The big question about Tom DeLay’s future seems to be a foregone conclusion: He’s toast. Crispy, heavily-buttered toast, the kind that comes with your omelet but is cold by the time you’ve finished and ends up being left behind with your tip after one desultory bite. Tom DeLay will be picked up, carried back to the kitchen, given a speculative glance by a hungry-but-not-THAT-desperate busboy, and tossed into the refuse bin.
Of course, most uneaten toast doesn’t go on to a rich future full of consultancy work and exorbinant speaking fees, so the metaphor isn’t perfect. But after some more damning revelations, and his friends starting to scramble for the exits, his immediate fate seems assured. One important question does remain, however:
How exactly are the Democrats gonna screw this one up?
Recent American political history closely follows the “Pink Panther model.” The Republicans have ably filled the role of Inspector Clousseau - they bungle and blunder from silly ruses to transparent deceptions to preposterous schemes. But somehow they end up winning. The Democrats are unquestionably the Inspector Dreyfuss side of the model - smart, competent, and utterly aghast at the twists of fate that somehow seem to always result in them suffering disgrace, humiliation, and grievous bodily harm. They sputter impotently and unbelievingly at the fact that nobody else seems to see what a boob Clousseau really is…
To extend the “Pink Panther model” (first explored by political theorist F.B. Kornheiser shortly before his final, extended tour of the Gute Hill Sanitarium in the late 70’s), we’ve seen the Democrats move into “Second Stage Dreyfuss,” wherein they have begun to actively plot to bring down the Clousseau-ite Republicans and have developed a tendency to fly into apoplectic rages and a pronounced twitch. This time, they are convinced, they will expose the Republicans for what they truly are… this time.
So the only question that remains is exactly how. How will the Democrats make a hash of it all? How will the Republicans emerge with a publicly-perceived victory and an electoral “vindication” in ‘06? It’s going to happen, of course, but how?
I have some ideas, but the most likely scenario is this (if you’ll permit me to mix a few metaphors):
“The Passion of the Tom.”
Through spin and carefully-placed “human interest” stories, Tom DeLay starts to look like a martyr to those bitterly partisan Washington politicians. His suffering becomes a prevalent theme, and the Democrats start to look more and more like a bunch of big, mean bullies. His actual resignation is staged on the Capitol steps and is filmed by Mel Gibson. During the ceremony Delay somehow performs the physically impossible task of nailing himself to a cross.
By late this year DeLay becomes a popular TV pundit, speaking authoritatively about Congress’ godless culture of blame, and by January he publishes his book, “Meanies: How Liberals Hurt My Feelings When I Really Didn’t Do Anything All That Wrong When You Think About It.” It’s an instant bestseller, detailing how godless liberal Democrats still really run things in this country despite conservative control of the House, the Senate, the White House, the Supreme Court, and most major media companies. There is a lot of material about the liberal plot to make religion all but illegal in America, triple taxes, and send chocolates to terrorist organizations in the hopes that they’ll “behave.” This is apparently detailed in a secret document entitled “The Protocols of the Elders of Hyannis” that DeLay somehow managed to get ahold of.
By summer, ‘06, when a “Remember Tom!” movement is gaining momentum and energizing the conservative base, the Democrats will flounder. Some will twitch and stutter and rage incoherently about being “tricked,” but most will hedge their bets and state loudly but unconvincingly that they “really like” God and are anti-giving-terrorists-chocolate. Those that insist on pointing out that chocolates and God aren’t the issue and that DeLay was forced out for very good reasons will find themselves getting less and less airtime as election day approaches….
That’s just one scenario of course, but it seems pretty likely. Please feel free to offer your version in the Comments below. Bonus points to any prediction that involves a prominent Democrat getting a bowling ball stuck on his hand and repeated knocking himself unconscious while trying to salute.
Have fun!





27 comments
NeoCleo
April 27, 2005 at 5:06 pm
1You know, you’re probably dead on, but for now, I’m just going to enjoy watching DeLay twist in the wind while his buddies jump ship like the rats they are.
NeoCleo
April 27, 2005 at 5:07 pm
2I don’t know what was wrong with my first post, this was blank and asking for a correction. I’m confused, but what else is new?
tess
April 27, 2005 at 6:19 pm
3Honestly, I don’t see how the Dems won’t fuck this one up. I mean, honestly, when are they going to get their act together? Delay could be eating fetuses in an effort to stay young and the Dems would probably still screw this up.
