Middletown, US (F.A. “Lifestyles” feature) - Brendon Teffton is a high school senior with everything. He’s got a 3.8 grade point average, a large group of friends, a runnning back position on the Middletown Maulers, and he’s dating the homecoming queen.
And he’s thinking of turning gay.
“Why wouldn’t I?” asked Teffton this week after the United States Senate failed to pass a constitutional ban on gay marriage. “The government has taken away my last reason to not be gay.”
All across America, millions of teens reacted with the same resignation, seeing little reason to maintain their heterosexuality in a country where the once-inherent advantages of straightness are being systematically stripped away by activist judges and slow-moving lawmakers.
“I was going to start dating boys this year,” said Michelle Connor, 16, from nearby Peoplesville High. “But now, I’m like, ‘Why bother?’ I’d might as well check out being a lesbian.”
Teens say their uncertainty is based on the fact that in this increasingly busy era they simply do not have the time to learn about how to please members of a completely different gender.
“It’s about efficiency for me,” said Brian Molette, a Middletown junior who looks like he gets beat up a lot. “Theoretically I’d like to date girls, but it’s so much work for no clear sociological or practical advantage. If I can get married and have kids with a guy, why would I bother learning all that stuff?”
“All that stuff,” according to most teens, includes the various challenges associated with getting to know the opposite sex. Like their parents and their parents’ parents, today’s kids are bewildered by the social and physical differences between boys and girls. Unlike previous generations, though, there is absolutely no reason for them to unlock those mysteries.
“Screw ‘em,” said Teffton, after officially breaking up with his cheerleader girlfriend. “I’m gonna be gay.”
“How to talk to a girl is hard enough, but add in the physical stuff and it’s way too steep a learning curve,” argued Molette, who by using phrases like ‘learning curve’ really does seem to be begging to be stuffed into a locker. Nevertheless, his feelings are shared by many. “I know how my own gender’s body works. It seems wasteful to devote so much energy to figuring out how to deal with all those unfamiliar parts.”
“Boys are gross,” agreed Tasha Morris, 7, who was really talking about something else but whose quote seemed to fit with this article. Ms. Morris asked that this reporter also mention that horsies are very pretty.
The Senate’s failure to pass the amendment had immediate impact on teens’ perceptions of other institutions as well. “Yesterday I could have told you what a family was,” said Justin Betel, 15. “Now… it’s when more than one person sleeps under the same roof or something, right? Are me and my mom and my dad a ‘family?’ And is that important in any way? I used to think so, but now I just don’t know.”
Middletown principal Frank Closetsky doesn’t see the problem going away any time soon, and says the government must act now or lose heterosexuality forever. “If only sexuality was some kind of natural impulse that generated an unequivocal momentum of its own. If only there were people who felt some sort of strong, natural, undeniable attraction to members of the opposite sex, then this kind of legal action wouldn’t be necessary.”
Tragically, according to Principal Closetsky and many experts, such a force of attraction does not exist. “First Mother Nature failed us, and now America has,” said Closetsky, who also blames Congress for the recent failure of his own marriage. He is far from an isolated case. And with the government’s refusal to act today, many fear that we may have seen the last of straight people.
“It’s the logical end-game,” agreed Mr. Molette, dangling from a locker room coat hook by his underwear. “The future is gay.”





48 comments
Ann
June 7, 2006 at 4:25 pm
1OK, see, you lost me at “Unlike previous generations, there is absolutely no reason for them to unlock those mysteries [about how the other gender’s bodies work].” I don’t want to get into male-bashing, but I think a lot of men of MY generation are still confused about that. But I’m still straight ’cause I always want to be “the pretty one.”
SeattleDan
June 7, 2006 at 4:26 pm
2Very funny,Adam,but invoke the three hour rule for Middletown “Principal” in paragraph three from the bottom…you did have it right in the peniultimate paragraph.
Gosh,I’m feeling too old and without enough energy now for becoming gay. I guess I’ll have to one of the last of a dying breed.
Bob
June 7, 2006 at 4:54 pm
3Well we clearly need a multi-pronged approach to this impending wave of homosexuality. I think the first prong should be a series of television public service announcements featuring David Hasselhoff and Star Jones extolling the benefits of heterosexuality. I think it needs to be a positive message about straightness … more carrot less stick.
