So… all across the country, thousands and thousands of high school students have walked out of their classes to demonstrate for the rights of immigrants, legal and otherwise.
*Yawn.* The national news media hasn’t made too big a deal about it, which is completely understandable. You probably haven’t heard too much about it, except maybe as local news (which doesn’t tally up all the protests), and that’s as it should be. Sure, it’s an even bigger walkout than some of the large Iraq war protest walkouts, which also got very little attention. Sure, there are arrests and marches, and sure, it’s been going on for days… sure. Sure. Whatever.
Here’s the thing. Youth protests were important in the 60’s. Back when the last culturally-important generation was young. The Baby Boomers mattered. Their sheer size, the huge number of them, made their importance an economic necessity. But that was then, and that was them. I wish today’s high school kids had asked me for advice before they staged their protest. I could’ve set ‘em straight. As a member of the first generation after the Boom, I’ve lived my entire life a decade or two younger than the people who actually matter.
It’s even more clear that today’s youngsters don’t matter. We don’t hear their music on television (unless we tune into the basic cable networks that are made for them). We don’t pay attention to their sense of style. We haven’t even bothered to name their generation, really. When they die in a war, we never see their faces again. Or their bodies. They are simply not news. Not unless they go on a rampage and shoot large numbers of each other in school (because that’s scary! Plus, it allows us to go on about how we never shot large numbers of each other back when we went to school).
So listen up, kids. Stop protesting - we’re not really going to pay attention. Go back to school, even if it’s not as good as the schools we went to back in the day. Graduate. Enlist in the military and go fight and possibly die for us in Iraq. In return, we promise to ignore your ideas about immigration, the war, and the environment. We’ll also run up a debt that guarantees that you will have to make huge sacrifices and STILL never collect Social Security, and create a economy in which you won’t be able to afford to buy a home or have health insurance.
Do we have a deal? Great! [We weren’t listening to your answer, so we’re going to go ahead with things as though you just said “yes.” Which is super!] See ya!





60 comments
Ann
March 31, 2006 at 6:35 pm
1They’re not Generation X? Is it Y now? I thought that was their music I heard in the background of every popular show on TV. Isn’t it their thongs and baggy-crotched jeans I’ve been seeing for a few years now? Or has there been another generation already…it’s so hard to keep up.
Not that I don’t appreciate Adam’s sarcasm, ’cause I do. And I’m thrilled to see teenagers protesting—I was afraid it wouldn’t happen again.
Maximum Bob
March 31, 2006 at 6:58 pm
2And remember, kids, if you do join the military and serve with distinction, we’ll use your exemplary record to smear you if you ever try to run for office. Just so you know.
Hot Tub Tommy
March 31, 2006 at 7:12 pm
3So, now Tony Rudy is singing like a canary. Jees, I’ve had better days…
ice weasel
March 31, 2006 at 7:45 pm
4Bravo Adam!
I wish I had something brilliant to add but I don’t.
So I’ll close with a, “Well said Adam.”
Mojo
March 31, 2006 at 8:01 pm
5“The social contract”; not Rousseau’s, Tony Soprano’s.
Murray
March 31, 2006 at 9:39 pm
6Silly children, protest are for adults.
Although as I recall, our parents didn’t listen to us baby boomers either. We marched, and protested and it wasn’t until Walter Cronkite declared the war unwinable that the nation started to do anything.
If there is anything that the youth should protest it’s the cost ($) of the war and how they will be the ones to pay for it when the monster bill comes due. (It’s a good thing that kids aren’t that smart or they’d be coming after us geezers).
David
March 31, 2006 at 9:53 pm
7For one who is technically pre-boom (yob 1942), but whose youth and young adulthood were intertwined with the period of which you speak, Adam, this post is particularly painful, but dead on. The truth really can hurt. To the youth I say Ne illegitimi non carborundum. Courage is to be admired even if the media is as indifferent as was the police chief of Albany, Georgia to civil rights activists (”It’s mind over matter,” he quipped. “I don’t mind and you don’t matter.”)
siobhan
March 31, 2006 at 10:34 pm
8The lousy side effect of the protests is that the schools lose $30/day for each absent student. Of course, the schools serving predominantly Hispanic populations are normally way over-funded, so they probably don’t need the money, right?
Ugh.
spotteddog
April 1, 2006 at 2:39 am
9Kids have it so easy today. When I was a kid we had to protest AND go to school.
