Brazil just doesn’t get it. Or at least they get it too often, and in immoral ways. Either way, because they get it and because of the way that they get it, they’ve proven that they just don’t get it and therefore they’re not going to get it.
What I’m saying is that those Brazilians have actually turned down $40 million in AIDS-fighting money from the US because it comes with the condition that the government denounce prostitution.
Brazil says it sees these conditions as “not based on scientific evidence” and use “biblical principles” rather than rationalism.
Fine. Listen up, Brazil, for I am about to clue you in:
You suck. You don’t get it. You’re this close to joining the New, Improved Axis of Evil.
See, here in America we understand that our values are the Microsoft Windows of morality. Sure, there may be other systems out there. But unless you make sure you’re compatible, you don’t get to play. Tolerated prostitution in your country is a deal-breaker, because it’s incompatible with our system, which works perfectly.
Prostitution’s simply not on the menu around here. It’s criminal. So targeting “health” campaigns towards criminals is a non-starter. Get it? We’re fighting epidemics by making it clear that criminals deserve what they get. Here in America, you’re rolling the dice if you engage in prostitution, so don’t come crying to us if you get AIDS because you weren’t properly educated and got paid for sex. Or if you paid for sex. Or were married to someone who paid for sex. Or were the child of someone who was married to someone who paid someone for sex. Being conceived by a woman whose husband had unsafe sex with a prostitute is high-risk behavior, and most American fetuses now know better than to get involved with that sort of thing.
What’s more, our zero-tolerance is WORKING. We don’t have all the stats about “increases” or “decreases” in actual “numbers,” but we know this: Recent respectable “guesstimates” indicate that less than one in every 20 American women is currently employed as a prostitute. That’s less than 5%. Rounding off, that means that 100% of our citizenry are NOT PROSTITUTES. That’s right, read it and weep, Brazil - statistically speaking, we have no hookers here. How’s life lookin’ at the Carnival now, huh?
But that’s not the road you’ve chosen to take, is it? No, you’ve decided to acknowledge that prostitution exists and try to educate these criminals to prevent the spread of disease. Well shucks, we’d love to help you fight AIDS, but not if you’re going to go around spreading the idea that these fallen women (and their clients and their clients’ present and future wives and their clients’ present and future wives’ children and etc.) can go on plying their unclean wares and expect to live. Nope. Not in our world. Do that and you’d might as well encourage illegal drug users to use clean needles. Might as well just hand ‘em the smack while you’re at it, give it right out in the 7th grade classrooms. Hey, that’s a great idea - why don’t we give every 13 year-old boy in America a syringe full of “H” and a whore! Yeah, we’ll post federal employees nearby to hand out condoms and fresh needles as our offspring slake their filthy lusts upon their government-provided painted slatterns. What an utterly fantastic idea!
Just in case you Brazilians are too busy trying to get your daughters into the best state-run Whore Academies to have invented sarcasm yet, let us put it another way: Either you tell your country’s adults under what conditions they can and can’t exchange their bodily fluids, or you’re stuck with AIDS. That’s what freedom’s all about. You can look it up.
And don’t give us any of that “greater good” bull hockey. We know all about that. That’s why we’re in the Middle East, trading, cooperating, and aiding regimes who officially support the subjugation and disenfranchisement of women, for example. It’s a hard compromise, but it might just save some lives. And the Bible doesn’t forbid a little judicious subjugation or even a beating now and then. We personally don’t allow the beatings any more, but hey, “judge not,” as the Book says.
But if you’re asking us to look the other way while you allow your women and men to flagrantly disregard the Book that our nation was founded upon, don’t be surprised if the checks don’t arrive. Maybe those kind of shenanigans flew in the 90’s, but they don’t anymore. Not one bit. Let us point you to the part of our Constitution where Jesus told the prostitute that she had it comin’. 35th Amendment or something, but take our word for it, it’s in there.
Again, we’re not saying we’re better than you. We just have more money and a superior system of morality. It’s up to you, though. We can help you die less, if you’d only listen to reason. If not, our hands are tied.
Your pal,
America





37 comments
Sue
May 4, 2005 at 4:47 pm
1Is it me, or does this government get more arrogant with every successive full moon? I thought one of the lessons of Prohibition was that you can’t legislate morality - but I guess that’s not gonna stop them from trying.