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
April 27, 2005 at 6:39 pm
4The Delaysons
Homer Delay, finally caught on video tape actually trying to damage the Halliburton nucyilar reactor so he can leave work early to go bowling, is thoroughly (if mistakenly) lionized by Lenny Lefty as a Born Again Greenie.
The Democrats, led by pseudo-straight Waylan Kerry, are determined to show Homer up for what he really is: a deranged conservative shyster who thinks only of immediate personal gratification.
Unfortunately, young Bart Moore, an impartial and gentle filmmaker, tries to assist Kerry in revealing the true nature of Homer, but only succeeds in angering the befuddled judiciary and alienating the gullible Registered Voters, resulting in the immediate passage of the Patriotic Chocolates Act.
When Monty Bush is found to own the only Patriotic Chocolate factory in Washington, Homer decides to moonlight as a Patriotic Chocolate Packer, but accidentally consumes all the Patriotic Chocolates he was supposed to pack. He then successfully sues Lenny Lefty, Bart Moore, and Waylan Kerry for forcing him to act as he did in the first place. A large proportion of the electorate decides to follow Homer as their leader, as his farts smell of chocolate, and nothing is more Patriotic than that!
shelley
April 27, 2005 at 6:54 pm
5Sorry, Tess, but you’ve got that one backwards.
Instead of eating babies himself, DeLay will give a heartbreaking speech about how the leaders of the Democratic Party are eating babies and can we really allow that to continue in this great liberty-loving nation? Rather than rolling their eyes at DeLay or, I dunno, asking for proof, Democratic leaders will give long, boring non-sound-bytable rebutals as to how they have never eaten babies and, in fact, do not approve of such a deplorable practice. The press will go with the pithy statements and soon the news will be nothing but cannibalistic Dems 24/7. Average Joes will claim that the Dems wouldn’t be denying the horrid practice of eating babies if they didn’t, in fact, eat babies, and so it becomes common knowledge that Democrats regularly eat their young. By the time it all comes out that the whole thing was nothing but a smear campaign, made up by a DeLay aide who once wrote a paper on Jonathan Swift, old Tommy boy has already been re-elected by his adoring constituents. After all, everyone already knows that Democrats eat babies and proof to the contrary is nothing but a dull rehash of an old story.
Man, those Dems are easy to bait, aren’t they?
dee
April 27, 2005 at 7:43 pm
6Easy. The Democrats will take three months to come up with a counterattack to the Former Fetuses for Truth ads that Nancy Pelosi had Harry Reid’s love child.
norbizness
April 27, 2005 at 7:50 pm
7I can definitely see someone the size of Tom DeLay hiding in a fridge and jumping out to attack Nancy Pelosi when she goes for a midnight snack.
Murray
April 27, 2005 at 10:03 pm
8Adam, your post has a bunch of scenarios about how Tom Delay will out wit the Democrats. He could nail himself to a wall and the Gutless Democrats will still screw it up all by them selves.
Democrat senator # 1:
“With the apparent demises of the demagogue Tom Delay, one would wonder if America would accept our pointing out his nefarious deeds and how it is indicative of all Republicans, or would our ratings drop?”
Dem # 2:
“Perhaps we should sit back and allow Americans to make up their own minds. They are all well informed, able to see the hypocrisy, and because we believe in the innate wisdom of Americans we would only be carrying coals to Newcastle by piling on Tom”.
Dem #1:
“I suggest we consult a poll to find out what we believe”
Dem #2:
“Well if it doesn’t offend any one”.
Dem #1:
“Maybe we should just say nothing”
Dem #1:
“OK”
pjk
April 28, 2005 at 4:18 am
9Here’s a suggestion for the Democrats- buddy up to Larry Flynt. He knows how to find out the good dirt on our beloved Republicans, because half of their Gawd-fearin’ base reads his publication (at least the “million dollars for good dirt” part).
Barring that, how about a “DeLay Sucks” paint job for a Nascar contender? Plenty of exposure to the impressionable there. But for balance, put Bob Dole’s face on the Viagra car.
Lastly, a giant can of DeLay-Be-Gone could probably be requisitioned from Ortho for the occasion, unless Orkin can use the event to show that they can eliminate really BIG cockroaches, no matter how well established they might be (And I just started accepting that he and his offspring would be infesting these hallowed halls forever! Thanks, Orkin Man!)