SeattleDan
April 1, 2006 at 3:01 am
10Clearly Adam is between the “boom’ and this generation. If he had a 17 year old (as perhaps SeattleTammy and I do) he’d be listening.
True story. Before the launch of the attack on Iraq in 03,SeattleTony,aged 14,marched against the impending war.It happened to coincide with the weekend that SeattleTammy was diagnosed with a severe anemia and spent the weekend in the hospital,getting infused with four bags of plasma. We’d fully intended to go to the march,but couldn’t. Our son did. And he was the lead interview in the Seattle Times. Reporters talking to our boy. The reporter asked “Did you come with your parents?” and eloquently, SeattleTony said “No,I’m by myself”. For weeks we were asked,”was that “SeattleTony” we saw interviewed in the paper? Why didn’t you go?”
Well, we were busy. But we have been consistently reminded of what old farts we are.
David
April 1, 2006 at 2:14 pm
11Seattle Dan,
On the days when life factors intervene, just remember to keep farting, especially in The Man’s face. And for a little extra kick, light the damned thing. Just make sure you have on jeans. Gotta love the blue flame.
Seriously, I think your son represents a growing phenomenon. Some days I border on despondent, but more often things pop up to remind me that I need to take care of my health so I can enjoy the next cultural breakout, which is coming. Only question is how deep a hole our kids will have to lift us up out of. Hats off to Seattle Tony. Bush & Company just think they can ignore young people like your son. Add one more item to the Staggering List of Things Those Bozos Don’t Understand.
One of Today's Generation
April 1, 2006 at 6:19 pm
12And you wonder why we’re supposedly lazy, self-absorbed and apathetic.
Pete IVDL
April 1, 2006 at 7:07 pm
13That’s amazing. All those kids stopped listening to (c)rap, put their hats on the right way, tied their shoelaces, replaced their baggies ‘n’ hoods with pants and shirts, and looked up from the ground, just to protest? I’m flabbergasted. I’m also sounding like my own father.
cooper
April 1, 2006 at 8:23 pm
14Off target - Wow, Mr. Bush and his Neocons certainly have stirred the pot in the Middle East. A quick look at Aljazeera shows Iraqis are still killing Iraqis by the dozens/day; Hamas is losing civil control in Gaza 3 days after taking over; Kurds in Turkey are protesting and rioting; buildings are being sacked in Egypt. Any more good ideas about how to introduce the Moslems to the benefits of democracy, Fraulein Doktor Rice? Mr. Perle? Mr. Cheney?
http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage
hedera
April 1, 2006 at 8:24 pm
15Pete, the extent to which I’m starting to sound like my own mother has been boggling my mind for the last few years.
I got through the sixties without attending a single protest, except the ones I had to step around at Berkeley to get to class. I don’t know whether I regret this or not; my reasons seemed good at the time. Trouble with protests is, they’re crowds, sometimes angry crowds; and crowds scared me then and still do.
cooper
April 1, 2006 at 8:27 pm
16Back on target, bloggingheads.tv current has, as one of its talking points, a discussion about immigration with David Corn and Byron White.
Join the fun - http://bloggingheads.tv/
cooper
April 1, 2006 at 8:34 pm
17One of Today’s Generation, well, the reason my 16 year old son is lazy, self-absorbed and apathetic is because he doesn’t like to get off the couch, he only thinks about how things will affect him, and he doesn’t give a damn. But that’s just my take on it; I’m 56, so what the hell do I know that’s relevant about today’s life on this planet?
Julia
April 1, 2006 at 8:47 pm
18I was born in what used to be the last official year of the baby boom - 1960. I spent most of my life feeling like I’d Just Missed Something Big and would never catch up.
The other day I heard the Boomer period now extends to 1964. I was too young for all the parties and FUN drugs; now you want me for political counts and Medicare????
I never really understood how you could extend ‘post-war’ for a full 15 years, at least not in the States. Sheeeit….
Jay
April 1, 2006 at 8:52 pm
19Hi All,
Slightly off topic, but I found this web site today and just had to pass is along.
www.itmfa.com
It is the brainchild of the same Seattle sex columnist who popularized santorum, so the language might be a bit harsh for some. But I like his idea of getting a lapel pin or a button to every member of congress.
