Terri Schiavo’s autopsy results are in. There was no evidence of the abuse, broken bones, and strangulation that Michael Schiavo was roundly accused of, and Terri’s condition was exhaustively verified as irreversible. Her brain was half the weight of a normal human’s, she was blind, and she would not have been able to eat or drink without her tubes.
This has fixed everything, and the long overdue period of national healing has set in.
It almost brings a tear to my eye the way the sides have reconciled. From far and wide, apologies are pouring in for all the hurt and hyperbole. Those who claimed Terri could see, respond, and even talk are abject, those who accused her husband of everything up to attempted murder have swallowed their pride and apologized, and everyone now agrees that the issue always was, and should have been, whether or not a woman in a vegetative state with no hope of recovery should have been kept alive against the wishes of her spouse and what he maintained were her wishes.
The United States Congress has offered their sincerest regrets that they interfered with the constitutional separation of powers in order to prolong a family’s agony. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a medical doctor, is abject and regretful about the cavalier “diagnosis” he publicly made based on videotaped evidence, because he now “can see, based on the autopsy’s data about the degredation of her visual cortex, that I was completely wrong, and making such a statement only fanned the flames of anger and misunderstanding.”
President Bush has also weighed in, remorseful that he was deceived by the “junk science” put forth by the Schiavonistas. “I still think that we should err on the side of life,” he said. “But in this case it’s clear that the courts worked the way they were supposed to, scientific evidence was weighed responsibly, and my involvement only caused more personal pain and national discord. Sorry.”
Randall Terry, spokesman for Terri’s family, was no less apologetic. “I still believe in preserving life and object to the way her life was ended,” he said. “But the accusations I made against Michael Schiavo and his motives, the assertions I made about Terri speaking and pleading for her life… I was wrong about that. It was irresponsible, and I put my ideology and wishful thinking in front of good faith and intellectual honesty. I’m sorry, and it’s time to heal.”
Even the Schindlers said today that…
————————————
Wow, that’d be great. Forget it.
This is, believe it or not, the Iraq war all over again. We will hear that the believability of Michael Schiavo was never the issue. That we had to be sure before we acted rashly on the word of a husband and dozens of French-looking medical “inspectors” and 15 years of unchanging brainless existence. That the autopsy was politically motivated and inconclusive. That whether or not Terri was in a persistent vegetative state or could recover was always a side issue. That the goal was always to liberate the Floridian people. That Michael Schiavo may have covertly shipped half of Terri’s brain off to Syria while nobody was looking.
Oh well. It was silly to think there’d be humanity, understanding, or reconciliation from the opportunists who grabbed Terri Schiavo’s inert body and dragged her, head lolling obscenely, into battle. They’re too busy sending out inflammatory fundraising emails and preparing the heavily-Photoshopped “2006 Terri Schiavo Swimsuit Calender.”
Being at war, even a “culture war,” means admitting no errors, not until it’s over. Which is why we’re fighting wars on “terror” and “the culture of death” rather than wars on “Iraq” and “The Schiavo Case.” Those might end, after all.





50 comments
Harold
June 15, 2005 at 4:58 pm
1I’m still eagerly awaiting all those breakthrough cures that Randall Terry promised us were days or weeks away for people in Mrs. Schiavo’s lamentable condition. I mean, someone like Randall Terry wouldn’t have lied about something like that, would he?
madbard
June 15, 2005 at 5:51 pm
2They were going to research stem cells before they banned them.
New meme: it is about the QUANTITY of life, not the QUALITY. We don’t know how to measure quality, so let’s make it last as long as possible. We shall not rest until there are giagantic Matrix-style pod mausoleums keeping everyone alive in definitely with a stem cell-free nutrient vat.
