Comments on: It Could Be Worse! http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/ America's favorite blog Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:03:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Harold http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18717 Wed, 16 Aug 2006 16:01:54 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18717 Yes, soldiers are dying in the field because they are being used as cannon fodder by an administration that has completely politicized terrorism, but it could be worse - smug wingnuts could blame the satirists. Yes, soldiers are dying in the field because they are being used as cannon fodder by an administration that has completely politicized terrorism, but it could be worse - smug wingnuts could blame the satirists.

]]> by: m http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18693 Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:09:21 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18693 Yes, soldiers are dying in the field- but it could be worse- some lame comedian could find humor in their death. Yes, soldiers are dying in the field- but it could be worse- some lame comedian could find humor in their death.

]]> by: Landis http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18363 Sun, 06 Aug 2006 22:43:47 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18363 If it's the one thing President Bush excels at, it's exceeding my expectations when it comes to being able to make things any worse. If it’s the one thing President Bush excels at, it’s exceeding my expectations when it comes to being able to make things any worse.

]]> by: David http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18329 Sat, 05 Aug 2006 04:41:39 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18329 No. No.

]]> by: Jim (Original Jim, not the Other Jim or the New Jim) http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18319 Sat, 05 Aug 2006 01:20:59 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18319 Thanks for the clarification Landis. I suspect that what the dems need to do now is an end run around the prez prior to impeachment, and get tricky dick II's taxes audited. Just like during the Nixon era, the vice goes down for tax evasion, and the sitting prez is ousted after appointing a new veep. Of course the difference between this administration and Nixon's is that Nixon was the power behind the throne during his terms, and Cheney has been the powermonger of this admin. As for which incompetent lackey may then be appointed veep by shrub, could it be worse than who we have now? Thanks for the clarification Landis.

I suspect that what the dems need to do now is an end run around the prez prior to impeachment, and get tricky dick II’s taxes audited.

Just like during the Nixon era, the vice goes down for tax evasion, and the sitting prez is ousted after appointing a new veep.

Of course the difference between this administration and Nixon’s is that Nixon was the power behind the throne during his terms, and Cheney has been the powermonger of this admin.

As for which incompetent lackey may then be appointed veep by shrub, could it be worse than who we have now?

]]> by: Landis http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18307 Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:40:42 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18307 Jim(OJ,NTOJORNJ), I believe that all depends on when the VP takes office. If it's with less than two years to go he can get elected for two terms. <blockquote cite="22nd Amendment">No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.</blockquote> My interpretation of this amendment also leads me to believe that Bill Clinton could run as VP - he just couldn't run for President again.... ICBW indeed. :) Jim(OJ,NTOJORNJ), I believe that all depends on when the VP takes office. If it’s with less than two years to go he can get elected for two terms.

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

My interpretation of this amendment also leads me to believe that Bill Clinton could run as VP - he just couldn’t run for President again….

ICBW indeed. :)

]]> by: David http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18278 Fri, 04 Aug 2006 03:10:28 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18278 It is, worse, far, far worse than it could be, and that's a fact. Pphhhllllttttthhhhhhttttttt (or however it's spelled). It is, worse, far, far worse than it could be, and that’s a fact. Pphhhllllttttthhhhhhttttttt (or however it’s spelled).

]]> by: Dale http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18208 Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:03:16 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18208 It probably couldn't be much worse, but watching this always makes me feel better: http://animal.discovery.com/cams/pandavidr.html It probably couldn’t be much worse, but watching this always makes me feel better:

http://animal.discovery.com/cams/pandavidr.html

]]> by: Stephen http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18192 Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:48:37 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18192 I take great comfort in knowing that they will never get enough votes together in the House or Senate to repeal the 22nd amendment. Failing that I highly doubt that 3/4 of the states would pass it. I have known that this was coming for about 3 years. Luckily, there are enough of you crazy liberals (no offense) and enough of us real conservatives to stop this from going anywhere if it ever reached the state level. It is depressing that they would even try. I take great comfort in knowing that they will never get enough votes together in the House or Senate to repeal the 22nd amendment. Failing that I highly doubt that 3/4 of the states would pass it. I have known that this was coming for about 3 years. Luckily, there are enough of you crazy liberals (no offense) and enough of us real conservatives to stop this from going anywhere if it ever reached the state level.
It is depressing that they would even try.

]]> by: siobhan http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18190 Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:25:23 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2006/07/30/it-could-be-worse/#comment-18190 It <strike>could</strike> will be worse. We still have two and a half years to explore variations on that theme. Oh goody. It could will be worse. We still have two and a half years to explore variations on that theme.

Oh goody.

]]>