Okay, so the United States can no longer claim to have the best public education system in the world, at least not with a straight face. As the only highly-developed nation that doesn’t make sure our citizens and children are provided with health insurance, we can’t say we have the “world’s best health care system” anymore, not really. Other nations can now boast a higher rate of advanced degrees in science. Our economy is neither the fastest-growing nor the healthiest, and our massive debt threatens its future. The War on Terror has compelled us to let other, smaller nations be slightly “freer” than us for the moment.
We’ve got some challenges, yes. But we’re not out of the running for any of the above. We can still bail ourselves out by deploying the one weapon which we are still the undisputed masters of:
Spin.
Ther most breathtaking example of the international Spin Gap has got to be the latest round of headlines concerning Amnesty International, Guantanamo Bay, and Gulaggate. To read today’s headlines, such as “Amnesty USA backs off Gitmo as ‘gulag’,” you’d think that this whole flap concerns a bunch of hysterical, exaggerating America-haters and their overreaching desire to Bring Us Down. Amnesty International is trying to change this perception, but they’re too late, outmaneuvered, and outclassed, the poor saps. The details of the story’s Death By Spin is a stunning example of our inarguable mastery of the discipline.
First, bear in mind that the summary on the US from the Amnesty International annual report does not contain the word “gulag.” Nor does an exhaustive specific report released a couple of weeks ago. The phrase “gulag of our times” comes from a speech made two weeks ago that refers to the reports.
That’s where our stunning advantage in spin technology began to assert itself. By the middle of last week, there wasn’t a single member of the Bush administration who wasn’t pushing his or her way towards a microphone in order to denounce Amnesty International for their ridiculous, unfounded, absurd, unfair “gulag” statement. They likened Gitmo to a gulag! Do they even know what went on at those gulags? What kind of gulag gulag says that we gulag our gulag with the gulag gulag still at gulag? Our technicians stuffed the foreign and domestic press’ ears so full of gulag that it became the story, the lead that consigned the actual report to the background.
And that was only the bait, Phase One. The poor Amnesty International idiots didn’t know what hit ‘em.
Even though the Pentagon chose this inoppportune moment to admit that yes, there was some Koran desecration going on at Gitmo, even though Amnesty’s report contained a thousand damning details and reasonable objections, our brave and brilliant spinologists kept the “gulag” thing on the front burner. And Amnesty took the bait:
“Well, maybe not a gulag…”
A-ha! So those Amnesty hippies admit that their criticism was over-the-top! And now they’re backing off! They said “gulag” and they now admit that it isn’t a gulag! So which is it, Amnesty? “Gulag” or “not gulag?” How can we believe anything you say now!?
Heh. Idiots. You’d think that they’d have learned something from Newsweek, so soon after “The Case of The Koran in the Toilet that Might Not Have Been Actually Flushed,” which became about poor reporting and liberal bias rather than the actual desecration that we now know took place. You’d think they’d wise up and upgrade their 80’s era PR technologies. You’d think.
You’d be wrong. Amnesty International is in the same boat with al Qaeda, Iraq, the UN, France, Iran, Germany, North Korea, Russia, and the Democrats. They’re all the same. Despite the fact that Amnesty is an organization explicitly devoted to absolutely nothing but promoting and protecting freedom, they hate us for our freedom. And they’ll say and do anything to bring us down.
Suckers.





16 comments
Amber
June 6, 2005 at 4:44 pm
1But, you see, Amnesty International (see, there’s that word that tells you that they hate America. /We/ don’t need no stinkin’ ‘global community’ claptrap.) cares about OTHER PEOPLE’S freedom, and not the freedom of Americans to pursue America’s agenda without restriction.
Bush and Co. do care about freedom. Their own freedom. And the freedom of ‘good American citizens’…a group that includes them and everyone who agrees with them. Any force which seeks to question what they choose to do, how they choose to do it, or (god forbid!) whether they should be doing it in the first place, is an threat to American freedom which can not be tolerated.
No one has the right to tell America what she can or cannot do. We are the Land of the Free. Not because we promote true freedom anymore, but rather because our government is currently run by people who refuse to tolerate any dissent or second thoughts on their chosen course of action.
tess
June 6, 2005 at 4:53 pm
2Yay! Freedom to chose . . . to not have an abortion because it’s illegal! Unless I’m not white (which I am) and living in an American-controlled overseas corporate territory (which, thankfully, I am not) where if I work in a sweatshop I’d be forced to have an abortion even if I don’t want it.
And the freedom to chose my religion, as long as I chose one, and that one happens to be Judeo-Christian.
