanks for the link to zefrank.
Sharon
September 8, 2006 at 7:28 am
16Thanks for the link to Michael Hirsh, whoever posted it. (I’m at work, using IE7, and it’s hopelessly scrambled posts from their authors.)
In his speech Tuesday, Bush called Iraq the “capital” of Al Qaeda’s would-be totalitarian caliphate and said it “is the central battlefield where the outcome of this struggle will be decided.” But military experts now say that the continuing violence since the killing of Abu Mussab al-Zarqawi, the top foreign terrorist in Iraq, last June is evidence that the insurgency there is mainly indigenous, largely unconnected to the larger war on terror.
The reason this doesn’t make sense to the casual observer is that Bush is not talking about this earthly realm at all. He is talking about the cosmic battle of good v. evil as “foretold” in Revelation, for which the central battlefield is the ancient city of Babylon. At least, that’s what his mythology tells him.
dee
September 8, 2006 at 7:39 am
17You’re right, Harold — Cody was by far the most photographed attendee. We are suckers for cute.
Siobhan– thanks for zefrank. I know it’s sites like that (and, of course, this) that are going to get me through the next 5 days of national glurge over this anniversary.
Well, that and an uninterrupted supply of limoncello.
Chris Regan
September 8, 2006 at 9:01 am
18I hate to be whorishly plugtastic, but today’s 40th anniversary of Star Trek is celebrated today on my mistress website:
www.mythstory.net
THAT’S an anniversary I can get behind!
Sharon
September 8, 2006 at 9:31 am
1940th? 40th! That can’t be! *I’m* certainly not 40 years older than I was that fateful fall evening in 1966! 25 years older, sure. Maybe 30. But surely not 40!
siobhan
September 8, 2006 at 9:38 am
20mmmm…. limoncello…. I’m happier just thinking about it.
dee
September 8, 2006 at 10:20 am
21Forty years of “Beam me up, Scotty” and never has it been more appropriate.
cooper
September 8, 2006 at 2:06 pm
22Sharon, of course you’re right about the “Vision Thing” with W and his Babylon fetish.
We missed seeing you at F*******looza. You would have been a good addition, plus I wouldn’t have had the weirdest accent there.
David
September 8, 2006 at 3:46 pm
23Chris,
GLAD you’re back. I’ve been muttering 9/11 fatigue for the past week - actually, 9/11 exploitation nausea. Keep hoping Karl Rove will spontaneously burst into flames. Blogwhore away, dude. Blogwhoring on FA has led me to all kinds of interesting places.
I was headed for grad school when “Beam me up” was first uttered. Hell, 40 years doesn’t sound so bad. Now 60 years might give me pause.
-laura
September 8, 2006 at 4:01 pm
24Sharon:
Good call on the Babylon thing!
I remember being totally baffled from the start of these Dark Years, having a sense that I was somehow missing something. How could he have so much adoration and praise from these “Christian” groups? It was like a cult. I told my husband at one point: “I don’t understand it. It’s as if he is saying one thing but secretly transmitting some secret message out to these evangelical wing-nuts that I am not getting”. Well, low and behold I was right. He was doing it all along. Speaking in code! And I was just not attending the right churches or subscribing to the same wacked-out theology, so I never got my decoder ring!
All:
love this blog and all the comments and your “blogwhoring”
…back to lurking.
Ann
September 8, 2006 at 4:15 pm
25I blame Mr. Spock for my string of impossible relationships. I had a crush on this emotionally unavailable, coldly reasonable alien just as I was entering adolescence. You’d be surprised at how many like him are out here in the real world!
My sister fixated on the Captain, though, so she just had a lot of fun.
SeattleDan
September 8, 2006 at 4:36 pm
26That doesn’t seem logical, Ann.
Sharon
September 8, 2006 at 4:41 pm
27Ann, the same thing happened to me! Do you remember the great TV Guide article by Isaac Asimov on ST titled “Smart is Sexy”? At the time he had an adolescent daughter who had a crush on Spock, and when he questioned her about it, that was her response. But then, what else would the daughter of the very intelligent Dr. A say?
9/11? HA! The day the world changed forever was 9/8/66.