Calling Dr. Mo Howard… calling Dr. Frist. Nyuk-nyuk-nyuk.
tess
June 15, 2005 at 6:09 pm
3I remember one nit-wit proclaiming that stem cell research would somehow help Mrs. Shiavo, roundly denouncing her husband for having a mistress and kids (which is what Terri’s parents encouraged him to do), saying he was keeping her alive for the money. Despite a doctor reminding her (a would-be medical student) that any stem-cell treatment would give her an entirely new personality, that there was no money from the malpractice suit left, and that her parents encouraged Michael to get on with his life, she refused to see reason.
This, my friends, is what Republicans ultimately want to breed — a new generation of parrots incapable of critical thought or reason. What’s worse is that she’s got the grades to get into med school with apparently the reasoning of a 5-year-old who still believes in Santa Claus. Who wants to be treated by this Bill-Frist-wannabe?
tess
June 15, 2005 at 6:10 pm
4Er, lemme rewrite that “keeping her alive” to “wanting to let her die” for the money.
Pete IVDL
June 15, 2005 at 6:51 pm
5I suppose an MRI while she was still “alive” would have been too obviously conclusive. These guys want to argue their moral superiority, not consider a human being.
Madbard is horribly, presciently right - we can’t adequately measure quality, so let’s just stretch the rubber band and point to length, not depth. Where the hell is Philip Nietsche and Jack Kevorkian when you need them for rational debate? Oh, that’s right, Jack’s in GAOL and Phil’s still avoiding attempts to have him deregistered.
Fuck the stem cells - just design a contraption that allows anyone to experience what Terri (or anyone with chronic pain or suffering, for that matter) experiences for just 24 hours (if they could stand it for that long) and see where the arguments go. They’d be too busy screaming for an end to their suffering and looking for biblical references to support their new-found “humanitarian” belief.
dee
June 15, 2005 at 8:45 pm
6Well right now we’re calling it a war on terror. We used to call it a war against Godless communism, before that fascism, before that we called it exercising our manifest destiny to kill all the natives and take their land… I could go on and on back to when that first tribe decided that other tribe was different and therefore evil. We just keep coming up with new names for “other.”
That’s why it will never end – why the War to End All Wars didn’t. We just give new names to the skirmishes – Spanish-American War, Korean Police Action, Operation Iraqi Freedom.
All the other issues — abortion, euthanasia, gay rights are just this particular moment in time’s ways of defining the us vs. them battle. When there are lines to be drawn, we will draw them, both to define ourselves and our enemies.
I’m not one of those people who think humans are somehow genetically programmed to fear the other. Like the song says, you have to be carefully taught.
Johnnyko
June 15, 2005 at 9:22 pm
7Dee — love the point, HATE the song.
Emmarie
June 16, 2005 at 12:21 am
8The Shiavo ordeal made me mad because perfectly reasonable people refused to look at the case itself and instead said that she must be kept alive out of “respect for life.”
A personal example to back up my generalization: We were discussing the matter in ethics class and mostly saying she wasn’t really living and it would be better to let her die, and a usually sensible girl/friend of mine started saying that Shiavo should be kept alive because there were “allegations of abuse” and her husband’s reasons for wanting her to die weren’t perfectly blameless. For her, it was about defending the always-right-to-life faction and ignoring the fact that Shiavo wasn’t going to get any better.
dee: I think you can just keep going back and seeing it as a “war against defamation of god-given beliefs,” because the righteous have always had god on their side and used as an argument the claim that the other side doesn’t.
Murray
June 16, 2005 at 9:33 am
9Folks with God directed emotional beliefs admit that modern science has proven them wrong?
Uhhm,, Adam, yer droppin yer bucket down a dry well.
You are asking for intelligence and reasoning where none is due.
If you believe to your core in God and his random willingness to do a miracle (step outside of physical laws (theories)). Then you can never be proven wrong. Sort of like intelligent design. If you believe that God trumps science when ever it’s convenient for him, then science is useful only when you want to use your computer to transmit your thoughts to others.