By the way, the grant and the “rules” for qualifying both went into effect in 2003, and my calendar says 2005. What, somebody was pulling a fast one, hiding Brazil’s AIDS-fighting programs from us? Or we’ve just been so darn busy training those “peace workers” in Iraq…yea, that must be it, we’ve been preoccupied. Thank Lobster somebody brought this gross negligence of basic morality/government policy to our attention!
Linkmeister
May 4, 2005 at 4:50 pm
2Oh, very well done, Adam.
Mike Z
May 4, 2005 at 5:18 pm
3Yes, yes Adam, but what about little Maria the Brazilian here? She heard about the Bush administration’s conditional benevolence and decided that maybe she should go to med school instead of continuing to be a prostitute.
If our country’s tough-love stance can save even just one girl like Maria, then it will all be worth it.
Landis
May 4, 2005 at 5:38 pm
4or Claire.
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
May 4, 2005 at 6:05 pm
5That’s what I mean! The damn US government and its fucking rules (pun intended)! Why, those… mffmmmm… how dare they shfffnnnt… Bloody… bloody… gah! (Wipes drool from chin).
Bingo, Adam.
Mojo
May 4, 2005 at 6:22 pm
6Does this mean that Nevada is going to lose all it’s federal health-related funding since they allow prostitution in some counties? Or is this just another case of do as we say, not as we do?
Think of the Children! (Who, I’ve heard, need a new pair of shoes.)
madbard
May 4, 2005 at 7:36 pm
7Hey, who kidnapped Adam and replaced him with a (moderate) Hotline writer?
madbard
May 4, 2005 at 7:38 pm
8oops. I meant “Powerline”.
Hot Russian Slut
May 4, 2005 at 7:51 pm
9Well there goes my trip to Brazil.
Murray
May 4, 2005 at 9:43 pm
10If you think that the Brazilians are bad you should see the Dutch. They believe in educating their youth in condom use and sex ed. They have a thriving red light district and they have legalized drug use. What a cesspool.
The fact that they have the world’s lowest teenage pregnancy rate is just a fluke, and just because ours is near the top shows what a screwy world it is.
Ananna
May 5, 2005 at 6:26 am
11We are a truly stupid people, Americans.
Jeff Gannon
May 5, 2005 at 7:05 am
12Brazil is so backward…
Allowing women to be prostitutes. The American Government would never allow fallen women to affect it’s policies or be found in places of power.
Prostitution is bad and wrong for women and should not be tolerated or my name isn’t Jeff.
Mary
May 5, 2005 at 9:08 am
13I hear those Brazilians teach *evolution* in their schools!!!!! That should have tipped people in the government off that something just wasn’t right down there.
timfc
May 5, 2005 at 9:40 am
14Don’t forget and/or mess with Texas. Now cheerleaders can’t dance in provocative ways.
I’m waiting for fights on what is or is not provocative.
I’m imagining a committee room filled with older white men watching hours and hours of scantily clad women bounce about. Clearly, they’re doing it for the common good.
Lynne
May 5, 2005 at 10:54 am
15Prostitutes, abortions and sex education. Oh, My! Bad, Bad and Bad. How can we possibly fund them?
Because I think we all agree that the abstinence only program we have is doing wonderfully. And don’t forget those Virginity pledges. So effective in preventing STD’s! Because it’s not sex if it’s up the butt, Bob.
David
May 5, 2005 at 11:19 am
16Hope America’s bungee cord holds - we’ve damned sure gone over the cliff. Georgie Boy is no surprise as the Leaper-in-Chief, but who’d a thunk Laura would be a co-dependent?
Kara
May 5, 2005 at 11:44 am
17I won’t say I hate America or Americans, because that is not universaly true. I just hate the ones that like our current administration. Nuff said.
tess
May 5, 2005 at 3:09 pm
18Okay, comment spam. I wonder if it has something to do with us talking about prostitutes and condoms.
