No, I’m not back yet. I just worked another 14 hour day, and it won’t let up ’til Friday.
Still, we have a new Supreme Court nominee, and it looks like she’s almost as qualified as my cat (Horatio has made several life-or-death decisions involving spiders and tiny rodents. It’s usually “death,” but you can tell he mulls it over). And Tom Delay has been wrongfully and spuriously indicted for the second time in a week. Look for a heartfelt and convincing “Evil Twin Defense.”
So with all that going on, I’m generously providing a forum for you to talk amongst yourselves. Me, I’ve gotta catch my 20 winks. The fate of several aggressively and unrepentantly silly comedy bits rests partially in my hands.





74 comments
Harold
October 4, 2005 at 7:21 am
1Anybody who makes the Far Right howl in unison can’t be ALL bad. At this moment my verdict is “Insufficient Data.” Which, for some people, means we should invade Iraq.
Doug
October 4, 2005 at 7:24 am
2Qualified? Where’s the proof that she knows ANYTHING AT ALL about Arabian horses?
dee
October 4, 2005 at 8:51 am
3Don’t worry, Adam. Lately the stuff just writes itself.
Tom M
October 4, 2005 at 9:40 am
4What makes me worry (for you guys. I’m not directly affected by whatever happens in your supreme court) is that apparently Dick Cheney rang the Rush Limbaugh radio show and told him “You’ll be proud of Harriet’s record, Rush. Trust me.”
Mary
October 4, 2005 at 10:19 am
5Tom- can it get any more surrealistic than when the Bush Admin starts snowing its supporters? These guys will lie to anyone!!!!!! (Kinda gives one a warm fuzzy to realize it isn’t just the left) Just he idea of Cheney saying “Trust me” is a laugh.
That said- Delay is so arrogant he can’t believe anyone would question him anything. I believe the man thinks he is more infallible than the Pope. I hope they fry his tukus.
As for Ms. Meirs, I fear this may be cronyism at its worst. Even more than Brownie was. Something about her links to the Bush family really gave me chills.
Pete IVDL
October 4, 2005 at 10:54 am
6Mmmmmm. Fried tukus. With infallible sauce. (And the guy must use some kinda hair tonic.
Wow, Rush Limbaugh must be in Heaven (Inc. LLC.). I know who he’ll be thinking of as he pounds the pickle under the sheets tonight. (Get that image out of your heads, I dare ya!)
Jeff
October 4, 2005 at 11:13 am
7I dunno - color me cautiously optimistic. I think that Bushie himself had a hand in this appointment, and that man can barely tie his own shoe laces. So I think that he may have really screwed his chances of having a comlete neo-facist majority.
Now if those old coots can hang in there at least until the Dems get the Senate back (in 2006 - Right?! Right?!). Maybe we should all just chant 4 more years - and mean the SC Justices - not Bushie.
Auros
October 4, 2005 at 1:00 pm
8The ‘wingers have not been howling “in unison”; some of the worst of them, in the theocratic wing, have expressed satisfaction with the pick. And given that the nitwit declared President Bush the “smartest man I know”, I think we can safely say that she’ll make Thomas look like an intellectual heavyweight. I am absolutely opposed. Confirming a Bush crony on the court would be a national embarrasment.
not that Pete
October 4, 2005 at 1:01 pm
9Geez Pete, I totally missed the no-bid government contract (that presumably went to Halliburton) for providing afterlife services… and I’m pretty sure you’ve earned a stint in Purgatory (Inc.) for sharing the Rush image.
Melina
October 4, 2005 at 1:07 pm
10Okay, okay…I know this is so “superficial” and has nothing to do with her possible (non) qualifications, but what is WITH the black circular eyeliner? It’s making her look like she’s practicing some sort of Halloween make-up. It just looks harsh…she needs a new haircut and soften the make-up a bit…just not a good look. The first thing I noticed when I clicked on my CNN, etc., links was that BLACK EYELINER.
Bob
October 4, 2005 at 2:14 pm
11If Senators approve someone whose qualifications are nonexistent, could we demand a law requiring that we get to choose their personal physicians in exactly the same way?
