- I admitted I was powerless over my addiction–that my life had become unmanageable, despite the best efforts of my management team at ICM and of my publicist Alan Nierob at Rogers & Cowan.
- I came to believe that a Power greater than myself, and a Power even greater than the machinations of the Illuminati within the Zionist International Banking Cartel, could restore me to sanity.
- I made a decision to turn my will and my life over to the care of God as I understand God (for more on my understanding of God, rent The Passion of the Christ or watch the Jesusy stuff at the end of Braveheart).
- I made a searching and fearless moral inventory of myself. A moral inventory, not a personal inventory. A personal inventory includes the community of Malibu, which I own, btw.
- I admitted to God, to myself, and another human being the exact nature of my wrongs. And I’m sorry that the human being, Officer Mee, is such a Chatty Cathy.
- I am entirely ready to have God remove the defects of my character, and for Him to maybe cut me a little slack because my character was shaped by a father who believes remote-controlled airplanes were flown into the World Trade Center.
- I humbly ask God to remove my shortcomings, or at least dull my eagerness to use “Sugartits” as a term of endearment.
- I have made a list of all the people I have harmed, and have become willing to make amends to them all. (Note to self: Send flowers to Officer Sugartits.)
- I have made direct amends to such people whenever possible, except when to do so will injure them or others. (Is threatening the florist who wouldn’t deliver to “Officer Sugartists, Mel Gibson’s Malibu, USA, an “injury?”)
- I will continue to take a personal inventory and AAARGGGHHHHHH!!!! (When things get dull, scream. See Braveheart again.)
- I have sought through prayer and meditation to improve a conscious contact with G-d, praying only for the knowledge of G-d’s will for me and the power to carry that out. (See Jews? The “G-d” thing is pretty considerate, huh?)
- Having a spiritual awakening as a result of these steps, I will carry this message to other addicts. At least until they stop running the inevitable and earnest PSA I will film as a condition of my parole.
In the FanAp Shop
Buy Adam's new novel, Mo's political exposé and more in the FanAp Shop





42 comments
JOHN MURPHY
August 1, 2006 at 8:32 am
1Question: What is the difference between “Controlled Drinking” and “Social Drinking”?
Answer: “Controlled Drinking” is drinking without puking on myself. “Social Drinking” is drinking without puking on you.
Happy day all, and lets tip a few to Mel today.
don
August 1, 2006 at 9:15 am
2So …
Has Mel’s career passed the ‘tipping point’?
tim
August 1, 2006 at 9:49 am
3I’m waiting for the Onion headline “Mel Gibson Joins Hezbollah”. Or maybe that will be the New York Times headline, I’m not sure.
Brian
August 1, 2006 at 10:25 am
4Excellent work, Chris — but a typo crept into your third use of that particular feminine endearment (item 9).
Sharon
August 1, 2006 at 10:30 am
5Oh, was he talking to a *female* officer? I didn’t get that from the news reports. That changes everything!
Steve
August 1, 2006 at 11:22 am
6I’m not a fan of Mel Gibson and haven’t seen anything he’s done since Mad Max but modulo his apparent antisemitism, which deserves appropriate derision, I think this is somewhat unfair. By and large, Mr Gibson has taken responsibility for his actions and has, at last report, entered treatment for his alcoholism. The medical community recognizes that alcoholism is a disease. You wouldn’t make fun of someone with cancer, for instance, would you?
Just like any other sick person, hope he gets well.
Steve
August 1, 2006 at 11:28 am
7Followup:
Mel Gibson’s apology to the Jewish Community may be found here.
It may be simply damage control, certainly, but I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, at least for the moment.
piglet
August 1, 2006 at 12:15 pm
8The apology was expected if his career is going to survive this.
Alcohol may loosen the tongue, but it doesn’t put thoughts in your head.
siobhan
August 1, 2006 at 12:32 pm
9I’m kinda with Steve on this one. Mel Gibson annoys me, in general, but this whole thing is a bit of piling on.