So if prostitution is illegal, why is pornography still allowed? I don’t get it — you’re a criminal if you sell it on the streets, but you’re a star if you sell it on the screen to some fat guy with a mullet?
chrisBix
May 5, 2005 at 6:32 pm
19tess, my god you nailed it! I needed that laugh, not that adam doesn’t make me ….oh never mind!
Tom
May 5, 2005 at 8:05 pm
20Okay, it’s finally happened. Adam has confounded me with his higher intellect and writing abilities.
Should I be angry at America for being such dicks and enforcing our own set of values on countries like Brazil? Or should I be angry at Brazil for allowing prostitution to run as rampantly as it has, spreading AIDS all across the country? Both seem like valid points to me. Is it really a good idea to remove the condition and give the money to Brazil without having them denounce prostitution? As far as I’m aware, prostitution is still illegal in Brazil, and if not, I’m fairly sure the limits and regulations are still being broken. If prostitution is still illegal, shouldn’t they denounce the trade?
I’m very much confused.
Murray
May 5, 2005 at 8:21 pm
21Tom, as long as men want sex with out commitment, and are willing to pay for it, and women are willing to trade sex for money, there will be prostitution. You can’t legislate successfully against human nature. Politicians can posture against it (then take refuge there) but legalizing and controlling it to make sure that condoms are used, makes so much more sense.
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
May 5, 2005 at 9:20 pm
22I just love the irony. The country with one of the biggest illegal organised sex industries, and the most publicly available pornography, witholding assistance to one of the largest religious communities in the world.
I’ll never forget a documentary I saw years ago, where a Christian fundie truck driver, on his way home to his wife and kids, thought nothing of eating his lunch in a pole-dancing bar, less than a foot away from a totally naked writhing woman with nothing in her eyes. Says it all, really.
hedera
May 6, 2005 at 12:53 am
23Sue, of course one of the lessons of Prohibition is that you can’t legislate morality.
Did we learn it? If we did, why are we still running a “war on drugs” that looks EXACTLY like Prohibition, complete with bootlegging runs, organized crime, people shooting people in alleys, etc. etc.?? The major differences are that they’ve graduated from Thompson submachine guns to AK-47s, and English is their second language.
Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. (George Santayana.) Also, history repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce. (Karl Marx, in case you care.) What is it when you go beyond the second round of reruns??
Thompson
May 6, 2005 at 10:18 am
24Ah. It becomes chapter 14 in your high school history textbook. Which no one reads, hence why we keep repeating it.
Mike Z
May 6, 2005 at 2:28 pm
25Unfortunately, the lessons of history are often a little too subtle for most people.
“History doesn’t repeat itself-at best it sometimes rhymes.” — Mark Twain
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
May 6, 2005 at 6:06 pm
26Yep. What’s past is past, we’re moving forward. We don’t understand the questions, but we have ALL the answers. Nothing like being right all the time!
OT - I hear the Virgin/Vulva in the underpass got someone steamed up enough to scrawl something across it, the State steamed up enough to charge the dude with damage to public property, and the fundies/dreamers steamed up because the whole thing (no pun intended) has been painted over. Isn’t the information age wonderful? I can hear about some dickhead with a shoebrush painting a waterstain 20,000 miles away in less than a day.
Tom
May 6, 2005 at 8:12 pm
27Sure we can’t legalize morality, but that shouldn’t stop us from taking out the trash, should it?
I’m pretty sure that we can all agree that drugs, prostitution, and alcohol are all pretty bad things, along with cigs and porn and all that jusk. So, isn’t it our perogative to go out and make these things illegal? I know evil is relative, and that people should have the right to mess themselves up as much as they want, but to just let the problem fester is just as bad. If Brazil would LEGALIZE prostitution like Nevada has, and put taxes and registration on it, they might be able to regulate it enough to actually stop the spread of AIDS and other STDs. Illegal prostitution is only one part of the problem; the other is the culture of the country. Unless I’m mistaken, most of the Catholics in Brazil (even the ones that engage in prostitution) don’t believe in using condoms or other forms of contraceptives. That’s not something we can change in the near future. But that’s still no reason for Brazil to let its prostitution ring remain in the soddy shape it is. If they won’t denounce it, the least they can do is clean it up.