Mary
June 16, 2005 at 9:49 am
10The only good I have gotten out of this was confirmation of my position by finding out that Terri was even worse off than I thought. I used to work with severely brain damaged children/teens, and know what irreversible tragedy can be.
Now if only my older sister could see my point of view…………..
(Human beings are highly over-rated.)
Lindsay
June 16, 2005 at 10:18 am
11I had a fantasy like this last night. It ended with Bush apologizing for everything he’s done in his entire life and retiring to a Buddhist monastery to spend the rest of his life in silent meditation. I had a stunning moment of almost total happiness- it…it was amazing.
Steve
June 16, 2005 at 11:31 am
12I hate to sound like a sycophantic fan boy, but, Adam, damn, you’re good. This is the best thing I’ve seen written on the whole Shiavo mishegaas.
Ever.
Anywhere.
Redshift
June 16, 2005 at 11:48 am
13I thought Bush was especially being an asshole for blathering about “supporting life” even now, after they voted to cut Medicaid. He always “errs on the side of life” unless, you know, you can’t pay, or are accused of a crime, or aren’t American, or…
Pete IVDL
June 16, 2005 at 11:48 am
14Wow. I just found the missing commandments:
XI. Thou shalt not confuse just breathing with living.
XII. Thou shalt not claim that Yahweh is “on your side”, because He always bets both ways.
XIII. Thou shalt stop with the killing! Please.
XIV. Thou shalt not infer that because God loves you, he automatically likes you. Look what happened with the Philistines…
ginny
June 16, 2005 at 1:02 pm
15You’re so right, Adam. It’s all about not ever admitting error, and always keeping the pots boiling.
On the other hand, I love how the folks in favor of stem-cell research have been able to to label their cause “pro-cure,” and the pro-life bunch are thus labeled “anti-cure.” Sometimes we lefty wusses actually score a point.
Monty Zoom
June 16, 2005 at 2:07 pm
16Thanks Pete. That gives me a great idea! God is Toshiro Mifume in “Yojimbo!” (Or Clint Eastwood in “Fist full of Dollars,” or Bruce Willis in “Last Man Standing”) God comes into town and plays each side against each other until they are all dead. The truly innocent who are caught in the crossfire end up with all the riches. The Schiavo’s are going to make out like bandits!!!
Bob
June 16, 2005 at 2:20 pm
17Yesterday evening, the right-wing USA Radio News Network reported the findings, then said that the Schindlers still had “unanswered questions.” Well, so do I, every day, but it doesn’t make the news.
Jerry
June 16, 2005 at 3:25 pm
18Pete IVDL - I understand she had some sort of brain implant. An MRI would have pureed her brain, and so was not done. But point well taken, why wasn’t a CT scan done… it would have clearly shown the brain atrophy.
Dee - I disagree. I do think that humans are inherently xenophobic. “If you ain’t us, you’re a threat to our resources.” What is not inherent is the nature of “us.” Race or culture may not be determinate in the composition of your “tribe,” but is an easy way to divide us up. I’ve spent a lot of time with little kids and know that “tribes” among the non-”carefully taught” can consist of very mixed individuals.
And now, my rant on the topic.
This is the sickest, most debased, and foul perversion of our legal, judicial, legislative and medical systems I have seen. She was dead, by any reasonable standard and the best, overwhelming majority of medical opinion. Her brainstem kept her breathing and her heart beating. I point out that the brainstem is even lower than the limbic system, the second most primitive of our brain components.
Now, pardon me if this sounds uttercold, but her parents could have had her freeze dried, taken her home, and combed her hair until they died. I don’t doubt that they convinced themselves that she was “responsive,” but the autopsy results show indisputably that she was not.
The invasion of privacy of the marriage (haven’t we been hearing a lot about that?) shows how shallow the real belief the neocons have for this concept. “make hay while the sun shines” and to hell with ethics, integrity, compassion, and real understanding of science.
