From AP (via SF Gate):
A suspect in the failed London transit bombings admitted Saturday to a role in the attack but said it was only intended to be an attention-grabbing strike, not a deadly one, a legal expert familiar with the investigation said…
He also reportedly told investigators the bombers were motivated by anger over the U.S.-led war in Iraq.
Let’s review:
- We’re fighting the terrorists in Iraq so that we don’t have to fight them here at home.
- However, we are fighting them in London.
- The ones we’re fighting in London are fighting us in London because we’re fighting them in Iraq.
Therefore: We’re fighting the terrorists in London because we’re fighting them in Iraq so that we don’t have to fight them here at home. Also: These terrorists that we’re fighting in London are fighting us in London only because we’re fighting them in Iraq (so that we don’t have to fight them here at home), given that the ones we’re fighting in London weren’t fighting us before that. Presumably, they feel that they weren’t fighting us in Iraq before we went to Iraq, and this has caused them to fight us in London rather than fighting us in Iraq so that we don’t have to fight them here at home.
What have we learned from all this? Beats me. But if we keep running this War on Terror as though the terrorists are a fixed number of radicals whose ranks will neither be swelled nor diminished by our actions, well, then we’re going to have to keep fighting them over there so that we don’t have to fight them over here which will make them want to fight us in some other place.
To me, the terrorists are like Doritos. Remember Jay Leno’s series of commercials for the tasty tortilla treats, which inevitably culminated in the slightly frightening tag-line “Crunch all you want, we’ll make more?” It was a simple (albeit creepy) statement of supply and demand. Substitute “terrorists” for “Doritos,” and for “crunch,” substitute “continue to aggressively attack targets in the Arab world that are widely perceived to have had no direct connection to actual terrorism while admitting no errors so that your nation looks like a hegemonic and unstoppable force of violence and cultural imperialism.”
It’s not as catchy as Leno’s slogan, true. But it seems to be effective.





14 comments
Allison in Santa Cruz
July 30, 2005 at 9:20 pm
1Adam — You’ll know this already because it was on WWDTM this morning, but we aren’t fighting a War On Terrorism (WOT) any more. We’re in a Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism (GSAVE). It remains to be seen how a GSAVE is materially different from a WOT, except it takes longer to say and doesn’t contain the w-word that makes many US voters uneasy.
Does anyone really think it’s makes a Lobster-damned difference what we call Bush’s little adventure in Iraq? Anybody at all?
I didn’t think so.
ice weasel
July 30, 2005 at 10:35 pm
2Gosh Adam, I’m still confused. What country am I in right now and how can I help stop evil throughout the world?
What? No monosyllabic response?
I read things like this Adam (I feel as though as I am addressing the president pro-tem here) and I say, sure, we know what this war isn’t about (I’m not sure we’ll ever know for sure what it really was about but that’s almost a different topic). So what? Won’t that mushy middle, those voters who, for all their own unimaginable reasons, voted this guy another bite at the proverbial apple, buy into this new brand of the “war on terra” just as easily as they did the last one. Do these people really want to know the truth behind the torture taking place their under our name, or are they really glad that the defense department will continue to evade, stonewall and obfiscate to keep this material under wraps?
Obviously, I think they’ll be happy with the “NEW” war on terra (%50 less casualties, this time we promise) and I think they love wallowing in their ignorance of messy details.
I suppose the theme I’m trying to develop here is that it’s going to take much more than yet another quick step back for this administration to shake the faith of not only their base of support but more importantly, that middle group that just wants to feel safe and be left alone.
Another blogger, Driftglass, has been writing on this for some time.
It’s unlikely the groups on either strong liberals or republicans will be moved more than they alerady are. So the real question is what is it going to take to motiviate that middle 20%?
Getting kicked out of our major staging base for Afghanistan? Nah, that’s not our fault.
The runaway critical mass of terrorists we’ve developed in Iraq, come on we’re turning a new corner by the light at the end of the tunnel, right? No, that’s just those crazy Islamofascists. They just hate our freedom and will stop at nothing to kill us.
The cartoon like graft and corruption that has characterized our occupation in Iraq? Well, no ones been indicted yet, have they?
Maybe the tipping point is then destruction of our own economy and the decimation of our financial and military resources? Oh pooh, that’s just those doom and gloom liberals. What next chicken little, global warming is coming to get us?
Stuffing those dorito’s down our neck may kill us eventually, but we’ll keep right on doing it until, well, I don’t know if we’ll ever demonstrate the national will to stop.
So much for flypaper. Like trickle-down, another neo-con myth evaporates.