Who would I choose for Frist’s physician? All I can say is, it’s a damned shame Bob Denver died.
Mr_Blog
October 4, 2005 at 2:49 pm
12Miers (and Brownie and Safavian and Just Say Julie Myers and Scott Gottlieb and Norris Alderson DVM…) is qualified for the same reason that Dubya believes Vladimir Putin has a good sould and Rafael Palmeiro didn’t lie to Congress– the Gut Instinct Style of Presidential Decisionmaking.
Did anyone else catch the thing this morning where Bush mentioned being proud of his time as “commander in chief of the Texas National Guard”? I nearly fell off my bicycle.
tess
October 4, 2005 at 3:22 pm
13Well, he is in a sense, though his mention of the Texas National Guard’s a little inopportune . . . then again, most of our fellow citizens have the memory of a fruitcake soaked in rum, so I wouldn’t put it past them to have forgotten his little “catch me if you can” act during the 70s.
Matt
October 4, 2005 at 3:23 pm
14Well, whoever was out of the room at the time got elected to be “commander-in-chief”. Happens a lot in committees–you get assigned if you’re not there. Since dubya was AWOL, the other Defenders of Texas chose him . . .
and he did a good job. He kept the Viet Cong out of El Paso.
Harold
October 4, 2005 at 3:40 pm
15Mmmm, rum.
Yeah, didn’t he use the same “I know her heart” formulation for Miers that he used for Putin? On the other hand, maybe he DID know Putin’s heart. That ex-KGB autocrat seem to be Bush’s idea of a model leader.
The “national embarrassment” is the fact that we failed to keep this jackass out of the White House not once, but TWICE. Bush cronies being confirmed to the court is just a consequence of that failure.
Murray
October 4, 2005 at 6:21 pm
16Great, just great. Now we get one more Bushie whose only qualification is loyalty to W.
Competence? Hell, that’s for those reality based folks.
cooper
October 4, 2005 at 11:08 pm
17Pete, your mental image of Rush’s after hour proclivities has set back my therapy at least fifteen fortnights. I thought that Rush’s drug load had put the kibosh on that sort of activity.
Mr. Blog, I also thought the line about “the commander in chief of the Texas National Guard” was particularly choice. I thought I heard him call Ms. Meirs “Harry” today. Must be her Bushie nickname.
Auros, if Harriet Meirs claims that Bush is the smartest man she knows, well that would sure explain why she never married.
ginny
October 4, 2005 at 11:47 pm
18That would make the item I read earlier today about Miers’ being W’s “work wife” after Condi’s promotion even more spectacularly inappropriate.
Linkmeister
October 5, 2005 at 1:46 am
19Billmon has some amusing thoughts about Rush (aka The Great White Whale).
Doug
October 5, 2005 at 7:22 am
20Mmmmmm, whale.
The lack of concrete information on Harriet Meirs is leading us into another “faith-based confirmation hearing.”
But while the wingnuts are apparently relying on divination and scrying to determine her judicial philosophy, there exists a more objective measure that I’d like to put forward for the rest of us: anagramming.
To start with, “Harriet Meirs” may be rearranged into “Sierra Hermit,” indicating her views on environmental issues are far outside the mainstream.
Another permutation is “Trim Her Raise,” a shockingly backwards take on the equal pay issue.
(Or is that perhaps “Raise Her Trim”? That sounds nautical, but I’m no sailor; I’ll defer to anyone in the boat-based community for interpretation.)
I don’t have time to do a full assessment of her judicial philosophy this morning, but you get the idea.
Jim
October 5, 2005 at 1:01 pm
21Murray:
Competence is for reality based folks? You must be talking about actual reality, not the reality based television type of reality.
Wait; that might be the answer! We could abolish the federal debt with the income generated by a new reality series set in the federal government. We could call it something like “That’s my Bush.” Oh…nevermind. It’s been tried, and the show was “cancelled.”
Back to the drawing board.
Harold
October 5, 2005 at 1:12 pm
22Mmmmm, concrete.
