WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Vice President Dick Cheney raised eyebrows on Friday for wearing an olive-drab parka, hiking boots and knit ski cap to represent the United States at a solemn ceremony remembering the liberation of Auschwitz.
Other leaders at the event in Poland on Thursday marking the 60th anniversary of the death camp’s liberation, such as French President Jacques Chirac and Russian President Vladimir Putin, wore dark, formal overcoats and dress shoes or boots.
“The vice president, however, was dressed in the kind of attire one typically wears to operate a snow blower,” Robin Givhan, The Washington Post’s fashion writer, wrote in the newspaper’s Friday editions.
Between the somber, dark-coated leaders at the outdoor ceremony sat Cheney, resplendent in a green parka embroidered with his name and featuring a fur-trimmed hood, the laced brown boots and a knit ski cap reading “Staff 2001.”
“And, indeed, the vice president looked like an awkward boy amid the well-dressed adults,” Givhan wrote.
________________________________________________
You can see it coming. Liberals are going to scream about how this demonstrates that the people in this administration are a bunch of go-it-alone millionaire cowboys who don’t sweat the details of diplomacy and don’t give a damn what our allies think of us. Conservatives, however, are going to proudly point to this as evidence that the people in this administration are a bunch of go-it-alone millionaire cowboys who don’t sweat the details of diplomacy and don’t give a damn what our allies think of us.
*Sigh* Won’t we ever agree on anything?
Seriously, there’s not a lot of decoding to do here. I suppose we could debate whether this was a clever and nuanced snub directed at the European powers who showed insufficient obedience in the Iraq matter OR whether it was just a case of Cheney and his people not thinking about it nor bothering to check what everyone else was going to wear. We could debate that.
Nah. Either way, it has the same effect. And back here, some people will feel acute embarrassment for our lack of respect for the occasion and other heads of state. Others will applaud Dick Cheney for doing it his own way and “keeping it real.” Though I’d have to wonder how many people in that latter group would wear ripped, stained jeans to a family funeral.
Maybe a couple of ‘em. Especially if Grandma was particularly stingy with the hard candies.

[Vice President Cheney keeping an eye out for the hot cocoa
vendor at Auschwitz’s 50 yard line.]
I suppose Cheney could be sending the message, “Oh, ’scuse me - I didn’t have time to put on my fancy duds because I was too busy workin’ out there fighting for your freedom.” That’s possible. It’d be more convincing if it wasn’t coming from a guy who’s never been combat with anything more lethal than a duck, but it’s possible.
But as I said, it doesn’t matter whether or not there was a message being sent, the message was sent.
Besides, if those high and mighty mucky-mucks had been suddenly attacked by a flock of particularly ornery ducks, only one amongst ‘em would’ve been dressed appropriately to do anything about it. And then who’d be the “embarrassment?” Huh? Are vicious, freedom-hating terrorducks going to wait around while you drop flowers on your fancypants monuments before they shred your snobby overcoats with their deadly beaks of fury? I think not.
I think not.





35 comments
Deno the Untergeek
January 28, 2005 at 5:28 pm
1Perhaps he was trying to capture that American hero image - rugged, daring and charismatic.
Of course, if he wass trying for that, he failed miserably. To wear something that you would take ice-fishing or, in the Veep’s case, duck hunting (even with Scalia, important though he may be) at a ceremony as sombre as the one at Auschwitz…tasteless, tactless and downright f***ed up.
Mike Z
January 28, 2005 at 5:35 pm
2I figure that he opened his suitcase an hour before the ceremony to the realization that he forgot to pack any warm clothes. He had to rush to the local Wal-Mart (built on the ruins of the main oven complex at Auschwitz) and that’s all they had in his size. Then he had to play it off legit for the rest of the day.
The experience would have given him another heart attack if it hadn’t been for his various cybernetic implants.