David
April 28, 2005 at 11:14 am
10Delay’s name always makes me think of the aid one could buy from a bathroom condom dispenser. As the name indicates, it was for males who cared about extended pleasure for their partners (is it still available?) So I never get any farther than chuckling over the association and pondering the question, Should one rub Tom on one’s wand for the sake of one’s sweetie?
Jason
April 28, 2005 at 11:37 am
11You forgot an important plot twist:
In an attempt to bring down DeLay, all of the evil Jews in Hollywood collaborate and create an amazingly lifelike CGI of Tom DeLay dancing to a Dixie Chicks song. The clip is then exposed to the Ultra-Liberal Media via John “Judas” McCain. The Ultra-Liberal Media lets go of the Michael Jackson trial and focuses itself on demonizing Mr. DeLay.
…this IS a Mel Gibson joint, right?
Skerlnik
April 28, 2005 at 12:14 pm
12Y’know, the saddest part is, and I’m being serious, here, is that people I have talked to about it don’t really care about any of this. It would be great if the DeLay implosion could start a chain reaction of backlash against Repubs, and BushCo, but the details of this are SOOOOO boring. Ethics violations? Improper lobby money? Zzzzzzzzzzzz……
It would take something on the order of a tape of Cheney in bed with Paris Hilton and Hillary Duff to make any sort of real impresion with Joe Six-Pack. Despite the seriousness of the issue, and the media frothing, DeLay is just another politician who nobody ever heard of before a few months ago.
You are so right that the Dems will likely not be able to make any real political gain from this in time to matter. Just like the euphoria of the First Gulf War wearing off long before the 1992 election, nobody will remember DeLay or Bolton in 2006 or 2008.
Sorry, I really wish I had a witty jibe, here, but I’m a blue man in a red state, and the apathy over DeLay is deafening and depressing.
Johnnyboy
April 28, 2005 at 12:32 pm
13Jason,
you forgot the last plot twist: the clip, scooped by pinko PBS’s Jim Lehrer, is revealed by shrewd Matt Drudge to be a fake, after the videotape is shown to contain a couple of seconds of unerased footage from Barbara Streisand’s nephew’s Bar-mitzvah. Conservative bloggers go on the attack, the mainstream media stops any further mention of DeLay, to instead concentrate on bringing down Lehrer, who is kinda old and craggy, a bit boring, and might just have a thing for kiddie porn, according to unnamed sources.
Johnnyboy
April 28, 2005 at 12:38 pm
14Skerlnik,
agreed. There will be no anti-repug backlash from Delay’s toasting, simply because probably less than 20% of the american public knows who Delay is, and fewer care. At this stage, it would take nothing less than footage of the Shrub in bed with an underage dead arabian horse to turn any red county a shade purpler.
Murray
April 28, 2005 at 1:32 pm
15The American public gets excited only by what it can understand. Campaign violations? Huh? Blow job in the oval office? Now that they understand.
Mary
April 28, 2005 at 1:52 pm
16Exactly Murray. Any time the Dems begin to make inroads showing how corrupt the Repubs are, Rove and his ilk start yelling “Clinton! What about Clinton?” and all the red staters become zombies. It is the equivalent of Pavlov’s bell.
Murray
April 28, 2005 at 3:55 pm
17Remember how many Democrats lost elections because the Republicans attacked them for check kiting? (Writing a check and covering it soon afterwards). Not only did Americans not know what check kiting was, it was neither illegal nor immoral. Only Republicans have the balls (and hypocrisy) to attack something like this. Yet because they are completely ruthless they can convince American idiots that it is something bad and needs to be punished.
Democrats just can’t do this kind of thing. It’s not in them.
Thompson
April 28, 2005 at 4:06 pm
18Hm. There’s an interesting thought. I hadn’t heard about the check-kiting accusations, but it brings to mind that scene from The Music Man. “Weeeeeeeell, you got TROUBLE, my friend.” I do believe we are actually approaching the point where to understand modern politics, it helps to have a firm background in performance art.
Provided, of course, that we didn’t sail over that point 25 years ago.
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
April 28, 2005 at 4:52 pm
19It sounds an awful lot like Delay is getting his goat scaped. What better way to take the pressure off the Prez’s policy gaffes (as they are being seen this side of the equator). Kinda like the t-shirt with the rifle scope view of the two bears, where the one with the crosshairs on him is pointing frantically at the Delay bear…
If the Democrats (the Labour party down here is in exactly the same league) are Wile E. Coyote, who the heck is the roadrunner? (I know the train that roars out of the painted tunnel is Halliburton!)
