Katherine Harris, in the Florida Baptist Witness:
…that lie we have been told, the separation of church and state, people have internalized, thinking that they needed to avoid politics and that is so wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers. And if we are the ones not actively involved in electing those godly men and women… then we’re going to have a nation of secular laws. That’s not what our founding fathers intended and that’s certainly isn’t what God intended.
…But that’s why we need the faithful and we need to take back this country. It’s time that the churches get involved.
… if you’re not electing Christians then in essence you are going to legislate sin.
…whenever we legislate sin and we say abortion is permissible and we say gay unions are permissible, then average citizens who are not Christians, because they don’t know better, we are leading them astray and it’s wrong.
As a non-Christian, I can vouch for what Ms. Harris is saying: Me, my people, my family… we actually don’t know better. Honest. No idea about the whole “right and wrong” thing. It all seems like one big gray, mushy area to me. So I’m voting Christian this year, and I hope you will too.
…let me say that I’m glad someone finally had the courage to suggest that religious organizations should get together and become active in politics. For too long the churches and the people of faith have kept themselves above it all. But if they start getting involved, then one day we might be able to elect representatives, governors, senators - who knows, maybe even presidents! - who don’t hide their Christian faith.
It’s not going to happen overnight, but if we follow Katherine’s model, we just might get there. Me, I’m tired of living in a country where people pretend not to believe in God just to get elected. Where a man of faith has to deny his love for Jesus just to get a few votes. I see a day when a politician can get up and say “I’m a Christian!” with the same joy and pride that today’s politicians get up and say “I’m an atheist!”
Someday.
Meanwhile, we need to get those Christians in office or else I’m going to stray from the path. I know it. I can feel it. I’m one of those average citizens who isn’t a Christian, and if you “legislate sin,” well, then I’m likely to think it’s okay. It’s not my fault, really. I just don’t know any better.
Let me give you an example: Rape. I don’t do it. Why? Because it’s wrong. How do I know that? Because it’s illegal. Easy, right? That’s how my non-Christian mind works.
But suppose for a minute that some weird ACLU types decided to pass a law that made rape legal. Some “freedom of expression” argument or something, get an activist judge to rubberstamp it - ba-boom! Rape is legal. Does that make it okay?
You bet it does! At least to me. As someone who doesn’t know Jesus, I can say that if rape wasn’t illegal, I would no longer see anything wrong with it.
Would I rape people right away? That’s hard to say. It wouldn’t be “wrong” anymore, but it’s never really been anything I’ve been interested in. But what if Hollywood started making rape cool? What if there were lovable movie heroes doing it, like maybe some flick where like Matthew McConaughey starts raping people for fun and the background music is kind of bouncy so you know it’s not a scary or bad thing and then maybe it cuts into a techno/house rhythm and neat spinning cameras and washed-out Matrix-like green lighting so it all seemed really excellent while he was raping people and stuff…?
Then I’d probably be into it. Seems hard to picture now, but if I really think about it? Sure. I can see myself happily bending innocent Christians over barstools - blonde, innocent Christians of both genders - and raping ‘em for fun just because is wasn’t illegal and because Matt McConaughey looked cool doing it.
Sorry if that sounds a little harsh, but that’s how the non-Christian mind works. That’s why I’m so totally into abortions and stuff, and I really wish I wasn’t. I wish I could see what might be wrong with ‘em. But I don’t have Jesus to tell me, so I’m all like “Whatever. I guess they’re okay.”
And that’s why I’m hoping we can all get together - Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, atheists, everyone - all get together and elect some Christians in November. It’s time to finally open the door for people of faith (Christian faith, for once!) to step out of the shadows and come into public life. Let then close the divide between church and state and make sure the law tells me what’s right and wrong. Otherwise I can’t promise that I won’t soon be spending my Saturday evenings trying to impress girls by raping, murdering, aborting fetuses, and marrying men.
Honestly, if it looks cool on MTV and there’s no law against it, I’ll probably do it. Only a Christian government stands between me and… that. Let’s all pitch in and help them help us. Some tiny voice at the back of my shriveled, half-formed, filthy non-Christian soul tells me that it might be my only hope.





61 comments
someguy
August 27, 2006 at 6:31 pm
1What are christians anyways? They’re just jews that decided to read a whole bunch of non-sense into life of some carpenter guy who did a few things that were misinterpreted.
