From Mediapost.com:
Fox Returns To Late-Night, Counters ‘SNL’
FOX ANNOUNCED PLANS FOR A late-night talk show to air Saturday nights, the first step in what could be a full-fledged return to the late-night battlefield.
“Talk Show with Spike Feresten”–the working title–will launch this fall and air from midnight to 12:30 A.M., following MADtv. The show sounds more like “Saturday Night Live,” which it will compete against, than “The Tonight Show.” Fox says “Feresten” will mock the celebrity-host interviews that are a late-night staple, while guests will deliver the monologues and participate in comedy sketches a la “SNL.”
In picking Feresten as host, Fox is taking a page out of NBC’s book. Feresten is an acclaimed comedy writer, much as Conan O’Brien was when he was given a show by NBC in 1993.
I’m usually pretty secretive about my jobs, a tendency that has been described as “judicious” and “prudent” and “idiotic.” Okay, mostly “idiotic.” This is a self-promotion-based industry, after all….
Anyway - that, above, is my show.
Yes, that’s right, the job I told you so much about on my first day, back in September:
The job? All I can say at present is that it involves a major network, I’ll be writing and, I think, performing, and - should the network air it - it’ll be really, really funny. Beyond that, I’ll have to play it cool for now.
Today was my first day of work (after getting the job around dinnertime yesterday). Lots of nice people, but they made fun of my Hannity & Colmes lunchbox.
Yes, that one. Remember how incredibly candid I was about it a few weeks later?
Here’s what I can tell you about what I’ve been doing. It’s a new late night television show for a major network. We’re making six “test shows” which may or may not air. And it is, I think, bizarrely, ridiculously funny. Of course I’ll let you all know if the Gods of the Network decide to let this thing see the light of day.
So now, finally, I feel a little more comfortable talking about it. Let me give you the bad news and the good news…
The bad news is that this thing is on the fall schedule. Yep, you’ll be able to read my book before you’re able to see my show. Poor, poor you. And poor me - the fact that I’m starting on the show in half a year puts a serious crimp in my Hollywood hireability today. Feel free to offer me light yardwork in the coming months.
The good news is… well, it’s a groovy show. Spike Feresten, as you’ll see, is an instantly likable host. More importantly (to me), he’s an amazingly funny writer. During the course of making those 6 test shows, we put some incredibly stupid and unique things on camera while loosely following the format of a latenight talk show.
And it was the most fun I’ve ever had working in television. Sure, at one point I had to sit on the floor of a discount shoe store wearing nothing but a towel and a little shaving cream. Sure, I had to dress up like an old prospector one night, and get shot in the buttocks with a paintball on another… Sure. I’d do it all again. In fact, it seems likely that I will.
Will you like it? Definitely! Or else you’ll really, really hate it. At least you’ll get the chance to do one or the other this fall, when our tiny craft goes up against that legendary battleship, the S.S. SNL. In fact, I expect each and every one of you to do your part and watch us rather than them. That’s .3% of a Nielsen point right there! Take THAT, Admiral Michaels.





66 comments
norbizness
January 25, 2006 at 4:29 pm
1Adam: (1) Congratulations and (2) you call THIS edging?!? Do it again!
Also, take heart that The Sorrow and the Pity is significantly funnier than current SNL episodes.
Jon
January 25, 2006 at 4:52 pm
2I think you forgot the rest of the bad news. FOX!!?? Yikes.
Don
January 25, 2006 at 4:54 pm
3Are you going to (maybe) give me a reason to turn on my TV, Adam?
Could be …
Congratulations!
dee
January 25, 2006 at 4:57 pm
4You’re too fast, norbizness, although I was thinking “Triumph of the Will.” When seeking the comic effect you can never go wrong with Nazis.
Hey now that you’re working for Fox do you get to be Bill O’Reilly’s partner in the wheelbarrow race at the company picnic?
Dug Steen
January 25, 2006 at 5:20 pm
5I assume you’ll be reminding us of this again when it gets closer? I’m an American, Adam. My attention span doesn’t
madbard
January 25, 2006 at 5:29 pm
6congrats. but does this mean you won’t be on WWDTM much anymore?
Mad Kane
January 25, 2006 at 5:29 pm
7Wow! Congratulations! I’m looking forward to seeing your new show! And good luck with your book as well.
