You may have noticed that things are getting a little crowded in the comments section lately. This is good. There are two reasons.
1) We’ve got more visitors than ever before. Welcome to you, new readers, and may the road rise to meet you. And may it thereafter sink a bit so that you’re not walking uphill the whole way. [Honestly, I never understood that old Irish blessing. Fortunate people in Ireland must have great calf muscles.]
2) There are a few more conservatives around, stirring things up a bit. Welcome to you, conservatives. May the road… be slightly downhill and well-paved in front of you, allowing you to get at least 3 or 4 miles per gallon out the behemoths you drive.
Seriously: Welcome. [And welcome back to Jerry the Conservatroll] With so much activity around here, though, I just want to go over the ground-rules. And because I’m a liberal, when I say “ground-rules,” I mean “loose, reasonable, but rarely enforced guidelines that rely on collective goodwill to succeed.”
- Keep it Friendly. There is a place you can go if you want to scream and type insults at people who do not believe exactly as you do. It’s a place I like to call “the rest of the internet.”
Okay, that’s not completely fair, but if you cruise the politically-oriented, comment-takin’ web, it’s not so far from the truth. Most sites have a core of true believers who maintain a fairly constant stream of anti-theotherguy invective. Occasionally, representatives from the Other Side will appear as “trolls,” usually for the sole purpose of making people angry and causing them to plunge into a frenzy of insult-ridden troll-denunciation. That’s exactly what happens too, even on the occasions when that’s not the troll’s intent.
Those sites (the “rest of the internet”) have their uses: Community, expression, the sharing of resources and information. This place is a little different. Call me an elitist if you want, but- … No, just call me an elitist.
- Keep it Somewhat On-Topic. This is tough. I really don’t mind digressions. In fact, that reminds me of a story…
No, what I mind is this: If you find yourself digressing towards a certain pet topic a whole lot, I’d like to to think about that. There are few topics that don’t get covered around here over the course of a month, and your pet subjects WILL get their moments in the sun. But if you’re taking something I posted about last night’s episode of “According to Jim,” to be your opportunity to start a discussion about Iraq or abortion or health care or evolution or Jesus… then that’s a sign that you’d ought to chill out and refocus.
Okay, maybe “evolution” would be an appropriate topic for an “According to Jim” discussion. I’m pretty sure the show is a fairly cogent argument against both evolution and Intelligent Design.
- Watch Yo’ Ass. Sorry to wax all early-70’s blaxploitation on you, but that’s how I feel. Comments are like email - one of mankind’s most poorly-understood methods of communication. If somebody’s insulting you, read it over a few times to make sure that they’re really insulting you. If you are replying in a fury of righteous indignation, read it over a few times before you post it to make sure it’s what you really want to say.
In general, feel free to call George Bush or Howard Dean or Jim Belushi an “idiot” or an “ignoramus” or a “puppykiller.” But don’t use those epithets on someone whose post you are responding to. Not because I’m all about peace and love and just want us all to buy a farmhouse somewhere and live in perfect harmony together in an environment where we all eat healthy foods and allow our body hair to grow unchecked.
No, I for one believe that God (or the Celestial Lobster) gave us Doritos and Gillette Sensors for a reason. I ask you not to type an insult at a fellow-commenter only because it gets us absolutely nowhere.
People who say things that offend you often aren’t trying to offend you. And as such, it makes a lot more sense to let ‘em know without the use of words like “moron” or “shithead” or “asshat” [though I’ve always had a soft spot for that last one]. People who are consistently insulting have never lasted around here. And I’ve never had to kick anyone off. It just works. Trust me. It’s my place.
-Don’t Watch Yo’ Ass. Yeah, I know. But what I mean is this: As long as you’re not tearing down someone else around here or obsessively leading us back to your pet topic, say whatever the hell you want. That’s what makes this site so entertaining to me, and that’s why I’ve maintained it over these past four and a half years. We’re all adults here (or at least I’m obligated to assume that’s the case for legal reasons). Say what you want, and if it rubs someone the wrong way they’ll tell you so without calling you an “asshat” and you can choose to retract what you said or not and the world will keep turning and this site will remain as cool as it’s been for all these years.
Whew! There you go. Happy Presidents’ Day, you magnificent bastards.





