From the BBC:
Bush ‘no good at singing Spanish’
The White House has rebutted claims President Bush sang the US national anthem in Spanish in 2000, insisting that his Spanish is not good enough.
Mr Bush has spoken out against the recent release of a Spanish language recording of the Star-Spangled Banner.
“He couldn’t possibly sing the national anthem in Spanish. He’s not that good,” said spokesman Scott McClellan.
The president regularly drops Spanish into his speeches, but has urged immigrants to learn English.
“The president can speak Spanish, but not all that well,” said Mr McClellan, describing the singing suggestion as “absurd”.
There are larger issues here: Immigration, honesty, xenophobia, and America itself.
I’m going to ignore those. Not interested.
No, I’m going to focus on an aspect of the issue that doesn’t really matter but that I actually have something to say about [a great rhetorical tactic known as “pulling a hannity”].
Whether or not our President sang the anthem in Spanish, the above explanation is complete and utter bullshit. Not because I’m accusing the President of being secretly fluent in Spanish, when by all reports he speaks “a little.” [Though apparently he does speak a bit…] That’s not the thing. The Thing here is that the “he’s not that good at Spanish” defense wouldn’t make sense for anybody.
I could sing the anthem in Spanish. And I don’t speak Spanish. What I would need is someone to teach me the anthem in Spanish. Or hand me a lyric sheet. And the thing here, to keep in mind, closely, is that there is no other way to sing the anthem in Spanish.
There is a word for someone who is so amazingly multilingual that they can translate a song in real-time and sing it as they go. Wait, no, I lie - there is no word for that. Because there is no such person. And the person who can translate a song in real-time and sing it along with a large group of people is even more nonexistent (if there can be degrees of nonexistence, which there can’t, because degrees of nonexistence are, in fact, nonexistent).
Translating a song is even tougher than translating a sentence. You have to take a lot of license, because it has to work with the meter of the song. And the melody. And the rhyme scheme. There are creative decisions to be made. Nobody, not even a UN translator, not even the Mozart of song translation, can just stand up and sing a song they know in another language. And even if there were such a savant on the planet, he or she wouldn’t be able to intuit the translation that everyone else in the room already knows…
So it comes down to learning the anthem in Spanish, which any suitably motivated person could do in a matter of about 15 minutes, whether they speak Spanish or not. It’s just four sentences, after all.
I’m beating this into the ground, I know. Si. But with reason. And my reason is this: The White House could’ve just said “the President never sang the anthem in Spanish.” [And then, presumably, held their breath as they prayed that no videotape would ever surface.] Or they could have said, quite plausibly, “The President simply doesn’t KNOW the Spanish version of national anthem.” Or they could have said, “Anthem? Why, of course I’ll answer that ques- hey, look! Iran’s making nukes!”
But no. They chose a theatrical, courtroom-style logical defense.
MCCLELLAN: Now then, Mr. Bush, are you comfortable?
BUSH: Yes, thank you.
MCCLELLAN: ¿usted tienen gusto de una bebida del agua?
BUSH: I’m sorry, what?
MCCLELLAN: Aha! You see, ladies and gentlemen of the jury? The President doesn’t really speak Spanish!
[The jury gasps.]BUSH: That was Spanish?
MCCLELLAN: Yes! I asked if you wanted some water.
BUSH: Oh, well, I -
MCCLELLAN: And therefore, ladies and gentlemen, if the President doesn’t speak Spanish well enough to understand the offer of a simple glass of water, I submit that there is no possible way that the President could have sung the national anthem in Spanish.
[The jury applauds, cheers, throws confetti at McClellan. A thousand red, white and blue balloons are released, and outside the courthouse we hear the cheering and screaming of the throngs of Americans who’ve been watching on closed-circuit TV. A marching band begins playing the national anthem, presumably in English. The judge bangs his gavel hopelessly, calling for order. ]BUSH: I actually would like some water… if you were serious about that…
Why did they do it that way? I don’t know. I suspect that lying has become such a reflex in Washington that nobody thinks twice about just… making shit up. And of course the larger point is that the President most certainly attended all those events at which the anthem was sung in Spanish, and by all reports never had a problem with it….