Harold
January 25, 2006 at 5:45 pm
8Huge congratulations, Adam! But why’d ya tell us NOW? I can’t wait until the Fall! I wanna see it right away! Maybe some Best Boy or Key Grip will secretly leak video onto the Internets in advance of the broadcast.
Doess this mean every time we slam FOX from now on, a few pennies will get deducted from your paycheck?
siobhan
January 25, 2006 at 7:20 pm
9Adam, it would be good if you could use the phenomenal pile of money they will be giving you to buy TVs (small ones are okay) for those of us without. If we can watch on our computers, then just go ahead and squander it freely.
SeattleDan
January 25, 2006 at 7:29 pm
10Many good wishes and congrats, Adam. At my advanced age,however,it is rare that even on a Saturday night, I’m up at 11:30. In your case I will make an exception. Remind me in September!
David
January 25, 2006 at 7:41 pm
11LIGHT yardwork? How are you with a big Poulan, Adam? There’s still some “brush clearing” from the three, count ‘em three, Hits by the Hand of God last year.
And as long as the Faux F**kers are still fair game, add two households to your Nielsen’s.
Congrats from everyone at the Green Swamp Connection. Hell, we might even invite Bigfoot in to watch your show.
Josh
January 25, 2006 at 7:44 pm
12Adam Felber working for the same conglomerate that brings you the Faux News Channel (also known as the Fox Propoganda Channel).
eep.
Doug
January 25, 2006 at 7:51 pm
13Congratulations, Adam, but… FOX?
I’ll watch every episode, of course, waiting patiently for you to move beyond this necessary stepping stone to your real destination!
Maximum Bob
January 25, 2006 at 8:08 pm
14Sure, Triumph of the Will was funnier than SNL. That part where Adolph and Eva meet cute? Better than anything Nora Ephron’s ever written.
And now the obligatory…
Fox? FOX? (Think Shatner in Star Trek II) FAAAAAAAAXX?
Murray
January 25, 2006 at 8:33 pm
15” wearing nothing but a towel and a little shaving cream. Sure, I had to dress up like an old prospector one night, and get shot in the buttocks with a paintball on another”
My God! Have you no shame? I set this up for your appearance at Felberpalooza and you make it part of your new show. Now I have to come up with all new degrad,,,um, humorous situations to please our crowd. (And THESE guys are your fans). *sigh* Does one of the scenes require you to wander around with dental floss casually hanging from your mouth?
Is this show live? When in the fall does it start? Do you have the situations set up already? Will this be like the Colbert Report, where Steve acts like O’Reilly (insane). Will you be like Rob Cordrey to Feresten’s Steward?
Just asking.
Now we are proud to know you for even one more reason.
Ann
January 25, 2006 at 8:37 pm
16Now let’s not forget that Fox brings (brought) us “Arrested Development,” as well as a couple of good animated shows. Maybe this is a trend.
Congratulations, Adam!
Murray
January 25, 2006 at 8:41 pm
17Having Adam on Fox is sort of like seeing your 16 year old daughter getting really involved in her new Gideon Bible.
OK, that analogy sucks, but you sort of know where I’m going.
Aww, screw it, if anyone can provide salvation for Fox it would be Adam. That’s good enough for me.
siobhan
January 25, 2006 at 8:44 pm
18If the Matt Groening has survived Fox all these years, I’m sure Adam can hold his own.
siobhan
January 25, 2006 at 8:45 pm
19Steve
January 25, 2006 at 9:18 pm
20Congratulations and good luck, Adam.
As others have said: Fox? Argh.
Ask Harry Shearer about dealing with the Dark Lord Rupert.
Make sure you get paid in advance. Cash or gold bullion are your best bets.
Sharon
January 25, 2006 at 9:49 pm
21Adam,
I was at a biker bar last Saturday (not my usual hangout, but some friends of mine who are in a band were playing there) and the teevee was on some channel called “CMT”(?) Country Music ? There was some sort of “history of country music” program on. I could have sworn I saw your name…several times. Was that really you?
First radio, now television and book deals! I hope you’ll remember us little people when you hit the big time.
cooper
January 25, 2006 at 9:59 pm
22Adam, I’m with SeattleDan; if I can somehow stay awake to watch your show on Saturday nights, I’ll definitely be sleeping in the next day and may miss Sunday School and Worship Service, too. But, since I haven’t been going for almost 40 years now, it’s no biggie.