Maximum Bob
June 7, 2006 at 5:02 pm
4Maybe we need to resurrect that old “Scared Straight” program.
waterfowler
June 7, 2006 at 5:48 pm
5Very funny, and you didn’t even have to invoke the Lobster or his book.
madbard
June 7, 2006 at 6:29 pm
6You are obsolete, Felber. Who needs comedians when you’ve got US Senate Majority Leader Frist? :
“For thousands of years, marriage — the union between a man and a woman — has been recognized as an essential cornerstone of society… Forty-five states across the country, both red and blue, have acted to protect traditional marriage, but that hasn’t stopped same-sex marriage activists from taking their campaigns to the courts, where overreaching liberal judges have consistently set aside the will of the people.”
Ann
June 7, 2006 at 6:30 pm
7Ah, the Great Lobster. Let’s invoke his wrath upon the crabs, who persist in their pernicious and evil sideways walking. May they someday see the light and start walking straight.
(With apologies to the Smothers Brothers.)
And did y’all see Jon Stewart’s smackdown of Bill Bennett last night? Absolutely brill.
Sharon
June 7, 2006 at 7:01 pm
8“For thousands of years, marriage — the union between a man and a woman — has been recognized as an essential cornerstone of society… “
Obviously SML Frist’s knowledge of history and sociology is not very extensive. I’ve never studied either subject deliberately, not since freshman Western Civ, but even I know that’s a very very false statement.
cooper
June 7, 2006 at 7:21 pm
9I’m going to send this link to my 2 Republican Senators and show them the damage they did today by not passing the Ban on Gay Marriage amendment to the Constitution. What failures they are! They should be ashamed.
David
June 7, 2006 at 7:35 pm
10If males are expected to well and truly understand what we are doing, as opposed to doing the best we can and otherwise throwing ourselves on the mercy of a loving sweetie of the opposite sex, heterosexuality is doomed anyway, Constitutional amendment to save the foundation of divinely approved human society or not.
Besides, whatever became of the procreation/recreation model of human sexuality? OK, OK, so it involved pubescent boys. And those people couldn’t resist idiot wars that they fought with their packages flopping in the breeze.
I ask again, And this grand experiment in the ape which talks makes sense how?
Ann
June 7, 2006 at 7:39 pm
11So true, Sharon, so true. It’s certainly not universal. And I’m curious about when the shift from polygamy to monogamy was introduced in the Bible.
Lemuel
June 7, 2006 at 8:20 pm
12“See the USA in your Chevrolet!” That ditty was from an ad campaign back in the 1960’s that my grandfather used to hum (wildly off key) over and over and over again on the rainy days that kept us inside his 12’ x 12’ cabin on the Clark Fork River outside of Missoula, Mt. I spent the better part of my 14th winter with him, iced and snowed into that drafty, leaky and dangerously out of square sorry excuse for a shelter, and I think that experience continues to skew my grip on reality to this day. I’ve never owned a Chevy. Well to be perfectly honest, I’ve never “owned” any car from a strictly legal standpoint, but that’s another story. I do make it a point to stay out of Nebraska, since I’m not sure of the statue of limitations. It was merely a quirk of fate and 2 palmed aces that found me in possession of that car hauler and 7 Blood-Red Ferrari Testarossas, but I’ll leave that for another day.
Anyone that tours the USA in a Chevrolet these days is fuckin’ nuts. The Prius is nice, but the Accord is absolutely amazing! Katia and I drive the Accord (“my” credit card, if you remember); Jorge and Rocio drive the Prius, since Xerxes can’t see for beans without his Coke bottle glasses, which he lost during the get-away. We’re heading north and then east to Katia’s cousin’s house on the coastal plain of the Southeastern United States. My Spanish is improving in leaps and bounds. Katia tells me stories and sings songs of her village in Oxaca to me as we go down the highway. What a sweet and lovely girl she is.
