Comments on: “Supreme?” http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/ America's favorite blog Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:21:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11 by: DugSteen http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5489 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5489 And wasn't it John Adams who said, "I can't even <i>pronounce</i> habeous corpus! What do I care if we don't honor it!?" And wasn’t it John Adams who said, “I can’t even pronounce habeous corpus! What do I care if we don’t honor it!?”

]]> by: Stuart http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5490 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5490 At least 3 of the 9 were true patriots. I haven't seen what their arguments were, but that doesn't matter because they got the RIGHT answer -- and by that I mean the one Bush wanted them to get. Perhaps if he gets another term he can replace a few of these pinko judges with ones willing to safeguard our freedoms by eliminating them. At least 3 of the 9 were true patriots. I haven’t seen what their arguments were, but that doesn’t matter because they got the RIGHT answer — and by that I mean the one Bush wanted them to get. Perhaps if he gets another term he can replace a few of these pinko judges with ones willing to safeguard our freedoms by eliminating them.

]]> by: Raymond Chen http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5491 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5491 The rethinking of "checks and balances" is already under way: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.R.3920: The rethinking of “checks and balances” is already under way:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c108:H.R.3920:

]]> by: tim http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5492 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5492 Habeus schmabeus, I just want to personally thank Clarence Thomas for letting me look at all the porn I want! Woo-hoo! Way to go, C! Habeus schmabeus, I just want to personally thank Clarence Thomas for letting me look at all the porn I want! Woo-hoo! Way to go, C!

]]> by: changetion http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5493 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5493 And it was Patrick Henry who said "Give me liberty or give me a color coded threat system" And it was Patrick Henry who said “Give me liberty or give me a color coded threat system”

]]> by: Bill http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5494 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5494 Is it just me, or is the sidebar encroaching on the text for everybody? Is it just me, or is the sidebar encroaching on the text for everybody?

]]> by: Murray http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5495 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5495 Those Supremes must be confused. They may think that they put W in power, but just ask W, he'll tell you it was God. And seeing as how God directly intervened on W's behalf why should they question things now. If those terrorists weren't guilty why would the administration charge them? W hasn't made any mistakes, just ask him. Those Supremes must be confused.

They may think that they put W in power, but just ask W, he’ll tell you it was God. And seeing as how God directly intervened on W’s behalf why should they question things now. If those terrorists weren’t guilty why would the administration charge them?

W hasn’t made any mistakes, just ask him.

]]> by: Pat R. http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5496 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5496 It might be time to rethink the whole "Supreme Court" thing. Er, that is, <i>after the elections</i> it'll be time to rethink the whole "Supreme Court" thing. It might be time to rethink the whole “Supreme Court” thing. Er, that is, after the elections it’ll be time to rethink the whole “Supreme Court” thing.

]]> by: Anonymous http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5497 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5497 Thanks for that link Raymond. THAT'S Scary Thanks for that link Raymond. THAT’S Scary

]]> by: POORWARREN http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5498 Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://fanaticalapathy.com/2004/06/30/supreme/#comment-5498 Re: Raymomds link. Doesn't anybody realise the "Founding Fathers" weren't really anymore serious about "checks and balances" than they were about "separation of church and state". Ask Dubya, he'll explain it to you. Re: Raymomds link.
Doesn’t anybody realise the “Founding Fathers” weren’t really anymore serious about “checks and balances” than they were about “separation of church and state”. Ask Dubya, he’ll explain it to you.

]]>