From The New York Times -
WASHINGTON, Dec. 29 - The Pentagon plans to retire one of the Navy’s 12 aircraft carriers, buy fewer amphibious landing ships for the Marine Corps and delay the development of a costly Army combat system of high-tech arms as part of $60 billion in proposed cuts over the next six years, Congressional and military officials said Wednesday.
Since the November elections, the White House has been under growing pressure to offset mounting deficits and at the same time pay for the unexpectedly high costs of military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan…
Military and Congressional officials said the Pentagon was looking to trim up to $10 billion in the 2006 budget alone.
_________
Current Cost of War in Iraq (est.) - $146 billion
___________________________________________
Yes ! We’re going to be cutting back the rate of growth of spending!
We’re tightening the belts. Well, not actually tightening ‘em, because we can’t do that. We can’t keep our belts at the same notch either, really - we’re at war, stuff happens, it’s the holidays, etc. We’re gonna put on a little weight, no way to avoid it. But with some will power we can loosen our belts at a slower rate. And since the economy is growing, tax revenue is growing, so we’re growing. Our economy is a growing boy, needing a larger waistband, yes, but also getting taller. Proportionally, he looks just fine!
Well, okay, tax revenue has actually declined for the past couple of years. Tax cuts. Riiiight. Income tax revenues last year were about the same as they were in 1999. Lower last year than the year before, which was lower than the year before that. So at the moment, the boy’s not actually growing as we let out his belt another notch or two, no, he’s sort of… shrinking a little.
But like any proud parent, we can look at our bouncing baby budget and see what’s beautiful in it. Our boy is just fine! Sure, he’s shrinking in size while getting fatter and fatter, yes, he collapses after running half a block and lies there panting until you tempt him to his feet with a bag of peanut M&M’s, yes, he was mistaken for a medicine ball in gym class last week, but he’s fine. THAT’S what other governments don’t understand, that’s what economists and financiers are overlooking as they forecast doom and downgrade our currency - our economy is good, our economy is handsome, our economy is just big-boned, that’s all. Big-boned and temporarily cursed with a slow metabolism. But just you wait. Just you wait and he’ll have his growth spurt. And then they’ll see. He’ll show them all.
Meanwhile, we’re gonna need a bigger belt. One whose designers don’t kowtow to that ridiculous, unattainable, media-generated image that children should be taller than they are wide. Just a nice new belt, whether or not it costs a few bucks. Nothing’s too good for our baby.





16 comments
Dave
December 30, 2004 at 4:01 pm
1Cutting an Aircraft Carrier and some ‘phibs, denying the army of some weapon systems… Carl Rove will try to put this up for a congressional vote somehow so anyone that sensibly votes for for the cut can be derided as “Hating America and her troops”
…Next on Fox News, how liberals are trying to help al Qaeda kill everyone close to you…
Allison in Santa Cruz
December 30, 2004 at 4:50 pm
2Oh dear. I was away for several days and missed you and your take on current events, Adam. The only news I got was TV news at the home of my brother-in-law, and that was all about tsunamis. Tens of thousands of people died, and it took the President of the United States 3 days to say anything about it?
It’s always good to hear positive news about the budget. And sure, we all gain a few pounds during the holidays. Now I’m gonna go NOT eat those 3 peanut M&Ms, and I’ll be back to my usual svelte self.
By the way, does anybody know how much body armor can you buy for the cost of an amphibious landing craft?
Emmarie
December 30, 2004 at 9:02 pm
3This makes me quite sad to realize that in this case America is kind of like teenage girls, following these steps:
1. Live stupidly.
2. Be told there is a problem with how you live.
3. Look around you and say that the person telling you there is a problem was right.
4. Blame the media for making you screw up in the first place.
The exception is that apparently the economy has overcome the cruelty of the media’s misconception of how it should be, whereas many teenage girls never get past step 4. Or 1.
Overland
December 30, 2004 at 9:22 pm
4Adam,
This piece would seem to be implying that a tax increase might be warranted to pay for the oh-so-necessary Iraq war. We’re supporting the troops already, just look at all those made-in-China “Support the Troops” ribbons on our SUV’s.
There can’t be a SACRIFICE involved with this war -right? Let the Chinese and Japanese pay for it via Treasury purchases.
But they can stop anytime.