So, I say let the rabbi’s run the world. Or at least the orthodox jews.
Maximum Bob
August 27, 2006 at 6:57 pm
2I think you’re jumping the gun, Adam, when you say that you’re going to be voting Christian this year. If we Jews can’t hold office, wouldn’t it also make sense to prohibit us from voting? Me, I might just be weak-willed enough to go into the booth and pull the lever for one of those commy, lily-livered secular humanists who’d probably turn the other cheek to our Enemy Of The Week. (Let’s be clear, here: it’s OK to talk about turning the other cheek, but when you actually do it, you’ve pretty much ruled out a future in public office.)
So maybe I’ll call Katherine Harris’s office and get a reading on this non-Christian voting thing. Hope she hasn’t fired the person who answers the phone.
piglet
August 27, 2006 at 7:39 pm
3Wow. If I were a conspiracy theorist type, I would be wondering if those Leftist Elites weren’t masterminding this whole Katherine Harris campaign. She’s like a bizarre caricature of everything awful about the current neo-con regime.
And comedy gold to boot.
Murray
August 27, 2006 at 8:14 pm
4Well if you can’t have Alan Keyes, to take the Republican line to its logical (illogical) end, than we will just have to do with Katherine.
Tell me her idiocy isn’t as entertaining as Alan’s.
YLlama
August 27, 2006 at 8:36 pm
5I’m just proud of Katherine that she’s so inclusive. I mean, to suggest that all Christians know right from wrong… It’s ridiculous, right? We all know only Pentacostalists have it right. And all those Catholics and Southern Baptists and Christian Scientists and Jews and other assorted Christians out there only get lucky most of the time because they’re out copying the Truly Moral Pentacostalists. But Katherine, being a modern woman, and all diverse and whatnot, is a great politician. Lying to get the Russian Orthodox vote. Good for her.
SpottedDog
August 27, 2006 at 8:37 pm
6Can’t we simplify things and just let the priests, bishops, and pope run the country? Then we could do away with all the confusing election stuff. Instead of voting we could all pray. That would be nice. And we could get rid of taxes. Sure there would be tithing but that’s different from taxes. Tithing goes to the church. That’s much better.
Fran
August 27, 2006 at 9:14 pm
7No no no, Dog, because hadn’t you heard? Catholics aren’t Christian! Yes, yes it’s true! Why I’ve asked many people over the years what the five big religions are, and you might be surprised at how often I hear “Catholic, Christian, Jew, Muslim, Buddhist” and once in a while people remember there’s a religion with gods with lots of arms, but that’s not a big religion ’cause no one can remember what Hindus do. So they don’t count. They certainly can’t VOTE, for pete’s sake! So we can’t have the pope as the head guy ’cause he’s not Christian according the Baptists. Or Holy Rollers. Or snake handlers. Whichever. I get them mixed up.
hedera
August 27, 2006 at 9:21 pm
8Well, there’s one group I’m sure she doesn’t belong to - when I was very small we moved to a new neighborhood, and the closest church was an organization called the Church of the Nazarene. It wasn’t until years later that I found out why we shortly began attending the more liberal and open-minded (?!!) First Baptist Church - the Nazarenes considered makeup on women to be unacceptable, and my mother (a former Catholic) put her foot down. From the depth of eye makeup in the photos I’ve seen of dear Katherine, I’m quite sure she doesn’t belong to them. I don’t know if the Nazarenes were rollers or snake handlers, I was only about 5, and we weren’t there very long.
Allan
August 27, 2006 at 9:24 pm
9Some years ago (1992 or 93) I was living just outside Nashville when the legislature passed a bill allowing prayer in public schools. The governor refused to sign it saying, look, it’s unconstitutional and if I sign it the state will get sued, we’ll lose, and it will just cost the taxpayers a lot of money for nothing. I recall reading an article in the paper where a Christian group was complaining about that, saying that the atheists, Satanists, Jews and Catholics could just move elsewhere if they didn’t like it.
Mike Z
August 27, 2006 at 9:36 pm
10I think Ms. Harris’s argument is mising a premise or two there somewhere. I mean, the move from being non-christian to being evil seems ill-supported.