77 comments
Siobhan
February 20, 2006 at 5:16 pm
1Thanks Adam. That’s really much nicer than sending us all to our corners.
Stephen
February 20, 2006 at 5:36 pm
2Thanks for a run down on the rules. As one of the new conservatives, albeit not a republican, and a driver of a small car, I’m happy to be here. I’ll try to stay out of “time out”.
historyenne
February 20, 2006 at 5:39 pm
3There’s only one “o” in “consistency” Adam. You might want to employ the two-hour rule. And thanks: One of the reasons I read this blog and ignore the others is because of the high quality of the disagreement that occurs in the Comments. I like to observe the debate, even if I don’t often participate in it. Jerry the Conservatroll, I’ve been wondering where you’d gone–nice to read you again. And now I can’t think of a good way to wrap up this post, so I’ll just say goodbye. Goodbye.
Pete IVDL
February 20, 2006 at 5:55 pm
4If this were a film, and Adam was Ernest Borgnine, then this would be the point when the camera zoomed in on the loveable-but-sheepish crew, all of whom would be shuffling their feet and not meeting the gaps in Adam’s teeth.
But it isn’t, and he isn’t (at least, I can’t see any dental gaps in the “Trust Me” picture), but I guess I should be.
Thanks, -sob- big guy!
P.S. Is it only 4.5 years? It seems much longer than that…
David
February 20, 2006 at 6:21 pm
5‘Kay.
cooper
February 20, 2006 at 6:38 pm
6Adam, “May the road rise to meet you…” is a well known Irish blessing. My grandma Joyce used to do a parody of it in her Bostonian corrupted Irish accent, which I remember hearing as a child. I remember, also, laughing my ass off to hear a normally very formal, college educated lady, use such earthy language. I don’t recall the verses, it was much too long ago. Hey, Ann maybe you can get Billy to recite the current variation! He seems to be so smitten by you.
Here’s the original. http://www.links2love.com/poetry_91.htm
Brent
February 20, 2006 at 6:43 pm
7It is president’s day. Not presidents’. The official holiday is President Washington’s Birthday.
b.
Sharon
February 20, 2006 at 6:51 pm
8So, would it be off-topic if I were to mention the most recent insanity of permitting Dubai Ports World, a state-owned business in the United Arab Emirates, to purchase Peninsular and Oriental, which runs major commercial operations in ports in New Jersey, New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami, and Philadelphia? Oh, but A.G. Gonzales says not to worry, because the deal was approved by the “normal review process.” I am SO relieved!
yllama
February 20, 2006 at 6:51 pm
9Why you down on Jim Belushi? What’d he ever do to you? Oh, right. K-9.
RRRRyan
February 20, 2006 at 6:55 pm
10[SMACK] - I have slapped my own hand quite hard and will be wearing camel hair for 7 days. Can I please stay? My pet topics are abortion, Jesus, and Al Gore. I repent of my topic monopoly and will give back Park Place if I can stay in the game. I’m keeping Bushwalk though… I mean Boardwalk.
The torture stuff has been on topic though, hasn’t it? Well I didn’t start it anyway. Just please stop calling me names!
What is an asshat anyway? Does that mean… oh… I think I get it. If someone’s an asshat than the next logical question is who is wearing it? I mean an ass isn’t a hat unless it’s worn right?
Before I get a buncha ridicule ass is in the bible and I’m allowed to say it if I want. So there.
RRRRyan
February 20, 2006 at 6:56 pm
11Sharon I agree. Insane.
not that Pete
February 20, 2006 at 7:05 pm
12Great. Just great. What am I supposed to do with the big farmhouse now? I was just getting through that awkward phase with the beard too. Anyone know where I can unload a 100lb. sack of preservative-free granola?
RRRRyan
February 20, 2006 at 7:07 pm
13use it to bait some cute fuzzy thing and we’ll have ourselves a hunting trip!
cooper
February 20, 2006 at 7:29 pm
14Brent, actually you’re sort of right. It is President’s Day, but it honors both Washington’s and Lincoln’s birthday. http://www.patriotism.org/presidents_day/
Hanna
February 20, 2006 at 7:34 pm
15What I wanna know most is what is so horrible about the port-guarding job that Haliburton didn’t even want it?
Too much liability if something goes wrong? I guess the U.A.E.-owned company figured they’d be blamed anyway if something went wrong, so they might as well cash in while they can.
