The word is that Wednesday will begin with undead columnist Robert Novak revealing that Karl Rove was a source in the outing of Valerie Plame. That sound you don’t hear right now is that of jaws failing to drop all across America. That overpowering aroma that you smell? That’s a tiny quantity of air being released from the overheated six year-old sweat sock that is the Bush administration.

[Novak in 1951, toward the end of the
short-lived “one-man barbershop quartet” craze.]
Novak said in a statement, “I have cooperated in the investigation while trying to protect journalistic privileges under the First Amendment and shield sources who have not revealed themselves.” How exactly did Novak protect journalistic privileges and shield sources while Judith Miller was doing a few months in the pen for the same alleged reasons? We may not know the answer to that for quite some time, though I’m reasonably sure that we can rule out “charisma.” It might be that the opportunity to send Judy Miller to prison was simply too much for any judge to pass up. That’s understandable. Or maybe everyone just figured that living inside Bob Novak’s body was punishment enough. Honesly, I don’t know. Novak’s column assures everyone that no secret pleas or shady back-room deals were made, which means that it’s a pretty safe bet that some sort of secret pleas or shady back-room deals were made.
But is this the beginning of an epic battle between hoary political lifers? Will we finally get to see a no-holds-barred slugfest between Darth Rove and Count Novakula? Will this column blow the smoky doors off Club Conservative’s 19th Hole?
By the time you read this, we’ll probably know the answer. But my guess is, “Of course not.” The real point here is that this story isn’t exploding. It isn’t even leaking. It’s oozing. In every sense of the word. It would’ve meant something in 2004, before the election, when Novak was first not cutting any deals. It might have meant something then, which is why it’s news now.
The thing to watch is that these revelations are coming slowly. Distance is key. By the time this thing winds up, the Novaks of the world will be able to revert to the same play that got used in the wake of the Ken Starr atrocities or the 2000 election:
“It’s OVER. You gonna dig up something that may or may not have happened years ago? You liberals cling to those old complaints because you have no ideas.” That’s how it works; the Complaints Department for getting knocked down the hill is a 20 minute walk uphill. And they only take complaints that are less than 15 minutes old.
And it is over. At this point, most people reading about this case are wondering, “Who’s Valerie Plame? And who cares if she’s gay?” For those of you who are pondering that very question, let me refresh your memory. You know that war that we’re fighting solely because the people of Iraq yearned for freedom? That war? Well, Valerie Plame had nothing to do with that, although her husband was somehow critical of something that wasn’t even a reason for the war in the first place. So somebody leaked, or confirmed the leak of a job that this Valerie didn’t even really have so it wasn’t actually a leak which there’d have been no reason for in the first place because there was no other reason for the war that Valerie’s husband didn’t contradict at no time.
Got it? Now get out there and find some new ideas.





25 comments
SeattleDan
July 11, 2006 at 11:34 pm
1Geesh, Adam, if this Fox show doesn’t work out, I’m sure you can get a job in the administration doin’ the spinning. You’re better at that than the Rovester, himself. I get it now. Outing a CIA agent is just telling the American people the truth that they need to hear.
ice weasel
July 12, 2006 at 3:47 am
2or not.
Dave D
July 12, 2006 at 4:22 am
3You’re right Adam; it’s old news <yawn/> Time to catch up with the times THE NYT IS GUILTY OF TREASON!! Those b*****ds need to be brought to justice, and pay for revealing the administration’s (or is that The Glorious Administration’s) Secrets. Well ok, it was just one (or two) or their Secrets, but they were Absolutely Essential in the Global War On Terror, and someone needs to pay for endangering the American People in such a reckless and Treasonous manner!
Plame is Soooo 2005 (or is it 2004?); well beyond the American Attention Span.
Murray
July 12, 2006 at 6:40 am
4Does Novak have a book coming out?
My definition of hell would be being chained to Novak and Coulter (in Texas).
cooper
July 12, 2006 at 10:07 am
5Adam, you know, if Valerie Plame would just burn another American flag, the US citizenry would recall the treasonous way her husband aided and abetted the terrorist’s cause by poo-pooing the scandalous Niger Yellowcake purchase by Saddam Hussein and his Al Qaeda cohorts.
Harold
July 12, 2006 at 10:18 am
6I think we need to learn to move on from these things. I mean, the Bush administration has moved on from looking for that Osama bin Laden fellow. Why are we so hung up over a little thing like who outed a covert agent, undermining any human intelligence networks she was connected to? Next we’re gonna hear people asking Bush to keep some promise he may or may not have made about firing anyone involved in this leak. GAY MARRIAGE! FLAG BURNING! MEXICANS EVERYWHERE! THE FEDERAL DEFICIT IS LESS THAN WE THOUGHT IT WOULD BE!!! See, we’ve moved on.