Mr. DeLay has been placing ads in the classifieds of every major newspaper I’ve read since I’ve been back in the country. I can see how he prospered as an exterminator and a politician, since he has such a soothing and seductive way of phrasing his thoughts. Mrs. Christine DeLay has always been a fool for him, that’s for sure, and said as much during those many nights when she laid with me and helped me to sleep. Anyway, Mr. DeLay wants me to come back to his house and claim some sort of reward he has for me – it’s up to $35,000.00 now – but I’m still not convinced that he’s over the big fire yet. I think I won’t rush over to pick up that money just yet. More later. Happy Motoring!
your pal, Lemuel
SeattleDan
June 7, 2006 at 8:39 pm
13Hey Coop, do you think your senators will understand irony? Just curious…
JR
June 7, 2006 at 8:40 pm
14That would be just like Connecticut. They have a state park there called Gay City.
Come out of the closet, Closetsky!
Jay
June 7, 2006 at 8:56 pm
15In yet another blow to traditional family values that may serve as an additional push into the gay lifestyle, an initiative to rollback legislation that prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation failed to get enough signatures to get on the ballot in Washington. This despite strong support from conservative Christian churches and our local “brick bat from the cheap seats thrower” Tim Eyman. It is entertaining to watch Eyman and the Christians frantically blaming each other for the failure. Perhaps, just perhaps, enough of the rest of us couldn’t find in our Bibles the “Thou shalt hate those who are different” commandment. A small victory, but a victory nonetheless.
Jay
Christopher
June 7, 2006 at 9:42 pm
16Adam, I think I just fell in love with y*u. Not that it has anything to do with this particular newsflash. I think it actually happened at the exact moment that the Senate failed to pass the amendment. I don’t know what to tell my parents now, especially since they are Christian. I need to find a rosary. Well, thanks anyways for your wonderful perspectives.
nigel
June 7, 2006 at 10:59 pm
17There’s something very queer about the Religious Wrong’s obsession with same-sex sex (which apparently was quite popular with Romans, from whom I believe we derive the concept of a “Senate”). Like, are their wives threatening to leave them for another woman, and they need a constitutional amendment to save the marriage? Or are they maybe coveting their neighbor’s man-servant and feel like a little lashing from Uncle Sam will help them get over it?
Ah well, at least Bill Frist doesn’t practice medicine. He’d probably be one of those assholes that wants to stick his finger up your ass when you’re having heart trouble…
Lee
June 7, 2006 at 11:18 pm
18All kidding aside, there is something very very crushing (and I’m sure all the immigrants, African-Americans, etc can back me up on this, but it’s always the hardest when it hits home)when not only does your government go out of its way to declare how much it hates you, but it can rely on public declaration of hating you as a popularity booster and a unifier. It’s weird…nobody I know hates me, and I feel like a pretty good American. I don’t get it.
nigel
June 7, 2006 at 11:27 pm
19That’s practice medicine ANYMORE. Although I see he has maintained his board certification. A certain ruthlessness is probably pretty common among thoracic surgery–it’s not for the faint of heart.
nigel
June 7, 2006 at 11:37 pm
20Here, in a nutshell, is what the Republicans have done for us the last 4 years. Then we were Cinderellas, now we are a pariahs:
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/columns/story?id=370304&root=worldcup&lpo s=spotlight&lid=tab4pos1&cc=5739
Erik
June 8, 2006 at 3:40 am
21See, the reason this logic never motivated me sufficiently (and oh, it has been tempting) is that it turns out being a gay guy is ALSO a lot of work.
Dan
June 8, 2006 at 10:54 am
22Having just recently and openly jumped over the fence into pinker pastures, I only wish the Senate had acted sooner and saved me from myself. They should have, long ago, passed a law that said that no one will consider one’s feelings to be true and honest unless it meets the criteria as defined by the Senate. I thought I made the decision after many years of struggle. It turns out that I was a victim of subversive activists. Those clever mind altering Hollywood and Media types did this to me and I should have been protected. Who am I to make my own decisions no matter how hard they are accept, how disruptive they are to my life and to the lives of my friends and loved ones? If I were capable of handling my own affairs, I would not be subjecting myself to open and prayerful discrimination. The Senate must act to save others before they succumb to the G factor. Be careful, you may be next.
