Some notes:
- Much is being made of the new Pope’s membership in the Hitler Youth, and his several years in the German army, and his 12 season as “Cliff” on “Cheers.” Yes, he must answer for all of these things. But I’d be more alarmed at the speech he made right before the conclave when he spoke out against the “tides of trends and latest novelties.” First they came for our iPods, and I said nothing…
- I’m slightly embarrassed to relate my reaction to America’s latest miracle:

Honestly, my first thought upon glancing at this picture on a news page was that I was looking at some gallery exhibition featuring an artist intent on becoming “the Georgia O’Keeffe of concrete.” So convinced was I that I was looking at some avant-garde artist’s depiction of a giant vulva that when I read that some people were calling it “the Virgin Mary,” I thought to myself, “Aw, that’s tasteless!” and “Geez, that’s one friendly virgin!”
Now that I’ve been set straight, I see it, I think. But I’m not convinced that the face looks like Mary. Doesn’t it look more like her neighbor, Stacey Beagleman? Or perhaps a proud lobster matriarch?
- Meanwhile, Shi’ite/Sunni violence is becoming somewhat prevalent in Iraq. It’s a pity that no-one could have possibly predicted that this sort of sectarian conflict might arise. We might’ve been able to take some precautions.
- Seriously, though:

Anyone could’ve made that mistake, right?





55 comments
dee
April 20, 2005 at 8:36 pm
1$100 to anyone who sneaks over there and glues some fake fur to the top of that thing.
Ann
April 20, 2005 at 9:24 pm
2I didn’t even have a beverage at my desk, but when I read “fake fur” I ran to the cooler so I’d have something to do a spit take with!
Johnnyboy
April 20, 2005 at 10:14 pm
3It kinda looks like someone taped the shroud of Turin over that crack, then peed all over it.
Emmarie
April 20, 2005 at 10:19 pm
4I can’t even remotely see Mary, but maybe I’m just not on the right drugs.
Deno the Untergeek
April 20, 2005 at 10:56 pm
5Ahaha…one very nice virgin indeed Adam. Oh Lobster, I love that.
Emmarie, I think it’s a matter of faith.
Did anyone else hear about the Virgin Mary appearing on an Australian couple’s soiled (keeping with the whole virgin scene…but not) bedsheets? I find that higly appropriate.
Bryan
April 21, 2005 at 12:32 am
6I think it shows a good reason not to be standing near to that overpass as the concrete isn’t holding and it could collapse.
tess
April 21, 2005 at 12:50 am
7That’s certainly a better interpretation of a water stain — it makes a hell of a lot more sense to see the “little man in the boat.” Otherwise, I’d say that Mary’s looking shapeless and blotchy - she needs an eyebrow pencil for better definition, like a nose, or perhaps eyes.
dave
April 21, 2005 at 1:21 am
8I always find it funny that anyone would think that their GOD would choose to reveal his majestic omnipotence as a stain on bedsheets, water stains on a dilapidated concrete wall, or a strangely shaped potato. Not quite the old testament razzle dazzle, eh? I favor athiesm myself, but if a giant godly index finger came out of the ceiling of the House and incinerated Tom Delay with lightning bolts, I might reconsider. Heck, I’d be impressed even if it just singed him a bit. But then again, those of greater faith would probably blame it on the vast left wing conspiracy…
dave
April 21, 2005 at 1:33 am
9dee,
I believe that would be a merkin miracle, but it would cover mary’s face like…a beard. Oh bother.
Mike Z
April 21, 2005 at 2:12 am
10So Adam, you never explained exactly what others have said to make you see that this could be The Virgin. Is it because, when you look really closely, you can see the still-intact hymen?
Ananna
April 21, 2005 at 2:23 am
11Dave, they’d probably blame it on electricity.
That’ll put the fear of science into them, though.
Love,
Hanna
Tom M
April 21, 2005 at 4:45 am
12Why do we continue to call Mary a virgin? I’m sure Joseph wasn’t slow in knocking her up again after she had Jesus. Besides, I always though she looked quite a minx in all the paintings and statues.
Lynne
April 21, 2005 at 7:34 am
13What’s a nice Jewish girl like Mary doing on an overpass?
Pimme
April 21, 2005 at 8:01 am
14I had something to say about this yesterday, too. People are so easily led! And, why do we keep seeing “Mary”? I thought that JESUS was the one who promised to return!
LemonTart
April 21, 2005 at 8:34 am
15Is it just me or does it just look like someone’s regular pissing spot?
Mary Kay
April 21, 2005 at 9:20 am
16This one is just WAY too boring after the Grilled Cheese one.
Mary
April 21, 2005 at 9:37 am
17Really, Adam. Must you take everything so literally?????? 8-D
Dorma
April 21, 2005 at 10:03 am
18I thought it was just me. That’s what I saw too.
I think I’ll wander over there today, get some photos and make up some t-shirts. “Virgin of Guadalupe - World Underpass Tour 2005″ or some such non-sense….