Network TV!!! Good for you, Bubbie! Of course, Susie will have to come up with another choice photo from the past to keep your head from getting too big. Maybe even the recent past; maybe that one of you wearing only a towel and a little shaving cream…
Adam Felber
January 25, 2006 at 10:46 pm
23For all you anti-FOX commenters:
“The Simpsons.” “The Family Guy.” “Arrested Development.” “Malcom in the Middle.”
Though I understand your trepidation, I feel pretty good about it, to be honest.
Plus, we took some pretty funny shots at Fox News, Bill O’Reilly, and even a certain overlord in our pilot, and nobody seemed to mind. Funny is funny is funny.
[Of course, starting tomorrow this blog will skew a little more conservative, but that’s just a contractual thing. You guys know where I really stand, right?]
David
January 25, 2006 at 11:52 pm
24Of course we do, Adam, of course we do. Did you have to sign a clause guaranteeing a tithe to the RNC?
Actually, it is pretty cool to think that His Rupiness’s network is going to bring Mother Felber’s boy Adam to the phosphor/plasma screen.
Skewing this blog to the right will be like trying to tack into a force 5. Good luck.
hedera
January 26, 2006 at 1:07 am
25Television? You expect me to turn on a television? I haven’t watched a television broadcast on an actual TV since 9/11/2001 (it was a VCR from the office conference room with a coat hanger rigged as an antenna), although I did watch one or two video clips of Hurricane Katrina on the Internet… That’s why I love WWDTM, it doesn’t involve the TV…
Siobhan
January 26, 2006 at 1:37 am
26So, for toiling in Murdochland, are you paid in Rupies?
ice weasel
January 26, 2006 at 1:41 am
27So Adam, if I bring one of my paintball guns to Felberpalooza can we…..naaaaah, I didn’t think we could.
Anyway, I’ll leave out the obligatory fox bashing. Congratulations getting a show anywhere. As if one demon tastes worse than another. At least you’re working and that’s a good thing. Anyway, now we can move forward with our secret plan to kneecap o’reilly right?
Oh shit.
So much for that secret.
I’m looking forward to the new Fanatical Apathy feature, “Those Fucking Liberals, What’s With Them Anyway” and I’m sure it will have nothing to do with whether or not those fox checks actually cash…
And once again, sincere congratulations. I look forward to actually using the fox channel on my TV for a change (at least for something other than the Simpson’s).
And by the way, I have this idea for a new feature, what books will the g.w. bush library include and will the library itself be the first presidential bookmobile (and it will be the first bookmobile to built on a Vespa scooter)?
waterfowler
January 26, 2006 at 6:38 am
28Congratulations Adam. Sign me up as a viewer. You know, this could be brutal if your lefties don’t approve.
I didn’t realize y’all had a certain dislike for O’Reilly. The wingnuts haven’t much love for him either.
Also, Adam’s not actually on the “wingnut” Fox. He’s on the one we hate. I can’t even stand to watch football on there because of the commercials and the fact that I have little rednecks to protect.
Ice, I’m looking forward to that new feature too.
cooper
January 26, 2006 at 7:58 am
29Siobhan, good one! Of course, the currency is now refered to as “Ruperts” by official edict (Congress said it was okay, part of the 9/11 abdication) in honor of the man behind the curtain.
Ice, not a Vespa, but a Segway (Insure the books!!!). Oh, and do make sure they are filed upside down on the shelves.
Fouler, Indietro sotto la roccia!!!
waterfowler
January 26, 2006 at 9:16 am
30Mordere mi, Coop.
Mary
January 26, 2006 at 10:28 am
31Sharon- I think you are refering to Kinky Friedman and the Texas Jew Boys. Friedman, Felber…yeah, they seem alike ;-D
cuz
January 26, 2006 at 10:56 am
32Congrats, Adam! Guess I’ll have to start coming home early.
Femme
January 26, 2006 at 11:41 am
33Ice,
Certainly the first book in Dumbya’s library has got to be “My Pet Goat,” which kept him enthralled as the Twin Towers crumbled. Then perhaps a copy of the bill of rights, with all the inconvenient, pesky bits blacked out.
DouglasG
January 26, 2006 at 11:55 am
34I’m shocked! I’m appauled! I’m nearly speachless! You mean to tell me, SNL is STILL on the air! Oh the horror! It hasn’t been funny since 1980! People still watch? I don’t know if I’ll recover from this astounding announcement…
Good luck Adam!