Maybe we should amend the Constitution so that the Presidency is more like a reality TV show. And if the ratings dip too low, it gets cancelled and a mid-season replacement is scheduled in its slot.
not that Pete
October 5, 2005 at 1:55 pm
23Further applying the ‘anagram your way to judicial temperment’ method yields “retire his ram”, “retire ham sir”, “remit hare sir” and “hire rime rats” — perhaps indicating a suprising and somewhat polite pro-PETA bent.
(I’m assuming rime rats are somewhat akin to ice weasels)
Keith
October 5, 2005 at 3:27 pm
24how about “I harm retries” indicating she’ll adhere strictly to established precedent - possibly Roe v Wade is safe?
Jen Lofquist
October 5, 2005 at 4:08 pm
25Adam, can I call you Adam, this is completely off-topic, but then so is “I nominate Harriet” in same topic as “who should be on the supreme court. The ? is “do you count as a celebrity?” The reason I ask this is for months I’ve been lobbying the husband for you to be included on my “list of three.” He says that since you are not a celebrity, you can’t be on the list, since to be on the list (according to him) the person must be completely unattainable and secure in their CELEBRITY. So…Adam, can you settle this for us. By the way, you’d share the list with Neil Gaiman and Elvis Costello, if that sweetens the pot.
Pete IVDL
October 5, 2005 at 4:30 pm
26Jen L, has your hubby not listened to WWDTM? On that basis alone, Adam is a celebrity of the utmost calibre. (Sorry Cooper, that’s “caliber”).
He’s also a FAR better blogger than either Neil or Elvis C (although I’m sure they’d be adequate if they tried). We all should assume that even if Adam’s upcoming super-secret TV series turns into laugh-track fodder, the pilot should air, so he most definitely qualifies as a celebrity. (No wuckas Adam, you don’t need to thank me). Hope this helps, Jen!
cooper
October 5, 2005 at 7:55 pm
27Good catch, Pete! Caliber it is! You’re such a good student. We got you writing like an American; next we’ll work on talking and then thinking like an American and in the end you’ll be one very sick puppy, hopefully un-skinned.
Mary
October 6, 2005 at 9:40 am
28Why do all of Bush’s “work wives” look slightly unbalanced when photographed? That eyeliner (shudder) does not help. Nor does claiming Bush is the most intellegnt guy she knows. As if her being single didn’t already qualify her for “Don’t get out much, do you?” labeling. Heck, all she has done is hang around sharks, pols and born-agains. Not a favorable crowd.
Thompson
October 6, 2005 at 9:43 am
29Also bear in mind, Ms. Lofquist, that you’d be condemning him to share that status with Paris Hilton and Kevin Federline. I vote that Adam is not a celebrity–he has -far- too much dignity.
Let the debate on Adam’s dignity or lack thereof BEGIN!
And out of idle curiousity, what is this “List of Three” you speak of? It sounds like some bizarre Chinese conspiracy…
Naked Ape
October 6, 2005 at 10:39 am
30Geez, and here I thought that big dick Cheney was just singing Disney showtunes to Rush. I can almost see the spinning hypno eyes on Cheney as he rubbed his nipples and crooned:
Cheers,
Naked Ape
Jen Lofquist
October 6, 2005 at 12:02 pm
31I have to admit that I’m not only personally affronted by hubby’s disdain of dear sweet Adam, but also his obvious faith in my lack of ability to attract anyone famous–thus his requirement. I mean, Bill Clinton is famous, and I’m sure that with enough corn dogs and cheap beer he’d be willing to break a commandment or two with me. (Sorry, Hillary, but you married a whore.)
To answer the “list of three” query, the list is the three persons that should any of them show up at your door requesting romance you have a “get out adultery” free card. My list is heavy on the geek-factor, but if you met my husband you’d see that the list fully imitates life.
The Husband
October 6, 2005 at 12:21 pm
32I have no disdain for Adam - I’m just using a stricter definition of “celebrity” than Jen does (namely “was there an action figure of him made”). After all, I wasn’t allowed to include Diane Rehm on MY list.