Sharon
June 8, 2006 at 11:32 am
23Off topic: Faux News has been running with the “dead Zarqawi” story since before the library opened today. Up in the upper left-hand corner of the screen are two photos, one labeled “Alive” and one labeled “Dead.” It would be funny if it weren’t so pathetic. And this is the same media that won’t show pictures of dead American soldiers.
But I can relax now. Finally we can see the light at the end of the tunnel. All will become peaceful now in Iraq, right?
Dale
June 8, 2006 at 12:13 pm
24“For thousands of years, marriage — the union between a man and a woman — has been recognized as an essential cornerstone of society…”
It now seems that this perhaps was not the case. At the time, we had no way of knowing this. All of our best intelligence was absolutely united on the timeless universality of marriage. Even if we do not find this proof, this was not the only reason for the Federal Marriage Amendment. Whether 5th century Nubians were marrying or not, gay people are bad and our goal is to remove them from power and conjugal bliss.
Harold
June 8, 2006 at 12:16 pm
25If FOX “News” won’t show pictures of dead soldiers, perhaps they can just show pictures of living soldiers. All of them. Give us a sense of the committment we’ve made.
I think the Zarqawi death is a big positive. On tthe other hand, was he even on the radar screens three years ago? How long will it be until someone else fills that niche?
I wonder if George Bush ever sent Zarqawi a thank-you note after the 2004 election. If it weren’t for Zarqawi going on a bomb-and-behead rampage in late 2004, Bush probably wouldn’t be President today. (Well, that and the help of the good folks at Diebold.)
Now I guess Bush will have no excuse not to focus on Osama bin Whatshisname.
Ann
June 8, 2006 at 4:02 pm
26Lee, that sounds like a very weird feeling indeed. I’ve been vilified for my beliefs, but never for my very nature (if you discount “goddamn smartass” accusations).
It’s hard to be patient and maintain your good humor when you have to endure the BS that was pouring out of the Senate—which is why I get my news filtered through this site and The Daily Show.
David
June 8, 2006 at 4:30 pm
27Goddamn smartass is about as high as praise can actually get, all things considered. Daily Show had a hell of a good time with the Senate shitheads. And do they come any classier or personable, not to mention insightful, than Christiane Amanpour? Yes, Jamie Rubin, that is envy of the first order you are sensing.
David
June 8, 2006 at 6:52 pm
28Just in case anyone missed this Molly Ivins commentary:
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0608-34.htm
The final paragraph is just too good…
Lemuel
June 8, 2006 at 8:05 pm
29Katia wanted to talk with Rocio and Jorge about something, so at the last rest stop Xerxes came over the Accord. It’s been a good trip so far, except for having to roll out of the rack in the middle of the night, sprint to the cars and floor it in order to out of Valdosta before the bounty hunters closed in. I must admit, I didn’t actually see anyone fitting that description, but about 1:30 AM I awoke from a deep sleep with a strong feeling of angst and the hairs on my neck standing straight up. I’ve learned to heed those sorts of omens.
So here we are, rolling out of the Piedmont, heading east and downhill towards the coast. I had never really paid attention to Xerxes’ profile before, but he’s really quite handsome without his Mr. McGoo taped up trifocals. Since there’s nothing but Bible thumping grease balls on the radio (yes, we’re still in Georgia), he asks if he might put in his new cd - Harry Connick Jr. does songs from “The Pajama Game”. I’ve never liked show tunes before but this is really quite alluring. I’ve never used the word alluring in a sentence before. Xerxes and I begin talking about electronic eavesdropping devices, but soon the conversation shifts to feng shui and the proper grooming of Shih Tzu puppies. Holy shit, what’s happening to me?! The cd ends and the radio news blares the headline that the “United States Senate Fails to pass a Constitutional Ban on Gay Marriage”. I can’t resist his alluring (damn, enough already) wiles any longer! “¡Béseme Xerxes - difícilmente, como un hombre!” (Kiss me, Xerxes - hard, like a man!)
cooper
June 8, 2006 at 8:40 pm
30Off target - Sharon, and the many others interested in the results and failures of the 2004 Election, RollingStone has an article by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that you may find enlightening.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_ stolen
SeattleDan
June 8, 2006 at 8:53 pm
31It’s a good article,coop.SeattleTammy and I read and found it illuminating.When the facts weren’t pissing us off.
