<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Set-up</title>
	<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/</link>
	<description>America's favorite blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: h.m rukeyser</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10704</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 06:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10704</guid>
					<description>hurricanes are not "unforeseeable" let alone "random."  in fact, we can count on them every autumn.  and your undocumented comment about scientists failing to show up for house appropriations meetings is non-sensical if not ludicrous.  every time scientists have advised this administration with suggestions that threaten their corporate pocket books, they are accused of "bad science."

is this blog "bait?"  bait to catch righties with a full mouth of copenhagen and a sweaty hand on the bible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hurricanes are not &#8220;unforeseeable&#8221; let alone &#8220;random.&#8221;  in fact, we can count on them every autumn.  and your undocumented comment about scientists failing to show up for house appropriations meetings is non-sensical if not ludicrous.  every time scientists have advised this administration with suggestions that threaten their corporate pocket books, they are accused of &#8220;bad science.&#8221;</p>
<p>is this blog &#8220;bait?&#8221;  bait to catch righties with a full mouth of copenhagen and a sweaty hand on the bible?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Baylink</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10522</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10522</guid>
					<description>Sure, Hannah; *beat* me to the damn joke.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, Hannah; *beat* me to the damn joke.  <img src='http://fanaticalapathy.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pubfan</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10489</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10489</guid>
					<description>I am always proud to be an American.  I just happen to be ashamed and embarassed by what the rest of the world thinks of the leadership they believe we elected.  Bush is an idiot in so many wonderful and terrible ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always proud to be an American.  I just happen to be ashamed and embarassed by what the rest of the world thinks of the leadership they believe we elected.  Bush is an idiot in so many wonderful and terrible ways.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hedera</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10486</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 04:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10486</guid>
					<description>"me" is correct (that's very hard to respond to) that the Shrub isn't solely responsible for the decay of the levees.  Several administrations back to and including his father's have been culpable there.  Shrub certainly didn't help, however, and several of his actions (not least, tucking FEMA into a side pocket of DHS where it wouldn't get in anyone's way) have made the situation worse than it would have been if the country weren't being led by people who didn't realize that when Frank Zappa wrote, "It can't happen HEEEEERE!", it was satire...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;me&#8221; is correct (that&#8217;s very hard to respond to) that the Shrub isn&#8217;t solely responsible for the decay of the levees.  Several administrations back to and including his father&#8217;s have been culpable there.  Shrub certainly didn&#8217;t help, however, and several of his actions (not least, tucking FEMA into a side pocket of DHS where it wouldn&#8217;t get in anyone&#8217;s way) have made the situation worse than it would have been if the country weren&#8217;t being led by people who didn&#8217;t realize that when Frank Zappa wrote, &#8220;It can&#8217;t happen HEEEEERE!&#8221;, it was satire&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Harold</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10478</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 19:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10478</guid>
					<description>You missed a Bush there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed a Bush there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: me</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10476</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10476</guid>
					<description>Just heard something on NPR yesterday about the dykes.  Seems funding was cut from teh beginning and started to get bad as far back as the 70's.

I don't think Bush is the only one responsible if the project was grossly underfunded through many administrations.

Just as all the world's intelligence community was wrong about WMD, it seems many administrations felt the NO levees were a secondary priority.

Not saying it is right, just saying I think it is wrong to point to Bush.  Clinton, Carter, Reagan all seem to have had a hand in this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just heard something on NPR yesterday about the dykes.  Seems funding was cut from teh beginning and started to get bad as far back as the 70&#8217;s.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Bush is the only one responsible if the project was grossly underfunded through many administrations.</p>
<p>Just as all the world&#8217;s intelligence community was wrong about WMD, it seems many administrations felt the NO levees were a secondary priority.</p>
<p>Not saying it is right, just saying I think it is wrong to point to Bush.  Clinton, Carter, Reagan all seem to have had a hand in this problem.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pete IVDL</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10472</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 08:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10472</guid>
					<description>Landis - is that the quote from 'The Princess Bride'? "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

Ice Weasel : yeah, it's definitely a case of "Do not adjust your set. Normality will be returned as soon as possible. We apologise for the inconvenience." (Or should that be, "We apologise for the incumbent"?)

Hanna, you go, girl! If you don't get shored up by a bunch of engineers from the ACOE, you'd better be talking to your local representative. Unless they're conservative, in that case they'll just blame dykes and liberals for one more administration-induced problem. Hmm. Maybe better not say anything after all...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Landis - is that the quote from &#8216;The Princess Bride&#8217;? &#8220;You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ice Weasel : yeah, it&#8217;s definitely a case of &#8220;Do not adjust your set. Normality will be returned as soon as possible. We apologise for the inconvenience.&#8221; (Or should that be, &#8220;We apologise for the incumbent&#8221;?)</p>
<p>Hanna, you go, girl! If you don&#8217;t get shored up by a bunch of engineers from the ACOE, you&#8217;d better be talking to your local representative. Unless they&#8217;re conservative, in that case they&#8217;ll just blame dykes and liberals for one more administration-induced problem. Hmm. Maybe better not say anything after all&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Murray</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10471</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 20:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10471</guid>
					<description>nokangaroos

I think that schadenfreude would be the word. Literally it means joy in the sorrow of others. I can see other countries taking pleasure in seeing us unable to take care of our own.

Bush doesn’t believe in planning.
He said so himself.

This is what he said 9/6/00 in Scranton PA
"We don't believe in planners and deciders making the decisions on behalf of Americans"

So there you have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nokangaroos</p>
<p>I think that schadenfreude would be the word. Literally it means joy in the sorrow of others. I can see other countries taking pleasure in seeing us unable to take care of our own.</p>
<p>Bush doesn’t believe in planning.<br />
He said so himself.</p>
<p>This is what he said 9/6/00 in Scranton PA<br />
&#8220;We don&#8217;t believe in planners and deciders making the decisions on behalf of Americans&#8221;</p>
<p>So there you have it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mary</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10470</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10470</guid>
					<description>This would have been much funnier if my sister hadn't basically said the same thing last night.  Except, she was serious and believes it.
Thank you, Hanna, for bringing it back to laugh inducing. 

I'm out of humor about this myself. I'll have to rely on the rest of you to get me smiling again. So far, all y'all are batting 1000 ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would have been much funnier if my sister hadn&#8217;t basically said the same thing last night.  Except, she was serious and believes it.<br />
Thank you, Hanna, for bringing it back to laugh inducing. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m out of humor about this myself. I&#8217;ll have to rely on the rest of you to get me smiling again. So far, all y&#8217;all are batting 1000 <img src='http://fanaticalapathy.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nokangaroos</title>
		<link>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10469</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/09/10/610/#comment-10469</guid>
					<description>Cooper, "Schadenfreude" is not the word (though Our Heroic Liberators are asserting themselves again these days). "Incredulity", I´d call it. Having served with the engineers, I have a reasonable grasp of what is doable with three days´ advance warning (in a shitty little Old European country, that is).
So, I agree on the "humiliating"...   but definitely not the Schadenfreude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooper, &#8220;Schadenfreude&#8221; is not the word (though Our Heroic Liberators are asserting themselves again these days). &#8220;Incredulity&#8221;, I´d call it. Having served with the engineers, I have a reasonable grasp of what is doable with three days´ advance warning (in a shitty little Old European country, that is).<br />
So, I agree on the &#8220;humiliating&#8221;&#8230;   but definitely not the Schadenfreude.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