Love,
Hanna
cooper
February 20, 2006 at 7:40 pm
16Okay, here’s one of my all-time favorite Irish Blessings, given often in the Joyce household, in lieu of Grace:
May those that love us, love us;
And those that don’t love us,
may God turn their hearts.
If he can’t turn their hearts,
then may he turn their ankles,
so we’ll know them by their limp.
Amen
Doug
February 20, 2006 at 7:52 pm
17Sorry to wax all early-70’s blaxploitation on you, but that’s how I feel.
I sometimes develop a waxy feel too. For me, it’s the shaving that causes it.
Comments are like email - one of mankind’s most poorly-understood methods of communication.
I’m not sure I follow…
hedera
February 20, 2006 at 8:03 pm
18Since we’re doing Irish sayings, I’d like to offer a toast attributed to my Irish grandmother:
Here’s to you, as good as you are,
And here’s to me, as bad as I am,
And as good as you are, and as bad as I am,
I’m as good as you are, as bad as I am.
It has kind of a swing if you say it fast.
On the subject of port management, we can hardly complain that Dubai Ports World has ousted a good patriotic Amurrican firm. The six ports in question were previously managed by Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., a firm based in London; the Dubai firm simply bought them out (including, apparently, their port management contracts). England had enough (presumably) Islamic wackos to bomb the Underground pretty well, but apparently we weren’t worried that any of them would get jobs with Peninsular and Oriental (what a great company name, by the way).
The days when American ports were managed by and for Americans are gone for good. I’m not an expert but offhand I can only think of one cruise ship firm that flies the American flag (Cruise West of Alaska); all the others fly foreign flags so they don’t have to meet our safety and labor standards. And AFAIK all the merchant shipping now flies foreign flags… We need to get used to this and just make sure the management contracts are properly negotiated for security. Unfortunately we have no evidence that Mr. Chertoff is capable of doing so.
hedera
February 20, 2006 at 8:04 pm
19The Irish toast has only 4 lines; there should have been another blank line there…
… and if you find you can’t say it fast, it’s probably time to quit drinking.
David
February 20, 2006 at 8:08 pm
20If the UAE is understood as a business district for international financiers, and if the administration and/or friends and/or the Carlisle Group gets at least an enabler’s fee, it makes perfectly good sense. If the UAE is understood as a separate nation with its own agenda, it makes no sense whatsoever.
David
February 20, 2006 at 8:09 pm
21Oh, yeah, I meant the ports job, not Adam’s lead-in.
Murray
February 20, 2006 at 8:34 pm
22The Competitor’s Blessing as recited on “The Smart Person’s Guide to Mountain Biking” DVD (which Adam has a copy of so I may need to look into copyright issues)
“May the road rise up to meet your wheel,
May the wind lift the sweat from your brow,
May the sun kiss your forehead,
And may your wheels and the road become one.”
(In other words, may you always be riding up hill, into the wind, while getting heat stroke with flat tires.)
Hey Sharon, it pisses me off too. I mean why shouldn’t Grouseland’s Port Terrorist Finding and Mountain Biking Division get the contract. We can screw it up as well as any other contractor, while making obscene amounts of money. I can even be the low bidder and save the US money. They can pay me millions less to do nothing, than they pay the others, to do nothing. And if things go really, really wrong, I get the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Why are they outsourcing this when American grown incompetence is here for the asking?
dee
February 20, 2006 at 9:10 pm
23Oooooh I love it when he gets stern.
Chuggo
February 20, 2006 at 9:58 pm
24Sing with me….
All you need is love! La ta, da da da da…
That’s always worked for me, sort of…
Deborah
February 20, 2006 at 10:24 pm
25“And as such, it makes a lot more sense to let ‘em know without the use of words like “moron” or “shithead” or “asshat” [though I’ve always had a soft spot for that last one].”
“Dickhead!” is the exclamation that springs unbidden to my lips as yet another car trys to run me down in the crosswalk, just as it has since the mid-70s. Lately if find it has a whole new resonance, however.
ice weasel
February 20, 2006 at 11:44 pm
26Damn Adam, wouldn’t an email have been a little more, well, subtle…
Just sayin’
siobhan
February 21, 2006 at 12:12 am
27But he did send an email… remember, it said “now don’t worry, I’m not directing this to you”. Oh, wait that must mean… um, never mind.