Oh well, maybe I was absent that day. Lots of other people seem to understand it just fine.
http://www.mndaily.com/articles/2006/03/24/67686
Apparently, atheists even rate below homosexuals in terms of trustworthiness. Dude, that’s pretty low.
Lauren
August 27, 2006 at 10:14 pm
11She is so, so frightening. Wow!
Mike: isn’t that amazing?
I had a religions class a couple seasons ago, and one of the profs (this was amazing in the Californian Bible Belt that is the Central Valley) actually commented to the class that it was more noble to be an athiest who behaves morally than a religious person who does–there’s no eternal reward in it for the athiest, and they do it anyway. The class on the whole didn’t seem to get it.
Apparently, if you don’t have the threat of hellfire hanging over you, you’re incapable of being good or trustworthy.
Interestingly enough, some of the Christian students in the class were even dumbfounded at the idea of good Jews, when we got around to the concept of Sheol and so on, because of the lack of a concrete idea of heavenly reward for being a good person in this life or of eternal burning for not. “If they don’t have a heaven, then why would they be good?” They asked the (Jewish) teacher this.
It seems to me that far, far too many people only have a concept of right and wrong as related to what gets you into heaven or hell in Christian faith. And considering that includes the out whereby believing Jesus died for one is enough to get them into heaven, regardless of what they’ve done. . . murder, rape, oppress, whatever. . . that’s. . . really scary, frankly. But it kind’ve explains the current Administration, don’t it?
Lauren
August 27, 2006 at 10:25 pm
12Oh, PS, though. Adam, I do still want to hear more about this bending good little blond boys over barstools thing. That just sounds like good, clean fun!
–A happy little nontheistic fetish-laden queer.
Dale
August 27, 2006 at 10:46 pm
13If the whole point of a belief system is to affect behavior on earth through the threat/promise of punishment/reward, I think reincarnation is more effective. If I could make myself believe that supporting gay marriage would result in me being reborn as, say, Katherine Harris, I would have six “Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve” tattoos already.
Lauren
August 27, 2006 at 10:49 pm
14Oh! And PPS! We are LOVING THE BOOK. It’s fantastic! Thank you!!
Maximum Bob
August 27, 2006 at 11:44 pm
15Murray, I always thought it was hilarous that Alan Keyes had a TV show called Alan Keyes is Making Sense! I believe it was produced by the same people who plan to make Mel Gibson is Doing the Hora!
Fran
August 28, 2006 at 12:05 am
16But Dale, to be a good Christian, you can’t have tattoos! Leviticus 19:28 says so.
Well, okay, you can. We all know that the laws in Leviticus only apply to gays. At least that’s what I’m repeatedly told when people find out I’m gay. But then I’m doomed anyway, since in addition to being queer, I eat shellfish and wear clothes made out of two different fibres. See how I ignore all that Christian morality and go straight to the really EVIL stuff?
A. Bryant
August 28, 2006 at 4:50 am
17I had no idea there were this many deviant Anti-Jesusites in God’s own Christian country! And there might be more of you out there lurking? Eeeeew! And homosexuals, too? Eeeeew!
tim
August 28, 2006 at 5:14 am
18Several things come to mind when I see this T-shirt, but Christianity isn’t one of them.
dee
August 28, 2006 at 5:28 am
19I think we all better get our spiritual houses in order toot sweet, because the Apocalypse is near. How else can you explain Stephen Colbert losing to Barry Manilow?
Oh, and congratulations, Chris!
Kip W
August 28, 2006 at 6:20 am
20I think Katherine Harris is right. It’s important for Christians to go out and make sure that our elected officials use our tax dollars to do the things that God just can’t seem to manage otherwise. Truly, His eye is on the butterfly ballot.
Kip W
August 28, 2006 at 6:21 am
21Um, oh yeah: meka-leka hi fabulalalalala baglodda niktu. (I’ve been watching “God Stuff” on YouTube for tongues-talkin’ tips from Tilton.)
jpj
August 28, 2006 at 10:12 am
22Adam, you are writing as if you would have a choice as to your raping preferences; doesn’t legislating sin mean that rape would be mandatory?
John Murphy
August 28, 2006 at 11:24 am
23I would like to modify a George Carlin quote slightly by inserting the name of Katherine Harris.