Fuck Bush. Fuck Cheney. Fuck the NeoTheoCons. Fuck all the miserable, lying, scientificly illiterate hypocrits.
Sorry; I feel better now.
David
June 16, 2005 at 5:48 pm
19Love it, Jerry. Reading your conclusion made me feel better. Thanks, dude.
hedera
June 16, 2005 at 9:23 pm
20The more I hear the phrase, the more disturbed I am by the whole concept of “right to life.” I suspect when the Founding Fathers put the inalienable right to “life, liberty, and ” into the Declaration of Independence (it isn’t in the Constitution), they meant nothing more than that you had the right not to have the government off you for some incomprehensible reason, because life in the 18th century was uncertain enough without having the gummint interfere.
The Founding Fathers almost certainly understood that life is not a right. Life is a gift, and a very uncertain one at that. It can be taken away at any time. Ask Terri Schiavo, wherever she is now. In the 18th century people died of measles and influenza and whooping cough and smallpox and horse kicks; children “didn’t thrive”. Now we die of car crashes and cancer and drug overdoses and pit bull bites and random gunshots in bad neighborhoods; but any of us can go at any time. There is no “right to life”. There may be a right to make the best of your life that you can once you have it.
And what really fries me about the right-to-life crew, especially when it comes to abortion, is that they are never there for this baby after it is born. Where are they when the diaper needs changing, when there’s no money for the vaccinations, when baby needs a new pair of shoes? Off harassing some other poor young woman who is trying to keep from ruining her life with a baby she didn’t ask for.
With due apologies to any anti-abortion types who actually do try to take care of the babies afterward.
Like Jerry, I feel better now, but I won’t apologize, because I didn’t say Cheney.
hedera
June 16, 2005 at 9:26 pm
21Oops, sorry, I have to quit using pointed brackets in HTML. That odd looking sentence should have read, ‘the inalienable right to “life, liberty, and (property/the pursuit of happiness, depending on the revision)” into the Declaration of Independence’…
Elliott
June 16, 2005 at 9:56 pm
22Hedera,
If you look at the actual written document, it’s the “purfuit of happinefs”.
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/treasures/images/uc06330.jpg
How can we look up to the founding dudes when then couldn’t even write an “s” properly.
Go Jerry, Neo-conf are full of fhit!
hedera
June 16, 2005 at 11:27 pm
23Yes, I know, Elliott, but I’ve read that Jefferson (who wrote most of the Declaration) wanted to put “life, liberty, and property”, but Franklin talked him out of it. If he’d done that there would have been no funny s’s at all.
I like the way they wrote; handwriting was an art form then, and was intended to be beautiful as well as informative. Most people nowadays can’t write so it can be read, much less be pleasing to look at.
Elliott
June 17, 2005 at 1:26 am
24I agree Hedera, They were a contemplative bunch of white guys who had the time and education to consider everything from the building of a nation down to the art of handwriting.
Makes you wonder what life would be like if the intellectual elite were still highly regarded in this country.
Ken... Just Ken
June 17, 2005 at 2:22 am
25Jerry,
a CT Scan was done on Terri Schiavo and it was determined by real doctors that she was in a persistant vegitative state with n hope of recovery.
The sad thing is that many people didn’t believe those doctors and paid other “doctors” to disput the fact. And these people were louder and more interesting to the media than the sane scientists that knew what they were doing.
The worst thing these camera hog quacks did was convince Mrs. Schiavo’s parents that there was hope for recovery. Making it so much harder for them to allow her body to follow where her mind had gone.
During the whole fiasco, I was half afraid that Terri might end up pregnant to prove to the world that she was alive and needed “saving” I really wouldn’t put it past Randall Terry and his ilk.
Now I must go wash my brain out with soap.
Excuse me.