Jay
Jay
April 1, 2006 at 9:00 pm
20Sorry, the first link didn’t work. Let me try this again:
www.itmfa.com
Jay
One of Today's Generation
April 1, 2006 at 9:52 pm
21I can’t speak for your son, Cooper, but I know that there are several of my generation that give several damns and have simply opted to fight battles that we have a chance of winning. We volunteer, are active in our respective religious groups, wish that someone would listen if we were to protest and educate ourselves so that someday someone might take us seriously.
Of course, there are just as many in my generation that view college as a never-ending excuse to get drunk, but since they aren’t trying to make a difference they never will.
Llelldorin
April 1, 2006 at 10:39 pm
22As a member of the tail end of Generation X (gads, I hate that name), I demand that we come up with new generational attributes beyond “lazy, self-absorbed, and apathetic.”
After all, those were supposed to be our generational attributes. I’m 32 and have a son who’s 3. Today’s youth can’t have them. They have to get their own.
Cooper, please don’t extend “there exists” to “all.” I’m sure you’ve never met any self-absorbed, lazy, and apathetic boomers, right?
One of Today's Generation
April 2, 2006 at 12:15 am
23Then the previous generations should come up with something different. There’s no way each generation would voluntarily label themselves with something so negative. I personally like creative, intelligent and hard-working, if you have to distill an entire generation into three adjectives:)
David
April 2, 2006 at 1:02 pm
24No generation can be distilled. “The Greatest Generation” is catchy, but it’s also nonsense. External pressures and demands vary, the two most important being environmental forces and the tenor set by leadership at all levels, from the president down to the mayor, the police chief, and the superintendent of schools.
My only suggestion on this issue: never let anyone else categorize, define, or distill you. And never narrowly categorize, define, or distill yourself. In this regard, churches are as often part of the problem as they are part of the solution, especially the churches that are currently all the rage. The same is true of our current crop of authority figures, both the reactionary ideologues and the venal opportunists, of which Tom Delay is both.
What was central to what was best about the 60s was the opening of the human mind and the humanist soul. What was worst was the self-destructive excesses, especially those that involved counter-violence (it was the authorities who were most prone to violence, both at home, especially in the apartheid South, and in foreign policy, most notably in what was formerly Indo-China. Current conservative revisionist history is a load of shit.)
Harold
April 2, 2006 at 2:02 pm
25As a member of Generation X (born in 1968), the least demographically significant generation, I have always thought of the children of the Baby Boomers (ah, those Boomers, the energetically-self-absorbed-and-apathetic-about-anything-that-doesn’t- immediately-affect-them generation, the “Me” Generation, the Pepsi Generation) as “Generation Y” - or “Generation Why?”, as in “Why do they dress like that and wear their hair like that? Why all the piercings? Why do they think the 1970’s were sooooo cool? And why do they keep killing each other?” But now I’ve realized that a more appropriate term would be “Generation Med”, to celebrate their status as the most overprescibed and overmedicated generation ever.
Adam, I’m surprised you didn’t mention the Army’s recent ban on non-officially-issued body armor - you know, the stuff that families were buying for their kids because the stuff that was being officially issued by the Army was inadequate.
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=domesticNews&story ID=2006-03-31T221128Z_01_N31202027_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-USA-ARMOR.xml&arc hived=False
Perhaps the Army has decided that dead soldiers are less of a strain on resources than wounded ones. (That is the principle behind anti-personnel weapons that maim rather than kill, right?) So up next, I suppose there will be a ban on scavenged junkyard steel plates being welded to poorly-armored Army-issue vehicles?
I guess maybe another term for the current generation could be “Generation Cannon Fodder.”
cooper
April 2, 2006 at 3:30 pm
26Harold, world traveler, li’l brother. I graduated high school in 68.
Re the body armor, if you’re blown up and severely wounded and found to be wearing non-issue body armor, does that void your VA benefits? This whole situation is an embarrassment to the U.S. and further confirms that Bush and Co are stupid assholes for inventing a war and sending American citizens into harm’s way with inadequate and non-existent armor for vehicles and personnel. What a GDSALSoS.
