<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merry Christmas, Mr. O&#8217;Reilly&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/</link>
	<description>America's favorite blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12251</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12251</guid>
					<description>Murray,

That's good...

Linkmeister,

Confirming ghani's post, here's the word from my Swiss friend from Zurich (German-speaking Switzerland):

Linkmeister? 99.9% of Germans wouldn't have a clue what that is, lest alone
Linkmeisterin. nor do I. Does this have to do with computer links? 
In sports we don't hesitate to talk about a Weltmeisterin in case of a world
champion of the other sex and I think you can make a Meisterin out of any
Meister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murray,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s good&#8230;</p>
<p>Linkmeister,</p>
<p>Confirming ghani&#8217;s post, here&#8217;s the word from my Swiss friend from Zurich (German-speaking Switzerland):</p>
<p>Linkmeister? 99.9% of Germans wouldn&#8217;t have a clue what that is, lest alone<br />
Linkmeisterin. nor do I. Does this have to do with computer links?<br />
In sports we don&#8217;t hesitate to talk about a Weltmeisterin in case of a world<br />
champion of the other sex and I think you can make a Meisterin out of any<br />
Meister.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: waterfowler</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12199</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 04:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12199</guid>
					<description>sea sk...er...
ice weasel, I couldn't help it, the timing just seemed right. Thanks for the material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sea sk&#8230;er&#8230;<br />
ice weasel, I couldn&#8217;t help it, the timing just seemed right. Thanks for the material.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12180</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12180</guid>
					<description>David,
(What is Yuletide in Hawaiian?) I think it's "Lay your coconuts on my Tiki" or something equally sort of erotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
(What is Yuletide in Hawaiian?) I think it&#8217;s &#8220;Lay your coconuts on my Tiki&#8221; or something equally sort of erotic.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12179</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12179</guid>
					<description>Hedera,
Guns of August? My kids send me gift certificates for Christmas and I think I'll use one on this book.

David, THE great male name, with Adam being THE seminal name; at least Murray is a cross over name. (When I order camera stuff from those closed on Saturday places, they always perk up when I say my name is Murray). It is also a Scottish name (useful with a Scottish wife) and the last name of my dad's favorite seminary professor. (My parents were incredulous when I told them that most Murrays were Jewish). Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hedera,<br />
Guns of August? My kids send me gift certificates for Christmas and I think I&#8217;ll use one on this book.</p>
<p>David, THE great male name, with Adam being THE seminal name; at least Murray is a cross over name. (When I order camera stuff from those closed on Saturday places, they always perk up when I say my name is Murray). It is also a Scottish name (useful with a Scottish wife) and the last name of my dad&#8217;s favorite seminary professor. (My parents were incredulous when I told them that most Murrays were Jewish). Who knew?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12148</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12148</guid>
					<description>Linkmeister,

Yes, they did.  I'll send along your Yuletide wishes to them (what is Yuletide in Hawaiian?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linkmeister,</p>
<p>Yes, they did.  I&#8217;ll send along your Yuletide wishes to them (what is Yuletide in Hawaiian?)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12147</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 03:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12147</guid>
					<description>hedera,

Thanks.

Motherweary,

Wonderful, especially the exercise in etymology.
Room to run with Merry-begot...

That David - the Green Swamp Felbernaut (David is THE great male name, even if Adam is seminal).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hedera,</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Motherweary,</p>
<p>Wonderful, especially the exercise in etymology.<br />
Room to run with Merry-begot&#8230;</p>
<p>That David - the Green Swamp Felbernaut (David is THE great male name, even if Adam is seminal).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ice weasel</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12142</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 02:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12142</guid>
					<description>hedera, if you haven't read Tuchman's other works, I highly recommend them.  She was a brilliant historian with a fanatical eye for detail and sourcing.  They're all goo but "A Distant Mirror" and "March Of Folly" are my favorites.  "March Of Folly" being especially relevant these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hedera, if you haven&#8217;t read Tuchman&#8217;s other works, I highly recommend them.  She was a brilliant historian with a fanatical eye for detail and sourcing.  They&#8217;re all goo but &#8220;A Distant Mirror&#8221; and &#8220;March Of Folly&#8221; are my favorites.  &#8220;March Of Folly&#8221; being especially relevant these days.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jay</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12140</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12140</guid>
					<description>Motherweary,

Your comment about "strong smart flying ... girl reindeer" reminds me of one of my favorite movies, The Dark Crystal.  Among the Gelfings it is the females who have wings and can fly, and Kira, the female Gelfing seems to be smarter, more resouceful, and braver than the male who is supposedly the hero, but would never have completed his task with the female's assistance.  One of my cats is named in her honor.

Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motherweary,</p>
<p>Your comment about &#8220;strong smart flying &#8230; girl reindeer&#8221; reminds me of one of my favorite movies, The Dark Crystal.  Among the Gelfings it is the females who have wings and can fly, and Kira, the female Gelfing seems to be smarter, more resouceful, and braver than the male who is supposedly the hero, but would never have completed his task with the female&#8217;s assistance.  One of my cats is named in her honor.</p>
<p>Jay
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Motherweary</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12139</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12139</guid>
					<description>While we're talking about the War on Christmas (which we were, weren't we?) it has recently come to my attention that Santa's reindeer are all, well, not to put too fine a point on it, that is to say ... they are all girls. Females. Female women reindeer. Because male reindeer shed their antlers by this time of year but the females don't.