But I intend to stand firm in my commitment not to talk about the larger points.
If there’s a lesson here for the White House, it’s this: When dodging a tough or embarrassing question, change the subject. Or vehemently stick to your talking points. Or question the questioner’s patriotism. Or invade somebody.
Just don’t appeal to reason. It’s a little late to start experimenting with that.





68 comments
Isaac
May 8, 2006 at 4:32 pm
1What would be fun is to see if he can sing the anthem in English without stumbling over the words…
Bits
May 8, 2006 at 5:21 pm
2“He couldn’t possibly sing the national anthem in Spanish. He’s not that good,” said spokesman Scott McClellan.
Arguably, this is true of English as well …
Sharon
May 8, 2006 at 5:44 pm
3Sorry to go off-topic, but the BushCo outrages are coming too fast to keep up with. Gen. Michael Hayden, the military man who has rejected 200+ years of 4th amendment judicial interpretation, has been appointed to replace Porter Goss as head of the civilian spy agency–the CIA.
Hot Tub Tommy
May 8, 2006 at 6:04 pm
4“I suspect that lying has become such a reflex in Washington that nobody thinks twice about just… making shit up.” Welcome to the big leagues, Mr. Felber. Now maybe you’re catching on to how things work in DC. What do you do when you’re elected to public office? “Now you … play the … game!” Burt Reynolds, “Deliverance”, 1972. God, I loved that movie - well not the squealing part - but everything else!
I see that Lemuel has been in touch. I need to talk to him about a scrap of paper he might have seen with a series of numbers and letters hand written on it. Tell him I don’t care about the Rolex, the diamond cuff links, or my wife’s collection of Wild Weasel thong bikinis. He welcome to them and his secrets are safe with me. I would like to talk with him ASAP. Please let him know. It’s very important.
Thomas DeLay, Patriot/Lobbyist
Julia
May 8, 2006 at 6:50 pm
5Lies?
From the man who said catching a 7.5 pound perch was the best day of his presidency?
(Apparently it should have been his best day ever; that’s about twice the size of the world-record perch catch…)
As if it wasn’t bad enough that his best day as “Leader of the Free World” involved catching a goddamned fish.
siobhan
May 8, 2006 at 7:03 pm
6Sharon, Hayden has to be confirmed first. I think Bush may regret this one, since there are even plenty of R’s who don’t like the idea of a military guy in a civilian agency, and others who oppose him because of his part in the domestic eavesdropping program. These hearings may end up turning over a bunch of rocks that W probably would have rather had left in place.
Sharon
May 8, 2006 at 7:09 pm
7To paraphrase a great line from “The Hunt For Red October” (the film), Bush doesn’t take a dump without a plan, and without the go-ahead from Cheney and the rest of the cabal. They must think Hayden has a chance of getting confirmation or they wouldn’t have put him up. The same D’s who rolled over for Alito will roll over for this, too.
Mojo
May 8, 2006 at 7:28 pm
8“He couldn’t possibly sing the national anthem in Spanish. He’s not that good”
Your error is in assuming that “not that good” referred to his linguistic ability. The sentence could very well be technically true if it referred to his atrocious singing voice.
cooper
May 8, 2006 at 7:36 pm
9Sharon, “They must think Hayden has a chance of getting confirmation or they wouldn’t have put him up.” Two words - Harriet Miers.
Sharon
May 8, 2006 at 7:47 pm
10Cooper, I still think Harriet Miers was the sacrificial lamb in a sort of bait and switch scheme. (How’s that for mixing metaphors?)
Alito was the intended nominee all along, and had been for many years.
siobhan
May 8, 2006 at 7:50 pm
11Okay, back on topic. And, hell, you’re not even talking about understanding the anthem in Spanish.
“So it comes down to learning (fill in the blank), which any suitably motivated person could do in a matter of about 15 minutes…”
Learning a new thing that might take 15 minutes? That’s not on the agenda for the ADD-ministration.
