NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. media coverage of last year’s election was three times more likely to be negative toward President Bush than Democratic challenger John Kerry, according to a study released Monday….
June 21, 2007:
Biased Media Slams Bush Over New War, Foundering Economy, Puppy Slaying
Washington, Tuesday (FA wire) - An increasingly liberal-biased media once again slammed the President this week, singling him out in negative reporting about the war in Holland, the Depression, and last week’s puppy-killing incident.
“It’s outrageous,” said media analyst Doug Bautenpade. “But I’ll tell you something - the more the liberal elite media slam the President, the less credibility they have. People are learning not to rely on the news to find out what’s going on in the world.”
At issue was newspaper, television, and internet coverage of some of the larger events of the past months:
- On the invasion and occupation of the Netherlands, a recent study showed the media 70% more likely to point out American forces’ failure to find the feared “Dutch Death Ray” super-weapon than the benefits of liberating the Dutch people and the elimination of the International Criminal Court. Another study found news reports almost twice as likely to focus on the 400,000 civilian casualties in the Netherlands rather than the expected drop in tulip prices over the next decade.
- On the economic depression that has taken 7 million American jobs in the past 6 months, a study by the Center For Totally Non-Partisan Study has found that news organizations are five times more likely to “go negative on the economy.” “The media is devoted to harping on what’s wrong with the economy, never giving the other side - how much worse it would be without the President’s strong leadership,” said CTNPS Chairman Tom Ridge. The study also showed that news organizations seem to favor the Democrats’ explanation for the depression (the worldwide selloff of US currency due to the ballooning deficit) rather than the Republicans’ (a cyclical correction brought on by an infestation of the US Mint by evil money-eating gnomes). “It’s a clear case of ‘Blame Bush First,’” said Ridge.
- As for President Bush’s unexplained strangling of a schnauzer puppy on his Crawford ranch last week (which was captured by several news cameras), studies show the media once again seemed to cover only the negative aspects of the story. A Republican strategist summed up the situation: “This alleged ‘incident’ shows one thing very clearly - with its relentless partisanship, the media is digging its own grave at this point. Average Americans are learning that the only reliable source for what’s going on in government is the government itself. The liberal press have written themselves out of the story.”





21 comments
Linkmeister
March 14, 2005 at 4:19 pm
1“That ‘Schnauzer’ was a Dutch/German assassin! Everyone knows that,” the strategist amplified on deep background.
Steve
March 14, 2005 at 4:33 pm
2Schnauzer, Mauser, what’s the difference?
bjd
March 14, 2005 at 4:44 pm
3tsk tsk Adam. everyone knows by 2007 there will only be Fox News and the Washington Times. only Jeff Gannon will be covering the White House press room. the rest of you dirty Godless commie Main Stream Media scum will be locked up in Guantanamo as DNC sympathizers.
Mary
March 14, 2005 at 4:56 pm
4Even if the press caught W strangling a puppy, the international conglomerates would still have all the power. The press can print the truth but it no longer matters.
Back to Murray’s mantra………………….
Mommie
March 14, 2005 at 5:49 pm
5OK. I could deal with the war, the rising gas prices, the pillaging of unspoiled natural resources, the fudging of election results, the inability to pronounce the simple word; “nuclear”, the trashing of the U.N., the destruction of Social Security (note to Adam: I love it, and if they take it away, it’s you, baby, it’s you) and the general misery of these latter days which happen to be the opening days of a new century. But hurting little fuzzy doggies? Now, I’m mad!
dee
March 14, 2005 at 7:57 pm
6Is this in celebration of “Sunshine Week”?
Murray
March 14, 2005 at 7:57 pm
7Adam, you missed the almost completely negative and totally unfair reporting on the Lake Michigan fire.
There have been only a handful of stories spotlighting the numerous benefits. Instead the biased news media has focused on the two years that oil derricks, several hundred yards off Lake Shore Drive, have been gushing oil forming the world’s second largest oil slick fire, (the largest off Catalina Island CA). Encompassing everything from the Shedd Aquarium to Muskegon MI, in a hellish fire and impenetrable toxic black smoke, you would think that there was no up side at all. Very little print has been given to the hundreds of previously unemployed Midwesterners now gainfully employed soaking up the spill with paper towels. They have also ignored the spike in the need for emergency room technicians, and physical therapists.
It’s just horrible how good news is never reported.