SeattleDan
February 21, 2006 at 12:33 am
28I hope I’ve not offended anyone with anything I’ve posted in a personal way. The only person who might think that would be cooper,over the very important and totally relevant topics of the Seahawks (sigh) and Ernest Borgnine (he who was married to Ethel Merman for about three days). And I apologize if I offended coop.
I actually look forward to his posts, as I do for most of you,as it is obvious to me that there are some very smart and funny people here and I enjoy your company.
ice weasel
February 21, 2006 at 12:40 am
29Oh siobhan, he always liked you better anyway…
I thought I was keeping it light and friendly. Man, you should see me when I’m pissed.
Siobhan
February 21, 2006 at 12:49 am
30Well, I’ve seen that picture at the top of WeaselDen. ‘Course them weasels look pretty pissed, too.
(not just light and friendly; you were keeping it practical, too.)
Jerry (not Jerry the Conserva-troll...for the new-comerswe worked this out earlier)
February 21, 2006 at 1:01 am
31Adam - roger willco…as long as the ignorant puppy-killing idiots don’t get out of line.
David
February 21, 2006 at 1:26 am
32Oh, heck, on a good day port security is a feces shoot. “Oh, it’s one, two, three, what are we worryin’ for? They don’t give a damn, next stop is Rotterdam…” But I do like this issue getting attention. Worth having people be aware of our brave new world. I would like Grouseland, Ltd., to at least have a shot at the Port of Elizabeth, anyway. Who has the Port of Philadelphia? I have a nifty oil of the P.o.P. my dad’s aunt painted about 50 years ago.
hedera
February 21, 2006 at 1:44 am
33I always liked the character in one of my endless detective stories, who (in objecting to the use of crude language; this was written around 1933, I think) claimed that she could call the most unpleasant person she knew a “leering cockroach”, with better effect on the whole than she would have gotten with profanity or obscenity.
Ice, if Adam tried to send an email to this entire list, he’d look like a spammer, and his ISP would speak harshly to him…
waterfowler
February 21, 2006 at 1:54 am
34Asshat, “can’t we all just get along?”…
kevin
February 21, 2006 at 2:14 am
35Did Adam just call us all “bastards”?
What happened to “keep it friendly”?
Redshift
February 21, 2006 at 2:40 am
36He called us magnificent bastards. That’s a compliment, son.
Dave
February 21, 2006 at 3:14 am
37Just to clarify Cooper’s Point:http://www.snopes.com/holidays/presidents/presidents.asp
cooper
February 21, 2006 at 8:34 am
38You mean you guys DIDN’T get an email from Adam? Hmmm… Okay, I’m sorry for being such an opinionated butthead. I’ll try to dial it down in the future.
hedera, “leering cockroach”? Well, I like the image, but sorry, I’m more of the Mark Twain school of thought. “Under certain circumstances, profanity provides a relief denied even to prayer.” Amen, brother, amen.
tim
February 21, 2006 at 8:43 am
39President(’s’) (Washington’s Birth) day is such a great holiday. It basically means anything you want it to mean. What it means for me is a) I don’t get it off, so it’s mostly just another Monday, and b) it’s the day I prostrate myself before the elaborate shrine I keep in my basement to Millard Fillmore. All hail to the Know Nothing Party!
I think an asshat is kind of like a cross between a tam-o-shanter and a balaclava. With an anus.
cooper
February 21, 2006 at 9:03 am
40SeattleDan, w’at you talkin’ ’bout, boy? We’re cool, never a problem. I’m betting Ms. Merman won the shouting matches with Ernest.
Mary
February 21, 2006 at 10:05 am
41Adam, that “magnificent bastards” statement…..back at ya buddy ;-D
From now on we will all follow the WWMED rule: What Would Miss Edith Do?
Old Mother Felber
February 21, 2006 at 10:59 am
42Well, Mary, I don’t know about other Ediths, but this Mz Edith would not have been so kind as Adam has been.
Trangressed, have you? Ho, she said hollowly. It would be back to your rooms, no dessert, and no playng outside after dinner. And of course, no TV.
There would be harsh looks even after you got out of your room, interspersed with long weary sighs, all of which translated to: “what did I do to deserve you?”
And talk about how she should have raised German Shepherds instead, because they are so much more obedient, charming, and intelligent.