Maximum Bob
May 8, 2006 at 8:01 pm
12“He couldn’t possibly be President. He knows nothing about government, law, international relations, or 27 other things essential to being an effective world leader. He’s not that good,” said spokesman Scott McClellan.
cooper
May 8, 2006 at 8:05 pm
13Julia, along with your charming Celtic ways and love of fine whiskey, you certainly know your World Record of Fishing statistics. Right you are, Bush is “caught” in another lie.
Perch, white - 4lbs-12oz - Messalonskee Lake, ME - June 4, 1949 - Mrs. Earl Small.
What I really like about that statistic is that the lake our camp’s on up in Maine, flows into Messalonskee Lake. I’ve caught plenty of perch there (catch & release, I’m hep), but nothing close to 4lbs-12oz. Our lake is bigger, cleaner and deeper than Messalonskee - gives me hope! And when you’re a fisherman, hope is all you need! Well, hope and the latest sure-fire, must have lure and that 225 HP V-6 bass boat I’ve had my eye on… Just kidding. I’m more of the 14′ aluminum boat w/ the 40 year old 6 HP Evinrude type.
Sharon
May 8, 2006 at 8:13 pm
14Oh, Bob, you’re so reality-based. Let it go!
SeattleDan
May 8, 2006 at 8:18 pm
15I wonder if the President can sing the Star Spangled Banner in Canadian.
cooper
May 8, 2006 at 8:52 pm
16“He couldn’t possibly sing the national anthem in Spanish. He’s not that good,” said spokesman Scott McClellan.
I wonder, Adam, if Scott was just getting a little pissy on his way out.
El Demento
May 8, 2006 at 9:18 pm
17“That was Spanish?” No, that was Turista. Much better to say, “Senor, quiere que beber un vaso de agua?” But he still wouldn’t get it. And, even if he did, he wouldn’t say “si” until consulting with Rove and Dick.
Dale
May 8, 2006 at 9:20 pm
18Mr. Felber, the defence (prosecution? who can tell…) responds that your client’s ex-press-secretary has just asked the witness not if he wants a glass of water, but if “you they have the taste of a drink of the water?” which not even Pancho Villa would have understood. We reassert that the President is secretly a brilliant linguist, or an undercover Mexican spy, or something.
MCCLELLAN: ¿usted tienen gusto de una bebida del agua?
BUSH: I’m sorry, what?
MCCLELLAN: Aha! You see, ladies and gentlemen of the jury? The President doesn’t really speak Spanish!
[The jury gasps.]
BUSH: That was Spanish?
MCCLELLAN: Yes! I asked if you wanted some water.
Adam Felber
May 8, 2006 at 10:23 pm
19Yes, yes, yes, I’m aware that it’s bad Spanish. I got it from babelfish with a high degree of confidence that the Spanish would be bad.
In fact, my first query, “Would you like some water?” turned up something that looked a little too close to correct… I had to go for “drink of water” before I got what I needed.
Dale
May 8, 2006 at 11:30 pm
20Q: What do you get if you type the words to the U.S. National Anthem into Babelfish?
A: Deported.
piglet
May 8, 2006 at 11:48 pm
21I was going to say something about how logic hasn’t really been a significant concern in this administration up to now, so why hold them to that kind of standard, but I liked what Maximum Bob said better….
hedera
May 9, 2006 at 12:30 am
22You don’t have to speak Spanish, or any language, to sing it. I sing all the time in languages I don’t speak, like Latin and German. All you have to know are the pronunciation rules, and the pronunciation rules for Spanish are quite simple, much easier than, say, Russian, which I’ve also sung (Rachmaninoff’s Russian Vespers). I agree with Adam that any suitably motivated person, with a song sheet and a coach, or even a set of rules, could sing Nuestro Himno. After all, I once taught myself to pronounce Elvish reasonably well from the pronunciation guide in the back of the Lord of the Rings, for no better reason than that I hate to read words I don’t know how to say.