Skerlnik
April 28, 2005 at 8:09 pm
20Hmm… what kind of things would red-staters not fully understand, but have an automatic, indignant, evangelical reaction to? Hmm…no, not ethics stuff…too boring and obscure…no…oh, I know!
Tom DeLay is a MASTICATOR! We have FOOTAGE of him masticating furiously, and in PUBLIC! Think of the children! And he shows his epidermis to little boys, wherever he goes! Just….like….MICHAEL JACKSON!
Fellow Americans, do we want a pro-mastication party in power? I think not! What Would Jebus Do?
Murray
April 28, 2005 at 8:52 pm
21Well Tom was caught in public nepotism with, not only his wife, but his daughter too! This man truly has no shame!
Hilary
April 29, 2005 at 12:01 pm
22Those tricks were actually played (and worked! this is not just a joke) against a Democrat in Florida - Claude Pepper, who I had the lovely opportunuty to meet and talk to, and the not so lovely opportunity to watch eat BBQ at a late point in his career. Lovely man, good politics, but his mastication in public might have been a valid issue in his later years, although not during his election in the early 1900’s.
By the way, I think thge exchange between Dem #1 and Dem #2 is so right on about our politics these days. They ened to wake up and start getting more on the offensive when outrageuos stuff happens.
Jerry
April 29, 2005 at 5:04 pm
23DeLay, delay, what does that matter? As long as the Democrats whimperingly, simperingly continue to vote with the Repukes and say, “Alternative, golly gee whilikers, we don’t want no stinkin’ alternative,” they are just sitting in the toilet pulling the handle. I am so damn disgusted with the Dums, uh, Dems in Congress trying to appeal to the masses (who, ironically, by the polls, actually seem to be starting to see through the Repuke bullshit)! If we don’t offer an alternative, and prove that we stand strong behind an alternative by voting against the crap that Congress is doing, why would anyone vote Dem in 2006? Arrgggghhhhhhhh!!!!
Jerry
April 29, 2005 at 5:10 pm
24And, yeah, why don’t we do the Repuke thing?
TOM DELAY PROVEN TO COMMIT NEPOTISM WITH HIS DAUGHTER!
What a great headline! I’d love to see them running around trying to explain what nepotism is, and how while Tom did do it with his daughter it wasn’t some sexual thing but only…well, you get the idea!
Thanx, Murray!
David
May 1, 2005 at 11:50 pm
25Oh, yeah, it did happen. Tells you the state of Florida politics in the 50s. Bright spot was one Leroy Collins, who as governor pointed the way out of the dark and evil world of segregation. He was a Southerner for the ages, as was the almost immortal Claude Pepper. We have had some of the brightest - and some of the truly dimmest - bulbs in the political chandelier.
But we are scrub league compared to the Altered State of Texas, aka the Lone Brain State (ok, ok, there’s more than one, and Molly Ivins alone counts for at least 10 bright bulbs - and the states we think of as more enlightened are just barely, and in danger of serious backsliding).
And as has been pointed out in numerous posts, the Dems, who came together in a rush of progressive unity, are now in danger of insider cephalo-rectal thrustitis. But fight it, gang. It’s either the Dems or nobody, unless you can get instant run-off elections. Besides, the Christian bible is filled with warnings about dark forces like the Republican National Committee, warnings even we pagans need to take seriously.
FRANK
September 28, 2005 at 7:16 pm
26Tom Delay is no more or less than any other republican pig in power. Kerry was so lame, I had no choice but to vote Bush. Will the next JFK please stand up????
Harry
October 21, 2005 at 7:34 pm
27Did you guys ever think that the contempt the Dems hold the majority of voters in, might be the core of the problem for Dems? Just because “Joe Si-Pack” votes Repubs (or Dems) doesn’t make him stupid. Joe made a decision based on what he believes he believes, not what you, me or anyone else thinks. In that booth, no-one can peek over his shoulder, no-one will probe, analyse or judge his answer to the poll question. In that booth, Joe decides, Joe’s the President and he’s appointing someone to do that job for him. For him. The way he believes it should be done.
If Joe doesn’t vote Dem to do the job it’s only because he doesn’t or can’t believe that the Dems will or can do it.
That’s not Joe’s problem, it’s the Dems problem. Who’s stupid now?