I’m sorry to have missed F*****palooza, but I just couldn’t face that many hours in the car. And flying is out of the question–I refuse to give in to the insanity of no carry-ons, so I won’t fly at all. Next year I’ll try to figure out a way to get there by train. Or bus.
cooper
September 8, 2006 at 4:53 pm
28Pardon my familiarity, Ann, but if some guy was actually emotional unavailable to you, he had to be an alien.
Seems like just moments ago that we were gathering in anticipation of the fine times that were to be that “thing that should not be called…, well, you know”. dee was in her room at the Day’s Inn, after enjoying a full body massage at the Vista Spa across the street (nobody believed you went “shopping”); Ann was experiencing the nuisanced pleasures of spending a week in Central Florida in August; and me, I was camping out in the remnants of Ernesto - by myself - in the field, but not yet wet; George was swimming to his car in Virginia Beach: George’s Sister was, well we can only speculate what she was up to; Harold was ordering the doughnuts and assorted pastries he would bring and share the next day. Adam, after a day’s work, was soon to be boarding a plane, destined to sit beside the chatty girlfriend of an unnamed wide receiver for the Baltimore Ravens, and wing his way to the east coast, not to sleep for another 26 - 30 hours. What fun!
cooper
September 8, 2006 at 5:02 pm
29Happy Birthday, Sharon. You don’t look a day past…well we don’t know, do we? Come to the gathering next time, dang it!
Chris, re: “Star Trek: Gratuitous Use of Colons”, you’re referring to more of the gay sex, right?
Ann
September 8, 2006 at 5:07 pm
30Ah, Cooper, you make me nostalgic for five days ago!
Sharon
September 8, 2006 at 5:19 pm
31All Things Considered did an OK retrospective on ST on this most hallowed of days. I cringed a little when the word “evildoers” was used to describe the crew’s various foes.
So much of the English language has been polluted in the past five years…
Sharon
September 8, 2006 at 5:23 pm
32cooper, my birthday was a few years, and some months, before 9/8/66! But I wouldn’t wish the years away, not now, because then I would not have been old enough to really appreciate Star Trek.
Murray
September 8, 2006 at 5:39 pm
33Chris, when your numbers and general perception are in the shitter, what else are you going to do? (I’d suggest going on vacation but Rove is in charge). They will try to milk this sucker the best they can, and those too dull and uinformed to know better, will buy it.
“MY GOD JIM! THE MAN’S DEAD!”
“I dunno how much more o’ this she’ll take capt’n!”
“That would be the logical solution.”
“Captain there appears to be a strange tachion reading.”
“Where are your nuclear wessels?”
“Steady course as she goes Captian.”
“Oh my God, I’m wearing a red shirt!”
Still have some t-shirts for those who missed F-ooza. (Help me out here!)
Sharon
September 8, 2006 at 5:44 pm
34I’ll take a t-shirt.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
September 8, 2006 at 6:03 pm
35Murray, what the hell do you want me to do about it? I’m a lurker and occasional poster dammit, not a surgeon!
George
September 8, 2006 at 6:04 pm
36Who could have predicted that a thread about 9/11 fatigue would end up as “How old were you when Star Trek began”?
Jim (OJNTNJ)
September 8, 2006 at 6:04 pm
37…..or a faith healer/messiah!
Jim (OJNTNJ)
September 8, 2006 at 6:07 pm
38George, when you’ve got 9/11 fatigue, the thread has got to end up just about anywhere but 9/11.
George
September 8, 2006 at 6:19 pm
39I don’t think of my age very often and even have to resort to math to fill out forms that can’t be properly processed without knowing my age demographic. So, I am startled to do the math and realize that asking me my age could be the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything.
SeattleDan
September 8, 2006 at 6:45 pm
40If the answer is 42. But that’s a different series.
Sharon
September 8, 2006 at 7:06 pm
41I’m sure I’m 42….in some number system other than base 10.
Sharon
September 8, 2006 at 7:09 pm
42Who could have predicted that a thread about 9/11 fatigue would end up as “How old were you when Star Trek began”?
If Chris hadn’t brought it up, I’m sure I would have.