Of course, the kicker here is that as far as we can tell, Dubya doesn’t read (except about pet goats).
siobhan
May 9, 2006 at 12:33 am
23Q1: Will Rove be indicted?
Q2: Will that help or harm the pledge drives now underway?
Q3: Will that finally mean that I can stop paying for him with my tax dollars? (I’m ready to call Grover Norquist every time I think about it.)
siobhan
May 9, 2006 at 12:35 am
24Hedera, clearly he doesn’t read perch fishing stats, despited his apparent interest in the subject.
Boggart
May 9, 2006 at 1:23 am
25Hmmm, I wonder if McClellan’s comment wasn’t a red herring. Many of us aren’t good enough to even attempt the stars bursting in air… except in a large crowd of equally bad singers. Just what is the man good at that anyone beside his mom would use to decorate a fridge door?
Dale
May 9, 2006 at 5:43 am
26In related news, Chief John S. Proudfoot has asked that “This Land is Our Land” be only sung in Navajo.
But frankly, I’m glad that we have gotten down to the heart of this immigration problem–the crisis epidemic of foreign nationals spontaneously singing OUR national anthem as we underpay, mistreat, and deport them. As a Minutewoman I am so sick and tired of hearing those dirty Mexicans burst into patriotic song as they straggle dehydratedly for days across the desert, dodging IMS traps, in order to feed their families because the economies of their home countries have been destroyed by US-backed policies (among other things). I hear they can’t get those Guantanamo prisoners to stop Nuestro Himno-ing away.
Final question–are Puerto Ricans not allowed to sign the anthem of the nation they are citizens of in their own official language?
Jay
May 9, 2006 at 7:12 am
27Back to the Hayden nomination for a minute. The scariest part of NPR’s coverage was that the Bush administration thinks that warrentless wire tapping is a winner, and hopes that the Senate will showcase the program during confirmation hearings. Apparently there are some polls that show the majority of Americans support the program. Where is Ben Franklin when you really need him. “He who would trade liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security.” Or words to that effect.
Jay
Sharon
May 9, 2006 at 7:20 am
28The trend seems to be towards either militarizing or privatizing the entire federal government, except for the departments, like Interior, that are being rendered ineffective.
Amina
May 9, 2006 at 7:26 am
29When Mr. Bush said (in Spanish) “I don’t want to destroy a beautiful language, so I’m going to speak in English,” one wonders how he would characterize English… homely? unattractive? unsightly? downright ugly?
–
It’s kind of amusing (and also kind of disheartening) to read some of the sentences from the Puerto Rico Herald article about Bush’s Spanish ability as if they referred to his English ability. Try these:
Mr. Bush speaks the language poorly “but with great confidence.”
“He doesn’t try very hard to get the pronunciation the way native speakers speak,” said Otto Santa Ana.
“He understands enough to respond back to people who ask him questions, and he could even read an article and understand it.”
cooper
May 9, 2006 at 7:29 am
30A bit of good news from Down Under -
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/05/08/australia.miners/index.htm l
A hint to the miners - go back to school! Get a nice soft job top-side, where it’s warm and sunny.
David
May 9, 2006 at 10:05 am
31“…just… making shit up.”
It is beyond just reflex. It is all they know how to do. Their jaws would lock up if they even tried to speak honestly. Of course, there is apparently no room for candor, or even staight talk (which it turns out McCain didn’t really mean), in successful American politics (see successful versus unsuccessful presidential campaigns, for starters).
Murray
May 9, 2006 at 12:37 pm
32So why should Bush and Co. lie when telling the truth is just as easy?
Practice.
(Not really, Lying is their natural state, any truth they spew is by accident only).
Tom in Santa Clara
May 9, 2006 at 1:41 pm
33OK, Jose, can you sing this:
¿El Oh, opinión puede usted ver por la luz temprana del amanecer lo que granizamos tan orgulloso en destellar pasado del crepúsculo?
¿De quién amplias rayas y estrellas brillantes por la lucha peligrosa, O’er los terraplenes que miramos tan galantemente fluían?