Ann
October 6, 2005 at 12:47 pm
33OK, Mary, speaking as an also-single woman “of a certain age,” I have to object to your assumptions about the nominee. While it might be true that Harriet doesn’t get out much, being single isn’t evidence of that. As a matter of fact, some of us are single BECAUSE we have full social lives!
I had hoped we were past the time when unmarried women were assumed to be losers. Hmmph.
Murray
October 6, 2005 at 1:13 pm
34Celebraties tend to be very good at being famous and not very good at any thing else, including being interesting, knowledgable, friendly or gratious.
Given that definition Adam wouldn’t qualify.
Jen Lofquist
October 6, 2005 at 1:41 pm
35Wow. So none of my three qualify. Elvis, Neil, and Adam are extremely talented and none have an action figure (much to my dismay). Neil Gaiman with kung-fu grip would be MIGHTY. Batteries not included. (take that phrase wherever it wants to go)
Pete IVDL
October 6, 2005 at 1:53 pm
36Mr Jen : they made an action figure of Elvis Costello??? (I like that clear, concise bloke’s definition of “celebrity”, BTW.)
Mrs Jen : She Who Must Be Obeyed, the Shining Light Of My Life, just laughed when I suggested we consider such a list ourselves. And it wasn’t the “oh, what a great fun idea” laugh, either, it was the “how likely is it that Charles Darwin, Richard Feynman, and Bill Gates are going to a) turn up on the doorstep, and b) suggest romance” kind of laugh. Maybe I should have suggested some opposite sex kinda people…
Naked Ape : that was just plain Evil ™. How the HELL am I going to get that sick, yet strangely unsurprising, Dick Cheney image outta my head? Yeeerch! (hoick, ptui)
Pete IVDL
October 6, 2005 at 2:02 pm
37Oh no - they didn’t make an action figure of Elvis Costello? Darn it. I’ll have to have a chat to the chaps at ThinkGeek (I do have an action figure of Einstein, complete with chalk : to see a picture, check out the ‘action shot‘ of the Zulu watch on the the ThinkGeek website. That’s my watch, action figure, and rubber mallet right there, photographed on The Couch Of Lurv!)
Thompson
October 6, 2005 at 2:04 pm
38I’m torn. So many celebrities have enough plastic content to count as limited edition action figures in their own right…
Allison in Santa Cruz
October 6, 2005 at 2:15 pm
39As our own dear Adam opined at the Pacific Grove taping of WWDTM last November, Condi Rice’s sole qualification for Secretary of State was that she watches football with the president. Sounds like that’s all it takes to get on the Supreme Court, too.
Given that Bush’s only criterion for determining whether or not someone is qualified for an important job is loyalty. Which explains why all of his appointees say he’s the smartest person they know, but doesn’t comfort me at all.
On the one hand, anything that makes the Religious Right cringe makes me rejoice, so part of me kinda likes the Miers nomination. On the other hand, I don’t think she’s necessarily a person I want interpreting the Constitution and American law for the next 30 years. Then again, we don’t know anything about her, she’s never been a judge, and there’s no telling what she’d do. Heck, I don’t know what to think anymore. You guys tell me, so I can get back on track.
Does anybody have any suggestions for getting the Democrats to actually do something to take advantage of Bush’s declining approval ratings?? I keep hoping for some unified message from them, a vision, a plan or SOMETHING, and don’t hear anything. Great Lobster, help them get their act together!
The Husband
October 6, 2005 at 2:20 pm
40I’m sure someone has/will made/make an Elvis Costello figure at some point. Errr…perhaps not. But if they do, I’ll be buying it for my wife. As for Neil Gaiman - the line for his autograph at National Library Day in DC last year speaks for itself.
The whole thing came out the theory that “celebrities die in 3s, and my friend’s insistence that “niche celebrities” aren’t really celebrities at all because only a relatively small part of the public is aware of them(this also applies to lesser known historical figures). I responded w/”but (deceased pro-wrestler) the Big Bossman had a freakin’ action figure.” Result: I got an Oscar Wilde action figure for my birthday.
The final conclusion was that the PERSON (their face and name) had to be famous - the fame or notoriety of their work is not sufficient.