Tom M
June 17, 2005 at 5:04 am
26Hedera,
good stuff, but I think that once you say life is a gift then it not a right to make the best of it you can, but a duty. Even if you don’t believe in God then your duty is to those who don’t have the opportunities that you do and have died too young.
Last night we were reading about the very early Christians, and I think they’d be horrified at how individualistic we are today, and in particular many of the so called “religious right”. They met every day and ate meals together, and if anyone needed support they would sell what they had to give to the poor members of the church. What they would make of a so called christian society that would let people go with medical care, food or shelter, I dread to think.
Jerry
June 17, 2005 at 2:05 pm
27Just a little tangential note: “pursuit of happiness” doesn’t mean “trying to ‘catch’ happiness,” it means something more like “enjoying happiness in your day to day life.” Without the government screwing with your life when what you do doesn’t mess up others’ “pursuit of happiness.”
That idea pretty much led to the Ninth Amendment.
Lynne
June 17, 2005 at 2:21 pm
28http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050617/ap_on_re_us/governor_schiavo
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - Gov. Jeb Bush said Friday that a prosecutor has agreed to investigate why Terri Schiavo collapsed 15 years ago, citing an alleged time gap between when her husband found her and when he called 911.
How ridiculous is this?
Yes, we are going to now investigate Mr. Schiavo about a 911 call from 15 years ago.
I really need to move.
Landis
June 17, 2005 at 3:04 pm
29The next Governor Bush is starting his presidential run…
Rusty
June 17, 2005 at 3:20 pm
30At least Yahoo had the sense to file the story under the appropriate heading: Politics
Harold
June 17, 2005 at 3:59 pm
31I seem to recall that when the Democratic Texas legislators decided to go AWOL rather than be railroaded into a fixed vote forcing an illegal state redistricting, and somebody placed a 911 call claiming that a plane carrying them had crashed, and the Department of Homeland Security got involved, and then in turned out that the original 911 call was false, and there were demands for an investigation into who placed the 911 call…well, it was revealed that Texas destroys such records within 30 days, so no investigation could be made.
And Florida holds onto them for over fifteen years?
Auros
June 17, 2005 at 4:28 pm
32Perhaps TX conveniently came up with that “destroy the records after 30 days” policy for the case in question. I wouldn’t put it past Governor Hairspray.
Landis
June 17, 2005 at 6:23 pm
33Keeping this on the table does nothing but hurt the crowd that is Right-To-Life-By-Any-Means-Necessary, right? Have fun Governor. Keep at it. Perhaps it will remind Americans what your crowd actually stands for.
Auros
June 17, 2005 at 7:17 pm
34Ken… Just Ken said:
Hey Ken: Inside Stricken Mother, a Race Between Life and Death: Cancer That Felled Woman Now Threatens Fetus
tess
June 17, 2005 at 9:40 pm
35Oddly enough I have sympathy for the Torres family, and they seem to be a great deal more realistic than the whacked-out Schindlers. Though that does bring up an idea — the Schindler’s could’ve rented out Terri’s womb as a surrogate mother to pay for her hypothetical nursing home bills! Imagine it, if you will, having a woman who is so incapacitated she wouldn’t have ever known she was preggers with another couple’s child! Isn’t that what right-to-lifers are all about? Allowing rich people to keep having kids?
hedera
June 17, 2005 at 11:49 pm
36Tom M, I agree with you - and I certainly agree with you about the early Christians! - but nobody wants to hear about duty any more. I have a great novel set in the late 13th century, in which one character snaps to another, “If you’ve rights, you’ve duties!” This is a concept we seem to have lost.
Ken, you definitely need to wash your mind out with soap!
And I heard that thing about the 911 investigation on NPR, and I remember thinking, oh, my God, what will they not do next?
Harold
June 18, 2005 at 10:23 am
37Tess, that’s chilling. And I see a bestselling novel (soon to be a major motion picture) coming out of it.
Sure beats my idea of renting people in permanent vegatative states out as as human shields.