And the freedome to chose my political leader, as long as he’s a he, Republican, and ultra-conservative.
Truly we are blessed to live in this land of the free. Amnesty International doesn’t know what freedom and human rights really mean if they don’t understand how free it is to be American!
Fuck yeah!
Dang
June 6, 2005 at 5:12 pm
3Amen.
It’s instructive that when the Bush administration has no answer, they are very good at all yelling in unison and blaming the resultant hearing damage on whoever they’re yelling at.
dee
June 6, 2005 at 6:09 pm
4It’s the Food Lion defense. Several years ago when ABC did an expose on the outdated food and unsanitary conditions at Food Lion stores, Food Lion never did dispute the findings. Their defense consisted of trumpeting to anyone within hearing range that those ABC employees had LIED on their job applications to Food Lion. Never mind the roaches in the potato salad — Jim over there never did work at a QuikMart like he said!!!
I’ve seen this pattern over and over in this administration. Never mind that George Bush has never explained why he failed to fulfill his TANG obligations — that memo was FAKED! Never mind that it turns out there were abuses of the Koran, Newsweek’s source was TAINTED! Never mind that the condtions described by AI at Guantanamo Bay haven’t been disputed, they said GULAG!!!
Potato salad, anyone?
Murray
June 6, 2005 at 6:16 pm
5We’re number 1! We’re number 1! We’re number 1!
U,S,A! U,S,A! U,S,A!
Goooooooooooo Bush!
Strangefate
June 6, 2005 at 6:44 pm
6Now that everyone on earth has been debunked and their credibility destroyed, from the evil liberal media to these Al Queda lovin’ international organizations, I guess we have no choice but to believe whatever the Bush administration tells us.
Since clearly they’re the only honest people left.
tim
June 6, 2005 at 8:59 pm
7I’m looking back at my past comments, and I see that I used the word “gulag”, while speculating about where FA readers may someday end up, on May 24th. Amnesty International’s Irene Khan used it on May 25th to describe Guantanamo Bay. Coincidence? I certainly hope so. Otherwise, I’m terribly, terribly sorry.
David
June 6, 2005 at 9:32 pm
8Decent,humane people just can’t quite bring themselves to stare these bastards down. Of course it’s a gd gulag, and anyone who dares speak the truth about the Bush administration is treated as an enemy of the state. They just don’t get shot the way they did in Stalinist Russia, or sent off to prison camps. There’s no need since these bastards have perfected the art of media-based assassination.
Lily Tomlin was soooooooooooooooooo right.
Tom M
June 7, 2005 at 4:02 am
9You’ve got to hand it to the Bush camp. They are masterful in their deployment of the Ad Hominem attack against the flank exposed by their diversionary tactics. It’s a poor show on the part of the press though. They were suckered in worse than anyone in their thirst for blood, and when the rug was pulled from under them they had no choice but to join in the ad hominem or look weak themselves.
Mary
June 7, 2005 at 8:47 am
10I’m beyond cynical. It is now a deep depression and my meds aren’t helping any more
Pete IVDL
June 7, 2005 at 8:01 pm
11I started to laugh, anticipating the “spinology” in this blog… I never finished.
If it wasn’t so Lobsterdamned true, it’d be unbelievable.
I’m prepared to vote Jon Stewart. Even in an Australian election. The alternative is just not plain funny anymore.
Mary, even the magic shoes don’t work anymore. There’s no place like home…
hedera
June 7, 2005 at 11:34 pm
12Pete, the trouble is, you couldn’t make this stuff up. You’d be laughed out of the room.
Ann
June 8, 2005 at 2:16 pm
13I don’t mean to be pedantic, but the phrase “gulag of our times” does appear in the foreword to the report. I’m not saying that the attacks by the administration and its henchmen were reasonable or fair, but I do think we have to be extremely careful to get our facts straight.
Pete IVDL
June 8, 2005 at 4:44 pm
14Ann, I think the gulag bit might have been added to the web release of the document. It doesn’t appear in the actual report or header. (Yes, I’m trying to read it. No, I don’t have a life!)
Ann
June 8, 2005 at 5:44 pm
15Pete,
Hmm. It’s in the foreword on the Amnesty site, but I haven’t obtained a print copy. Do let us know how it all turns out!
Pete IVDL
June 10, 2005 at 4:40 pm
16Ann, the report could have been called “A Gulag By Any Other Name”… It’s about the only word that isn’t used in the report, like a dead elephant in the room. If you substitute “CCCP” for “US” and change the dates back 20 years or so, the only difference is the continued press coverage!
I’m not sure I shoulda read the damn thing, now I dunno whether to laugh or cry. Perhaps I’ll try laughing first.