I suppose the fact that I felt had to put (deceased pro-wrestler) in my second paragraph to describe “The Big Bossman” thoroughly discredits my claims as to his celebrity status. I guess the action-figure method doesn’t work.
Harold
October 6, 2005 at 3:05 pm
41Sigh. Bush is a genius.
Why? How?
Miers is a win-win candidate for him. If she is approved, she’ll most likely promote his agenda for the rest of his life (see Dee’s analysis of this, http://deteriorata.blogspot.com/2005/10/loyalty-is-for-losers.html). But at the same time this pick will anger and re-energize the Far Right, who may have gotten complacent after handing the Middle, the Left, and Democrats their respective asses time after time in recent elections. While everybody else sits back and anticipates watching the Evil Republicans beat each other to death, instead they will come back more Evil and more powerful than ever before.
And if she’s rejected? Then he comes back with an Right-Wing ideologue activist judge who will gladly legislate from the bench in favor of the Far Right. And that nominee will easily be approved. And then we’re all screwed.
Allison in Santa Cruz
October 6, 2005 at 3:46 pm
42Harold — Methinks you’re right. We’re screwed no matter what happens with Miers.
Mary
October 6, 2005 at 4:07 pm
43Ann- being single didn’t mean she didn’t get out much, being a work-aholic who only socilaizes with the Bush crowd, put her in the “sheltered social life” group. I didn’t word that well.
I have many friends of “a certain age” who are single by choice. And with good reason.
The Husband
October 6, 2005 at 4:10 pm
44Harold - I also have to agree that this is very possible and very frightening. I was dwelling on it a bit in discussion with a work colleague, who agreed that, short of a Bush Sr/Souter-style miscalculation, this isn’t a good sign at all.
ice weasel
October 6, 2005 at 4:40 pm
45I saw that NTP.
Just sayin…
waterfowler
October 6, 2005 at 5:33 pm
46Harold,
I hope you’re right. But for now “East Tree Stump” ain’t very happy.
Harold
October 6, 2005 at 8:28 pm
47Waterfowler, I hope you’re not hoping I’m right about the “And then we’re all screwed” part. ‘Cause I was including you and the ducks and everybody else in the “we’re all” part.
Mike
October 6, 2005 at 9:48 pm
48Oh… My… God…
Bush claimed God told him to invade Iraq, Afghanistan: BBC
Mike
October 6, 2005 at 9:49 pm
49Stupid links.. http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051006/ts_alt_afp/mideastbritainusiraq_0 51006214432
cooper
October 7, 2005 at 6:58 am
50Mike, a truly chilling new report. Makes you wish “God” had told George to “go jump off a cliff”. Now THAT would have been a hilarious monologue.
Overland
October 7, 2005 at 8:12 am
51Mike, Bush does what the voices in his head tell him to do. It’s not the same as listening to God, even though he thinks it is.
Ken... Just Ken
October 7, 2005 at 8:45 am
52So with all the conservatives complaining about Miers’ Supreme Court appointment, I’m wondering if it’s the biggest “Dont throw me in the brier Patch” ever.
Are they just complaining because then the liberals will think there may be something right with her?
My head hurts.
Pete IVDL
October 7, 2005 at 12:02 pm
53Someone hold me, I’m scared. Really, really, deeply shitscared. And our reliable and good and honest friend Scott has already denied it, which is better than 100 video, documentary, and audio confirmations!
I guess this disproves the theory that we create our own reality. On the other hand, if it is true, we’re one big bunch of sick fucks, and that scares me almost as much as the voices in Georgie Porgie’s head. (Must be kinda echo-ey in there, surely? “hello ello ello lo lo o o …”)
Vinft
October 7, 2005 at 2:23 pm
54I see. So its not Bush who is responsible for all of his mistakes, its God, the “Intellegent Designer” who is the moron. Bush is actually admitting that he is merely a puppet after all. But maybe what is happening is that its not really God, but maybe Dick Cheney has been sneaking in at night and whispering sweet God-like nothings into W’s ear while he is asleep.
cooper
October 8, 2005 at 10:06 am
55So, where is eveybody?