Sharon
June 8, 2006 at 11:07 pm
32coop, I read it a few days ago, and it is a good article, but it barely scratches the surface. There’s little or no mention of the role that e-voting machines played in all this, for example. Blackboxvoting.org and several other organizations have documented all the problems with the machines, and the information may have finally reached critical mass. Enough, anyway, to attract some attention from the MSM.
I’m no Luddite–I programmed the damn things for over 20 years–but that’s exactly why I say it’s time to go back to paper ballots, the kind that the average citizen can witness and understand and validate the counting thereof.
David, thanks for the link to Molly’s column. I usually keep up with her, but I fell behind this week. You’re right, the last paragraph is Pure Molly.
hedera
June 9, 2006 at 12:11 am
33I’m pleased to report that Alameda County, California, where I vote, has reverted entirely to paper ballots, marked with black felt pens inside little ovals (flashback to the SAT here). It took them over 2 days to return the election results in the mayor’s race; in fact they may still be counting. But by God, the count is accurate. Even better, they’re looking into equipment to make counting paper ballots faster; they seem to have given up entirely on electronic voting. And a good thing too, although not necessarily enough.
I read the Rolling Stone article and I’m appalled. The thing that appalls me most, is that the MSM have just rolled this off, like water off a duck. The Republicans, especially in Ohio, are open criminals, and the MSM just yawns. Thank you, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., for a detailed expose that not enough people will read.
Dale
June 9, 2006 at 12:46 am
34Lemuel, I loved your “besame dificilmente-como un hombre” especially in light of Adam’s post. “Dificilmente” translates to “with difficulty” (as opposed to “duro” o “con fuerza” which would be “hard”). It evoked humorous high-school memories of tongues striking glasses lenses and incompatible nose positions. Then “quitame el sosten–dificilmente” (take of my bra, with difficulty) etc. etc..(although not much et cetera for me, at least while in high school)
Christopher
June 9, 2006 at 7:10 am
35This is pretty off topic, but I just happened to stumble across this in Yahoo news. I have never read anything about this guy al-Masri, the new al-Qaida leader in Iraq. Here is an excerpt:
As Iraqi and U.S. leaders cautioned that al-Zarqawi’s death was not likely to end the bloodshed in Iraq, an American general said another foreign-born militant was already poised to take over the terror network’s operations.
Maj. Gen. William Caldwell said Egyptian-born Abu al-Masri would likely take the reins of al-Qaida in Iraq. He said al-Masri trained in Afghanistan and arrived in Iraq in 2002 to establish an al-Qaida cell.
Al-Masri, whose name is an obvious alias meaning “father of the Egyptian,” is believed to be an expert at constructing roadside bombs, the leading cause of U.S. military casualties in Iraq.
HERE is the link if you want it: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060609/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
Is there anything odd about this or am I just imagining things?
Sharon
June 9, 2006 at 8:18 am
36Christopher–’Odd,’ as in a pointless act of vengence not actually intended to end the insurgency but bolster it?
Hedera, I actually have some hope now that Rolling Stone–which may reach a wider audience than the MSM, for all I know–has printed this story.
But why did it take so long to count the ballots? Was this only in Alameda COunty? What’s the population and how many polling places were there? Was there a problem at the precinct level? I’m interested because I want to see CT go to paper ballots instead of e-voting. We may have to re-evaluate the size of a precinct, however, in order to complete the tally within a reasonable time–reasonable probably being defined as “in time for the next day’s morning paper.”
Sharon
June 9, 2006 at 8:53 am
37Garrison Keillor on Republican Ineptitude, and it’s even on-topic…at least in the beginning.
Christopher
June 9, 2006 at 9:23 am
38Hi Sharon. Well, I was just commenting on the nonchalance mentioning in the article of the fact that this guy al-Masri was in Iraq in 2002 setting up an al-Qaida connection. I am guessing that it was in the northern reaches of the country that this was happening. I also am wondering if this guy was mentioned before in part of the explanation for the connections between al-Qaida and Sadam.