Y el fulgor rojo del cohete, las bombas que estallaban en aire, dio la prueba con la noche que nuestra bandera todavía estaba allí.
¿El Oh, opinión hace que bandera estrella-star-spangled con todo onda O’er la tierra del libre y el hogar del valiente?
Thank you Babelfish!
Murray
May 9, 2006 at 1:53 pm
34On the Felberpalooza front.
I trekked to Washington last Thursday to watch the WWDTM taping and try to alert folks of our upcoming party.
After the taping I was lucky enough to be able to ask if they were all coming to Felberpalooza in front of the 1400 at Lisner. I was given the microphone for about a minute so that I could stumble along and as best as I could explain what it was all about. I forgot to mention the brochures I was holding in my hand. Hopefully something came for my efforts.
The show was fun but without Adam it didn’t have the same spark it had in Baltimore.
Murray
May 9, 2006 at 2:21 pm
35On the political front.
PA’s 9th district is home to former Congressman Concrete, Bud Shuster, who gave his district to his son Bill Shuster, who appeared to be on the verge of not having a Democratic opponent on the November ballot.
My good friend Tony has stepped forward and if we can get 1000 write-in votes in next Tuesday’s primary, he will be the Democratic nominee. So last night we visited the Democratic Party meeting in Somerset. Tony addressed them and they were happy that he was running. Tony is a very likeable and outgoing. We also got to witness why the Democrats are wandering in the wilderness.
One of the members proposed a motion that laid out a resolution on the war. It agreed with Murtha (neighboring district) and I thought it was fairly soft in its wording. They voted it down because it might offend some people.
They have sold their souls to prevent offending those who should be offended.
Tony’s night went well but it was very disappointing to watch committed Democrats cower and hide.
We will be meeting with another group in Chambersburg on Wed. and we have thousands of postcards to get out by Thursday.
We know that we are knats ready to take on a tractor trailer. Shuster represents big business, and the very rich. Tony is just a school teacher. But at least we should be able to raise some issues about how badly this country is being run. We can’t reward Shuster with a free ride back to Washington.
cooper
May 9, 2006 at 2:29 pm
36AOL news has just put up an interesting story. It seems that Prescott Bush (W’s grandfather) and a number of other Skull n Bones guys were stationed at Fort Sill, OK during WWI - beats the Hell out of the trenches in Sommes and shows that wealth and privilege have their rewards, beyond just wealth and privilege. While they were there, they had a grave robbing party and stole the skull n’ bones from Geronimo’s grave and took these back to Yale to the tomb where the SnB meets. One of the initiation requirements is to kiss the skull. Needless to say, Geronimo’s great grandson would like the bones back. Hilarious shenanigans will no doubt ensue.
Ann
May 9, 2006 at 2:50 pm
37Murray, if you’re going to start inviting the riffraff that attend a taping of WWDTM (especially when Adam isn’t participating), I don’t know whether I want to attend Felberpalooza! I thought it was going to be strictly for those of us who read this blog! The event is rapidly losing its cachet of sophistication, exclusivity, and superiority. Next you’ll be telling us that we needn’t bring formalwear.
Murray
May 9, 2006 at 3:08 pm
38Ann, last I heard you were talking about running around naked. Now which is it?
Ann
May 9, 2006 at 4:06 pm
39Well I certainly wouldn’t run around naked in front of riffraff. I have SOME standards.
dee
May 9, 2006 at 4:14 pm
40I have a fig leaf embellished with crocheted riff-raff that I was planning to bring along for the mixer on Friday night.
(”Mixer” — sheesh. Those of us old enough to remember mixers will meet in the big room with the comfortable chairs and flattering lighting on Friday night)
nato
May 9, 2006 at 4:35 pm
41Sharon, the department of Interior isn’t just being rendered ineffective, it’s about to be bent over a table and reamed with a large stick (and not one of those smooth mop handles like we use in gitmo), should the governor of my fine state be confirmed. Go, Kempthorne! Go far, far away.