Hello? How ’bout them White Sox?
What are the voices saying to Bush today?
Think Karl Rove’s having pleasant dreams these days (nights)? Watch for the telltale, bacterially infused sweat rash to form this next week over the brow and upper lip.
Any upstanding citizen of Teutonic ancestry (on Dad’s side anyway, hence the last name with 37 letters) knows that Miers should be pronounced Mears. If she wants to call herself “Meyers”, she should spell it Meirs, right? Ergo, my many mispellings of her name this week.
Don’t you yearn to hear those NPR reports from the Katrina disaster area, if only for the melodious, calm, steadfast Southern voices.
You may have guess it’s rained 3″ here in the last two days and continues today. But I’m not bored, no, I’ve got lots of things to do. Don’t worry about me. Yep, I’m fine. Hello?
Doug
October 8, 2005 at 11:29 am
56Did anyone happen to watch MSNBC’s “Countdown with Keith Olbermann” on Thursday night? Anagrammatist Mo Rocca expanded upon the anagram-Miers’-name-for-judicial-insight comments from earlier in this thread.
From the transcript (nearly at the bottom of the page), we have Mo’s findings:
Later he pointed out Miers’ existentialist leanings, too: “I’m Sartre heir.”
nigel
October 8, 2005 at 3:20 pm
57Hmmm…perhaps that voice in GWs head is more evidence of Unintelligent Design.
http://www.theshrubbery.com/udn/
If God is really an unstable right wing wacko with a flair but uneven talent for biological engineering and an impressive indifference to human suffering, it would explain a lot. The old testament rather suggests this interpretation, as does the Moose.
Of course GW is a well known dyslexic, so perhaps when he referred to God he was actually referring anagrammatically to his DOG.
nigel
October 8, 2005 at 3:46 pm
58I forgot who it was that said there were four kinds of soldiers: dumb but hardworking ones, dumb lazy ones, smart hardworking ones, and smart lazy ones. Smart lazy ones are generally the best, because they find a way to do their job efficiently with a minimum of hassle (Adam and his poor excuse for a thread is clearly in this group). Dumb hardworking ones tend to cause SNAFUs–they’re by far the worst.
Harry is a well known workaholic, which could be good or could be very bad. Her career suggest that she is rather intelligent, but her belief that George Bush is a genius suggest one of three things: early Altzheimer’s, pronounced unresolved Oedipal conflicts a la Anne Coulter, or that she is a very crafty double agent of the left.
In any case I’d sort of rather she listened to God than Antonin Scalia.
littlebit
October 8, 2005 at 8:44 pm
59I might rather know that Bush was getting his edicts from his dog than from any kind of god I can conceive of.
Pete IVDL
October 8, 2005 at 9:18 pm
60Sorry Coop, I don’t have any white socks. I use black cotton. So what’s so special about these white socks? Do they stand up on their own or something?
It’s raining here too, thank Lobster. Our reservoirs are now around 40% full, so we’re all happy to see the rain. (I wonder if it’s the same water you are using?)
I’ve just finished loading my new robot controller (I designed it on Friday, etched the board yesterday, and loaded it today while listening to the 3-hour Beatles special by Graham Nash. Cool. Hope I haven’t put any components in frack to bunt). So I had to refocus my eyes. I can’t solder (sorry, soder) like I used to. 600 joints (solder joints, not puffpuff joints, that’s later tonight) and I’m stuffed. At least I can still type. Though perhaps I shouldn’t.
At least it takes my mind of all those strange, disturbing images of Dick Cheney in the comments here. You just know that at some time in the future, when things have finally caught up with him, he’ll mutter something like “Drat those pesky kids” and disappear into a rupture in spacetime and go back to the planet he came from. Well, we can hope, can’t we?