David
January 26, 2006 at 12:39 pm
35Waterfowler,
I’m assuming you know the origins of the term redneck, most of whom were New Deal Democrats until they no longer had to work in the sun for shit wages, in part because of the direct and indirect benefits over time of FDR’s policies. Are you raising your children as New Deal Democrats? Wow! Hats off to you, good buddy.
Pete IVDL
January 26, 2006 at 5:00 pm
36Congratufuckinlations, mate! Well done! Radio, blogosphere, print, and now the TELLY! Talk about renaysonce man - woohoo!
When do the DVD’s come out? And/or will Faux be considering additional alternative streaming options, like webcasts? Of course, by fall, everyone on the planet will own a video iPod, so I expect TSWSF eps will be available on Conservashare, the top-secret Halliburton-sponsored grass-roots file sharing service…
Julie
January 26, 2006 at 5:28 pm
37Congratulations, Adam! This is great news — FINALLY something funny will air on Saturday nights!! I’m so excited for you - and for America.
Sharon
January 26, 2006 at 10:19 pm
38hedera, I’m with you on the teevee thing. I had the cable cut sometime soon after the 2000 election fiasco. I couldn’t bear to see or hear Dumbya, and I still can’t. Evey once in a while I am subjected to his voice when I turn on the radio. {grumble} But for Adam….hmmm….well, maybe there will be a webcast available. That, I’d watch.
Mary, no it was not Kinky Friedman–he’s much older than Adam. The sound wasn’t on or, if it was, I couldn’t hear it over the music, but the text definitely said “Adam Felber”.
Mo Moskowitz
January 26, 2006 at 10:28 pm
39Adam, baby, Mazoltov!!! Listen, the drums of the jungle are beating, beating, beating and they’re saying, Felber’s got a network show!!! Good, good, good, good, GOOD! Forget about the 6 figure salary per show, the real money is in *Product Placement*!
Stay with me here - OK, opening scene, camera slowly pulls back revealing the cover of a Jewish Hero Corp, Vol 1, Comic Book (So there was only the one issue, I’ve got most of them! - in a warehouse in Encino - 22,674 copies), Spike comes into the room, picks it up and leafs through it saying things like “Cool!!!” or “Rad!!!” or “Oy!! That girl looks like Havka Finkelstein!!”. I don’t know; you’re the writer, come up with something here. Sell the product!!! Spike puts down the book strolls over the wall and admires the poster titled “Day in Tzfat”, a beautiful black and white print of two Hasidics walking up a long flight of concrete steps into a fog bank, yada, yada… Spike smiles to himself a wry smile of the knowing and says “Oh, yes, Tzfat!!!” (My brother-in-law’s first cousin, Danny Bloom, took that picture and I bought the rights to the first 500,000!!! Can’t you just smell the money?)
Adam, Edith didn’t raise a moyshe kapoyer. Put the product in the scene; pump the product, Badhkin; and flash our website at the bottom of the screen, in the opening credits and at the end (www.youwantchotkies.com). And I haven’t even gotten to the bathroom scene where all you have on is - now get this - a towel and a little shaving cream! You like? And prominently positioned around the sink… “Venus Envy Hair Spray”, “Levine’s Hair Fastener Heat Bags”, “Lady O’ Spain Self-Blinding Eye-Shadow with Magic Puncture Pencil”, and deported “Italian Napa-Gel Balls”. Adam, I have rights to them all, can you believe the luck? You write them in and ten… okay 9% IS YOURS!!
So? Get writing, Boytchik. I’ll see what else is out there. WE’RE GONNA MAKE A FORTUNE!!!
Happy Entrails
January 26, 2006 at 10:57 pm
40Sheesh. If Google didn’t back you up on this, I’d swear the whole thing was confabulationated. Spike Feresten, come on. Sounds like a pal of Gummy Binkman. (Was pleasantly surprised to see he’s written an episode of The Simpsons … even if it’s one involving Sideshow Bob). Fox comedy rocks!
cooper
January 26, 2006 at 11:40 pm
41Well, well, at least one Democrat is thinking about maybe growing some balls. http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/alito/index.html
hedera
January 27, 2006 at 2:00 am
42Yes, but two others have deserted the sinking ship, one of them Byrd of Virginia who should know better, dammit. Feinstein and Boxer both oppose the nomination but I don’t know if either will support a filibuster. We’ll have to see.
