On the surface, Laura Bush on vacation and Saddam Hussein in his underwear might not seem to be linked. But they are. Intimately.
Now calm down, Mr. President, it’s not what you think. It rarely is these days, come to think of it.
In the Abu Ghraib scandal or the li’l matter of prisoners dying in Afghanistan, we’ve had the ready excuse of an overextended and undertrained military. You know, good American boys and girls put in a prison guard role that wasn’t part of the boot camp regimen. Youthful high spirits, little more than a fraternity prank that got out of control, really. We’re taking action, and the perpetrators of this completely isolated incident are being severely reprimanded and they’re very, very sorry. Etc.
That’s a harder sell with the candid lingerie shots of Saddam Hussein that have humiliated and enraged the very Iraqis whom we’re trying to convince to Stop It With The Blowing Up Already. It’s not extremely credible that the people with close access to the most important prisoner on the face of the earth are a bunch of good-hearted but undertrained kids with a penchant for mischief. Maybe a good-hearted but undertrained four-star general with a penchant for mischief, I guess, god bless the li’l nipper…
But you’re still thinking about my opening sentence, and wondering “So how did Laura Bush get into Saddam’s underwear?” It’s a fair question, and it’s more interesting than the non-shocking revelation that a ruthless dictator would prefer briefs to boxers (I mean, of course…). Let me explain.
Mrs. Bush’s tour of the Temple Mount yesterday sounded like a lot fun. She got to visit the Dome of the Rock! Remember, the Dome of the Rock, that really holy Islamic place that Ariel Sharon visited in 2000, which touched off a violent and still-continuing Palestinian uprising and soon afterwards helped sweep a law-n-order candidate into the Prime Minister’s office in Israel, a candidate whose name just happened to be “Ariel Sharon?”
Yes, that Dome of the Rock.
You’d think that in the wake of Undiegate the First Lady might have wanted to alter her day’s plan in some way. Maybe go to nice restaurant and avoid any further appearance that we Americans are a bunch of cloddish, cruel infidels who cheerfully stomp on everything that folks in the Middle East hold dear simply because we can. You’d think.
You’d be wrong. The administration doesn’t think that way. To them, we Americans are so clearly righteous and good and free that all we have to do is hang around long enough and they will love us. We’re cuddly. We’re nice. We radiate Freedom. They’ll get it after a while, and these little incidents like Laura on the Rock and Undiegate and Abu Ghraib and Koran desecration and etc. will be things that we’ll all look back on together and laugh at some day:
“Dang, we were a bunch of silly billies, weren’t we, Mohammed?”
“Oh yes, buddy, but we were SO touchy! It’s a little embarrassing.”
“Aw, not another word about that, pal. Let’s go to Applebee’s.”
“You got it, praise Allah. I’m buying!”
With a future like that a near certainty, it’s not hard to see why our First Lady would take her day trip so close to Saddam’s underpants. There’s never a “sensitive time” or a need for “restraint” or anything like that. Laura had a trip planned, and she took it. Chalk it up to youthful high spirits.





24 comments
dee
May 22, 2005 at 4:26 pm
1I suppose we should be grateful for the small mercy that Laura didn’t make any “George has a habit of trying to milk Arabians” jokes.
tess
May 22, 2005 at 4:36 pm
2I imagine it’s those same high, youthful spirits that led her to crash into and kill her first boyfriend, and then that joke about her husband’s fondness for milking male horses. Youthful indiscretions well into your 50s are a-okay in this administration, and so it’s okay to insult a whole continent of people because they know that it’s all for shits and giggles!
Though can’t say the same about those damn Commie liberals every time they open their mouths and mention “oral sex” — nope, SF’s mayor Gavin Newsom’s wife got the rightful kick in the face when she made a joke about giving her husband blow-jobs! That’s just so completely out of line! Why can’t they tell clean jokes, like Mrs. Bush?