Oh, and thanks for the image of the bacterial soup pouring from Rove’s pores. I’ll be thinking of that next time I see him flushed…
cooper
October 8, 2005 at 9:24 pm
61littlebit, maybe best of all would be for Laura to be the one that’s whispering words of wisdom into to his ear. BTW, since W’s drinking again (if rumors can be believed), do you think Laura might be selling dope again? I tell you, with all this bad karma oozing out of the White House these days, I’m ready to get buzzed. My last dealer has been out of the business for about 25 years, so pretty dry over here. Laura was reputed to always have only the best buds.
cooper
October 8, 2005 at 9:55 pm
62Yo, Pete! About this whole white socks thing… we live on a thick bed of red clay soil here in the Southeast. White socks give an immediate indication that they have been “soiled”. And regarding “standing up on their own”, sure, after 10 - 12 days, chisel them off and they stand up on their own. Another indication that laundering may be warranted.
Do we use the same water? Don’t know, though an interesting concept to consider as I flush the toilet, then go for a drink of water.
“Hope I haven’t put any components in frack to bunt”. I’ll need some help with that translation. 600 solder joints. Impressive, amazing actually. So a ripping good sense of humor and arcane technical profiency - wow, She Who Must Be Obeyed must be a candidate for sainthood, putting up with all that abuse.
We had a break in the clouds at sunset, so I lugged out the Dobsonian mount, schlept the optical tube outside as well, assembled it all, dug out the star charts and just as it began to get dark enough for observing, the clouds rolled in again. The thankless life of a scientist…
littlebit
October 9, 2005 at 9:11 am
63I’m so glad someone said it, cooper, and I read it here some posts ago first. It’s pretty clear that Bush is using, so who knows about the supply of either substances or ideas.
Three more years—ugh, I need a drink.
Pete IVDL
October 9, 2005 at 6:20 pm
64Laura used to deal? Oh, what a lovely First Family! Well, it looks like we have a contact for medicinal tetra-hydra-cannabinol! (Oh, my glaucoma - every time I open my eyes it hurts…) Anyone have Laura’s phone #? (Mobile preferred, can’t stand talking to the White House middlemen).
Yeah, it’s a scientific fact that clouds have intelligence (well, more intelligence than most poll-aticians, anyhoo). Maybe you could employ a little maskirovka like the Russkies did during WWII, and fool the clouds: make a cardboard replica of the ‘dob, leave it outside for a while to fool the clouds, then sneak out the real scope…
Er, frack to bunt? “back to front”. I usually spell it phonetically, since ‘frack to bont’ looks even worse.
Yeah, you’re right. She Who Makes The Earth Tremble is without a doubt my angel without wings. No-one else would put up with an übergeek like me, let alone going back to school at 40 to get her 4-year horticultural apprenticeship, then working 7-day weeks to make ends meet while going in to hospital to cheer up her husband every day for weeks on end, every few months, for 16 years… Sainthood doesn’t even begin to cover it. One day I’ll begin to scratch the surface of returning the favo(u)r. No “Twilight Pines Retirement Village” for her!
cooper
October 9, 2005 at 8:12 pm
65Yeah Pete, my glaucoma, too!
Deception, huh? Maybe I could construct a little Potemkin backyard observatory. What a concept!
The “frack to bunt” I actually puzzled out during our long drive to my wife’s family reunion today. Good food; long day. So when you plugged the board in for the “smoke test”, how’d the little monster do?
Jeez Pete, I had no idea of the troubles she’s known. You’re right, sainthood seems a bit shabby for her. She should be granted the Walking on Water concession down at Docklands! Give Fran a suitably Ozzie hug from me. The best is yet to come - for both of you!
hedera
October 9, 2005 at 11:44 pm
66Pete, I feel a kinship with your wife, since I also did a radical career change at 40 (from library work to computer geek). When you successfully pull off that sort of switch, it gives you the feeling you can do anything; maybe that’s how she manages you
)
Pete IVDL
October 10, 2005 at 7:27 am
67hedera - Fran read your comment, and puzzled out the moniker. Hedera helix, right? Don’t worry, your secret’s safe!