Lindsay
April 21, 2005 at 10:27 am
19Why do we continue to call Mary a virgin? I’m sure Joseph wasn’t slow in knocking her up again after she had Jesus.
If I’m not mistaken, Catholics for some reason believe that Mary was always a virgin, and that the part of the bible where it specifically talks about Jesus’ brothers is metaphorical or something. Correct me if I’m wrong.
I myself like the Dogma quote: “Mary gave birth to CHRIST without having known a man’s touch, that’s true. But she did have a husband. And do you really think he’d have stayed married to her all those years if he wasn’t getting laid? The nature of God and the Virgin Mary, those are leaps of faith. But to believe a married couple never got down? Well, that’s just plain gullibility.”
David
April 21, 2005 at 12:09 pm
20If it weren’t for gullibility, we’d have no myths at all, and what a dull world that would be. Imaginings, sweet imaginings…
Ann
April 21, 2005 at 12:26 pm
21Catholic doctrine is not just that Mary remained a virgin in the “never had sex” sense, but that her hymen remained intact despite her giving birth. I don’t know, maybe Jesus was somehow teleported from her womb.
Ken
April 21, 2005 at 3:48 pm
22Hmmmm. If the shoe fits….
extraterrestrial
Main Entry: 1 ex·tra·ter·res·tri·al
Pronunciation: -t&-’res-trE-&l, -’res(h)-ch&l
Function: adjective
: originating, existing, or occurring outside the earth or its atmosphere
http://www.m-w.com
Auros
April 21, 2005 at 4:02 pm
23We couldn’t have the original Madonna, used to inspire Madonna/Whore complexes in countless generations, dirited by that icky physical sex or birth or anything like that… Bodily functions? Ewww, no thanks, we’re Catholic!
Skerlnik
April 21, 2005 at 4:17 pm
24Every sperm is sacred…
Isn’t it interesting that millions accept sex advice from decrepit, isolated old white men, who probably haven’t had an erection in 60 years?
I mean, the Catholic Church sure seems obsessed with something they allegedly know nothing about.
I think I will get some French Ticklers embossed with “Pope Benedict XIV” and hand them out to friends…sure to break the ice at parties, eh?
Skerlnik
April 21, 2005 at 4:58 pm
25Your feeble skills are no match for the power of the Church!
http://www.francesco.biz/papa.jpg
Mr_Blog
April 21, 2005 at 5:11 pm
26The publicists for NBC’s “Revelations” have been busy beavers.
Hannah
April 21, 2005 at 5:26 pm
27Skerlnik, you could always hop on over to http://www.divine-interventions.com for bible-themed sex toys. I’m sure you could get them engraved with the name of his eminence.
(Warning: best not to click on this link at work…)
You truly CAN buy anything on the internet.
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
April 21, 2005 at 5:48 pm
28(all together now) Oh, what a beauty! I’ve never seen one as big as that before!
Isn’t it wonderful how the eternally gullible look at a five-foot twat and say “Oh, it’s God’s virginal mother. Let’s light a candle or three”. I know what would happen if I tried lighting candles around stuff that looked like that…
Oooh, ooh, it’s an American Merkin Miracle!
I’m not sure I want to get close enough to see if there’s a hymen visible - absolutely everyone would get the wrong idea! They might think I was a priest.
Skerlnik
April 21, 2005 at 6:14 pm
29Pete-
Eww…
No, I think I have enough sheets with holes in ‘em, thank you. Besides, when she screams “Oh, God! Oh, God!!”, I would want to think it was because of me, and not the Jesus Jelly…
Jim
April 21, 2005 at 8:38 pm
30Don’t these idol worshippers realize that if they don’t change their heathen ways, Lobster will condem them to spend eternity in the bottomless pot of fire and brinestone?
Murray
April 21, 2005 at 8:44 pm
31“Why do the faithful have such a wish to believe in something, and having chosen that, believe in nothing.” - Ian Anderson.
What do they mean it’s Mary, any fool can see it’s Elvis!
Minky
April 21, 2005 at 11:29 pm
32Along the same lines as seeing the Christian celebrations as adaptations of the old pagan celebrations - Christmas was once Candlemas, etc. it is easy to suggest that Mary is an adaptation of the Goddess. The Goddess was a fertility deity, and was often represented as a vulva. Ergo this is Mary/Goddess/vulva! It all makes sense to me.
Bob
April 22, 2005 at 12:10 am
33Why would anyone admit to worshipping a deity who communicates to His followers through bad concrete work?
Deno the Untergeek
April 22, 2005 at 12:20 am
34Bob, I think the faithful would say: ‘you just don’t get it.’
Faith is something you get or you don’t. Either you see the Virgin in all her (ahem) glory, or you see a shameless depiction of a 5 foot vulva.
Personally, I think very little of Christianity’s attempts to cover up the pagan religions of yesteryear. I’d rather see a sign of the Goddess than a sign from Him…crappy concrete work or no.
merkley???
