Every July 4th I think the same thing: The audacity. The nerve. The sheer cojones that went into our founding fathers cutting the tether to King and country and launching Democracy 1.0 without so much as a round of beta testing.
We wouldn’t do it like that nowadays. We’d know better. The Declaration of Independence was basically the work of one overachieving focus group. There were no control groups, no cost-benefit analyses, and a shocking lack of Powerpoint presentations [I’ve read that Benjamin Franklin actually prepared a nifty one entitled “Effective Team Building and Post-Colonial Management Techniques” with clear bullet points and amusing clip art, but he never got a chance to present it].
No, we’d have done it differently. For one, slave-related sex scandals would’ve destroyed Thomas Jefferson’s credibility long before the writing of the Declaration, and the task would have fallen into the hands of a more reliable and moderate patriot. And that document would have been thoroughly vetted by a legal staff to ensure that our nascent revolutionaries were protected from lawsuits from both the British and the new Americans. The resulting Declaration would have been 12,000 pages long, with a dozen appendices and copious footnotes. But it would’ve been airtight. Ponytailed dreamers might feel that certain truths are “self-evident,” and the rabble might find such pithy phrasing inspirational, but nowadays we know better. The truth that hot coffee might burn you isn’t self evident, fergodsakes, so how can any reasonable person expect the so-called inalienable rights of man to slide by with a simple “because we say so?” The fact that the Declaration of Independence was issued with no caveats, waivers, or warning labels strikes the modern reader as not only silly but very, very irresponsible.
But they went ahead and did it anyway, didn’t they? And yeah, it turned out all right for that undeniably treasonous bunch and their fledgling nation. But do we really want to hold these loose cannons up as examples for our children? After all, they were rash, impolitic, conspiratorial, treasonous, and they spoke out against their leaders during wartime. These are the people we call patriots? Forgive me for saying so, but it sounds to me like they could’ve used a li’l dose of the Patriot Act.
It all worked out, of course, and we righted the good ship America along the way. Hundreds of years and thousands of laws later, we’ve filled in the blanks and covered our asses. It wasn’t easy, but we did it.
So have a very happy Independence Day, and make sure you raise a glass to the cooler, saner, more professional heads that took a messy, impractical, liberal idea and turned it into something that could actually make some money.





12 comments
Linkmeister
July 4, 2004 at 1:57 pm
1While digging around for an adjunct to my thoughts today I found this, which allows you to learn just what happened to those revolutionaries post-Revolution. Enlightening.
Murray
July 4, 2004 at 2:32 pm
2Britain was the world’s superpower of the time, and the colonies were at best what we would call a 3rd world power. The signers of the Declaration knew that if they failed to subdue this colossus their names were on the document and George III would see them all hang and strip their families of their lands.
Sort of a contrast to the chicken hawks running the show now.
The framers traded their security for individual freedoms, this administration has traded our freedoms for what they claim is security.
Oh well, happy 4th, it’s still the greatest country on earth. So far.
Elayne Riggs
July 4, 2004 at 5:04 pm
3Yay Adam! Brilliant as always!
historyenne
July 4, 2004 at 7:10 pm
4I agree with everything you said, Adam, except for one small point: Jefferson’s slave-related sex scandal didn’t begin until some years after the declaration was written. It was an issue during his presidency, and would certainly have ruined him today.
Happy independence day, everyone!
Dee
July 4, 2004 at 7:21 pm
5Oh heck I still cry at the scene in “Moscow on the Hudson” when the immigrants in the cafe take turns reciting the first paragraph of the Declaration. Marvelous words, indeed. Hard to believe that it was put together by a committee.
The men who wrote it were inspired, and the economy and power of the language are testament to their intelligence and vision. And while we may bemoan the lack of such intelligence and vision today, I think we can blame it on one thing — air conditioning. Just think of how brief meetings and how short documents would be if these meetings were conducted and these documents were produced in sweltering board rooms and offices. You can get a lot more done when you just want to get the hell out of there and grab a cold one.
Which I will do, toasting Tom and John and Ben and all of ‘em. Nicely done, boys.
tatonka
July 5, 2004 at 11:19 am
6I thought it was beta tested by the Native Americans.
Happy birthday USA!
t.a.
July 5, 2004 at 11:26 pm
7people bemoan the lawyers and the laws, but look at the alternatives around the world. we’ve had no violent coups, just some legalistic ones. we started with a very limited democracy, and it’s grown — slowly, yes, but relentlessly. it hurts to watch the present pace and condition of our country, but there are enough of us working for change, enough of us who care, that i continue to believe we will get better and do better.
unless we poison every thing on the planet or blow the fucker up. no guarantees, but we aren’t doing that bad. not good enough, but hey, we’re only human. (read walt kelly for a good viewpoint.)
-=e=-
July 6, 2004 at 12:28 am
8Oh! Oh! Don’t get me STARTED on those traitorous “King George haters”! Wasn’t there at least one decent person there to remind them of the slogan: “The Colonies: Love it or Leave it!”? And the Boston Tea Party? That was terrorism. Simple and plain…. GITMO FOR ALL OF THEM, I SAY!!!
heh heh… Happy Birthday, U.S.A!
lovable liberal
July 6, 2004 at 11:29 am
9Can you imagine any of the current bunco artists pledging their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honour? And meaning it?
tess
July 6, 2004 at 12:56 pm
10wait, i thought the hot coffee scandal was reasonably legit. the woman suffered 3rd degree burns on her lap because mcDonald’s consistently heated the coffee well above what was considered normal, and in fact several people had complained before the lawsuit was ever brought up.
then again, this was from npr, and we all know that we can’t trust npr.
Murray
July 6, 2004 at 3:15 pm
11The woman received 3rd degree burns that required skin grafts. The coffee was 190 degrees, 140 will burn you. Several others had injured themselves and had complained but to no avail. The woman only sued to recover the cost of the grafts, the jury, incensed, upped the amount on their own.
The full story has little to do with the “spill coffee and get millions” story that has been going around.
ellen barnett
July 6, 2004 at 4:28 pm
12Any win against McDonalds is probably a win for human and animal rights. Democracy is great, if you don’t have corporations “secretly” running the government.