Comments on: Cross Your Heart http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/ America's favorite blog Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:33:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: Murray http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6515 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6515 Considering our ballooning deficit, and how our economy is heading south, I would call Bush the Chesty Morgan Manolo Balonic bra. Huge boobs that end up in your shoes. Considering our ballooning deficit, and how our economy is heading south, I would call Bush the Chesty Morgan Manolo Balonic bra.

Huge boobs that end up in your shoes.

]]> by: Ann http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6516 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6516 The irony of that CNN headline just cracks me up. The irony of that CNN headline just cracks me up.

]]> by: rabbit http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6517 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6517 I think that you know way more about bras than any guy I've ever met. At least about the proper terms for them, most guys know a lot about how they look, at least. I think that you know way more about bras than any guy I’ve ever met. At least about the proper terms for them, most guys know a lot about how they look, at least.

]]> by: dee http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6518 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6518 Adam, I find the fact that you know so much about the details of the differences in women's underwear mildly disconcerting. Because I'll tell ya the God's honest truth, most men couldn't get past "It was white...or maybe black. I think." I can't decide if this represents a side of you we were heretofore not privy to, or one hell of a time spent on "research" Adam, I find the fact that you know so much about the details of the differences in women’s underwear mildly disconcerting. Because I’ll tell ya the God’s honest truth, most men couldn’t get past “It was white…or maybe black. I think.”

I can’t decide if this represents a side of you we were heretofore not privy to, or one hell of a time spent on “research”

]]> by: Jerry http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6519 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6519 Brilliant! True! Defining, even!! But you kids have no sense of what political lingerie can be. Those of use (males) than hit puberty in the 50s know what it means for a politician to be straight to the (very sharp) point, but still entirely mendacious! And how impervious to reason a Republican girdle can be, regardless of logic, entreaty, and need! Brilliant! True! Defining, even!!

But you kids have no sense of what political lingerie can be. Those of use (males) than hit puberty in the 50s know what it means for a politician to be straight to the (very sharp) point, but still entirely mendacious! And how impervious to reason a Republican girdle can be, regardless of logic, entreaty, and need!

]]> by: bushburner http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6520 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6520 Adam, In your fifth paragraph you speak of <i>brassieres, we need to look for two major characteristics</i> and in the very next sentence you're talking about the <i>analysis of bush</i>. Either you have got to take some anatomy classes or I am going to have to persuade my wife to increase her matrimonial generosity. Adam,

In your fifth paragraph you speak of brassieres, we need to look for two major characteristics and in the very next sentence you’re talking about the analysis of bush. Either you have got to take some anatomy classes or I am going to have to persuade my wife to increase her matrimonial generosity.

]]> by: bushburner http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6521 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6521 Oh and as to the beginning of the last paragraph <i>Further study is of course necessary</i>, that's what I keep telling my wife. Oh and as to the beginning of the last paragraph Further study is of course necessary, that’s what I keep telling my wife.

]]> by: Deno the Untergeek http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6522 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6522 Right on, good analysis Adam! However, I think the main point is that, no matter what everyone says about their favorite bra, the fact is, one size (rather, type, in this case) does not fit all. Oh, and I definitely agree wholeheartedly with bushburner. Further study is (almost) always warranted. Right on, good analysis Adam! However, I think the main point is that, no matter what everyone says about their favorite bra, the fact is, one size (rather, type, in this case) does not fit all.
Oh, and I definitely agree wholeheartedly with bushburner. Further study is (almost) always warranted.

]]> by: bjd http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6523 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6523 boxers, briefs, or au naturale? boxers, briefs, or au naturale?

]]> by: Bob http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6524 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2005/01/20/cross-your-heart/#comment-6524 I think Bush is more like undergarments worn lower on the body. Which ones? Depends. Rimshot, please. I think Bush is more like undergarments worn lower on the body. Which ones? Depends.

Rimshot, please.

]]>