Sharon, First Generation Trekkie
SeattleTammy
September 8, 2006 at 8:12 pm
43At the mystery Bookshop, we’ve long had a rabid customer from the Eastside. After a few years we clued in she was married to Scotty. THE Scotty. I finally got to meet him one February morning, We, the staff of Seattle Mystery were huddled in the front stone archway, huddled in one of those group Mary Tyler Moore kinda hugs. She pulled up in her Landrover and I finally ran over, bits of motar was raining down. Jimmy, in the pasenger seat, 3 year old daughter in back…Are you guys ok? yeah are you??? By the way, nice to meet you Jimmy, wish it was better circumstances.
I ran in grabbed all her books on hold, ran them back out and said “call me back and tell me what’s in the stack we’ll ring it up tomorrow”
It was the Nisqually Earthquake. In Pioneer Square.
One time Robert Crais was signing. She waited in line with the daughter on her hip, Bob signed her entire set of First Edition HC’s, she left. I explained she was THE Scotty’s wife. He, bright guy, quickly did the math. “Man, I gotta get me some of them Dialithium Crystals!” he shook his head.
There was an article about Bob in Pages magazine ages ago that involved a scandalous hussy at a certain mystery bookshop….the one with Anne Rice on the cover. And he swears I am that Tammy character in his book.
siobhan
September 8, 2006 at 8:35 pm
44Murray, I think my super-signed book is coming from you? If it hasn’t already been sent, add a t-shirt and tell me how much money.
tess
September 8, 2006 at 9:01 pm
45I remember watching “Star Trek” reruns as a kid on Saturday evenings while gulping down this sort of ground pork soup my mom would leave my brothers and me before going to work, with instructions to my dad to warm it up. Those were happy days, of watching “Dr. Who,” “Red Dwarf,” and “Blackadder” until my brains were ready to burst with nerdiness.
Now I have to download everything I want to watch because I only get NBC, Faux, and PBS, and I usually forget what I wanted to watch on PBS.
cooper
September 9, 2006 at 5:11 am
46Jeez, you work in a bookstore and you get to meet all these famous people? Marty Allen, Robert Crais, *THE Scotty*. I’m a mere printer and who do I meet? The sweaty UPS man at the end of the day. Oh wait, I did get to meet George’s Sister. Never mind.
cooper
September 9, 2006 at 8:28 am
47Space Shuttle Atlantis is safely into orbit. Beautiful launch video courtesy of NASA TV. I’m really going to miss these launches after 2010.
David
September 9, 2006 at 9:27 am
48OK, gang,
I was born in 42, turned 42 in 84, celebrated by watching Hitchhiker’s Guide, went berserk when the meaning of the universe was revealed, and obviously never recovered, having thought as the question was uttered, What does that mean? One of the characters in Stephen Crane’s “The Open Boat,” answered the question, of course, when he gave the ultimate answer to a specific question, “It don’t mean nothin’.”
Remember saying to some friends a while back that W is our first actual cult president. Kind of hard at times to distinguish him from oh, I don’t know, say Father Coughlin on ignorance meds and meth.
I’m a secular humanist, Jim, not a myth adherent.
David
September 9, 2006 at 9:40 am
49Just for the hell of it:
This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector: Plato (428/427-348/347 B.C.)
Some things just never change.
George
September 9, 2006 at 9:53 am
50“On the Media” did a piece on Star Trek’s 40th anniversary. You can hear it here:
http://www.onthemedia.org/stream/ram.py?file=otm/otm090806g.mp3
(if that link doesn’t work, go to onthemedia.org and find the show for Sept 8th, 2006. This is the last story on that day’s show.)
piglet
September 9, 2006 at 10:09 am
51Tess:
Blackadder was nerdy? I’m stunned. No wonder the cool kids never talk to me…the nerd is always the last to know…
cooper
September 9, 2006 at 10:31 am
52Lest anyone forget why we really went to war in Iraq, grinding away on our reservoir of healthy young people and pissing billions upon billions of dollars down a rat hole…
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blsaddamdaddy.htm
Sharon
September 9, 2006 at 11:18 am
53Ah, yes. Reason #12, subheading D, if I recall correctly.
George
September 9, 2006 at 11:40 am
54Thanks for the link, Cooper. I spent some time looking backwards through the pictures there and it is clear that those who forget their propaganda are doomed to repeat it.