Linkmeister
January 28, 2005 at 6:02 pm
3There are over 170 comments on this subject over at Political Animal so far. It’s amusing to see the conservatrolls try to defend the SOB.
Murray
January 28, 2005 at 6:20 pm
4What surprises me is that the Administration didn’t send Pat Buchanan. Take that old Europe!
I think that Cheney got Auschwitz confused with schussing, and he was dressed for the slopes. What a bummer.
ACW
January 28, 2005 at 6:32 pm
5Umm, Mike Z? The parka was embroidered with his name. And said “Staff 2001″. Not a recent purchase.
Mike Z
January 28, 2005 at 8:40 pm
6ACW -
They coulda sewed that in real fast. He’s got a big staff of seamstresses and knitters provided by the secret service that follow him everywhere.
Bob
January 28, 2005 at 10:02 pm
7Dumb hat, big shoes,
Clearly don’t know where I’m goin’ to.
Old gloves, old coat,
Hey, bud, we already won the vote.
They come runnin’ just as fast as they can
coz every girl crazy ’bout a sharp dressed man.
Landis
January 29, 2005 at 1:26 am
8“Arie Espy Easy Tea”
OK, a little embarrassed at how long it took me to get this one. But I do appreciate it.
Lynne
January 29, 2005 at 12:11 pm
9“you forgot about Poland” GWB to John Kerry.
Prophetic.
ginny
January 29, 2005 at 12:19 pm
10I fear for the ducks of Europe. But I’m grateful that Cheney isn’t a Packers fan, or we’d have been treated to the sight of a vast, scarred, middle-aged torso bearing the letter “G.” And presumably, the rest of his entourage would have been forced to strip, shave, and paint up in order to spell the remaining “O B-U-S-H” slogan.
chrisBix.
January 29, 2005 at 1:43 pm
11You see, he REMEMBERED to get nicely dressed to attend the Very cold Ignaugural! Oh well, he looks like the grouchy old bastard who was Forced to attend by his wife.
Emmarie
January 29, 2005 at 2:00 pm
12Quoth Landis: “OK, a little embarrassed at how long it took me to get this one. But I do appreciate it.”
I still don’t…I feel outclassed…
David
January 29, 2005 at 2:06 pm
13An asshole is an asshole is an asshole, as by extension now are 60 million American voters.
Some days I can focus on what we as Americans generally share in common, but having to share this compost heap of arrogant indifference as vice-president is just too damned much. Wish I had something witty to add, something to help us through the insanity, but this just ain’t funny. Pathetic is what comes to mind.
Deno the Untergeek
January 29, 2005 at 2:29 pm
14Pathetic indeed David. I’m flabergasted. And so should be 60 million voters. Bet they aren’t…
Could someone explain the Arie Espy Easy Tea joke to me? Maybe I’m just too tired (fire alarm at 4:52 this fine Saturday morning….), but I’m not getting it.
Dean
January 29, 2005 at 3:49 pm
15Deno, say it fast and think of Aretha Franklin.
…If Cheney is going to dress that way, they should sit him next to his intellectual equal, Prince Harry.
Lauire Mann
January 29, 2005 at 5:21 pm
16Hell, I remember the shitfit Republicans threw in the mid-’70s when Carter dared to wear a plaid shirt in the Oval Office when he was doing some work in there on the weekends. Naturally, none of them dare criticize Cheney for showing how little respect he showed to the occasion.
tess
January 29, 2005 at 5:44 pm
17. . . Just be grateful that Cheney had the sense to strategically put the program in front of his spread legs or else we might’ve been given another glimpse of a mysterious and quite frightening bulge down one of his pant legs . . .
Deno the Untergeek
January 29, 2005 at 6:41 pm
18Ohhh….awesome. Gotcha Dean.
Elayne Riggs
January 29, 2005 at 6:42 pm
19I believe those are, indeed, high and mighty mucky-mukluks on his feet…
David
January 29, 2005 at 6:58 pm
20Thank you, Dean. I too was a little slow. Too much cranial aluminum, I guess. That or all the leaded gas I was exposed to in my youth.