Guilt is mightier than the sword!
artist-NW
February 21, 2006 at 11:08 am
43First time posting, but I’ve been reading for over a year. Really, really glad to see the guidelines since some of the comments were getting a little testy and beginning to look like, well…the rest of the internet. I lurk here for the quality of the invective, er I mean, humor and thoughtfulness.
On the subject of managing ports and international shipping, there is a book, The Outlaw Sea : A World of Freedom, Chaos, and Crime by William Langewiesche that lays out just why this latest take-over by Dubai Ports World should concern us all. The main point of the book is that shipping firms operate like worlds unto themselves and that no country or government has any oversight. Bush Flag of Convenience anyone?
jerry-the-conservatroll
February 21, 2006 at 11:10 am
44Wow, a specific mention! Can my birthday have been any better?! I THINK NOT!
Murray
February 21, 2006 at 12:21 pm
45jerry-tct,
Is it your birthday too? (Not me, my wife Jane, who hits her second half century), oooh maybe she wouldn’t want that mentioned.
RRRRyan
February 21, 2006 at 12:53 pm
46Wow, Murray I wouldn’t have pegged you for a gold. If I had known I would have ended my responses with sir.
Chuggo
February 21, 2006 at 1:31 pm
47I’ve heard the following twice in the last week, so it must have been meant for me. (paraphrased)
Mark Twain: It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid, then to open it and remove all doubt.
Now I’m not saying that applies to any particular person…I’m just sayin’….
Siobhan
February 21, 2006 at 1:33 pm
48Chuggo, you were listening to The Puzzlemaster, too?
Auros
February 21, 2006 at 2:10 pm
49If the road is rising as it “approaches” (i.e. it goes up in the direction facing you), you must be at the TOP of a hill, going down. So, it’s a wish that you may always feel as if you are travelling downhill.
Which, if you ask me, isn’t such a great thing either. Eventually, you get wet.
Auros
February 21, 2006 at 2:23 pm
50BTW, I wonder if this was partly a response to my calling one of the conservatives an ignoramus.
If a person is plainly ignorant of the facts — whether because they simply don’t bother to read or pay attention (even when offered links to reliable accounts), or because they’re willfully ignoring those sources to avoid the cognitive dissonance of accepting that they were — I don’t see how sugar-coating, for longer than it takes to offer them a chance to revise their views in light of evidence, that helps anyone. Saying that their views are “sincere” is a cop-out. I’m sure flat-earthers and ID advocates hold their views sincerely. But they’re in conflict with established fact.
Murray
February 21, 2006 at 2:23 pm
51Today’s party for Jane will be a private affair. We will celebrate it properly at the Fleberpalooza, when we have our friends around.
Auros
February 21, 2006 at 2:24 pm
52missing word: “accepting that they were wrong”
Mary
February 21, 2006 at 3:21 pm
53Mz. Edith-
I meant that we should consider what you would do before responding. Perhaps that should have been what you would do to us.
Agree with the statement about shepherds. They also don’t borrow the car keys
David
February 21, 2006 at 3:55 pm
54Hell’s bells, as my henna red English/Irish/Jewish/Cherokee mother loved to say (the Jewish and Cherokee were “incidental,” to be sure, but certainly added piquancy to the stew), I have to agree with Cooper about the value of swearing. There are times when nothing else suffices. I do restrict myself to hurling invectives only at people in positions of power, and then only because of the consequences of their exercise of power. Hence, while I would never call the private citizen Bush names, Bush as president deserves every invective ever hurled at him, something he and Cheney do with great regularity towards individuals they simply see as obstacles to asserting their will.
I assume the only constraint here is regarding calling another poster an idiot. I assume it is both ok and welcome for an idea to be called idiotic, preferably intelligently and in the most concise and engaging manner possible.
Murray
February 21, 2006 at 3:56 pm
55Auros
Whatever the definition of ignoramus, when used as an epithet, it’s derogatory.
