Over on MSNBC.Com, instead of devoting precious bandwidth to flood victims and other whiners, a “Superman Who’s Who” is being offered up, to help guide the uninitiated through the complicated morass that is the new “Superman” movie.
With one click, a window pops up, and you can research such obscurities as “Lois Lane” and “Jimmy Olsen” so you don’t tumble into a dark and cold pool of your own confused spittle when a lady named “Lois Lane” stumbles into the film and muddies things up. And for those of you always baffled by the connection between this Clark Kent fellow and The Man of Steel, MSNBC will help you take off the glasses and recognize the superhero underneath.
Actually, I could have used MSNBC.com when I was back in film school, and would have appreciated someone explaining to me what the hell “Last Year At Marienbad” was all about.





17 comments
Ann
June 29, 2006 at 10:51 am
1Dammit, Chris—enough with the spoilers!
SeattleDan
June 29, 2006 at 11:15 am
2Chris, Last Year at Marrienbad is about 94 minutes.
Edith
June 29, 2006 at 2:31 pm
3>>I could have used MSNBC.com when I was back in film school, and would have appreciated someone explaining to me what the hell “Last Year At Marienbad” was all about. >>
The haircut. It was about that woman’s cool haircut. That was all anyone talked about and all I remember.
dee
June 29, 2006 at 3:18 pm
4I saw it in French first and then saw it with English subtitles. It didn’t help.
(I mean “Last Year at Marienbad”, not “Superman”, by the way)
cooper
June 29, 2006 at 6:33 pm
5In “Last Year at Marienbad”, Robbe-Grillet deals with the concepts of reality and time. The reconstruction of reality or the fabrication of fantasy through the inconsistencies of memory and time are examined and explored from an aesthetic, rather than clinical standpoint.
That, and what Dan said. Hey, Dan.
cooper
June 29, 2006 at 6:39 pm
6dee, I’m still really steamed that I didn’t get to go to Provence. However, if you did happened to bring back some high end chocolate, I can be bought.
SeattleDan
June 29, 2006 at 6:42 pm
7Hey, back at you cooper. Did you ever have to sit through Marienbad, though? As we’re about the same age, we do remember Marienbad as some sort of must-see cinema event, sort of like “I am Curious Yellow” or “Red Desert”. But have you also noticed how often these films are revived in the art houses? I haven’t either. Nor have I seen Robert Osborne introducing them on TCM. It may be speculation on my part, and idle at that, but I think it’s because they were boring films. Just a hunch.
dee
June 29, 2006 at 7:08 pm
8No chocolate. It’s really not part of the “Provencal” cuisine — all that butter and cream is more northern.
But wine (and cognac) — now that’s another thing.
cooper
June 29, 2006 at 7:24 pm
9Marienbad? naw. I just googled the title and went to the most pretentious and pompous critical review, did a copy and paste on the second paragraph, and viola! Now I’m a pretentious, pompous and hip euro film expert.
I didn’t see any of those other films either. I did see “A Man and a Woman”, not for the French ambience, but for the ear-splitting roar of the Formula Fords GT cars that raced all across Europe in the ’60’s but were made right down the road from me at the Holman and Moody race shop. Man, those cars shook the earth when they were cranked! Monsters, they were.
SeattleDan
June 29, 2006 at 8:07 pm
10coop, I never saw “A Man and a Woman”. If I’d gone, it would have been to score with my date. Did you? Have you seen “The Umbrellas of Cherbourg”…another score movie. Damn, I’m blowing off my new age sensitive guy image.
Scamper off to IMDB to look that up.
And to be honest, I never saw “Marienbad” either. But I pretended I had a few times.
cooper
June 30, 2006 at 4:00 am
11Confession is good for the soul, SeattleDan. It helps remove the oily residue left behind by having watched the View, even once. And new age sensitivity is a thin veneer; the average urban woman sees right through it, and so much more. We only fool ourselves.
Chris Regan
June 30, 2006 at 5:54 am
12Holy crap!
Did I really admit that I went to “film school?”
Don’t hold it against me.
Ann
June 30, 2006 at 9:40 am
13Don’t worry, Chris—as long as you don’t actually make “films,” you’ll be forgiven for your youthful missteps.
piglet
June 30, 2006 at 2:02 pm
14Leave it to you guys to read “boy, this Superman site sure is for the obvious-challenged!” and turn it into “boy, art films are sure arty!”
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Draco
July 1, 2006 at 3:47 pm
15I long thought Last Year at Marienbad should be remade with Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan. Now they’re getting too old.
What struck me most about the movie was how the woman refuses to let the plot get started, blocking all the male’s attempts to move the narrative forward. She’s one of the most disruptive characters I’ve ever seen, even though she remains stubbornly passive for most of the movie.
Draco
July 1, 2006 at 6:48 pm
16I don’t know–is Superman a man? He’s male but he’s from another planet. I always thought his name was something of a misnomer.
hedera
July 1, 2006 at 10:24 pm
17I liked Mick La Salle’s review of Superman, in the SF Chronicle. He made the point that although any good looking hunk with black hair can play Superman, it takes actual talent to play Clark Kent, and he didn’t think what’s-his-face came anywhere near the late great Christopher Reeve at playing Clark Kent. If I get an urge to see Superman, I think I’ll just rent the old one.