Jim
May 6, 2005 at 9:06 pm
28Um, at the risk (as usual) of sounding obtuse, if prostitution is indeed illegal in Brazil, doesn’t that constitute a form of condemnation (i.e. if you get caught getting paid for providing sex in exchange for money, you will be condemmed to X amount of time in jail)?
If so, the criteria was met before the demand was meted, and this is all a tempest in a teapot.
LAmom
May 7, 2005 at 3:47 pm
29Really, all laws are codifications of moral values. We all agree that values about hurting other people should be imposed on the entire society in the form of laws. The controversy is that some people believe there should be laws concerning “victimless” acts and others don’t.
tommy
May 8, 2005 at 12:04 am
30Adam you are a genius.
And so are all you commentors.
There are so many of us, you gotta wonder if he really did ‘win’ election 2004.
Tsk tsk, I think not.
David
May 8, 2005 at 12:57 am
31A lot of laws are codifications of practical matters, some of them devoid of or even contrary to moral values, but I do agree that the notion of laws as accepted and supported by most people do arise from an attempt to codify a common sense of justice. On the other hand, codifications by religious authorities and venal opportunist politicians acting on behalf of powerful economic interests often codify concepts that absolutely fly in the face of any common sense of justice.
Damned, I had to go and bring up common sense. Glorious Leader couldn’t find common sense if it were attached to the end of his penis.
I think we should all go make our professions of faith at the next call to salvation at the Center fo Enlightenment Baptist Church in Waynesville, NC, which is just up the road from my little home away from home in Hendersonville. The eight enlightened Baptists in that congregation deserve our support.
I have a very small house with a tiny yard, but with enough Maker’s Mark, who’d notice (or care)?
And it’s only what, three thousand miles from the Left Coast and half a world away for Van Diemen’s Land? But then Bush’s world is about three universes away from anything that makes good sense (can I ramble late at night, or what?)
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
May 8, 2005 at 5:55 pm
32hedera, nowadays few people (or as I like to think of them, ‘the great unwashed’) have a long enough attntion span to remember the first iteration. This rule certainly seems to apply to ‘popular’ ‘music’ (I had to wiggle my fingers there
vis-a-vis covers of covers of ‘retro’ music (Pink Floyd, ABBA, Jethro Tull, etc).
Unfortunately, it also applies here - Bush’s first term was highlighted early on by his withdrawal of funding for humanitarian family planning serices in India and Africa. I think that was just before he refused to ratify the Kyoto protocol, and just after he refused to acknowledge the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction. (I’m trying to think of a funny tie-in, but I’m just shaking my head).
Mike
August 12, 2005 at 8:59 pm
33Lol, you really know how to state a case…
Jemieka
August 21, 2005 at 6:46 pm
34ok, it’s official- Americans ARE the stupidest, most modest, arrogent race there is. No offence or anything but do you people ever get sick of your unrealistic morals? you DO have prostitution you, DO have the highest deaths by gun rate and you DO all think your country is the best and has good morals. Do you not think if you had better morals then another they would have followed you? Have you not realised that educating youth from a young age on sex and controception is the best way to go so then you can inform them of the problems and aware them of how they’re life will change. I don’t understand why it is so hard for you to realise that maybe Brazil are happy with their current legislation on prostitution. I’m from Australia and we have different laws in different states, in which my state (queensland) has only just ammended our 1999 act to legalize brothels. This was not a stupid move, if your ugly and you need sex… its there? etc. and as for ‘adam felber’your theory on prostitution in the US is totally ignorant and your sarcasium wasnt funny in teh slightest. I’m sorry but it had to be said??
Nick
September 29, 2005 at 6:56 pm
35Hmmm. I am moving to crime free America then.
I dont think you its possible to take the take the pi$$ out of an individual american.
sara
December 6, 2005 at 2:42 am
36How could I to denounce some prostitute girls?
Who can I call and denounce, what is the number in NJ?
I too much for me…
Website
January 21, 2006 at 12:23 pm
37Prostitutes, abortions and sex education. Oh, My! Bad, Bad and Bad. How can we possibly fund them?
Because I think we all agree that the abstinence only program we have is doing wonderfully. And don’t forget those Virginity pledges. So effective in preventing STD’s! Because it’s not sex if it’s up the butt, Bob.
-Chris