Murray
June 18, 2005 at 10:44 am
38Yup, now we know what happens when Republicans are proven wrong by science. They attack.
To start with science is not fact on its own, it is merely something that can be molded into what you want it to say. (You can do the same with the Bible). And given that a mea culpa is impossible, you divert attention by attacking.
This is an administration that believes the only sacred thing is the right to life PRIOR to birth. If, because you grow up, not wanted by a mother unable to raise you, and you then turn out bad, this administration is more than willing to kill you.
Jerry
June 18, 2005 at 7:14 pm
39Murray - I’m sure this was just odd wording: “…science is not fact on its own, it is merely something that can be molded into what you want it to say…” Perhaps you meant that’s how the theoneocons use it.
Science of course is a process, and done right, it precludes molding into inanities and bullshit.
Murray
June 19, 2005 at 6:34 pm
40Jerry,
I was unclear. I was speaking in my neocon voice.
Faith is what you believe in the absence of proof (if there is proof it’s not faith) and science is what you belive only with proof (if there is no proof its not science). Fundies and neocons keep mixing these up.
Lily
June 19, 2005 at 6:53 pm
41Not to be mercenary, but throughout this long ordeal I kept wondering who pays to keep the braindead bodies alive…and at what cost to others? I mean, every day I see collection jars on counters at the grocery store or gas station with some pathetic little kid’s face who needs medical treatment, or posters announcing bake sales to help somebody get an organ transplant.
Seems like you’d have to sell one hell of a lot of brownies to get a new kidney, doesn’t it? How many of these people end up dying because they can’t afford medical treatment? Meanwhile, some poor soul with no hope of recovery is kept alive artificially!
And more importantly, if “right to lifers” can become so obessessed about the “rights” of one braindead woman, why aren’t they just a passionately on the frontlines of the battle for universal health care coverage? Is it because allowing people to die for lack of health care coverage is not such an overt act as pulling a plug, and they therefore do not grasp the fact that in a country as wealthy as ours, this is corporate murder by neglect?
For that matter, if Jeb has so gosh much spare time that he can be stalking Michael Schiavo, why isn’t he leading the fight for health care coverage in his own state? I suppose that allowing people to die for lack of health care is merely “letting God work in His mysterious way.”
Jeb is such an idiot.
Ken... Just Ken
June 20, 2005 at 2:37 am
42Lily,
Unfortunately it’s been estimated in past studies that up to 40% of all medical expenses are for the last year of life.
It’s hard to say, but we (as westerners) need to learn how to die and how to let our loved ones die with dignity.
We, in Oregon, keep passing the right to die law and the Federal government keeps trying to knock it down. I don’t understand what they have to gain by doing that.
I hope that someday we’ll learn how to take care of the people who need it and find some way to ease the pain of the people who won’t survive.
And learn how to tell the difference.
David
June 20, 2005 at 8:27 pm
43Ken…Just Ken,
Big $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. Frist’s father founded the Hospital Corporation of America. Your bottom insures their bottom line.
Murray
June 21, 2005 at 8:36 am
44It’s clear enough.
If you are dying because you can’t afford health care, that’s your problem. You can’t expect the public to foot your bill.
If you are already dead but your body is being kept warm by machines, it’s only right that the public pay (for ever). We believe in the sanctity of life.
Got that?
Lily
June 21, 2005 at 10:32 am
45I suppose it also depends upon your insurance coverage: ie, how much they can soak you for. I was recently offered the opportunity to increase my lifetime benefit from $1 million to $5 million by paying an additional premium out of pocket. No way…I figure if I ever need that much medical care, I’d rather be dead anyway, and I don’t want to give a hospital the incentive to keep my body alive!
BTW: did ya’ll know that a Catholic hospital will not honor a legally executed Living Will if it violates Catholic teachings? IE, they will not take you off life support because the Church has made it quite clear this is, as they say, “euthanasia by omission.”