Harold
January 27, 2006 at 8:01 am
43Waterfowler, I was a little disappointed to hear you’re not planning on hauling ass all the way to PA for the Felberpalooza. But now that it sounds like Adam’s gonna be rubbing elbows with the conservative media elite at Fox, I’m thinking you guys on that side of the fence could have an alternative celebration of all things Felber - Texas style! How does the “Fel-Ber-Q” (or would that be “Fel-Ber-Cue”?) sound?
Sharon
January 27, 2006 at 10:49 am
44Exposing the fiction of “strict constructionism” for what it really is: the fast track away from a government of laws towards tyranny. Wish I’d written this:
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0125-21.htm
waterfowler
January 27, 2006 at 10:49 am
45I think that would be “Fel-Ber-Que”.
David
January 27, 2006 at 11:49 am
46Sharon,
Excellent article. I definitely share your sentiment as well.
Nathan
January 27, 2006 at 1:22 pm
47”wearing nothing but a towel and a little shaving cream. Sure, I had to dress up like an old prospector one night, and get shot in the buttocks with a paintball on another” — Is this where we get to watch the “hot sexy naked dwarves drowning in semen” that we’ve all been googling for these days?
tess
January 27, 2006 at 1:28 pm
48Well, if it’s funny that means that Fox’ll start moving the time slots around, never promote it, and then finally pre-empt it for sports coverage. I mean, they cancelled “Firefly,” “Wonderfalls,” “Arrested Development,” and “Futurama,” for crying out loud. The execs there tend to be more schizophrenic than a homeless guy in Berkeley.
hedera
January 27, 2006 at 2:25 pm
49Sharon, thanks for the reference, what a brilliant dissection of what this administration has been up to. Should be on the front page of every newspaper in the country, but unfortunately won’t be. As you said, oh, to have written this…
hedera
January 27, 2006 at 2:49 pm
50One more thought about strict constructionists: everyone assumes (and they may be right) that Samuel Alito is a running dog for the Imperial Presidency and will cheerfully vote to erode all the checks and balances built into the Constitution. I’m going from memory here, but those attitudes seem to stem from when he was trying to get a job with the Reagan administration; one or two judicial opinions he’s written have been closer to the strict constructionist line (look at his opinions on the Interstate Commerce clause).
What if it turns out he really is a strict constructionist, in Andrew Schmookler’s sense? Speculations that he might turn into a David Souter are I think unlikely; but based on his judicial record, he might possibly hew closer to the Constitutional line, in terms of checks and balances, than the current administration would be happy with.
His social policy rulings would still resemble something issued by Genghis Khan; but if he’ll support separation of powers, we might survive him.
waterfowler
January 27, 2006 at 3:21 pm
51…and they were so afraid, they ran screaming to the left, and they ran so far to the left, they found themselves Libertarians…and suddenly they realized that Waco and Ruby Ridge were not just wingnut fantasies…
Sharon
January 27, 2006 at 5:16 pm
52wf, I’m so far left that I can’t even see Ted Kennedy.
Here’s an interesting article on cosmology that one doesn’t usually expect to find on a political blog like DailyKos:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/1/27/7140/04722
Ann
January 27, 2006 at 6:34 pm
53WF,
No, Waco and Ruby Ridge weren’t fantasies. But I’m wondering why the people who support the Second Amendment so passionately are disturbingly silent regarding the Fourth.
When I was in law school, a private criminal defense attorney gave a talk in which he postulated that the greatest threat to our individual security was not criminals, but rather, the government. The government defines crimes, defines the burden of proof for crimes, defines the punishment for crimes, and administers the justice system. He regarded himself as an important shield against governmental abuse.
So I can sympathize with those who are just a little bit “paranoid” about the federal government—I just wonder why they aren’t screaming bloody murder now that the government has revealed that it’s perfectly willing to spy on citizens!
And it’s not a valid argument to point to the President’s stated intent (thwarting terrorism). Because that intent isn’t part of a law, it isn’t limiting. If Bush is allowed to spy on us without a law or a warrant, then there is no limit on any future president’s spying for any reason.
I’m sickened by those who write letters to the editor—whether in local newspapers or national magazines—volunteering to give up their Fourth Amendment rights simply because they have “nothing to hide” (and thereby suggesting that only the guilty need privacy). This is a deeply un-American attitude masking itself as patriotism and candor.
Oops! How did I get so far off topic? I blame Sharon (because of that link). Congratulations again, Adam!
