I’ll be flying to Chicago in a few hours, helping Wait Wait break in its new permanent home. Despite the added air-time to get my airtime, it’s a move I’m in favor of - doing the show in front of an audience allows me to work in some of my vast mime repetoire, which is often lost on radio listeners.
Another noteworthy new policy is the largely uncelebrated little clause in the latest defense bill that would bar women from “combat support” and “combat service support” in our military. A few years ago moderates and liberals would’ve been raising a ruckus about this regressive return to ol’ fashioned values. Today, it’s just another small leak in a vessel that has already has a few noticeable torpedo holes to worry about.
It’s worth mentioning though, if only because we’re at war, our armed forces are missing their recruiting goals to an alarming degree, and suddenly we’re telling Rosie to pick up her rivets and go home. And, um, rivet from someplace safe. Write inspirational letters to our boys at the front. I don’t know - tie a yellow ribbon or something - we’re trying to fight a war here for godsakes.
Actually, in some ways it might be a brilliant strategy. We’re fighting an ideology that more than almost anything else objects to our insistence on treating women as equals in all ways. Once we correct that, they’ll have one less reason to want to kill us. Soon, al Qaeda may look at us and say, “Hey, they’ve curtailed personal freedoms, they’re increasingly intolerant of sexuality in their media, they consider their government to be founded upon religion, and now they’ve started to limit the role of women in their society! They’re just like us! Let’s go and attack the French…”
So not only will this protect our women, it’ll help win the war. Or at least end it. See, ladies? It all works out. And thanks for all the help. Now go cover up - you’re embarrassing us in front of our new friends.





35 comments
Jerry
May 12, 2005 at 2:05 am
1Yes! I knew the Yellow Rose and the whole Republican party were fucking geniuses! You are right! By emulating our enemies, starting with torture and murder, and now moving on to repressive fundamentalist social policy, including restricting education to simplistic rote memorization of archaic texts, we will deflect their wrath! Brilliant!
Scott
May 12, 2005 at 2:26 am
2The scary part is that everything is changing so hard and so quick, but it doesn’t appear that way. In a normal day, gas prices are the only things that shows up. It’s like the sea swelling behind a dyke about to burst.
We’ll wake up and know that we are through the looking glass. I mean how could we not have a banner headline EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DAY that reads GOVERNOR SCHWARZENAGGER (or however it is spelled)
gtc
May 12, 2005 at 6:53 am
3So there it is. The solution to the one obstacle which heretofore made the idea of a military draft politically impossible. I had, until I read this news, always said it couldn’t happen because I couldn’t imagine this country, in its make-believe equal rights position, endorsing the idea of our daughters and mothers being forced to serve in combat. So now, beware the draft, everyone.
craig
May 12, 2005 at 7:37 am
4First, eliminate homosexuals from the military. Second, eliminate women. If there are not enough straight male Americans to defend the country, we can start a “guest worker” program to import mercenaries from third world countries and grant them posthumous citizenship for defending a country that never wanted them.
I feel so secure.
Tom M
May 12, 2005 at 8:47 am
5craig, didn’t you know that’s SOP for any imperial power. It worked great for us Brits, the French, the Romans, the Greek etc etc. It’s the penultimate step on the road to former great nation status.
Mary
May 12, 2005 at 10:13 am
6Who needs those gays and women anyway, right W? Oh, that’s right, you didn’t serve in the military. Silly me.
Jon
May 12, 2005 at 10:43 am
7Just to nit-pick for a moment, Rosie the Riveter was an iconic homefront worker, not soldier, in WWII. See, she’s riveting planes & whatnot because the men are off fighting. That’s what passed for equality then. “Riveting,” this comment ain’t.
chrisBix.
May 12, 2005 at 10:52 am
8My husband, an unabashed liberal democrat and loving man, just is livid that new mothers are sent to Iraq. I must say i agree. Mothers of three month olds should not be running supply missions in a war. sorry. Oh, and by the way. I don’t think anybodys son or daughter should be fighting a war to maintain the House of Saud and thier oil wealth.