This plays merry hell with all that testosterone-driven North Pole stuff, doesn't it? I mean, there's Santa (male) and his elves (male) and Mrs. Clause (female, presumably, but out of the running) and a bunch of strong, smart, flying ... girl reindeer. What a blow to tradition! Females shouldn't be strong and smart and able to fly. It's just not right.

The truth is that years ago, we lefty pinkos packed those twelve reindeer (and Rudolph!) off to Sweden for sex-change operations. So the truth is that Santa makes his seasonal rounds courtesy of a bunch of transexual antlered ex-boy members of the species &lt;i&gt;Rangifer tarandus.&lt;/i&gt; 

Now then, anybody interested in the fact that "Merry Christmas" is a lewd suggestion? According to the &lt;a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=merry" rel="nofollow"&gt;Etymology Online Dictionary&lt;/a&gt;: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Merry-bout "an incident of sexual intercourse" was low slang from 1780. Merry-begot "illegitimate" (adj.), "bastard" (n.) is from 1785. &lt;/blockquote&gt; And this is the greeting that O'Reilley favors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re talking about the War on Christmas (which we were, weren&#8217;t we?) it has recently come to my attention that Santa&#8217;s reindeer are all, well, not to put too fine a point on it, that is to say &#8230; they are all girls. Females. Female women reindeer. Because male reindeer shed their antlers by this time of year but the females don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>This plays merry hell with all that testosterone-driven North Pole stuff, doesn&#8217;t it? I mean, there&#8217;s Santa (male) and his elves (male) and Mrs. Clause (female, presumably, but out of the running) and a bunch of strong, smart, flying &#8230; girl reindeer. What a blow to tradition! Females shouldn&#8217;t be strong and smart and able to fly. It&#8217;s just not right.</p>
<p>The truth is that years ago, we lefty pinkos packed those twelve reindeer (and Rudolph!) off to Sweden for sex-change operations. So the truth is that Santa makes his seasonal rounds courtesy of a bunch of transexual antlered ex-boy members of the species <i>Rangifer tarandus.</i> </p>
<p>Now then, anybody interested in the fact that &#8220;Merry Christmas&#8221; is a lewd suggestion? According to the <a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=merry" rel="nofollow">Etymology Online Dictionary</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>Merry-bout &#8220;an incident of sexual intercourse&#8221; was low slang from 1780. Merry-begot &#8220;illegitimate&#8221; (adj.), &#8220;bastard&#8221; (n.) is from 1785. </p></blockquote>
<p> And this is the greeting that O&#8217;Reilley favors?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hedera</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12135</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 23:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/12/24/merry-christmas-mr-oreilly/#comment-12135</guid>
					<description>Murray, on the subject of WWI:  last week I read Barbara Tuchman's brilliant &lt;i&gt;The Guns of August&lt;/i&gt;, which is the detailed account of how it actually started.  If you haven't read this, you really should do so:  the mental parallels (allowing for time and change) between Kaiser Wilhelm II and Dubya are absolutely terrifying, including:

1.  We're going to war because I want to, and because the French have dissed us.  (Very loose translation...)  They don't give us any respect!  (AFAIK from the evidence in the book, he made all this up from sheer paranoia.  Since he was a monarch, he didn't have to explain anything to Congress.)

2.  Nobody will object if we just roll the German army through (neutral) Belgium; after all, we have to do it in order to outflank France.  (They did object, of course... later in the war, WillieII was heard to complain that no one had &lt;i&gt;told&lt;/i&gt; him the British would actually fight to defend Belgium - except the guy he fired early on for saying that...)

3.  It'll all be over in 6-10 weeks.  (Because the Germans were brilliantly organized and no one was going to fight them.  And besides, that's as long as we can afford to have it run...)

Reading the whole thing, I was depressed by how little we seem to have learned in the intervening 95 years.  As usual, I agree with you fully that the money we spend on aid is niggling compared to what we could spend; further complicated by the fact that when the current administration says they'll earmark X billion dollars for good cause Y, they never somehow get around to &lt;i&gt;funding&lt;/i&gt; the X billion dollars.  (Check out "No Child Left Behind" and other unfunded disasters.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murray, on the subject of WWI:  last week I read Barbara Tuchman&#8217;s brilliant <i>The Guns of August</i>, which is the detailed account of how it actually started.  If you haven&#8217;t read this, you really should do so:  the mental parallels (allowing for time and change) between Kaiser Wilhelm II and Dubya are absolutely terrifying, including:</p>
<p>1.  We&#8217;re going to war because I want to, and because the French have dissed us.  (Very loose translation&#8230;)  They don&#8217;t give us any respect!  (AFAIK from the evidence in the book, he made all this up from sheer paranoia.  Since he was a monarch, he didn&#8217;t have to explain anything to Congress.)</p>
<p>2.  Nobody will object if we just roll the German army through (neutral) Belgium; after all, we have to do it in order to outflank France.  (They did object, of course&#8230; later in the war, WillieII was heard to complain that no one had <i>told</i> him the British would actually fight to defend Belgium - except the guy he fired early on for saying that&#8230;)</p>
<p>3.  It&#8217;ll all be over in 6-10 weeks.  (Because the Germans were brilliantly organized and no one was going to fight them.  And besides, that&#8217;s as long as we can afford to have it run&#8230;)</p>
<p>Reading the whole thing, I was depressed by how little we seem to have learned in the intervening 95 years.  As usual, I agree with you fully that the money we spend on aid is niggling compared to what we could spend; further complicated by the fact that when the current administration says they&#8217;ll earmark X billion dollars for good cause Y, they never somehow get around to <i>funding</i> the X billion dollars.  (Check out &#8220;No Child Left Behind&#8221; and other unfunded disasters.)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