Emmarie
May 22, 2005 at 7:14 pm
3Call this a useless question:
What did people call government scandals before Watergate? Now you can just add -gate to anything and have an easy appellation, but what did people do before that?
tess
May 22, 2005 at 7:19 pm
4I think they were just called “scandals” or “affairs,” like the Teapot Dome scandal, or Iran-Contra. I could be wrong since it’s been a few years, but the -gate suffix seems more of a byproduct of an increasingly sensationalistic press. Or maybe it’s always been sensationalistic, only now I’m starting to notice.
gmc
May 22, 2005 at 8:28 pm
5I just finished reading Clay Jenkinson’s new book: (imagine italics here) Becoming Jefferson’s People: Re-inventing the American Republic in the Twenty-first Century.
This is a must-read for all of you that follow Fanatical Apathy. Adam’s satirical insight goes well with the logic of this book.
Buy several and pass them out to anyone you know that can read. My only interest in promoting this book is that it is a worthwhile read and I think you folks will find it stimulating.
Murray
May 22, 2005 at 8:45 pm
6I’m sure that God directs Laura’s footsteps in the same all knowing way that he leads George, to bring peace to the world and lead the heathen to Christ. Perhaps one day they can even bring Sadam to salvation. We are so lucky to have them represent us to the world.
tim
May 22, 2005 at 9:07 pm
7Yeah, that was a great plan to take humiliating photos of Saddam. If there’s one thing radical muslims can suffer copiously in stony silence it’s got to be humiliation.
David
May 22, 2005 at 9:19 pm
8WP HASHCASH FAILED, etc., etc. What the hell is this? That’s the second amazingly clever post I’ve lost to this whatever-it-is. Or else Lobster is trying to tell me something.
gmc,
I’ve printed out my Borders 25% off coupon.
David
May 22, 2005 at 10:04 pm
9Oh, yeah -
Alexandra Pelosi’s Sneaking into the Flying Circus: How the Media Turn Our Presidential Campaigns into Freak Shows is an interesting, entertaining read. One anecdote from the second inauguration. “Live on Fox News, a newswoman was talking about the people who came out to salute the president. When the anchor asked her what the people behind her were chanting, she reported they were saying, ‘Hey George Bush, how are you feeling today?’ In fact, they were chanting ‘Hey George Bush, what do you say, how many soldiers did you kill today?’ Details, details.”
hedera
May 23, 2005 at 12:04 am
10I think they were just called “scandals” before Watergate, too, but I feel I ought to point out that they can’t have been called “Iran-Contra” before Watergate…
As for Laura B. visiting the Dome of the Rock, it’s probably extremely offensive (she is, after all, female) to your basic Muslim fundamentalist, but it can’t be any worse than Ariel Sharon’s little jaunt. As far as I can see, he meant to touch off an uprising and he did. Laura’s just a tourist. If anything, the photos of Saddam (can we possibly get any more insensitive? Is somebody trying for the Guinness Book of World Records?) may have drawn some potential fire.
tess
May 23, 2005 at 1:14 am
11Yeah, yeah, I know — Iran-Contra after Watergate, but wasn’t called Contra-gate.
Though “gate” seems to be a by-product of when the press really watered down content during the 90s and filled air time with detail about whitewater, and Lewinsky.
music and meaning
May 23, 2005 at 2:57 am
12David, I’m sorry that your replies disappeared.
I’m working on the comment-eating thing right now, and have addressed your concern in another thread.
Mary Kay
May 23, 2005 at 10:24 am
13We love London.
We hate France.
Let’s show Saddam’s underpants!
Steve
May 23, 2005 at 2:59 pm
14tess: Actually, there were attempts to attach a -gate to Iran-Contra, specifically Irangate, but it never stuck. Occasionally you will see or hear someone refer to it by that name.