Yes, he said some nasty stuff, but I wouldn’t want to be held responsible for what I said if I were monumentally drunk either (which is why I haven’t been that drunk since I was 17 or so). I find it interesting that people seem to be much more up in arms over his stupid words than over the fact that he was driving in that condition.
The other thing about it that I have a problem with is the whole thing about “he could only say things like that if it was already someplace in his mind”. Well, yeah. Maybe he really is a raving anti-Semitic sexist asshole. If he acts that way normally, then by all means, shun him.
We know that he’s someone who had a lot of that crap instilled in him when he was growing up. Maybe he has to make a conscious effort to keep it in check - but he normally does make the effort.
I grew up hearing all kinds of racist crap (though not in my own home), along with the typical homophobia and other bigotry common to the era and locale. I cringe to think of the kind of things that I probably said back then, things that I’d find completely repulsive now. But who knows? Maybe it’s still in some dark corner of my brain. Maybe if I got that loaded some slime would leak from my past too.
I don’t like his movies, I don’t really have an opinion on him since I don’t know the man. And really, I’ve already spent more minutes of my life thinking about it than it’s worth.
Jim (Original Jim, not the Other Jim or the New Jim)
August 1, 2006 at 12:34 pm
10Mr. Regan,
FYI: You may want to put some leading zeros in steps 1 through 9, so that you end with 11 and 12, rather than repeating 1 and 2 (or did you mean to do that because they relate back to the original steps 1 and 2? - Satire can be subtle).
Steve, I’m with you. I hope that Mel is on the road to recovery from both alcoholism and bigotry, and is honestly horrified by his own actions and anti-semitism. Hopefully he will be able to extrapolate the lesson to other previously maligned groups (i.e. the gay community).
The loosely balanced benefit of the doubt is in place.
siobhan
August 1, 2006 at 12:35 pm
11Piglet, your comment came through while I was composing that whole thing - didn’t want to sound like I was jumping all over you personally.
Steve
August 1, 2006 at 12:47 pm
12piglet sez: Alcohol may loosen the tongue, but it doesn’t put thoughts in your head.
No question there. I’d considered writing something of that nature myself by way of disclaimer.
However, maybe Mr Gibson will learn something as a result of this. He may be learning that those thoughts in his head are wrong. Even while drunk he said his life is “f—ed”.
Heck, even George Wallace, as slimy a segragationist as any that trod the floor of the Alabama statehouse, eventually reformed and became a champion of civil rights.
Noll
August 1, 2006 at 12:50 pm
13While I do agree that, in many circumstances, jumping all over someone for inappropriate drunken comments can be inappropriate in itself. Mel should know better than to go shooting his mouth off even when drunk (and only blowing a .12), because of:
1: His father’s not so pc history (read, he’s from crazytown).
2. Passion of the Christ
3. Mel is a movie star, and thus subject to scrutiny.
4. Sugartits is a very funny word.
Harold
August 1, 2006 at 2:04 pm
14I call dibs on the “Sugartits” T-shirt franchise.
I would be a little more admiring of Mr. Gibson if he had checked into rehab before this incident rather than after. And yes, his drunk driving is a far more serious matter than his drunken ranting. Perhaps this monumental embarrassment will help avoid a tragedy in the future.
Speaking of drunken ranting, I trust there will be some of that at the Thing Which Is Not Felberpalooza after sufficient Yuengling Lager and Maker’s Mark has been imbibed.
Chris Regan
August 1, 2006 at 2:46 pm
15“The medical community recognizes that alcoholism is a disease. You wouldn’t make fun of someone with cancer, for instance, would you?”
No, but I will make fun of someone afflicted with the disease of “over-earnestness.” Please post your e-mail address so that I may do it privately.