Harold
May 12, 2005 at 11:59 am
9Hey, look! “House Of Saud” made it through! This site really is New & Improved!
Landis
May 12, 2005 at 12:17 pm
10New, maybe, but I think I’ll miss “House of Vagina”
Speaking of recruiting goals, my brother (21) was seriously thinking of joining the army and then he got so turned off by the recruiting tactics (calls, random stops by his house and place of work) that he called the whole thing off. Well, at least I know that they won’t be sending my sister to the front.
David
May 12, 2005 at 1:29 pm
11Second attempt - got a blank page, except for a trio of squares, first time.
The point about banning women from combat roles as a step toward re-instituting the draft is entirely too plausible. Jenna and Barbara as conscripts? Right in there with avian porci.
Allison in Santa Cruz
May 12, 2005 at 1:38 pm
12Wow, some of you are even more cynical about the current administration than I am. Or maybe you’re just better at catching on than I am. When I read Adam’s entry today it didn’t occur to me that a ban on women in combat roles could be the first step towards re-instituting the draft. But it makes perfect sense.
Kelli
May 12, 2005 at 1:50 pm
13This administration always leaves me shaking my head and gibbering; trying to decide if their policy represents general malicious ignorance and bigotry (sexism)or purposeful malicious ignorance and bigotry (sexism and the draft).
This is not the first example of Republican actions that leave me pondering this question. Maybe that is part of the plan, keep us wondering about the depth of their evil for long enough an we forget to respond to it in the first place.
CLEVER, purposeful, malicious ignorance and bigotry…
madbard
May 12, 2005 at 1:57 pm
14The loyal opposition (as opposed to use, the liberal traitors) keep talking about starving the Federal behemouth to death. I think starting by restricting the military is a *great* idea….
[This comment is rated 8.5 on the irony scale.]
JB
May 12, 2005 at 2:24 pm
15This is off subject, but first I should admit that I like the design of your new website. I especially like the colors. They are easy on the eyes. I just wanted to bring your attention to a memo I came across yesterday. This may be old news, oh, wait, wait, it is. What I mean is this may have been the uproar of the week, and I missed it. (I’ve been real busy this week having to work to pay the rent and all. You know, busy just like you and everyone else.) If I did miss the moaning and wailing then I may have to apologize for wasting your time (but I probably won’t). The upshot is that the following link reveals that, well, well, I’ll just let you read it for yourself.; http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1593607,00.html
and this has some explication: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1592724,00.html
Enjoy
Auros
May 12, 2005 at 3:07 pm
16Yeah, the memo on how they planned to invade Iraq, and massaged the intel to support that conclusion, was a big deal in the Brit election. I’m kinda bummed (though not surprised) that Labor wasn’t knocked down far enough to force them to form a coalition with the LibDems and kick out Blair…
This is just another step on the road to ensuring that we don’t have the manpower to meet our imperially overreaching aims. They already have done stuff like firing ten Arabic-speaking translators for suspected queerosity.
ginny
May 12, 2005 at 3:14 pm
17Hmm. ginmar will be pleased that she won’t be expected to carry a rifle and defend herself in a firefight if she’s deployed by the Guard again.
But then she wasn’t before, but her position was overrun. Oopsie.
Murray
May 12, 2005 at 4:49 pm
18Barefoot and pregnant, that’s how we want our women soldiers, like that Lyndie England girl.
David
May 12, 2005 at 9:31 pm
19Off topic, sort of, but Lobster what a poem.
http://www.poetsagainstthewar.org/poemsoftheweek.asp
This is the link to Bonnie Roberts’ poem “The Lord’s Prayer for the ‘Right.’” Other way is just to go to Poets against the War website and click on current poems, then scroll to her poem.
hedera
May 13, 2005 at 12:14 am
20I saw that memo written up, JB and Auros; can’t remember where offhand but it could have been in this week’s Economist, it’s the sort of thing they carry. It’s 2 years too late and no one would have believed it at the time anyway. Labor won the election anyhow for the simple reason that the LibDems and the Conservatives are even more incompetent that the Democrats.