“I wish they would just fuck (Katherine Harris) in the ass with a big rubber dick”!
When they make rape legal she is number one and number two on my list.
Happy day all
Sharon
August 28, 2006 at 12:00 pm
24Another Apology From a Bush Voter
Harold
August 28, 2006 at 1:29 pm
25Didn’t Katherine Harris get the memo about the Letter to Timothy? She should just shut the hell up. Women, I tell ya.
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/08/21/menonly.sundayschool.ap/index.html
I’ve actually had devout Christians argue with me that, in the absence of God, there is no such thing as morality or ethics. They have a spooky, sociopathic attitude: If it weren’t for the Big Guy with the beard watching me, oh, the things I would do… In that sense, Christians who act only out of fear of divine reprisal are inherently less virtuous than non-believers who act out of a basic preference for good actions over evil actions. Add to that the fact that most Christians believe that upon accepting Christ they have an irrevocable Get Into Heaven card for the rest of their lives, and they’re truly a scary bunch that deserves to be watched closely. (Catholics, at least, believe that you have to confess your sins and perform penance to get absolution from sin.)
I’ll take a virtuous atheist over a divinely restrained sociopath any day.
Jerry
August 28, 2006 at 2:51 pm
26Personally, I think it’s a GREAT idea that she wants churches to become secular and start paying taxes on their property and income!
Harold, I agree wholeheartedly! These folks that are only constrained by their fear of eternal hell-fire scare me shitless. What REALLY scares me is that sometimes they “slip,” but the love of Jesus accepts them back, so they really don’t “sin” or can be forgiven again.
But what REALLY, REALLY scares me are the folks (like the current administration!) who feel that they are living in the Dispensation ! Check my post for refs, but basically, it means that you don’t have to obey the teachings of Christ right now. Yer saved, no matter what you do!
Stephen
August 28, 2006 at 4:29 pm
27I believe the theory is “once saved = always saved” There are even those who believe that once they have been “saved” they can actually do NO wrong because everything they do is what Christ would have them do. Commit adultery, murder, whatever… since they have accepted Christ he wants them to do it. Not everyone believes it, but a lot do.
One of the reasons I no longer get upset when people say I’m not Christian.
vachon
August 28, 2006 at 4:56 pm
28Here in Florida, we love God’s Own Garden Gnome. She stands up for Gnomes (not an easy feat seing as we’re 5 inches tall on a good day and a big wind) everywhere. Whatever happened to that 60’s Commandment called Affirmative Gnomeaction? For shame, people. For shame.
Jim (Original Jim, not the Other Jim or the New Jim)
August 28, 2006 at 5:56 pm
29While not identical to the definition of dispensation provided in Jerry’s blog, the Vatican (fka “The Church”) could warn against the use of dispensations, since they were directly attributable to their change of identification as “The Church” to “a church.”
Do you think the powers that be still believe in payment of moolah for absolution of sin?
cooper
August 28, 2006 at 6:47 pm
30By Jesus, Harold, that’s enough to make one lose one’s religion, assuming one had any left after the last 5-1/2 years of W sawing on the steering wheel of state. Thanks for the link. Believe me, I’ve seen enough of those “devout Christian” who, if they weren’t walking with the Lord, they’d be ax murderers. They may yet.
Just Jay
August 28, 2006 at 7:32 pm
31OK, this is way off topic, but I wanted to congratulate Adam on selling out in Portland OR. My family and I stopped at Powell’s in Portland on our way to Newport (My apologies to Seattle Dan, but Seattle wasn’t in the schedule this trip), and I didn’t see his book. I asked at the desk and was told that their first shipment had sold out completely, but they had ordered more and it was expected soon. Way to go Adam, you’re a hit! But I guess we here in the Lurker’s Lounge have known that all along.
Jay
siobhan
August 28, 2006 at 9:34 pm
32One of the most frustrating things about this one segment of the Christian faith (let’s call them Christianists) is the way that their excesses and hypocrasy tarred ordinary Christians. I’m an atheist, but most of my family is not; we’ve even got a few priests and nuns in the mix (Irish, ya know). It has never been a source of conflict and rarely even a source of conversation.
Their outlook on the rules of the faith seems to be less about fear of God (”wait until your father gets home!”) and more about behaving in a way that would make their Father proud. They’re good people at the core, and that’s what guides them to behave in a civil manner. Their faith gives them something to steer by when they get to a trickier situation. We atheists just have to find a different point of reference to set our compass.