This one really hurts - http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/bliraqrealinspectors.ht m
Dale
September 9, 2006 at 11:49 am
55Off topic question. For the first amendment buffs out there:
So I live in a typical Brooklyn neighborhood, lots of street traffic, apartments over stores, park, lots of people in very few square feet. So at 11AM two men install themselves on the street corner opposite mine and begin preaching what I guess I would classify as an Afrocentric apocalyptic (Christian) tirade, with microphone and speakers to better spread the word to the entire neighborhood. The messages include some very (to me) offensive stuff (AIDS and WTC as plagues sent by God to punish the world for our sins etc etc), but that is besides the point. The point is that they kept at it for three full hours, top volume essentially right under my (and many other people’s) windows. After about an hour and a half, I asked a policeman who was out on patrol if they could possibly be asked to put away the microphones. It seems to me that freedom of speech does not imply freedom of electrically amplified speech. The cop said that as long as they were talking about religion, they were free to do whatever they wanted. I made the point about the microphone, and he said that it was their right, cuz otherwise how would people hear them.
Is this correct? I hate to be the grumpy, old fart in my neighborhood, but it was REALLY loud and distracting (people blast music all the time, but I can send that into the background) and for THREE hours!
cooper
September 9, 2006 at 12:23 pm
56Dale, next time slip the cop a fin, they’ll get rid of the problem, chop chop; slip them a twenty and they’ll break knee caps. Urban Life 101.
If buttheads with bullhorns make your teeth itch, don’t move to the South. We have our own problems with these morons.
Sharon
September 9, 2006 at 12:46 pm
57Dale, I did pretty well in Con Law, but it was a long time ago. One thing that I do remember, though, is that (1) there are very few absolute constitutional rights, and (2) policemen aren’t always 100% up to date on 1st Amendment rights, or on municipal codes, either. I would start by checking local laws. Whether they were talking about religion or about sports (that’s the same thing in Texas), there has to be some kind of excessive noise ordinance that covers this. I guarantee you that if it had been 2 a.m., their sopposed 1st A. rights would have been given short shrift.
hedera
September 9, 2006 at 12:52 pm
58Dale, how close under your window were they? Because back in the day, when my sister lived on Telegraph Avenue in Berkeley (1966 or so), she had a similar problem with the Hare Krishnas, who chose her window under which to stand and chant, for hours. She went down and asked them politely to move, and they said, “We bring you joy!” “You drive me crazy!” she replied, to no avail. Repeat conversation 3-4 times.
After the 3rd or 4th useless conversation she went back up to her apartment. I lived in this apartment building too, in the sixties, and I clearly remember the central steam heat (a Brooklynite should understand this). All the rooms had a steam radiator under the window, driven by a boiler in the basement, and all the radiator valves leaked. My sister’s radiator valve leaked even more than mine, so she had quite a large pan of drip water on the floor. Next to the window. Under which the Hare Krishnas were chanting. She thought for a minute, opened the window, picked up the drip pan, and emptied it out the window.
The chanting stopped. She looked down - the Hare Krishnas were milling around, puzzled. After a few minutes they began to chant again. She filled the pan at the sink, went back to the window, emptied the pan out the window. The Hare Krishnas moved down the street a block or so and never chanted under her window again.
Oh, sorry - I just realized these yo-yos were across the street from you. Won’t work. You might pass the suggestion on to the neighbors. With any luck, a little water will short out their amps. Or is this something you can’t get away with in these politically correct days??
hedera
September 9, 2006 at 12:53 pm
59If all the above suggestions fail, try ear plugs.
hedera
September 9, 2006 at 12:55 pm
60And in case nobody but me remembers cooper’s slang, a fin is five bucks. The twenty would be a double sawbuck. I love thirties currency slang.
tess
September 9, 2006 at 1:45 pm
61I would’ve thought that assholes with blowhorns would fall under the category of “noise pollution” and thereby fall under public disturbance laws. That’s how most parties get broken up in California — an annoyed neighbor calls the cops about the noise being above 100dB and they come and break the party up.
Murray
September 9, 2006 at 4:20 pm
62Dale, that’s why God invented Shotguns. Oh, I’m sorry, I live in South Central PA, that kind of thing would just be understood.
You live long enough and you get to run into several celebrities.
Adam. (The rest of you had your chance, suckers!)