If they ban women from combat and combat support, they’ll have to reinstate the draft. There’s no other possible way they can accumulate enough cannon fodder.
You’re right, David. Lobsterwhattapoem.
madbard
May 13, 2005 at 3:36 pm
21i just want to say that i just realized Jennifer has absconded (as opposed to ab-sconed… Mmmm, scones.) my color scheme.
madbard
May 13, 2005 at 3:37 pm
22damn autofill in. wrong url above.
Murray
May 13, 2005 at 5:14 pm
23hedera,
You can find out about it here, http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0511-24.htm
This is Molly Ivan’s column about the smoking gun memo.
Mike Z
May 13, 2005 at 8:35 pm
24test
Bob
May 13, 2005 at 8:52 pm
25Open book, I hope.
tess
May 14, 2005 at 4:02 am
26One good thing is that I’m unlikely to be drafted with the new sexist rules. Bad news is that my boyfriend and my brothers are at risk of becoming cannon fodder for a war that none of them support. Makes me glad I was too lazy to join up ROTC to pay for college.
David
May 14, 2005 at 9:43 am
27Tess,
Maybe they could contact Dick Cheney for pointers on how to avoid being drafted.
hedera
May 14, 2005 at 3:42 pm
28Thanks, Murray! That’s what I read, all right. Molly gets carried by the S.F. Chron on their OpEd page, when they feel like it - there doesn’t seem to be a pattern. But they printed that column and that’s what I read.
Jerry
May 14, 2005 at 3:45 pm
29David - Hardly just Cheney…avoiding the service they advocate is something of a skill with most of them:
Republicans
* Dennis Hastert: did not serve.
* Tom Delay: did not serve.
* Roy Blunt: did not serve.
* Bill Frist: did not serve.
* Mitch McConnell: did not serve.
* Rick Santorum: did not serve.
* Trent Lott: did not serve.
* Dick Cheney: did not serve. Several deferments, the last by marriage.
* John Ashcroft: did not serve. Seven deferments to teach business.
* Jeb Bush: did not serve.
* Karl Rove: did not serve.
* Saxby Chambliss: did not serve. “Bad knee.” The man who attacked Cleland’s patriotism.
* Paul Wolfowitz: did not serve.
* Vin Weber: did not serve.
* Richard Perle: did not serve.
* Douglas Feith: did not serve.
* Eliot Abrams: did not serve.
* Richard Shelby: did not serve.
* Jon! Kyl: did not serve.
* Tim Hutchison: did not serve.
* Christopher Cox: did not serve.
* Newt Gingrich: did not serve.
* Don Rumsfeld: served in Navy (1954-57) as flight instructor.
* George W. Bush: failed to complete his six-year National Guard; got assigned to Alabama so he could campaign for family friend running for U.S. Senate; failed to show up for required medical exam, disappeared from duty.
* Ronald Reagan: due to poor eyesight, served in a non-combat role making movies.
* B-1 Bob Dornan: Consciously enlisted after fighting was over in Korea.
* Phil Gramm: did not serve.
* John McCain: Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross.
* Dana Rohrabacher: did not serve.
* John M. McHugh: did not serve.
* JC Watts: did not serve.
* Jack Kemp: did not serve. “Knee problem,” although continued in NFL for 8 years.
* Dan Quayle: Journalism unit of the Indiana National Guard.
* Rudy Giuliani: did not serve.
* George Pataki: did not serve.
* Spencer Abraham: did not serve.
* John Engler: did not serve.
* Lindsey Graham: National Guard lawyer.
Pundits & Preachers
* Sean Hannity: did not serve.