Lauire (Laurie?),
I’d forgotten the plaid shirt incident. Thanks. I’m chuckling again. Those people are rewriting the text on hypocrisy.
Nell Lancaster
January 29, 2005 at 7:53 pm
21it doesn’t matter whether or not there was a message being sent, the message was sent.
That’s the bottom line, perfectly expressed. Thanks, Adam. Hope Vegas is/was productive!
Mary Kay
January 29, 2005 at 11:16 pm
22Yes, thanks much, Dean! I was trying too hard…thought it must be pig latin. Pig latin would have been fitting.
Jerry
January 29, 2005 at 11:29 pm
23I just wish he hadn’t been humming “Springtime for Hitler” all through the ceremony!
Leslie
January 30, 2005 at 11:17 am
24Thank you, Dean. I was too embarrassed to admit that I didn’t get it either. I could get the R-E-S-P, but then I fell apart. Now, Dean and Landis, don’t you feel smart for having figured it out all by yourselves?
tim
January 30, 2005 at 12:12 pm
25Grumpy Old Vice-Presidents.
weblackey
January 30, 2005 at 12:36 pm
26Ahh, Americans and our insensitivity. Europe, Holocaust srivivors, go Cheney yourself.
/end Cheney.
Landis
January 30, 2005 at 1:16 pm
27I didn’t get it until I actually started to read it aloud to my fiancĂ©e. So no, I don’t feel any smarter for being the first to admit that it took me too long to figure out.
Thinking about this, I just can’t come to grips with why he would do it. Please, oh please, be an oversight. I think that I’m going to rationalize it as an oversight and hope for the best. After all, he and his crowd will be running things for at least the next four years. I’m gonna work on being outraged about the things that I might be able to stop. This will be filed with any back-filler arguments I may need while conversing with the blindly faithful in the Bush administration.
jack*
January 30, 2005 at 1:58 pm
28Deadly bills of fury, isn’t it? At least for the common or ringed terror duck.
Mike Z
January 30, 2005 at 8:56 pm
29Jack*, I believe you are correct. After all, who ever heard of a “duck-beaked platypus”? That would be rediculous!!
adam
January 30, 2005 at 9:03 pm
30jack* is right. I was aware of this, but there’s little doubt that “deadly beaks of fury” is about 500 times funnier than “deadly bills of fury.”
I was pretty sure I’d get caught, but I thought it was worth a try.
…And I woulda gotten away with it too, if it weren’t for you meddling kids!
Mike Z
January 30, 2005 at 9:17 pm
31Adam -
For Shame! You knowingly sacrificed accurate avian anatomical terminology in the blind pursuit of comedy? I had no idea you had sunk so low. I thought you could resist the corrupting influence of Hollywood, but apparently I was wrong. Now I don’t believe in nothin’ no more.
Well, back into the mystery mobile in search of another wacky adventure. Hey Shaggy, pass that this way, man.
Emmarie
January 31, 2005 at 9:28 pm
32I think he thinks he’s a teeanger who was dragged there by parents and is sulking.
For shame. Even teenagers aren’t that awful.
David
January 31, 2005 at 10:23 pm
33Emmarie,
You got it, girl. The world’s oldest petulant child.
Jerry
February 1, 2005 at 1:36 am
34A petulent child with the power to “put you in the cornfield.” If ya know what I mean.
PC Pete
February 5, 2005 at 6:25 pm
35Maybe Dick had to wear Prince Harry’s spare clothes, since his swastika-shaped chest scars were too visible in his yellow lycra bodysuit?
Oh, and BTW, shouldn’t it be ‘insurgent semi-aquatic avian guerillas’, not ‘terror ducks’? You don’t want to offend anyone’s sensibilities, do you? The Great Lobster forbid!
Good luck, young master Felbur.