Harold
July 31, 2005 at 8:32 am
3I still have the nagging feeling that this war is being masterminded on both sides by a bunch of Armageddonists, folks who see this as the Final Conflict, Ragnorak, whatever. The goal is not to bring the conflict to an end through force of arms, but to maximize the amount of conflict prior to the ultimate act of Divine Intervention and thus curry the maximum amount of divine reward. I think the reason Bush & Co. didn’t have a plan for a post-war Iraq is because they thought that by fighting a war in Babylon they would set events in motion that would bring about the Final Trump. Basically, according to the plan, Jesus was supposed to have shown up by now.
Say, how’s that Pure Red Heifer breeding project coming along?
jacqui
July 31, 2005 at 10:47 am
4those who work to stop escalating oppression of other cultures, degradation of women’s rights and children’s safety, expanding governmental corruption, unprosecuted war crimes and abandonment of the Geneva convention are waging a Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism (GSAVE).
my question is: what further fronts remain on which to wage this Struggle against Bush and American foreign policy?
Murray
July 31, 2005 at 1:21 pm
5I believe that the phrase should be Global Obsessed Divine Struggle against Violent Extremism by the United States. (GODSAVEUS) makes a lot more sense.
AussieAndrea
July 31, 2005 at 6:42 pm
6I have nothing to add beyond thank you for a laugh on this yucky Monday morning at work!
nigel
July 31, 2005 at 11:56 pm
7Meanwhile, our fearless leader is doing the important work of consoling Boy Scouts, who despite facing eviction from government property for loving Jesus and hating queers (not necessarily in that order) nobly risk their lives erecting large tents near power lines. Also heat stroke secondary to global warming, but that’s another story. The point is these are future Soldiers, dammit, and we need to maintain morale in the upcoming generation because we’ve got an indefinite struggle on our hands here…
Damn, Karl, is it just me, or is it awful hot this summer?
tess
August 1, 2005 at 6:27 am
8Harold,
The red heifer’s born in Israel. I think most of the fundies are just sitting back and waiting for Kirk Cameron to announce a come-back of his ker-splatted career to announce that he’s really Christ with a really nasty ‘fro.
Mary
August 1, 2005 at 10:41 am
9Good one Murray!! Where do I sign-up?
As for wanting attention, gosh but that sounds like a whiney teen to me. Wouldn’t a demonstration also get attention which a lot less destruction? Is the destruction really necessary? Are you listening to me Shrub?
ice weasel
August 1, 2005 at 1:11 pm
10I don’t know whether to laugh or not anymore. This raging fundamentalism that is so omnipresent in our country certianly isn’t laughing at end times prophecies and armageddon (not the with Ben Affleck, I know, I looked it up).
I mean, it’s really beginning to confuse me. I’m supposed to take this stuff seriously, clearly, a good sized portion of the population claim to. Our “leader” claims to believe in the same thing and his actions do speak to having little concern for much beyond appearances and the immediate future.
No, I’m not really personally concerned about the judgment day, as it were, but what are these other people thinking?
It was so much easier when it was just Ernst Stavro Blofelt trying to take over the world. I mean, S.P.E.C.T.R.E. was easy to remember and say but Pre-millennial-dispensationalists?
Yikes.
hedera
August 2, 2005 at 12:16 am
11Let’s all keep reminding ourselves of the 80-20 rule: 80 percent of the noise and flash is made by 20 percent of the people. 80 percent of the headlines ditto. The other 80 percent of the people are just trying to get by and keep the mortgage paid.
The trouble with the End-Of-Times boys is that the rest of us are going to have to clean up the mess they make as they try to make Judgment Day happen.
Pete IVDL
August 2, 2005 at 1:20 pm
12Harold, you’re on to something. It kinda explains a lot about the current administration :
- don’t care about what happens to the deficit
- don’t care about where the tax cuts get funded from
- don’t care what happens to health care
- don’t care where pensions get paid from
- don’t care about global warming
- etc.
Makes strange, creepy, Twilight-Zone kinda sense…
Adam, you forgot The Bottom Line : You don’t have to fight them there at home! See? It’s working perfectly! (It also works for us in Van Diemen’s Land - we fight them anywhere but here!)
Did I spot another Aussie lurker popping her head up for a moment there? Oi! Oi! Oi!
Anyway, armageddon outta here…
hedera
August 3, 2005 at 12:49 am
13Pete. Oh, Pete. You should be ASHAMED of yourself! What nameless substances have you caused people to inhale with that signoff?? (I personally wasn’t eating or drinking anything when I read it, thank Lobster…)
Secret Rapture
November 27, 2005 at 3:11 am
14My Inaugural Address at the Great White Throne Judgment of the Dead.
At: http://www.angelfire.com/crazy/spaceman/
eschatology,End Times,second coming,rapture,secret rapture,Second Resurrection,Great White Throne Judgment of the Dead,
End of days,Day of the Lord,Endtime,Judgment Day