National SAviors
May 9, 2006 at 5:26 pm
42N SAve 1, this is N SAve2. We got a hit on “nato”. Re-task satellite H473.Z89412, triangulate with others and zero in on location. Inuendoed to be in the state of Idaho. Scurrilous defamation in progress. Assemble splinter infested mop handles and proceed to co-ordinates in the transmission to follow. Over and out.
cooper
May 9, 2006 at 9:39 pm
43NSAve2, don’t be such a buzz kill.
Well, a hot story like this had to eventually show up in the MSM.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/custom/newsroom/hc-skullbones0509.a rtmay09,1,5941114.story?coll=chi-news-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true
I wonder if any of the White House press corps will ask W about this. Prescott Bush continues to embarrass decent American citizens. Why would we expect different from his grandson?
Sharon
May 9, 2006 at 10:44 pm
44That link wants me to register, Cooper. Try this one:
Yale’s Tale Of Skull Gets New Backing
cooper
May 9, 2006 at 10:58 pm
45Sharon, you’ve got a back door into the Tribune? Why you crafty Librarian, you!
Sharon
May 9, 2006 at 11:14 pm
46Google News found it, not I!
hedera
May 10, 2006 at 12:15 am
47Dang, I won’t be able to come - I’m dying to see dee’s figleaf with crocheted riff-raff embellishment. Crocheting is such a dying art. How about a photo?
David
May 10, 2006 at 12:46 am
48Being frequently mistaken for riff raff and all, I was quite relieved to learn that riff raff are indeed to be allowed in. Thank Lobster it ain’t the Minutemenpalooza. By the way, does anyone else remember the mid-20th century Minutemen. Those people were radical reactionaries. Hell, they gave the Cold War FBI the willies.
And speaking of naked fauna cavorting through the flora, how’s this year’s crop of poison ivy, oak, and/or sumac, Murray?
RHDBRNMB (raise hell, drink beer, run naked, make babies), as we fun loving but highly sophisticated Florida Gators were want to chant at keg parties.
cooper
May 10, 2006 at 6:43 am
49David, I do remember the Minutemen. One of their indoctrination letters came to our house - don’t ask, I really don’t know how, but I suspect the usual suspect - and picking it up and reading it as a young teen was blood chilling. I think J. Edgar rolled them all up and made them wear feather boas in the slammer.
Hot Tub Tommy
May 10, 2006 at 8:27 am
50Lem, buddy, son! Call home to Papa and Mama. We miss you so much. No more binding and injections in the middle of the night, we promise. Come home; we need you! Come home, soon. Bring that piece of paper with those silly numbers.
Daddy Tommy
Mary
May 10, 2006 at 9:46 am
51dee - I’ll be joining you at the “mixer” but full clothed. Even with the flattering lighting ;-D
Murray
May 10, 2006 at 10:56 am
52David,
Poison Ivy, always a concern but we work to eliminate it were we can.
Naked or not we recommend hiking boots.
Ann
May 10, 2006 at 1:25 pm
53Hiking books? With the smart little frocks I’m bringing? I don’t think so.
dee
May 10, 2006 at 2:11 pm
54Ann, these might fit the bill. Should protect against any nasty vegetation, although you may find yourself walking towards sailors…
Sharon
May 10, 2006 at 2:13 pm
55Yikes, Dee! PLEASE tell me this is a joke!
And they wonder why podiatrists make such a good living.
Maximum Bob
May 10, 2006 at 3:27 pm
56Them boots ain’t made for walkin’.
Ann
May 10, 2006 at 4:42 pm
57Yikes indeed! I was certainly intrigued by the velour uppers, but they have leather soles and I’m not buying leather anymore. Otherwise…well, otherwise no way in hell anyway. Guess I’ll get out my vegan hiking boots and rethink the whole “frock” idea.
cooper
May 10, 2006 at 5:47 pm
58Sharon, “And they wonder why podiatrists make such a good living.” At $2800.00/pair, we KNOW why shoe manufacturers make such a good living.