To me there is a very significant difference between a troll and someone who is honestly challenging the arguments of others. If the person is ignorant of the facts then it is my duty to fill him in. Calling him a name doesn’t help. With a troll the facts are irrelevant. Actually the only thing important to a troll is my reaction, which if I deny him removes his satisfaction.
nick
February 21, 2006 at 4:36 pm
56My opinion on what lead to Adam’s post here is that in several of the past comments sections there were posts that included statements along the lines of, “[asshat], since you would like to pay less money in taxes, I am assuming that you also think God demands women stay at home” or, “[fucknuts] I am baffled that in your defence of the practice of recycling, you fail to explain why you support the murder of unborn babies”
One annoying thing about the polarization of debate in this country is that there are only two poles. If you express an opion that is associated with one pole, many assume you hold all other opinions associated with that pole AND that you hold these opinions as vehemently as the hardest-line fundamentals.
I think what Adam is saying is nice and good, and I agree that part of it is the nasty nature of internet-board response etiquette, but I think the underlying problem is the irrationally wide range of assumptions we make nowadays about a person’s beliefs on everything based on a certain line of argument on one topic. No one can agree on one topic because we have to bring in every other topic people disagree on. (You can support the homosexual agenda and domestic eavesdropping without a warrant.)
My pet plan is to have every partisan American take a survey course on Latin American history so they’ll all get so confused as to what the words liberal and conservative mean that the words will never be used again.
and in response to Deborah, I find “dickweed!” to be a much more satisfying exclamation to yell at misbehaving cars (though my aunt brings an alarming forcefullness to the simple, “buddy!”)
Julia
February 21, 2006 at 4:50 pm
57And I am simply grateful to Adam for teaching me a new vulgarity. My others are worn nearly to a nub. Somehow I’d not heard ‘asshat’ before; being in serious need of new words, I am delighted with this one. I always learn something at FA.
In keeping with the general tone, I swear - oops - never to swear at Fanny again, no matter how frustrating she may be.
[curtsey]
Julia
Siobhan
February 21, 2006 at 5:17 pm
58Just a few days too late, alas… Edinburgh Castle in SF just had a Swearing Festival this past weekend. Think of the vocabular additions!
Pete IVDL
February 21, 2006 at 5:44 pm
59Murray, Murray, Murray. “If the person is ignorant of the facts then it is my duty to fill him in.”. Your duty, FMB*? Depending on how you define “facts”, this could be construed as the core of evangelism. And let’s face it, with the modern confusion regarding the word “theory”, the word “fact” can mean a number of different things, but not a reality-based understanding of a scientifically proven actuality. I’m just sayin’…
Julia, as a pale, pasty-faced member of the Nerd tribe (and a massive SF fan), I’ve heard a number of reasonable and funny alternatives to traditional expletives: ‘Frack’ and ‘frell’ (for the more traditional f-word), ‘hezmata’ (if someone is so repressed that they can’t bring themselves to say “hell” (ooooooh, that’s where I’m going when I have my permanent holidays)), and ’smeg’ for doodoo (can’t remember what Farscape term was used for kaka - ‘yotz’?). Fun for all the family!
Kevin - the term ‘bastard’ is one of the highest (or lowest) compliments that an Aussie can call another human being. Yes, it’s contextual, but usually the spittle flying from the lips of the utterer is a good sign that the utteree is one of the bad kinds of bastard. That, and the fact that they’ve just screwed over the other person in the worst possible way… But then, ’screwed’ and ‘taken a reasonable opportunity to benefit from someone else’s misfortune’ are so… confusing for some people.
* Fellow Magnificent Bastard
ice weasel
February 21, 2006 at 5:52 pm
60Oh Siobhan, I miss the fish & chips at Edinburgh so much. Great place. I used to go down and hang out a lot.
Oh, and just to be a rebel, new swear word for this post:
fuckstick
Sharon
February 21, 2006 at 6:08 pm
61“Firefly” is another good resource for new and inventive invectives. Of course, most of them are in Chinese.
(another SF fan)
cooper
February 21, 2006 at 6:30 pm
62nick, I understand that when Edward R. Murrow would get in the face of some journalistic neophyte who was not pulling his weight and call him “Buster!”, that even crusty WWII survivors of the Bataan Death March would go into the fetal position.
siobhan, a Swearing Festival? Unbelievable.
Pete, as always, thanks for the heads up on Aussie etiquette.
DouglasG
February 21, 2006 at 6:33 pm
63But what if I am an “asshat”?
