Donald Rumfeld’s getting a lot of criticism from powerful Republicans, as you might have heard. From John McCain, yes, but also Trent Lott. And Susan Collins. And Chuck Hagel. And Norm Coleman. Many of them are calling for his resignation.
Wow! What we can glean from this is that after 4 years of stellar, circumspect, admirable service to his country and deft prosecution of the war in Iraq, Rumsfeld has suddenly made a ton of unpardonably bad choices in the past five weeks. I mean, how else could you possibly explain all of these prominent and patriotic Republicans not speaking out beforehand?
There was the election of course. But who could ever believe that powerful public servants who’ve vowed to act in the best interest of our country would voluntarily remain silent while they watched the Secretary of Defense inadvisably put American lives on the line? Who could believe that? That would imply that they were willing to see our soldiers die in an ill-managed war rather than risk losing the White House. That would be almost treasonous. It’s inconceivable!
Nope. It has to be that this was a really, really bad month for Rummy. Until just a few weeks ago, these fine senators believed that Rumsfeld was doing a terrific job, and only in recent days has he suddenly become the kind of guy who makes rash decisions, ignores good advice, plans poorly, and fails to provide for our fighting men and women.
It seems odd that this would all happen so quickly. But the alternative is unthinkable.





15 comments
Trackback from Michael Williams — Master of None - Timing and Treason
December 21, 2004 at 7:17 pm
Josh Narins
December 17, 2004 at 4:35 pm
1To suggest otherwise is unthinkable.
I’m glad patriotic Americans, such as yourself, realize what one bad month can do, and will understand if Bush looks past the last few weeks of less-than-complete-perfection and signs Rummy on, or replaces him with everyone’s darling, Wolfowitz.
Perhaps, as Silvio “Little Bennie” Berlusconi and Bush are so close, Bush will do as he has done, and name _himself_ Defense Secretary. After all, that is his job.
I can hear it now “The President keeps Americans safe, and that’s what I’ve done, will do.”
lovable liberal
December 17, 2004 at 6:02 pm
2If it’s unthinkable, the Bushies will try it.
Murray
December 17, 2004 at 7:04 pm
3Bush doesn’t want to fire anyone because it means that he did a poor job of picking in the first place, and besides, the guy was just carrying out orders. Firing would be to admit a mistake. I’m curious as to whether W sticks to his beliefs or caves in to Republican nervousness of having to defend this seriously incompetent and arrogant boob.
Overland
December 17, 2004 at 7:28 pm
4The solution for the Rummy problem is simple and proven over recent days; award him a medal and retain him in his position.
But so much Administration incompetence, so few medals.
Bob
December 17, 2004 at 7:34 pm
5It’s completely understandable. Until a short time ago, all of these people were too busy not reading the omnibus budget bill to pay much attention to Rumsfeld.
tess
December 17, 2004 at 9:17 pm
6While we’re at it, can we get rid of Condoleeza? I’m getting tired of hearing about how great she’ll be as secretary of state when all anyone has to say is that she was a good concert pianist, an “excellent ice skater” and provost of Stanford with a Ph.D in Soviet/cold war strategy. I mean, if they can’t find something laudable about her tenure as security advisor . . .
Sharon
December 18, 2004 at 3:23 pm
7I, too, was surprise that Rummy did not receive a Medal of Freedom this week. That was the first clue that something had gone horribly wrong. We have an expression for this in the world outside of government: “One ‘aw-shit’ wipes out 1000 ‘attaboy’s”. Rummy must have made one heck of an aw-shit this month. The question is, what was it?
Will W spend some of that “political capital” of his to retain this guy? Does Rummy have compromising photos or documentation on some member of the Bush family? Only time will tell.
Murray
December 19, 2004 at 5:30 pm
8Yup it sure is a bad month.
Now Rummy’s ass is in another sling. Seems the letters sent to the grieving families of the fallen soldiers were machine signed. Apparently he was too busy thinking up excuses as to why the troops don’t have proper armor to pen his name.
But no matter. Only disloyalty is punished with removal.
katie
December 19, 2004 at 8:58 pm
9On a totally unrelated issue….
It would appear that Adam is playing himself this week on WWDTM. I went to listen to this weeks’ show, and saw that the performers were: Adam, Roy, and Adam.
I wonder if this is because Adam has been on such a winning streak of late? Maybe they thought that he could defeat himself?
I wonder if one Adam is the Straight-line Adam and the other is the Zinger Adam?
I must go listen and see who wins…
Sue
December 20, 2004 at 11:16 am
10Katie,
As I’m sure you’ve figured out by now, one was straight-line Adam and the other was Adam’s dead-on impersonation of Sue Ellicott.
And Roy beat him both.
joncoop
December 20, 2004 at 1:51 pm
11Here’s the form letter sent to the fallen…
Dear parent/guardian,
I am truly sorry your son/daughter has been killed. He/she served our country bravely and killed many evil insurgents and/or terrorists.
God bless America,
Rummy
Jerry
December 20, 2004 at 2:45 pm
12joncoop - You missed the second paragraph:
“Please be advised that in furtherence of our stop-loss policy in Iraq, and your son/daughter’s unexcused failure to complete his/her open-ended tour of duty, a blood relative must report for duty in Baghdad (transportation to be at your expense) for duty withing 14 days”
Nathan
December 20, 2004 at 3:13 pm
13Oh quit picking on the poor guy. He’s still too busy trying to figure out whether our misplacing 380 tons of explosives would be categorized as a known unknown or an unknown known to do something as trivial as show a little humanity and sign a sympathy letter himself. And are you really un-American enough to wish our Secretary of Defense risk carpal-tunnel syndrome signing a bunch of letters to the families of soldiers who are now completely useless to our glorious God-driven cause? Speaking of which, what are we fighting for again?
Thompson
December 21, 2004 at 11:06 am
14Nathan, I’m surprised at you. We’re fighting for God, king, and country, same as any other historical crusaders bolstered by divine mandate.