Jim
May 10, 2006 at 9:07 pm
59I don’t mean to split hairs Adam (pulling out the teeny tiny hatchet), but there is at least one language where it is possible to translate and sing in real time within a large group of people: sign language for the deaf.
The cool thing about sign language is that one can sing or speak in two languages in real time at the same time.
O.K. about them overly-priced torture devices that have been flippantly been labeled “boots.” Yeouch. Put those on before the game, and it just may be possible to hit all the high notes in the national anthem.
Murray
May 11, 2006 at 2:28 pm
60Dee,
Just how did you know about these boots? Is there something we should know?
Pete IVDL
May 11, 2006 at 5:27 pm
61Hedera, I’m with you on the pronunciation thing. A couple of years ago, when I was last laid up with the back thing, I bought a whole swag of historical translations (Homer, Ovid, Herodotus, Gilgamesh, Tacitus, Caesar’s stuff, Chaucer, Livy, all the good ones), and I was mentally pronouncing the names all wrong at first. It’s amazing how much better I can read that stuff while mentally pronouncing the names CORRECTLY.
Still, I think we’re stuck with “seezer” (Caesar), “gillgehmesh” (Gilgaamesh), “salladin” (Salah Ahd Din). No worse than “alkayder” and a thousand other Bushistic malapropisms, I spose.
Coop, we just had nearly 10 days of 150+ “journalists” setting down on Beaconsfield mine like a flock of preening harpies. They interviewed the miners’ families (until they got too pissed off to answer questions from journos hiding in their gardens), then the friends of the families, then the relatives of the friends, but we knew they’d hit rock bottom when they tried to interview the primary school kids WHILE THEY WERE IN SCHOOL.
The miners, out for less than 36 hours, were guest stars on a nighttime footy show; when they were asked how they had survived, one of them replied ” Show us your chequebook, and we’ll answer that question.”. Maybe they should’ve stayed in their hole in the rock.
David
May 11, 2006 at 6:02 pm
62Now if only those boots had been green, they could have been worn by Poison Ivy in that Batman movie. Maybe Hippolita would want a pair. I can just hear Oberon.
Better yet, Ophelia in a high-fashion production of HAMLET (I like the idea of boots only).
Ann
May 11, 2006 at 9:02 pm
63Clearly, the guys are having trouble getting past those boots. Dee, what have you started!
hedera
May 11, 2006 at 11:10 pm
64Podiatrists, hell; orthopedic surgeons. I look at those boots and the arthritic knees I don’t have any more start to ache. Not to mention my lower back. Not to mention that the attitudes I inherited from my Depression-era parents would entirely prevent me from spending $2800 on any single article of clothing (don’t pick nits; a pair of boots is an article of clothing, who do you know that wears only one boot?). I once bought a car for less than those boots cost.
David
May 12, 2006 at 1:44 am
65Hell, Ann, imaging those boots on various characters caused me to use the wrong spelling for Hippolyta. Apparently I was thinking about Hippolita, who probably had a pair of those boots for her job servicing Porter Goss.
Good job of sending us off on a wild spree of imaginings, dee - ok, so that’s a fairly easy task with this crowd. But thanks anyway.
joe
May 12, 2006 at 8:37 am
66According to a Spanish spokesperson”he couldn’t be President”. He is ignorant about the government,law and international relations. How made him President?
David
May 12, 2006 at 1:46 pm
67Dog made him President.
Richard
May 18, 2006 at 4:02 pm
68I’m reminded of the UK’s former Secretary of State for Wales, John Redwood, attempting to mime the Welsh national anthem when he didn’t know the words, back in the 90s. The footage was shown on most news programmes at the time and he was suitably embarrassed enough to go away and learn it, thus forcing us to put up with his strangled tones at every official Welsh function covered by the media until he resigned from the cabinet some time later.
In other words, pray that you never get to hear Bush sing the national anthem in any language, because you’ll have another nightmare to add to all the others he’s been giving you these last six years. Particularly when somebody sticks a dance mix of it on My Space.