Cooper, consider it done (hey, it was fun, too). She’s well and truly hugged. I should never have stopped, but you know how the neighbours talk…
The smoke test went well (i.e. no smoke - woohoo!), now I gotta get into calculus (it’s been a long while since I failed maths) so I can figure out basic speed, velocity, and positioning via motor feedback, and do it all in 8-bit arithmetic. Guuhhh. (I’ve got ultrasonic and IR laser distance designs in the pipeline, but the pipeline’s long, and thin, and twisty, so it might take a while…) Meanwhile, TLF is at least rollin’. (TLF - The Little F*cker). I might be tempted to christen it “Cooper” (heh heh heh heh)
And yeah - Potemkin! Couldn’t remember the name for the life of me. Must be the glaucoma. Or the drugs.
Lily
October 10, 2005 at 9:30 am
68I’m in on the “Dont throw me in the brier patch” assessment. Surely conservatives realize Miers nomination is a stroke of genius on Bush’s part: A former Catholic who left that liberal bastion to become an Evangelical, and who (because of lack of knowledge and experience) won’t let silly constituitional law stuff get in her way of enforcing God’s agenda. Meanwhile, she has no conservative paper trail for the Democrats to complain about.
Genius, sheer genius.
Murray
October 10, 2005 at 10:22 am
69It could also be that the right is convinced that “Harry” is gay.
Why else would they be so upset? Bush has put in one bozo after another everywhere he can and they defend him like a newborn.
Coop.
Last weekend we had 20 Boy Scouts camping here for a daylong program. New moon and totally clear sky. The Milky Way was a big splash across the sky and Andromeda Galaxy was easily visible with the naked eye. With my Dobson we got to see lots of fun things, like the Ring Nebula and different colored binary stars. Sometimes things work out.
cooper
October 10, 2005 at 8:52 pm
70Murray, we’re still socked in down here. You’re making me crazy… Andromeda Galaxy with the naked eye. That’s some excellent seeing conditions!
“Harry” may be gay, who cares? God-fearing, Born Again, Evangelical Troglodytes care, by Jesus! I’m sure they feel the same about Condi. And now that Jeffrey Gannon is no longer able to shill for Bush during the press conferences, he’s fair game, too. I wonder what became of him anyway. Has he been pushed in front of a bus yet? Thrown onto the third rail? Slipped on a “freshly waxed floor” and fallen down an elevator shaft? That whole enterprise was truly wierd.
Lily, I must say, I’ve been having the same thoughts about those wiley conservatives, bitching and moaning about the Miers selection and all the while knowing she’ll end up being free-thinking America’s worst nightmare.
Pete, if all that robot does is fetch beer, then I award you the use of the copyrighted, franchised and legally ensconsed licensed use of the name “cooper”. If TLF does more than that, you’re aiming way too low for such an honor.
hedera
October 11, 2005 at 12:39 am
71Pete - good for Fran, a lady of parts, as we’ve already agreed.
The one thing we should all keep in mind about Ms. Miers is - this lady is Tough. Big time tough. First female head of a Texas law firm plus first female head of the Texas bar association adds up to significant infighting skills - she’s the one who took on the Good Ol’ Boys on their own turf and won. This says nothing/zip/nada about her ability to interpret constitutional law, but let nobody underestimate her just because she looks like a Nice Li’l Southern Lady…
Pete IVDL
October 11, 2005 at 3:06 am
72Yeah, she must be good at the low punches, ’cause she looks like she fell out of the Ugly tree and smacked into every branch on the way down… Now don’t get all bitter and twisted about my patriarchal phallophile point of view here, I’m just sayin’ she must be good at something to get where she did, rather relying on stunning good looks and a boob job to sway Billy Bob and his fambly of roughouse boys.
And while I’m on the topic, how the hell did she get labelled as gay? Just because she ain’t pretty enough to be called a trollop? Or is there more that I’m not hearing about?
Murray
October 11, 2005 at 6:37 pm
73Pete,
She’s single, no children, not dating anyone. That’s more than enough info for the Righteous Right to go after Sponge Bob and Tinky-Winky. (And she looks at least as funny as they do).
Coop,
Yes we have very dark skys here. The closest town of any size is 20 miles with mountains between us. We have very close to a virgin sky.
Pete IVDL
October 12, 2005 at 5:29 am
74Mmmmmm… dark skies…. Murray, we all already knew it, but just for the record : you lucky, lucky bastard.