The Christianists seem to lack an internal moral compass, and thus need instruction at every turn. Unfortunately, they assume everyone else shares their condition and that we all need their set of rules to overcome it.
I really can’t wait until January 20, 2009.
Dale
August 28, 2006 at 9:42 pm
33The odd thing about Christians says that you need to believe in God to know right from wrong is that the central tenet of Christ–”do unto others as you would have them do unto you”–is completely God-independent.
SeattleTammy
August 28, 2006 at 10:41 pm
34No problem, Jay. Hope to see you when Adam comes to town!
Back on topic, I grew up Unitarian.
I am so confused.
Harold
August 29, 2006 at 4:11 am
35Just Jay, are you calling Adam a sellout?
I am thinking now that the title of this post, “Learning from Katherine”, is actually a reference to the relevant passage from the Letter to Timothy: “I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.” But then, I also think that the storytelling structure in Schrodinger’s Ball is actually one long reference to the “Double Slit” experiment, http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/schroedinger/two-slit3.html,
so what do I know?
lilyfern
August 29, 2006 at 7:01 am
36If the only reason to behave morally is fear of retribution, then let’s elect people who believe in Santa Claus. Oh wait…I think we already did…
Heather
August 29, 2006 at 9:30 am
37What I find interesting, is the Golden Rule is found in the religious literature of all the major religions, such as Confusism, Taoism, Buddhism and even Zen. It isn’t the provenance of just the Christians.
Jerry
August 29, 2006 at 2:08 pm
38I would say the debate is between empathy and sociopathy. Most people are (at least toward members of their own “group” whatever that may be at the moment) empathetic. Sociopaths have no comprension that others have feelings that deserve their regard. Hence, the current administration are almost exclusively socciopaths.
nato
August 29, 2006 at 5:00 pm
39Nothing whatsoever to do with god or Katherine “Sugartits” Harris: The latest GYWO is up. Okay, back to G/god(ess?).
SeattleDan
August 29, 2006 at 6:14 pm
40Between Katherine and Don, I’ve come to see the light. I’m Saved!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14570794/
dee
August 29, 2006 at 6:19 pm
41Holy Mother of Pearl! There are only three copies left in stock at amazon.com of The Book. But they promise there are more on the way.
I love the fact that customers who bought this book also bought The Three Musketeers. Or maybe they bought a Three Musketeers. Hard to keep the chocolate off the pages, though.
cooper
August 29, 2006 at 6:24 pm
42nato, good man. I have been checking the GYWO site recently, thinking it was time for another page. Thanks, pal. BTW, if you click on the teen “sex-based cults” link on page 57 (I can hear all you guys clicking away right now. Ow my ears, the sound is deafening!), you go to a page on the Rolling Stone website. At the bottom of the first post is a link that says “More General”. Click on this and scroll down to the second item, which is a letter to the Editors of the National Review from Al Franken, a writer I’ve always enjoyed. Or you could just click here http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/?cat=1
Murray, the long range forecast for Ernesto currently shows it hovering over Grouseland on Saturday. You got somewhere for the thousands of Felber fans to get in out of the rain? You need those of us driving to bring tarps, etc.?
cooper
August 29, 2006 at 6:43 pm
43Well, Fanny ate another of my posts. I’m going to have to learn to quit using proper names and titles of publications. Adam, feed that creepy rat, will ya?
SeattleDan, thanks for the link. I personally think that Donald Rumsfelt is fomenting a “new type of stupidity”. That boy needs to get bitch slapped.
Harold
August 30, 2006 at 3:54 am
44Duuuude, it’s gonna be like Woodstock! Mud everywhere!
I just hope I don’t have to man the basement pumps at home this weekend. That would suck.
Sharon
August 30, 2006 at 4:21 am
45The happiest phrase I’ve read in a long time came at the end of a NY Times editorial today which lays out the slow downward economic slide for millions of Americans, even as corporate coffers are stuffed to overflowing:
“But the economic agenda for the next president couldn’t be clearer.”
Don’t you just love that phrase, “the next president”?