Billy Joel, (I built his solarium on his Central Park South penthouse, and met with Christy several times.)
Carl Kastle, Peter Segal, Charlie, Roxanne, Tom, and the gang at WWDTM. (Some 2X).
I shook Bill Clinton and Mo Udall’s hands, along with Governor Rendell, Carl Levin, and numerous other political types. The future US congressman Tony Barr is a close friend.
True story.
Memorial Day several years ago, a woman calls up and asks if we have bikes for rent. Sure. She comes with her husband, mother, and father. The parents aren’t out of the ordinary but she is very short, very cute and has enormous breasts. Her husband is as homely as she is good looking. His nose is pushed to one side, he is missing several teeth, and he sounds like a Hill Billy caricature. They rent 4 bikes; I give them a map of a good route, and tell them if they get lost to call. Several hours later, I figure that I’ll give them another half hour and I go looking for them. At that point a neighbor with a pickup pulls in with them and the bikes, and the neighbor has this really silly grin on his face. They pile out, I take care of the bikes, the parents head off to the car, the woman takes a shower, and the husband asks me, “Have you ever had a celebrity here?” “No.” “Well now you have.” “OH?” “The woman taking a shower is Miss Penthouse Pet for April (It’s May).” “That’s interesting.” “I asked the driver of the pickup if he had ever had a celebrity in his truck and he said no, so I told him that he had Miss Penthouse Pet for April in the back.” That explained the stupid grin. He went on to tell how they had worked hard for this and finally everything had started to fall in place. At that point she came out of the bathroom and he turned to her saying, “I asked if he (me) had ever had a celebrity in his shop and he said no, so I said he did now, that you were Miss Penthouse Pet for April, I also asked the pickup driver.” All of a sudden a dark cloud appeared over her head and in a very strong and sharp voice she said, “Not everyone wants to know that.” I said it was OK, didn’t mean anything one way or the other for me, but I knew what she was thinking. Now I wasn’t seeing her as a customer but as a naked sex symbol. (Well, actually she was probably right, even if I was trying not to convey it.) A normal conversation was no longer possible, and hubby wasn’t catching on. They left, and I was left wondering what she saw in him. She could have her pick of men and what kind of guy would find a boost of social ranking by parading his wife’s Penthouse status in front of strangers. I felt sorry for her. They had some real issues to work through.
I was sort of curious, and went on line to Penthouse.com but they wanted $10 to check through the archives and I never did it.
Another celebrity.
Ian Shoals
September 9, 2006 at 4:31 pm
63Dale, I have just the solution (so to speak) to your problem - the Max Infusion Arctic Shock super soaker filled with saltwater supersaturated & chilled to 31F with 20% anhydrous ammonia and a potent jot of Hell Oil (registered trademark). This takes care of the tomcats in rut in my little corner of the world.
http://www.hasbro.com/supersoaker/default.cfm?page=browse&product_id=1 7452
Dale
September 9, 2006 at 4:45 pm
64Thanks for all the ideas! If the Apocalypse Road Show shows up again, I will certainly try them all. Using the cop’s own logic, I think that as long as I mention God while I am doing it, I am free to do whatever I like.
David
September 10, 2006 at 5:40 am
65Good stuff, cooper. Thanks for the link.
Harold
September 18, 2006 at 4:13 am
66I hate spam comments.
cooper
September 19, 2006 at 4:59 am
67Yo! Franny, get to work, dammit. Where’s a Roborat spam filter when you need one? Jeez!
FANNY PLEASE HELP!
September 19, 2006 at 10:32 am
68I keep reading that spam comment as “cure for incompetence.” THAT would be something I would buy.
Fanny, there are spam comments inundating some of the older posts. Help!
Harold
September 19, 2006 at 10:34 am
69And by “inundating” I guess I just mean the two that are on this post.
dee
September 19, 2006 at 11:50 am
70Fanny is trying to distract us from her own incompetence. Instead of going after the real spam terrorists, she’s attacking commenters such as myself who are no immediate threat to the blog. I expect this place to descend into chaos any day now.
Then maybe Adam can apply to Halliburton for a grant to repair the infrastructure. Or increase his bandwidth.
Harold
September 20, 2006 at 9:05 am
71Fanny, you da rat!