Single H. Monad
July 12, 2006 at 12:44 pm
7Ouch, bummer. But that *is* the way it’s allways worked. The outrageous, over- (or under-) blown and spun first-report leads the news. The sensible, staid, and usually more damaging analysis is always on (the proverbial) page B4.
Maybe we should erect a memorial of all the administration’s gross behavious. Something that would fuction as a reliquary of all the forgotton droppings of the other shoes. We could wiki it.
www.theothershoedrops.org is an available domain name.
cooper
July 12, 2006 at 3:49 pm
8Now can we impeach the sum’bitch?
cooper
July 12, 2006 at 4:05 pm
9Does anyone know if the few liberals with deep pockets or any strict constitutionalist legal organizations are suing the Bush administration for all these breaches of ethics or violations of law that continue to emerge on a daily basis? Everything these clowns do turns out to be illegal, immoral, violates the constitution or is fucked-up by any criteria of common decency. Sorry, but this is enough already!
George C
July 12, 2006 at 4:53 pm
10The American people voted for Values and that is what they got.
Values - A principle, standard, or quality considered worthwhile or desirable.
Sounds great in a sound-bite and is vague enough to be correct no matter how you use it!
Dale
July 12, 2006 at 5:32 pm
11How exactly did Rove get cleared by the grand jury? Doesn’t one of the following have to be true:
1) Novak perjured himself to Fitzgerald (and since he is not being prosecuted now for perjury, must have made some shady deal with Rove and/or Fitzgerald)
2) Novak told Fitzgerald that Rove was the source and then Fitzgerald let Rove get off anyway, which is also a scandal.
And if either of these are true….see comment #8.
cooper
July 12, 2006 at 6:24 pm
12In case anyone, anywhere, has any illusion that Michael Chertoff is anything but a slack-jawed, mouth breathing, dim-witted, ill prepared, over-his head, politically appointed, GDLASSOS, who heads a governmental agency of like minded fellow travelers, read this and weep. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/12/washington/12assets.html?hp&ex=11527 63200&en=c44f308452f2eba9&ei=5094&partner=homepage
SeattleDan
July 12, 2006 at 6:36 pm
13coop, don’t hold back, tell us how you really feel.
It is complete idiocy. But should we have expected anything else?
Sharon
July 12, 2006 at 7:24 pm
14This was in my in-box today:
The big surprise was that the Congressman who uttered these words was Republican Texas Congressman Ron Paul.
Can the Apocalypse be far off?
David
July 12, 2006 at 8:58 pm
15That is sickeninly precisely how it works, goddamnit. Oh, how I wish you were wrong, Adam, but as always, you are humorously dead on.
Matt Dave
July 13, 2006 at 12:27 am
16I think that Mr Bush know only one thing that is to console the nation every year after the 9/11 tragedy and looking that idiot fellow Osama Bin Laden. Will he look up that what’s going on in the nation itself! God save America!!
siobhan
July 13, 2006 at 1:38 pm
17It’s getting more interesting…
Sharon
July 13, 2006 at 2:27 pm
18From the New York Times online…
cooper
July 13, 2006 at 2:31 pm
19Saints be praised - someone with a backbone stands up and says “Eat it, Mr. Vice President, eat it raw!” I love it! Thanks, siobhan.
Sharon
July 13, 2006 at 3:19 pm
20I’ve been trying to exercise more restraint lately, and not deluge everyone I know with the daily outrage, but this essay is so well-written and well-argued, that I had to share it. Perhaps it can be used to convince some of the few remaining holdouts that no, it’s not okay to suspend the Constitution, not under any circumstances, and certainly not under these circumstances.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0713-22.htm
hedera
July 13, 2006 at 9:38 pm
21Yes, but the Wilsons are suing for violation of their civil rights. This is total candy-assed wimping out. Why is nobody pursuing these people for TREASON? Here’s the Wikipedia article on Valerie Plame, quoting Patrick Fitzgerald:
The CIA started a criminal investigation into this and the only person indicted has been Scooter Libby, and him only for perjury. Are they really that clever that nothing can be proved?
Mary
July 14, 2006 at 5:25 am
22When there are a bunch of goons following you, threateing to take-out your entire extended family if you continue investigating, yep- nothing can be proved.
Steve
July 14, 2006 at 8:18 am
23cooper sez:
That’s the spirits we have hear at Morse Science High School!
Steve
July 14, 2006 at 8:24 am
24. . . here. . . dammit, not “hear”. Geeze.
pete
July 14, 2006 at 5:08 pm
25hedera, i think that with a civil case they might have the tighest case. we all know full well that since the aformentioned 70’s and maybe even earlier, Dick “absolute power.. something ..absolutely!” Cheney has been researching his way to the top, using any precedent to expand the power of the executive. now, knowing thine opponent, would it be in our best interests at this point to go so big against such an entrenched status quo? i think not, and i think that a well played, small scale suit like this will either pave the way for the real deal, or it will reveal strategies in their case for total executive hegemony.
right now, i think playing it tight is the best strategy.