If memory serves at all, The New Republic, which I read at the time (I’m better now, thank you) ran a contest of sorts to “name” the scandal. The winner was Iranamuck which TNR used in reference to the scandal but that didn’t catch on with the rest of the press either, so we were left with Iran-Contra.
tess
May 23, 2005 at 6:40 pm
15My mistake. It happens when I try to remember bits of TV news from when I was 7.
dave
May 23, 2005 at 8:44 pm
16Off topic, but … I just caught up on WWDTM from May, and must applaud Adam for:
A. Winning 1 1/2 times
B. Making me laugh diet coke through my nose with his impression of a lonely Satan waiting by the telephone.
Cheers!
David
May 23, 2005 at 9:05 pm
17Thanks, music and meaning. As Donald Rumsfeld said,”Stuff happens.”
I agree, Adam’s impression of Satan suffering through an area code error of cosmic proportions was wonderful.
Does anyone remember what the address of the house that was given to Reagan when he left office was changed to? How ironic if they changed it from 666 to 616…
Mike Z
May 23, 2005 at 9:42 pm
18music and meaning -
Below is the Hashcash message I usually get when I try to post, and I can’t seem to figure out how to solve the problem from my end. I’m usually on AOL, and I know they are sometimes difficult to deal with when it comes to these sorts of things. Any suggestions are certainly welcome.
Thanks.
—————-
WP-Hashcash Check Failed
Your client has failed to compute the special javascript hashcode required to comment on this blog. If you believe this to be in error, please contact the blog administrator, and check for javascript, validation, or php errors. It is also possible that you are trying to spam this blog.
If you are using Google Web Accelerator, a proxy, or some other caching system, WP-Hashcash may not let you comment. There are known issues with caching that are fundamentally insoluble, because the page being written to you must be generated freshly. Turn off your caching software and reload the page. If you are using a proxy, commenting should work, but it is untested.
This comment has been logged, and will not be displayed on the blog.
David
May 24, 2005 at 2:36 pm
19Mike Z,
Did it feel like some kind of FBI intervention the first time you saw it? But since music and meaning is on the case, I am now at ease. Of course it could have been just free floating anxiety, since I’m on film somewhere in some probably long-forgotten film footage for daring to participate in the first Civil Rights march at the University of Florida. I waved at the bastard, an Alachua County deputy who was filming away (maybe it was just for home movies…)
Of course, that was in the glory days of the pre-professional counseling office at UF sending evaluation forms to one’s instructors which included a question about whether or not one showed any signs of communist leanings or affiliations (I am not lying). Oh, the good old days of it just being locally-based, amateur assaults on our civil liberties.
I just spotted the “Protected by WP-Hashcash,” which makes the whole thing cyber-innocent again.
Pete IVDL
May 24, 2005 at 9:09 pm
20Oh dear. Whatever happened to the deposed dictator living in obnoxious luxury in a sun-drenched, tax-free principality? Now we catch ‘em, clean ‘em, and tag ‘em.
What’s the bet that Bennetton uses Saddam’s candid shots in an advertising campaign?
Oh - and what’s the bet all this good-natured humiliation backfires just a little bit?
David
May 24, 2005 at 10:15 pm
21Pete IVDL,
Excellent question. At least my beloved Florida is trying to figure out some way to provide safe haven for an international terrorist who released FBI documents indicate helped blow an airliner out of the sky, killing 273 people. Of course, it was a Cuban airliner, the first act of airliner terrorism on this side of The Pond.
Perhaps the Yellow Rose will award the guy a pardon and a Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Murray
May 25, 2005 at 6:09 pm
22David,
Time to redefine terrorist,
Terrorist= a bad person we don’t like.
Freedom fighter= a bad person we do like.
Sort of similar to how the most partriotic and heroic thing an American can be is a soldier in our armed services, unless you run for office as a Democrat in which case you are a war criminal.
David
May 25, 2005 at 10:05 pm
23Murray,
I guess at this point, running for office as a Democrat qualifies as an act of treason.
hedera
May 28, 2005 at 12:26 am
24Was it Anastasio Somoza about whom some person I can’t recall said, “He’s an SOB, but he’s our SOB” ??