Mary, WWDTM is coming to AA on May 19! Get your tickets now!
Lynne
March 14, 2005 at 9:18 pm
8I’m looking over at my very old schnauzer now and thinking, did it have to be a schnauzer puppy?
Oh well, freedom IS on the march.
tess
March 14, 2005 at 10:00 pm
9. . . *opens mouth, thinks better, closes it*
I would try to say something outrageous, but it seems that just about everyone beat me to it. That, and I can’t think of anything other than screaming WHORE at the top of my lungs at no one in particular. Well, I do have someone in particular, but I’m afraid that he’d sick his buddies in high places on me and I’ll be seeing the insides of a gov’t transport vehicle for severals hours praying for death or debtors prison.
Sue
March 15, 2005 at 8:44 am
10Murray:
Don’t forget increased corporate profits to P&G (for starters) due to the use of the paper towels and dish detergent!
C’mon, people, if we can’t find the upside to these tremendous success stories, we’re just not trying hard enough! (oohmph,,,,,hernia, hernia, hernia)
sue
jrm
March 15, 2005 at 8:50 am
11The Lake Michigan oil fires are just another example of Muskegon’s liberal bias to west Michigan’s good conservative ethics.
Mary
March 15, 2005 at 10:28 am
12Murray- there is nothing to be found on WWDTM coming to A2 other than the notice on the WWDTM site. It is a conspiracy, I tell you! W is not allowing those of us who support Adam know about his public appearances.
(And I thought the puppy incident was depressing)
Monty Zoom
March 15, 2005 at 10:46 am
13With the balooning National Debt, the Bush Administration considered declaring bankrupcy. However, with the law passed in 2005, since the U.S. Government makes above the median income, they are forced to pay back their creditors. The press completely missed took the negative approach on this. The jobless poor are sucking the U.S. dry with their wandering the streets looking for a government hand-out. The press takes such a negative stance on that whole starving the poor. Taking more money from them will lead them to starve to death and clear the streets so that commerce can once again flow. It is truly a win-win situation. Less people dependant on the government and getting rid of more homeless. How can the press be so negative about it?
Alec
March 15, 2005 at 2:04 pm
14This is reminiscent of “Lucky Ducky,” In Ruben Bolling’s Tom the Dancing Bug.
Alec
March 15, 2005 at 2:06 pm
15Oops, I meant your post about bankruptcy.
Deno the Untergeek
March 15, 2005 at 5:18 pm
16Er…could I point out that maybe, just maybe, the reason behind all the ‘negative’ articles and reporting going on may have to do with the fact that life isn’t all too positive?
Love the tongue-in-cheekness of everything here.
Puppy incident?! I’m shocked, off with his head!!…merr, what exactly happened? I don’t know really, but as an example of the average American, I am morally outraged, and I demand that Kerry give answers as to why his liberal media is skewing everything, dammit!
adam
March 15, 2005 at 5:56 pm
17Sorry about the imaginarily dead puppy. If it’s any help, the postulated pup won’t even be born for a couple of years. There’s plenty of time to save him.
I won’t be in Ann Arbor or Orlando. San Diego will be my next show.
David
March 15, 2005 at 6:21 pm
18Adam,
You’re going to miss getting to see all the blue roofs (it’s a fashion statement). Some of the roofs might even still be tarped when the next round of killer hurricanes rip across Florida. God, global warming is exciting.
Auros
March 15, 2005 at 9:20 pm
19“Lucky Ducky” is named after a Wall Street Journal editorial, about “lucky duckies” who don’t pay income tax.
http://www.pkarchive.org/column/120302.html
http://slate.msn.com/id/2077201/
Murray
March 15, 2005 at 10:20 pm
20Mary,
Contact WUOM, they would have the info. I had to bug my Balmer station for a while before I was able to get tickets. Even if Adam’s not there, it’s still a great deal of fun (It’s just better if he is).
Jerry
March 18, 2005 at 4:40 pm
21Jeez, will you lighten up on Bush? It’s like making fun of the kids at the Special Olympics!
And, OK, he strangled the puppy. Big deal! For all you know, the puppy was riddled with anthrax, and Bush was only trying to save the country! And even if that is “one of those “exagerations”" he was only following in the great tradition of Presidential animal abuse! *Here’s* a shot of LBG pulling the ears off his pet beagle, for all you ‘liberals.’
(And whether you are having a good day, or a bad one and need a chuckle, listen to the audio associated with this page!)