April 22, 2005 at 5:53 am
35I had a mother mary oil stain on my driveway. But it certainly didn’t perfom any miracles on my cadillac.
i also pee’d a mother mary into the snow — i have a miraculous pee-er.
Harold
April 22, 2005 at 12:23 pm
36So if this water stain looks like a vagina AND the Virgin Mary at the same time, does that mean that there’s a good chance we can find miraculous images throughout the current issue of Hustler? Or on half the websites on the internet?
ellen
April 22, 2005 at 4:09 pm
37I never knew Georgia O’Keefe was a Catholic.
Murray
April 22, 2005 at 5:43 pm
38Harold,
Those pictures seem to work miracles for me.
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
April 22, 2005 at 6:16 pm
39Harold, I’ve looked, and I’ve looked, but I just can’t see Mary the Virgin Mother of The Incarnate Son of The Ineffable God. Maybe I’m looking in the wrong magazines?
And another thing - that leaking concrete looks nothing like a crustacean. Something smells fishy, here (heh heh heh)
Jerry
April 22, 2005 at 6:33 pm
40Laugh at the apparitions if you will, but my dog once pooped something that looked exactly like the fig that fell off the Bodhi tree onto the Buddha’s head, and made him realize the gravity of the human situation!
worker bee
April 22, 2005 at 6:38 pm
41“Catholic doctrine is not just that Mary remained a virgin in the “never had sex” sense, but that her hymen remained intact despite her giving birth. I don’t know, maybe Jesus was somehow teleported from her womb.”
Who verified this miracle?
hedera
April 22, 2005 at 11:55 pm
42I don’t know if I have an unnaturally clean mind (surely not!) or just no imagination, but from the time I saw that thing I thought it looked like a diagram of a tooth I once saw in a dentist’s office, with the enamel and the dentin and the root… But what fun is a tooth?
hedera
April 22, 2005 at 11:55 pm
43Can you fail a Rohrshach test?
Deno the Untergeek
April 23, 2005 at 3:53 am
44I guess if you’re Catholic you can, hedera.
Jay Nickola
April 23, 2005 at 5:40 am
45Holy hell. Like our religion doesn’t look retarded enough in the first place, without these pearl-clutching idolaters. People like this and Fred Phelps almost make me ashamed to go to church every couple months.
David
April 23, 2005 at 12:21 pm
46Confessional time -
As a collard worshipping pro-enlightenment pagan (golden mistletoe and fatback just doesn’t get it), I was stunned to realize I can see the Virgin of the Overpass. But I could only see in his addendum the vulva of which Adam speaks - and what a heck of technicolor pudendum.
Given the origin of pudendum, the Latin word for something to be ashamed of, piety seems to me to require that one conceive of the Virgin Mary as not having had a pudendum.
Perhaps Lobster performed a Divine Hysterectomy, complete with the requisite Plastic Surgery for Piety, before Impious Puberty could forever thwart the possibility of the Virgin Birth, the Crucifixion, and Mel Gibson’s movie.
hedera
April 23, 2005 at 5:04 pm
47But, Deno, I’m NOT Catholic. And I can see the “general” (very general) resemblance between the stain on the concrete, and the traditional representations of the BVM (who, remember, was a Palestinian lady and probably never wore pale blue and white in her life). I just think it looks more like my former dentist’s diagram.
ned ludd
April 23, 2005 at 8:59 pm
48touche
Jerry
April 24, 2005 at 12:28 pm
49For a little more scientific view on this “apparition phenomenon” I refer y’all to the ‘Skeptic’ column of the May Scientific American. It briefly descibes how the human brain is adapted to pattern recognition, and tends to find patterns in random or abstract images.
Pete in Van Diemen's Land
April 25, 2005 at 6:00 pm
50Hey, if we can “see” a face on Mars, why not a virgin in a vulva in an underpass?
Deno the Untergeek
April 25, 2005 at 10:22 pm
51Nor am I hedera, more of a Greek Orthodox myself…no offence meant.
hedera
April 25, 2005 at 11:26 pm
52And none taken, Deno.
pjk
April 26, 2005 at 4:04 am
53Here’s an idea for a Domino’s ad campaign: If it’s not there in thirty minutes, and you CAN’T see an image of the Virgin Mary in the toppings, it’s FREE!
Subject that deal to a third-party arbitrator contracted by Domino’s, and they’ll never hand out a free bad pizza again, so help me Lobster.
ginny
April 26, 2005 at 11:05 pm
54Hmm. Adam may someday be able to go out and worship the Virgin of the Underpass in person. In any case, I wonder how long until the local Chicago traffic people start reporting “Virgin blocks” in that area?
Pope Gwazz III
April 27, 2005 at 10:19 pm
55Personally, I think it looks like a praying platypus. Another friend says it looks like a sperm whale, while another thinks it’s a cactus with a mask wearing a cape.