David
August 30, 2006 at 7:03 am
46Apparently Ernesto had no intention of devastating Florida. His only purpose appears to have been to force me to return to Florida from NC to secure the homestead. And all he is apparently going to do is casually blow by to the east, going naa, naa, naa, naa, naa as he passes. So now I am two days drive from the Great Gathering I made the mistake of really wanting to be part of. Guess it’s my punishment for sharing siobhan’s take on the topic of this thread.
Pissed On/Pissed Off on the Edge of the Green Swamp
cooper
August 30, 2006 at 3:00 pm
47Ron Elving, TOTN’s Political Junkie, predicted that Katherine Harris will win her primary, mainly because three other candidates jumped into the race late in the game and though all of them are indeed saner than Ms. Harris, it’s thought they will split the vote against her, allowing her to win. Then this fall it will be curtains for Katherine as the Democratic opponent mows her down with a vengeance. That the latest take on the race, anyway. Time will tell.
Murray
August 30, 2006 at 6:08 pm
48Coop, my faith in weather forcasting is about as strong as my faith in Chaney predicting what will happen in Iraq.
I’m keeping my eyes open and may have to find an alternative venue.
I’m sure that what ever happens weather wise we will still have fun.
David
August 30, 2006 at 9:42 pm
49Murray,
With you hosting and a gang of FAers in the house, it is certain to be a great time. I hate the thought of missing it, but my best laid plans have gone astray. I am losing myself in reading Schrodinger’s Ball in a mad attempt to accept the fickle fucking finger of fate. I love the fact that I haven’t a clue where Adam’s going with this tale.
I am planning to send another donation to the cause via snail mail since I won’t be able to do it in person now. Would really love to see a political upset of major proportions in this one.
siobhan
August 31, 2006 at 6:32 am
50After you’ve polished off your most recent GYWO buffet, here’s a little dessert.
hedera
August 31, 2006 at 9:16 pm
51Getting back to Katherine’s concerns about legislating sin, did anybody else notice that the only sins she’s worried about legislating are sexual? No concerns about theft, about fraud, about murder; just abortion (well, I guess the right wing considers that a form of murder) and gay marriage. Certainly no worries about stolen elections…
The religious right’s fixation on sex, and attitudes toward same, are truly bizarre.
David
September 1, 2006 at 7:11 am
52It’s a fixation that’s been integral to Anglo-America since 1620. We are seeing the worst relapse of this disease in my 64 years and what might prove to be the worst since the 17th century. It’s now sucking in other Americans at an alarming rate. Where’s a good social antibody when the body politic so desperately needs one?
Jim (OJNTNJ)
September 1, 2006 at 9:52 am
53David,
As social anti-bodies, cures for STDs and convenient, effective birth control have worked wonders in the past.
When you take the danger or life altering effects out of sex, the prudes don’t have a leg to stand on.
hedera
September 1, 2006 at 8:10 pm
54Which, of course, is why they are all so anxious to prohibit the OTC sale of “plan B” or the “morning after pill”…
David
September 1, 2006 at 8:40 pm
55Yeah, god forbid we should have the un-baggaged pleasures of rational, kind, thoughtful, responsible, guilt-free sex in all its glorious non-rational sensuality.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
September 5, 2006 at 6:20 pm
56Erm….correction…”antibodies.”
This slightly embarrassed, definitively pro-body social liberal, will now exit to the lurker’s lounge to drown his mortification with the left over Maker’s Mark.
siobhan
September 5, 2006 at 6:44 pm
57I thought it was very clever in the original form, J(OJNTNJ).
David
September 6, 2006 at 4:53 pm
58I’m with siobhan, Jim.
News flash: Ms. Harris won the Republican primary, so the open wound will carry forward into the general election. It will be interesting, because she is a woman spurned by her former political paramours (she follishly thought it was a two-way relationship, and apparently believed she would be respected in the morning).
David
September 6, 2006 at 5:04 pm
59Foolishly, g’dammit, unless follishly can be taken as an adverbial form of folly.
Jim (OJNTNJ)
September 6, 2006 at 6:22 pm
60Just call me the “The Accidental Pun-ist.”
(I refuse to believe that I was out-clevered by my rebellious keyboard)
David
September 8, 2006 at 3:55 pm
61Jim,
Truth be told, rebellious keyboards might damned well rule before it’s over with, so you’re just ahead of the curve.