David - swim, kill, consume, sleep…
historyenne
April 2, 2006 at 4:02 pm
27My dad always says that the trouble with being a baby boomer is that any time you have what you think is a good idea, you can be pretty certain that at least 100 people have already had that same idea. My response to this has always been, well, what does that say for baby boomers’ children? There’s more and more competition these days for admission to colleges, for jobs, and children are put under pressure from a very early age not only to succeed, but to be more successful than all their peers. Is it any wonder that these children grow up to be self-absorbed? That they are apathetic about any topic that doesn’t directly relate to them? How can they develop a social conscience when they have to spend every waking moment from birth to graduation preparing for college? I would argue that this is more a national trend stemming from the 80’s yuppie philosophy than simply the flaws of the young.
cooper
April 2, 2006 at 7:17 pm
28Historyenne, I would agree that the American culture has gone off the rails. Perhaps, the kids are aware of that and trying to figure out what part of the whole deal is relevant to their needs. My son tends to bring in friends and school mates from a whole spectrum of ethnicity. From what I’ve seen, it’s the children of Asian and South Asian immigrants who are the ones being pushed from dawn to dusk to advance and succeed. Whites and blacks are in cruise control.
cooper
April 2, 2006 at 9:42 pm
29For those who follw and admire Get Your War On, page 53 is up.
http://www.mnftiu.cc/mnftiu.cc/war53.html
nigel
April 2, 2006 at 11:41 pm
30And pull up your pants.
nigel
April 3, 2006 at 12:08 am
31But seriously, here’s one issue that I kind of agree with W on, and I hope to god he doesnt’ fuck it up, ’cause these kids if we let em stay in school and don’t kill or deport ‘em, are going to pay my social security someday…
By the way, and this may seem crass or worse, do all second generation citizens of Texas named “Gonzales” speak with such a pronounced drawl? I find it vaguely disturbing, but am prepared to be educated.
“Poor New Mexico, so far from heaven, so close to Texas!” –Manual Armijo, 1841
nigel
April 3, 2006 at 12:17 am
32“Ah, Dennis Miller– the satirist whose grasp of foreign policy is as strong and sure as a baby’s grip on a buttered anvil”.
Thanks for the link, Coop– good stuff.
siobhan
April 3, 2006 at 12:42 am
33Nigel, I loved that line too. Still my favorite semi-recent GYWO is the first on #52: “Christmas wish“.
waterfowler
April 3, 2006 at 12:46 am
34David, Eat ‘em Gators! or whatever y’all yell.
What are we called stuck between the boomers and Gen. X?
siobhan
April 3, 2006 at 9:54 am
35Fowler - “hosed”
cooper
April 3, 2006 at 10:18 am
36Fowler - “Bummers”. Quit bringin’ me down, man.
Sharon
April 3, 2006 at 10:36 am
37Nigel, all second-generation Texans speak with a pronounced drawl, it doesn’t matter what their surname is. Speaking Texan is sort of like a dominate gene–it swamps every other influence. Listen to Molly Ivins sometime, and she’s not even a Native-born Texan.
Murray
April 3, 2006 at 10:55 am
38Adam,
Even the Sopranos are getting into the act. Your publicist must be working overtime. In the middle of the show Hal Holbrook started talking about Schrödinger’s Cat. I missed the web link though.
Chuckles`
April 3, 2006 at 11:12 am
39Nigel, Sharon, et. al.
There are some places in Texas where the drawl is not that pronounced. Houston is actually one of them, considering it is the 4th largest city in the nation. Get outside the city and you have it. I don’t have much of a drawl myself (this is from people in Maryland who couldn’t believe I was from Texas), but I do still say “y’all.”
“Y’all have a good day, ya’hear!”
Harold
April 3, 2006 at 1:12 pm
40Waterfowler, according to the list in the Generation X article in the always-qustionable Wikipedia, if you were born between 1954 and 1965 you may fall into “Generation Jones”, between 1964 and 1984 you may be in something called the “Consciousness Revolution”, and between 1958 and 1968 you could be a “Baby Buster” - a term I always thought was an alternate name for “Generation X.” According to this article, it is the Busters who are the smallest and least demographically significant gneration. So you probably fall into several different overlapping named generations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_X
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_Busters
Ann
April 3, 2006 at 2:20 pm
41I love GYWO, but my favorite strip is the classic “second strip on the first page,” wherein our success in the War on Terror is compared to our success in the War on Drugs.
Also, ditto on “pull up your pants.” I know that every generation develops a style that shocks its elders, but maybe this is the first one that voluntarily subjected itself to such a mortifying admonition.
Stephen
April 3, 2006 at 3:00 pm
42Consciousness Revolution? It sounds good and everything but I don’t think alot of the guys I grew up with fit into that mold. I mean, I still remember the bottle rocket fights around the 4th of July!
YOB 1970.
Stephen
April 3, 2006 at 3:01 pm
43Oh and I lived in TX for 8 years. No drawl that I know of.