Edith, Mother of all Felbers
August 1, 2006 at 3:11 pm
16If Mel Gibson were ugly, or fat or hairy, etc. - there’d be a whole different take on this. But he’s always a hero. He’s set himself up as an uber-male, an “our kind of guy” and it sort of hurts to attack him. Problem is, it doesn’t hurt him to attack anyone else.
tess
August 1, 2006 at 3:12 pm
17Wait, I thought that he wasn’t *that* drunk — he was over the limit but not shit-faced to the point where I honestly expect someone to act like a moron. But then again, if he called an officer “Sugartits,” well, uh, um, I really can’t say much more about that other than I’m going to have to put him in the same league as the frat-guys who live on the same block as me.
Julia
August 1, 2006 at 4:44 pm
18My basic thought: a badly-behaved drunk is pretty much a loser no matter who he is, where he stands, or what he does for a living. I don’t read too much more into it than that. But then I’ve never really been a big action-adventure movie fan, either.
Murray
August 1, 2006 at 5:25 pm
19Harold, I assume that there will be sufficient ranting, prior, during, and post imbibing. Get a bunch of pissed liberals together and ranting is the inevitable result.
Chris? You got Labor Day Weekend open?
Maximum Bob
August 1, 2006 at 5:40 pm
20I’m not the kind of guy who sees antisemites behind every tree (for one thing, they hate trees). But I figured Mel Gibson for an antisemite when he financed a zillion-dollar passion play.
He can apologize all he wants; I’m not buying. But if he gets ripping drunk and starts talking to a cop about how much he loved Fiddler on the Roof…
Dale
August 1, 2006 at 6:11 pm
21Harold, I recognize that you got in there first on the T-shirt franchise. But I wonder if you might recognize my inherent claim to a partial stake, as Sugar is my last name and I possess a pair which could use all the signage they can get.
Jim (Original Jim, not the Other Jim or the New Jim)
August 1, 2006 at 6:12 pm
22Maximum Bob, do you mean the movie version? My favorite scene was in the tavern with the cosacks smarmily giving their best wishes to the proposed groom-to-be and Tevye.
Come to think of it, if the movie was remade with Mel Gibson, that scene could have the same connotation. Of course, in the Gibson version, everyone with a beard would get their asses kicked after the communal dancing.
kathieliza
August 1, 2006 at 8:53 pm
23I gave up on reading all the comments. But my comment is…just forgive the dude. He is an arrogant wealthy movie star and thinks he can say anything. hell I’d probably say anything if I was him. The bottom line is who cares what the movie stars think or say. Seek freedom and peace within yourself. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. PEACE!
Maximum Bob
August 1, 2006 at 11:26 pm
24Jim, I hadn’t given any thought to movie vs. play, having never staked out a position on the relative merits of Topol and Zero Mostel. But perhaps Mel will weigh in on this in a week or two.
eee'd
August 2, 2006 at 9:08 am
25Would I make fun of someone with cancer? Depends…who has it?
Steve
August 2, 2006 at 9:56 am
26Chris Regan responds "No, but I will make fun of someone afflicted with the disease of ‘over-earnestness.’ Please post your e-mail address so that I may do it privately."
Define “over-earnestness“.
I used my actual email address on the posting and have done so here, as well. I assume you can get it from the logs.
Please feel free to ridicule me in public, if you wish. I can take it. I’ve been worked over by experts.
To echo siobhan’s thoughts, I’ve probably expended more brain cells on this than it’s worth but just to reiterate, I’m no particular fan of Mel Gibson’s — the only film of his I’ve seen is Mad Max and that was only because I was with a group and couldn’t wriggle out of it without having to walk home.
Perhaps my cancer analogy was a bit strained and, yes, over-earnest — perhaps I should have referred to some congenital deformity instead — and I do separate Mr Gibson’s alcoholism, which is a treatable but incurable disease, from his apparent antisemitism and sexism, which, I fervently hope, are both treatable and curable.
Having worked with several people who have done research in the field of alcoholism, as well as having had a borderline alcoholic parent and knowing more than a few "functional" alcoholics, may have affected my thinking in this area but it pains me when we treat this disease as an appropriate subject for joking.
Hey, there’s an alcoholic, falling down drunk. Ha ha. Right. Whatever you say.
I also like to use italics far too much. So sue me.