I thought this had to be an urban legend but the Schiavo affair prompted me to research the matter further, since 2 of the 3 local hospitals are Catholic so I could end up there in an emergency.
The “Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services” promulgated by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops states:
“24. In compliance with federal law, a Catholic health
care institution will make available to patients
information about their rights, under the laws of
their state, to make an advance directive for their
medical treatment. The institution, however, will not
honor an advance directive that is contrary to
Catholic teaching. If the advance directive conflicts
with Catholic teaching, an explanation should be
provided as to why the directive cannot be honored.”
http://www.nccbuscc.org
In other words: To continue sucking at the government teat, we will help you write a legally binding Living Will, but we will not honor it if it violates our teaching…even if you’re not a Catholic.
If you check the websites of your local Catholic hospitals, usually in their Hospice or Pastoral Care section, you will see somewhere a statement that they adhere to the Directives…though in the case of my 2 local hospitals, the statement is in barely visible grey print at the bottom of the page.
And it doesn’t pertain only end of life issues: my friend needed an ovarian cyst removed, so she asked the surgeon about doing a tubal ligation while she was, as she put it “unzipped.” The surgeon said he wasn’t allowed to perform a birth control procedure at the Catholic hospital, and since he didn’t have privileges at the non-Catholic one, she’d need to seek out another surgeon! Which of course created a tussle with her insurance company when she tried to go “out of plan.”
Emmarie
June 21, 2005 at 1:10 pm
46Lily: I thought that life support in some instances would count as “extraordinary means” of keeping someone alive and therefore does not have to be administered under Catholic teaching.
David
June 21, 2005 at 1:28 pm
47All I can say to this is Please never admit me to a Catholic hospital, which is worrisome, because the best hospital in Asheville is Catholic. Luckily the best hospitals in Orlando are Seventh Day Adventist. They provided, and had their personnel witness, my father’s living will. The regression of the Catholic church is at least as significant as the Southern Baptist decent into childish, but ruthless, fundamentalism, and no less an assault on personal liberty. It’s time to offend somebody.
Lily
June 21, 2005 at 9:04 pm
48Emmarie,
The Church is currently trying to define exactly what “extraordinary means” means in this technological age. In fact, they recently held an international conference on the topic, and you can read more about that at http://www.vegetativestate.org/commenti.htm
However, the Vatican has been clear on the issue of withholding nutrition and hydration, quoting from the same website:
“Patients who are in a persistent vegetative state have a right to hydration and nutrition even though it must be provided through artificial means, said a leading Vatican bioethicist. Bishop Elio Sgreccia, vice president of the Pontifical Academy for Life, said that “with all these tubes in the veins, the nose and the stomach” too many people think of nutrition and hydration as a form of medical treatment.
“These interventions are simply care, which is obligatory to the moment of natural death,” he said at a March 16 Vatican press conference.”
However, as a former Catholic with 16 years of Catholic education, I know that not everybody adheres to the doctrines. So one might get lucky and be in a Catholic hospice where the staff values death with dignity…but I sure wouldn’t stake my life (or in this case, my death) on it.
Emmarie
June 21, 2005 at 10:46 pm
49That’s strange and unhappy. Much as I’ve given up on hearing anything really life-promoting from the Catholic church (as differentiated from Catholics themselves), I was kind of excited to hear that it does differentiate between “ordinary” and “extraordinary” means. But I guess it was a lack of information about the latest developments.
David
June 25, 2005 at 12:54 pm
50In case you missed it, Michael Schiavo put a wonderful plaque on his wife’s gravesite:
SCHIAVO
THERESA MARIE
BELOVED WIFE
BORN DECEMBER 3, 1963
DEPARTED THIS EARTH
FEBRUARY 25, 1990
AT PEACE MARCH 31, 2005
I KEPT MY PROMISE
Michael Schiavo is a truly classy gentleman. Pity the same cannot be said of our governor.