David
January 27, 2006 at 7:39 pm
54Waterfowler,
One of the things neither I nor my liberal friends are is frightened. Pissed, appalled, disgusted, alarmed by a President who believes he is above the law and an NSA director who doesn’t even know what the Fourth Amendment says, let alone what it means, yes. But scurrying about like frightened chickens? Not even close.
For very centered courage, I offer the fearless Cindy Sheehan, along with the equally fearless hero from the past who is still alive and fighting the good cause, Daniel Ellsberg.
Sharon,
Fascinating Daily Kos article. Many thanks.
Like you, my redheaded sweetie and I are way to the left of Ted Kennedy. Both of us come from real redneck roots, and both of us, before we met each other, made that marvellous journey to the enlightened, reality-centered side of the political spectrum. The company is wonderful (but by no means our only friends - we’re Southerners to our bone marrow).
Emmarie
January 27, 2006 at 8:09 pm
55Congratulations Adam.
I save the political thoughts for another day.
waterfowler
January 27, 2006 at 8:53 pm
56Ann,
That’s my point, we couldn’t agree more. I just wish some of you lefties freaked out when it was another administration trampling our rights.
David, clueless sheehan?…and if you aren’t frightened, you should be.
cooper
January 27, 2006 at 11:46 pm
57Fouler, Нет. Нет. Сдержите меня.
David
January 28, 2006 at 12:16 am
58Waterfowler,
Clueless Sheehan is the best you can do? Clueless she ain’t. Have you read any of her articles? Now if you’d offered some reasoned disagreement with her, that would be one thing. But clueless? And no, I’m not so much frightened as enraged. There is a kind of determined fear of an adversary that is quite different from frightened, rather like soldiers in battle, and versus this lawless administration, that is where we are. But lots of people are raising hell at this point, which is good. And I’m definitely with the Libertarians on Iraq, personal liberty, medical marijuana, and freedom from Gross Bruder.
The Left-Wing Redneck with the loaded 12-gauge
Sharon
January 28, 2006 at 11:47 am
59Ann, I, too, went to law school, graduated about 9 years ago, but have never practiced. I used to work with people like the ones you describe. When the library and bookstore records provision of the USAPATRIOT Act (what a prime example of NewSpeak!) first came to light, they were the first to tell me they had no objection, since they had “nothing to hide”. I imagine they are telling themselves the same thing about the NSA wiretapping. “Un-American”, that’s a good way to describe it. It saddens me that otherwise well-educated, well-informed people somehow missed that point in Civics class.
David, I, too, am a recovering Southerner. I was born and raised in Texas, but I got out as soon as I reasonably could. I miss the geography of the southern Plains, but not the climate or the politics. My family is still there, as are several friends from way back since junior high school.
David
January 28, 2006 at 1:23 pm
60Sharon,
A recovered Southerner from Texas - you get to lay claim to Molly Ivins, Jim Hightower, Bill Moyers, Ronnie Earl, Willie Nelson, Whole Foods, and “Keep Austin weird.”
But the general political climate in the South is still essentially what it has been my whole life, which is really sad. The best we can muster is islands of enlightenment in a still primarily anti-intellectual, Bible-wielding region of generally good-hearted folks.
I think the political degeneration of the Bush family can be directly linked to the move to Midlands (the other unsavory aspects apparently go back much farther). Poppie’s moderate Republicanism could not survive the ersatz-cowboy oilman mentality. And it did no good to send Junior back Up East. The locoweed was just too powerful.
cooper
January 29, 2006 at 7:51 pm
61David, you left out Tommy Lee Jones and Jimmy Dale Gilmore from the Texas honor roll. Were you having a bad day?
David
January 30, 2006 at 12:10 am
62Mea culpa, Cooper, mea culpa. Two serious oversights.
Mary
January 30, 2006 at 10:09 am
63To quote Bart Simpson:”Everybody knows when you sign a contract with Fox you’re gonna get screwed.” Keep that in mind
Richard
January 30, 2006 at 10:12 am
64Belated congrats, Adam…but Fox? (We’re always behind with things here in the UK, even outbursts of incredulity). I hear they cancelled Malcolm in the Middle too, so I hope you’ve still some comedy brethren on the network by the time September comes around.
Murray
January 30, 2006 at 8:59 pm
65Even in PA, a blue state, you can’t avoid backward areas - like where I live. As they say, to the east is Philly, to the west Pittsburgh and in the middle is Alabama.
At least the scenery is beautiful.
David
January 30, 2006 at 9:39 pm
66So that’s why Joe Willy played for the Tide?