Ann
February 21, 2006 at 7:21 pm
64I just have to say—as a longtime SF fan (the genre and the channel)—that “frack” is ridiculously overused on “Battlestar Galactica.” The writers are like junior-high kids who can’t believe they’re getting away with cussing. And the constant shift from the expletive “My god” to “My gods” is just too contrived.
Asshat. I like it.
Julia
February 21, 2006 at 7:23 pm
65Pete, Billy Connolly had a few good false words if I recall - something like “gettifuh” and “baza” — which if run together and said loudly enough could impress … well, no one really, but they work…
Julia
cooper
February 21, 2006 at 8:07 pm
66As long as we’re defining “Asshat”, a picture is worth 1000 words… http://members.cox.net/dequosaek/fark/asshat-in-iraq.jpg
Murray
February 21, 2006 at 9:35 pm
67Coop, yup, that would be it.
David
February 21, 2006 at 10:04 pm
68Fuckstick - man, it’s been a while for that one. High school buddy referred to getting laid as getting his stick wet.
Magnificent bastards really is high praise for flawed but loveable folk. Miserable bastards was a colleague’s (chem prof) favorite phrase for whoever were the point people for the Reagan administration’s horrible idea of the week.
Jay
February 21, 2006 at 10:43 pm
69hedera (Post #18),
You are almost right. There are a couple of other U.S. flagged cruise lines operating small ships in Alaska, and one cruise line that operates large cruise ships in Hawaii using U.S. crews. In the freight world the only U.S. flagged ships left are those that operate strictly from U.S. port to U.S. port. Here in the Northwest that includes T.O.T.E. that runs liners from Tacoma to Alaska, Matson that runs container ships from various west coast ports to Hawaii, and the tankers that carry Alaska oil down to the lower 48. Not much left for U.S. merchant seaman which is why I am writing software for a living and not standing watch on a ship’s bridge. Deep sigh for a forlorn sailor.
Jay
Pete IVDL
February 22, 2006 at 6:26 pm
70Hmmm. Turns out Australia’s two major ports will also be taken over by the Dubai-based company as part of the P&O sellout. Oooooh. I’m scared.
One wonders, as one sips one’s jinnyntonnyx (as one does), how much of an expression against globalisation (sorry, Coop, “globalization”) this outcry is. Seems like all the small businesses in greater Asia and other developing countries who’ve suffered from the same problems are now looking at the US and asking “…and your problem is?”. For all the weeping and gnashing of teeth about the security concerns, big business is big business.
I’m sure that one day, as my molecules are dispersed by a nukular bomb imported by jihaadis allowed into the country by the lax security afforded by the new port management system, I’ll regret my advocating this devil, but for now I’m just enjoying the irony (as opposed to my potential “ion-y” ha ha ha).
cooper
February 22, 2006 at 7:18 pm
71Pete, you’re such a good and deserving student, it brings tears to my eyes. Here you go, mate, move to your place of honor at the front of the class. Here’s hoping the big blast never happens and you don’t wind up “ionically” inside someone else’s Gin & Tonic. Cheers!
Kerry Johnson
February 25, 2006 at 1:12 am
72“Asshat” was new to me (also). I googled it — worthwhile.
A friend of mine uses “ignoranus” for, you guessed it, a “stupid asshole”.
A few years ago I coined (to myself, at least) “jackhole”, which would be a combination of a jackass and an asshole.
TC.
Kerry Johnson
February 25, 2006 at 5:16 pm
73I just sent the information about the new word, “asshat” (also spelled “ashat”, I read on Google), to an email-list to which I belong.
In reply, someone wrote that in the music industry the term is “ASSCAP”. It took me awhile, but then I realized that that must be a joke — play on “ASCAP” (American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers).
Pete IVDL
February 27, 2006 at 8:14 pm
74It’s already started, coop - the other day, Fran asked me if I wanted my Shrödinger’s shirt “ioned”… badaboom!
David
March 1, 2006 at 12:25 pm
75Dear W,
Happy Bastard’s Day, Mr. Unitary President (pity unitary in this context has nothing whatsoever to do with those magnificent bastards, the Unitarians).
iva
April 16, 2006 at 10:18 pm
76Very cool template. I also agree, hey I am upside down or even right side up
. Make sure you keep this blog active.Thanks again my friend!.
work at home
April 19, 2006 at 7:35 am
77I really appreciate what you are trying to do with this Blog. Congratulations and keep up the good work!
Linda