Steve
April 3, 2006 at 3:05 pm
44I have to confess that, even as one of the Boomers, who ostensibly Mattered, I’ve never understood what cutting class had to do with protest. Students, it would seem, are only hurting themselves by boycotting the classroom for the picket line. The teacher’s probably happy for the day off. The school, as mentioned elsewhere, is poorer for the lack of attendance, which directly affects the quality of education, again depriving the student.
It would seem that carefully crafted and sustained economic boycotts would have more effect.
Boycott the malls, the Wal*Marts, the purveyors of baggy jeans and hats designed to be worn backwards.
That would get someone’s attention in a hurry.
waterfowler
April 3, 2006 at 3:47 pm
45Stephen, sorry ’bout that bottle rocket.
As far as the drawl, when I hear my voice on tape, I think “Damn, I sound like I grew up w/ Larry the Cable Guy.”
Lee Smith
April 3, 2006 at 5:02 pm
46Waterfowler, Bless your heart!
Stephen
April 3, 2006 at 5:09 pm
47WF-
No problem, bro. Don’t even have the scar anymore.
I grew up in three southern states, FL, TX and MO. No accent at all that I can be proud of. Not fair, really.
Ann
April 3, 2006 at 5:21 pm
48And remember, Larry grew up in Nebraska. His accent is no more authentic than Dubya’s.
Murray
April 3, 2006 at 7:53 pm
49Ann you’re right, they are both full of shit.
nigel
April 3, 2006 at 10:47 pm
50Thanks for the info. I haven’t been much past El Paso, which is more West than South, I guess. I’ll have to revert to the usual reasons for finding Alberto disturbing.
waterfowler
April 4, 2006 at 2:02 am
51Aunt Lee, is that you?
Siobhan, why “hosed”?
Murray, your dirge…nevermind…
Harold
April 4, 2006 at 7:15 am
52Waterfowler, I think one of the reasons why you’re part of “Generation Hosed” is because of the strain the geriatric Boomers will put on the Social Security and Medicare systems (and other social services systems) before you are eligible for or in need of them. By the time you and I hit our 80’s, there won’t be anything left in the pot for us. Maybe it’s a good thing that we’re less likely to spend our last years alone in a diaper filled with our own filth in some nursing home somewhere, and far more likely to have tasted the sweet, sweet kiss of death from government-sponsored euthanasia.
That is, if our majority-geriatric nation even makes it past, say, 2030 without being invaded by a country with a far larger number of young, hale and hearty soldiers - which by then could be, say, Costa Rica or Monaco.
Boomer
April 4, 2006 at 7:30 am
53Murray/Waterfowler - “By the time you and I hit our 80’s, there won’t be anything left in the pot for us.” At least you’ll have a pot you can piss in. Of course, it may take you 3 hours, but that’s something, anyway. Bwaa! Haa! Haa!
Boomer
April 4, 2006 at 7:34 am
54Oops! Harold/Waterfowler.
BTW, don’t think of us as your enemy. Think of us more like a plague of locusts, eating everything in its way! Yeah, that’s more appropriate.
Harold
April 4, 2006 at 10:14 am
55You Boomers just try to stay healthy and muscular into your eighties. After you’ve consumed all available resources, you may be a vital source of protein for us younger generations.
siobhan
April 4, 2006 at 1:31 pm
56What really sucks is: born in 1960, I’m considered part of the boomer generation and thus fair game for all who loathe the boomers, but I’m late enough that I’ll be sucking the hind teat on SocSec and Medicare. If I retire before I’m 80, it will be a miracle.
Maximum Bob
April 4, 2006 at 2:59 pm
57Soylent Green is…boomers!
Harold, by the time we’re 80, we’re gonna be pretty tough eating. Take care of your teeth.
siobhan
April 4, 2006 at 3:10 pm
58Max Bob, that’s why the marketers are expending so much effort to get young people hooked on sodas.
David
April 4, 2006 at 4:04 pm
59Waterfowler,
We yell Gator Bait (among other things…) The UCLA Bruins definitely were this time around. I’m still absorbing how totally we dominated that game. Those come around once in a lifetime. I don’t think UCLA believed we could stay with them. Only problem now is that everyone will be looking to pound the @#%& out of us next year. Ah, well. Kill, eat, sleep, and bellow at mating time…
David
April 5, 2006 at 9:40 am
60Correction:
Swim, kill, eat, sleep, and bellow in a mud wallow during mating season.