1 Euro = 1.36 US Dollar today. Higher inflation, coming right up…World currency crisis possibly in future…Thanks, Yellow Rose.
hedera
December 31, 2004 at 12:26 am
5How about we eliminate the Missile Defense Program? You know, the one that doesn’t work even when we rig the tests? The one where the launch vehicle misfired on the last test? The one that will almost certainly NEVER work (and in any case if we had the brains God gave bastard geese in Ireland, we’d be tightening surveillance on container shipping and ignoring North Korea entirely…)?
If “the Pentagon [is] looking to trim up to $10 billion in the 2006 budget alone”, this looks like a prime candidate, since that’s how much is budgeted to it in FY 2005…
Thompson
December 31, 2004 at 1:18 am
6My personal favorite missile defense moment? Had to be when, just after Bush announced the installation of several almost-functional pieces of point defense, Putin immediately stated that Russia was working on a missile that could bypass the system.
Okay, the irony of that comment is that Russia’s current missiles could bypass the system. Nevertheless, huzzah–this incredibly expensive defensive “tool,” and a supposed ally is talking about rendering it obsolete in roughly a year and a half. Not a year and a half from full functional deployment, but a year and a half from initial untested deployment.
Well, who knows? Maybe Russia’ll need another year and a half after the defensive system is actually up and running to build a workable counter-measure. Yup. That year and a half of protection from what amounts to the method of attack terrorists are LEAST likely to use will certainly make -me- feel better.
tess
January 1, 2005 at 12:30 am
7Thompson, wait, are we talking about the same Russia which has been known to slack when it comes down to protecting old missle silos, nuclear waste, and nuclear weapons sites? Oh boy! Big boy’s going to lard up a little more before daddy-Bush and daddy-Cheney finish these next 4 years and Americans are still going to feel nervous but ironically safer with the mandate boys in power.
Yup, this upcoming year’s going to be a hell of a toboggin ride. Pity we’re the ones on it.
Katie
January 1, 2005 at 11:21 am
8“……if we had the brains God gave bastard geese in Ireland…..”
SNORT!!! ROFL!
Actually, that is a VERY good point. N. Korea has been rumbling and grumbling like a pendantic two year old, and yet Shrub et al don’t even notice. I hate to see what is going to happen when the temper tantrum erupts.
Jerry
January 1, 2005 at 12:48 pm
9*Here* for another take on how the war is causing cuts in defense spending. Dizzyfying, ain’t it?
And I hope, hedera, that th’t y’meant that the fine Irish geese have more brains than bastard geese elsewhere. Ye did, now, din’t ya? ‘For ‘t’would be a shame if a car just “blew up” outside yer house, now wouldn’t it?
Happy New Year t’all!
Murray
January 1, 2005 at 5:10 pm
10I noticed that they plan on decommissioning the “John F Kennedy”. Can’t have that name around to remind W how a good president ran things.
Nothing is more efficient at projecting our power to more places than an aircraft carrier. And for the same price we can have a missile defense system that can’t do anything.
As long as you are living in a fantasy, I guess it doesn’t make any difference.
hedera
January 2, 2005 at 12:47 am
11Jerry, I haven’t evaluated the brain power of bastard geese in Ireland versus bastard geese in other locales. I wonder how they are in Texas?? Maybe we could get funding for a study; would you like to start the grant application? In the meantime, drink some more poteen and calm down…
Jerry
January 2, 2005 at 4:30 am
12hedera - Hmmm…the brain power of bastard geese in Texas. I know some of them have been known to get frozen into cattle tanks, and the really brainless ones can go on to the governorship, and then even bigger things, leading whole flocks to get frozen in one morass or another. But one and all, they are greasy, mean-tempered, unlovable, have webbed toes, and shit all over where ever they are.
I’m thinking on the grant thing, but I can’t figure out how make it a (Xian) faith-based study and thus assured of funding.
Jerry
January 2, 2005 at 4:34 am
13Murray - “…decommissioning the “John F Kennedy”“! Now wouldn’t that make a fine presidential yacht?!
hedera
January 3, 2005 at 12:22 am
14Jerry, we’ll never get “Xian” faith based funding to study bastard ANYTHING, even geese. The whole concept is a slap in the face of the sanctity of marriage… (Are geese among the 5 or so birds that mate for life? How do you tell if a goose is a bastard? This is clearly more complicated than we thought.)
Steve
January 3, 2005 at 10:25 am
15Since when was John F Kennedy a good president? The Bay of Pigs, the assassination of Ngo Dinh Diem, Vietnam in general, sexual relations with Mafia-linked Judith Exner, nearly igniting a nuclear war with Russia over missiles in Turkey? That’s a good president?
Murray
January 4, 2005 at 5:57 pm
16Steve,
Compared to W, Kennedy was a god.