Stickum and Slyme - Attorneys at Law
August 2, 2006 at 12:28 pm
27Chris,
Feel free to give us a call at 1-800-NOitlc.
We are committed to wiping out the scourge of overuse of italics within our lifetime.
Jim (Original Jim, not the Other Jim or the New Jim)
August 2, 2006 at 12:36 pm
28Steve:
I don’t know about you, but it seems to me that drunkeness as comedy has abated somewhat (rightfully or not, depending on your pov).
Bear in mind that even Foster Brooks was a spokespersong for MADD and had quit drinking in the early 60s.
Peace,
Jim
Jim (Original Jim, not the Other Jim or the New Jim)
August 2, 2006 at 12:38 pm
29Five hour rule:
“spokesperson”
FYI:above info from IMDB database.
nato
August 2, 2006 at 1:39 pm
30Steve,
Was Chris really making fun of Mel Gibson’s alcoholism, or just his incredibly stupid behavior? My sense was that Chris was making light of the initial behavior and the subsequent attempts to make up for those actions. Disease or not, there is no excuse for Mel Gibson’s behavior.
siobhan
August 2, 2006 at 2:16 pm
31The most entertaining take on sugartits yet.
(Someone here at FA introduced me/us to Ze Frank with Code Red
in March… wish I could remember who so that I could thank ‘em.)
dAVE
August 2, 2006 at 3:09 pm
32Someone who’s been an alcoholic for a long time will start acting like an asshole after only a couple of drinks. It’s as if the brain circuits that keep one under control when sober have been so damaged, that there isn’t much of ‘em left. So, it doesn’t take much booze to inhibit them entirely.
So, I’ve got a question for y’all. Assuming that Mel Gibson doesn’t just retire or start working in Turkey or some place, what do you think he’ll do:
1) Convert to Judaism
or
2) Convert to Scientology
Steve
August 2, 2006 at 5:33 pm
33nato sez: My sense was that Chris was making light of the initial behavior and the subsequent attempts to make up for those actions.
Perhaps. If so, I withdraw my objection. I am a perhap hypersensitive.
For another take on this subject by satirist Harry Shearer, check his blog here.
And with that, I’m going to go pour myself a stiff shot of Old Over Earnest.
SeattleDan
August 3, 2006 at 7:37 pm
34Hello! Anyone home? Anyone here? Helloooo!
piglet
August 3, 2006 at 7:44 pm
35Sorry. We’ve all gone off to see what Star Jones is up to.
David
August 3, 2006 at 7:58 pm
36And I’m off in search of the Wonderful Wizard of Odd, what with not being fully engaged in the Star Jones whatever it was, and wishing to hell we could all escape the Marvelous Machinations of the Powers that Be.
SeattleDan
August 3, 2006 at 9:09 pm
37Ah, thanks,David and piglet. That explains it. Well, carry on, then! And much good luck! Just to report, Star Jones hasn’t been seen in my neighborhood. Any sighting will be duly reported.
Thought I did catch a glimpse of Elvis the other day. He looked old.
David
August 4, 2006 at 6:28 am
38Old? Old? Oh, shit!
David
August 4, 2006 at 9:39 pm
39dAVE,
He’ll convert to Judaeo-Scientology.
Murray
August 7, 2006 at 3:26 pm
40Elvis is not only not dead, but he isn’t old either. Come check him out at the 72 Hours of Elvis, Felberpalooza, Save America, 3 day festival. Bike, Laugh, and redeem America.
See you on Labor Day Weekend.
David
August 7, 2006 at 8:59 pm
41Othankgod.
Mike
August 11, 2006 at 1:41 am
42Mr. Gibson is a hugely prominent public figure who has taken strong moral stands, & has shown attitudes consistent w/both Homophobia & Anti-Semitism. He apologized, but his insistence that his ranting did not represent his feelings at all is wholly implausible. He deals w/many sensitive religious subjects-it would be wrong to NOT to site that his bias & example need be at least humbly acknowledged by him to obviate its sentiments. And make the apology fully meaningful.