Murray
June 9, 2006 at 10:11 am
39According to our opponent, Bill Shuster, he plans to run his campaign on Tax cuts, Bringing jobs to the district and Family Values. So our response to the inevitable gay marriage bs is to offer Shuster the finest meal he has ever eaten if he can come up with just one example of a heterosexual marriage that was destroyed by a gay marriage. If there isn’t a single case of it happening then it must not exist. If it doesn’t exist than why are we talking about it. (Perhaps to hide his dismal record?)
Mary
June 9, 2006 at 10:58 am
40Just a few comments on all of the above:
1) Adam- great writing, as always
2) Dan- the government has spent the last 50+ years legislating what I can/can’t do with my body. Obviously, I can’t be trusted making a choice either.
3) Al Masri means of/from Egypt. Abu Masri would be father of Egypt. I call them Abu Harra (you can guess what harra means.)
4) I agree with you, Murray. I have yet to hear a truely logical argument against gay unions or marriages. Remember, the Bible is only to be taken literally when it proves your point ;-D
cooper
June 9, 2006 at 6:31 pm
41Off Target: Since al-Zarqawi was reportedly still alive when the Special Ops people arrived, I wonder if one of them had the presence of mind to ask al-Zarqawi, through his interpreter, “How does it feel to get killed by a bomb?” Also, inform him that since he had killed so many people lately, that Paradise was all out of virgins, but there would be 72 skanky whores for his pleasure.
lurker dave
June 9, 2006 at 7:46 pm
42Sharon,
The delay in counting for Alameda county was caused by a lack of the optical readers for the paper ballots. All the ballots in the county were transported to Oakland I believe and counted at one location instead of at the local precincts. The acting registrar said the county would buy enough of the readers for the next election.
Much like Hedera I’m proud of my county officials for having a backbone and telling Diebold to take a hike.
Jay
June 9, 2006 at 8:50 pm
43More on al-Zarqawi: From all I’ve read the guy was a thug and Iraq is well rid of him. But is anyone bothered by the evident glee the military is taking in displaying pictures of his corpse? Even more troubling to me is the fact that no seems to mind that in disposing of al-Zarqawi we also seem to have disposed of a number of other Iraqis who may or may not have been terrorists. It brings to mind Robert DeNiro in The Untouchables “I want Elliot Ness dead, I want his family dead.” What is an acceptable level of collateral damage? Is everyone who happens to share a house with an evil man also a legitimate target? Sorry this isn’t very funny.
Jay
hedera
June 10, 2006 at 12:10 am
44Thanks for the explanation, lurker dave. For everyone’s amusement: the count is still going on, largely because Ron Dellums for the last day and a half has been either 150 votes above the 50% margin he needs to avoid a runoff for mayor, or 150 votes below it (his current position), and there are still between 3,000 - 7,000 absentee, provisional, and damaged ballots to count. So we still don’t know whether the November election will include a runoff for mayor or not. For lovers of the electoral horse race genre, we’ve got a hot one.
Emmarie
June 10, 2006 at 2:38 am
45I just got out of an all-girls high school. Please, sympathize with me. My life would have been so much easier there had this amendment been rejected earlier. The great majority of the girls I went to school with were rather unfortunately straight, but it didn’t have to be that way.
Sigh.
K. V., Jr.
June 10, 2006 at 9:44 am
46Emmarie, did you just graduate? “Congraduations” - too old to be in your spellchecker. I think I gleaned that from “Beowulf” or Chaucer - roughly translated, congratulations on graduation!
“…BTW, there is still lots of love in this imperfect world - give it out, and it comes back in spades. Oh, yeah, and wear sunscreen.” Thank you, folks; thank you! No, really, you’re too kind! Thank you! Bless you! Thank you! Thank you very much! Now cut it out. Sit down, already… Thank you! What a great crowd! Oh, you’re too much!…
Ann
June 12, 2006 at 4:20 pm
47I liked Stephen Colbert’s speech at Knox College: “You can’t be both young and wise.” Unfortunately, you CAN be both old and foolish.
hedera
June 13, 2006 at 7:58 pm
48Sorry, K. V., Jr. - you got it from Tom Swift…
“Congraduations,” said Tom, diplomatically…