* Rush Limbaugh: did not serve (4-F with a ‘pilonidal cyst.’)
* Bill O’Reilly: did not serve.
* Michael Savage: did not serve.
* George Will: did not serve.
* Chris Matthews: did not serve.
* Paul Gigot: did not serve.
* Bill Bennett: did not serve.
* Pat Buchanan: did not serve.
* John Wayne: did not serve.
* Bill Kristol: did not serve.
* Kenneth Starr: did not serve.
* Antonin Scalia: did not serve.
* Clarence Thomas: did not serve.
* Ralph Reed: did not serve.
* Michael Medved: did not serve.
* Charlie Daniels: did not serve.
* Ted Nugent! : did not serve. (He only shoots at things that don’t shoot back.)
However, they really can’t turn to the Democrats for advice:
* Richard Gephardt: Air National Guard, 1965-71.
* David Bonior: Staff Sgt., Air Force 1968-72.
* Tom Daschle: 1st Lt., Air Force SAC 1969-72.
* Al Gore: enlisted Aug. 1969; sent to Vietnam Jan. 1971 as an army journalist in 20th Engineer Brigade.
* Bob Kerrey: Lt. j.g. Navy 1966-69; Medal of Honor, Vietnam.
* Daniel Inouye: Army 1943-47; Medal of Honor, WWII.
* John Kerry: Lt., Navy 1966-70; Silver Star, Bronze Star with Combat V, Purple Hearts.
* Charles Rangel: Staff Sgt., Army 1948-52; Bronze Star, Korea.
* Max Cleland: Captain, Army 1965-68; Silver Star & Bronze Star, Vietnam.
* Ted Kennedy: Army, 1951-53.
* Tom Harkin: Lt., Navy, 1962-67; Naval Reserve, 1968-74.
* Jack Reed: Army Ranger, 1971-1979; Captain, Army Reserve 1979-91.
* Fritz Hollings: Army officer in WWII; Bronze Star and seven campaign ribbons.
* Leonard Boswell: Lt. Col., Army 1956-76; Vietnam, DFCs, Bronze Stars, and Soldier’s Medal.
* Pete Peterson: Air Force Captain, POW. Purple Heart, Silver Star and Legion of Merit.
* Mike Thompson: Staff sergeant, 173rd Airborne, Purple Heart.
* Bill McBride: Candidate for Fla. Governor. Marine in Vietnam; Bronze Star with Combat V.
* Gray Davis: Army Captain in Vietnam, Bronze Star.
* Pete Stark: Air Force 1955-57
* Chuck Robb: Vietnam
* Howell Heflin: Silver Star
* George McGovern: Silver Star & DFC during WWII.
* Bill Clinton: Did not serve. Student deferments.
Entered draft but received #311.
* Jimmy Carter: Seven years in the Navy.
* Walter Mondale: Army 1951-1953
* John Glenn: WWII and Korea; six DFCs and Air Medal with 18 Clusters.
* Tom Lantos: Served in Hungarian underground in WWII. Saved by Raoul Wallenberg.
David
May 15, 2005 at 1:14 am
30Jerry,
I’d never seen such a complete list. Talk about “No Comment Required”…. Fascinating about Tom Lantos.
Jerry
May 15, 2005 at 3:38 am
31David…it is, indeed. Lots of good info here.
Murray
May 15, 2005 at 10:35 am
32Jerry,
Excellent!
tess
May 16, 2005 at 5:58 pm
33Jerry,
Wow, I mean, WOW. That’s pretty complete.
David,
Are you thinking of a “dickless” Dick?
David
May 16, 2005 at 10:59 pm
34tess,
Indeed I am - dickless, soulless, merciless, insightless (this list could just take over and start extending itself, kind of like our neocolonial military garrisons on behalf of Halliburton et. al.
Pete IVDL
May 20, 2005 at 6:37 pm
35Love your work, Jerry. Armchair generals love to fight, eh? ‘Specially with someone else’s children.