Well now I’ve gone and done it. I’ve touched off an international incident, enraged the French, and slandered the White House. The really remarkable thing about it is that this time it was accidental.
This morning I was using various means to peruse exactly who’s linking to me out on the web, and why. I do this frequently, because as a professional writer it’s important for me to remain vain and thin-skinned.
It seemed the usual assortment of links - liberals and satire fans giving me the ol’ thumbs up (thanks, guys!), conservatives and literalists remarking on what a dumb, unfunny, effeminate traitor I am (thanks, guys!), and an obscure cult in Idaho once again “decoding” my writings to reveal the approaching Hour of Doom and the Rising of the Snakehead God (seriously guys, for the last time, I’m NOT the Eleven-fingered Herald of the Doomtimes, whatever that is). All-in-all, a pretty ordinary week.
Then I came across this website:
Idiots à ce point ?Sur les tortures en Irak : [ Via Fanatical Apathy ][ McClellan also pointed out that the incidents themselves were isolated in terms of what parts of the prisoners were abused. “Take the beatings,” he said. “Deplorable, yes, but often they were isolated, for example, to just the head and some parts of the torso. Sometimes as much as 76% of a prisoner’s body was treated completely humanely and in accordance with the Geneva Convention. But you guys never report that.” ] [ “Prennez les coups par exemple. C’est déplorable en effet, mais ils ne touchaient que la tête et quelques parties du torse. Donc, au moins 76% du corps du prisonnier a été traité conformément aux Conventions de Génève.” ]
McClellan est porte-parole à la Maison Blanche. Ils sont vraiment abrutis à ce point les américains pour qu’on veuille leur faire avaler ce genre de trucs ?
My French is not particularly good, but reading this and the ensuing comments (and then employing babelfish, naturellement!) gives me the definite impression that the French now believe that McClellan actually said that, and they’re using it as evidence of how incredibly dumb and insensitive we are. Worse, it comes at a time when our President is making his way through Europe.
Um… oops. Sorry.
I’m really embarrassed about this. Especially if we end up going to war with France and my blog turns out to have been the Archduke that broke the camel’s back. That’d be awkward.
So I’ve composed a little message to the people of France, just to clear things up:
“Howdy, French folks. Remember that thing I said Scott McClellan said about the prisoner abuse thing that was kinda shockingly insensitive and stuff? Well - heh, this is sort of funny - it turns out that he didn’t in fact say that. Nope. See, I was just engaging in a little satire, you know, like, exaggerating stuff for comic effect. So while McClellan is almost certainly an insensitive and bullheaded mouthpiece for an immoral and evasive administration, he didn’t actually say that thing I said he said that you said was so dumb. Sorry for any confusion. Love, Adam.”
As a means of making sure that my message gets across, I went back to babelfish and translated this into French and then translated it back into English, just to see how it reads. This is the result:
“Hello, French people. You point out this Scott thing by I McClellan called about the thing d’abus of prisoner who was a little shockingly not very sensitive and substance? Well - heh, this is the kind of funny - it s’avère qu’il word of didn’t does that of it. Nope. See, just j’était s’engager in a little satire, know you, like, by exaggerating the comic substance for l’effet. Thus while McClellan is almost certainly a little sensitive and bullheaded l’embouchure for an immoral and evasive administration, he of didn’t word really that this thing I said qu’il said that you said were so deaf-mute. Afflicted for any confusion. Love, Adam.”
So that should clear things up. And if it doesn’t work out, well, I’m sure that the French people will welcome our liberating forces with flowers and dancing in the streets. That’ll be nice, and it’ll help foster the spread of American-style democracy throughout Europe. So on second thought, my little fib that led to the war might turn out to have been a good thing, a small lie that helped us achieve a higher purpose.
You know, when I put it that way, I’m kinda proud.





29 comments
Yenayer
June 4, 2004 at 3:03 pm
1You really made me laugh .. To be fair I was quite sure i did not get the real thing about your post ( the one i linked to in my blog ) .. I think I have to correct something in my blog ?
But be quite sure .. no one thinks that all americains are dumb .. I actually love america but NOT BUSH !!
I am realy sorry
littlebit
June 4, 2004 at 3:13 pm
2Good grief–so you ARE the anti-Bush. Go figure. You try so hard and then you succeed in spite of yourself. We need you now more than ever.
So much for language being the foundation of civilized communication, huh?
Ian
June 4, 2004 at 3:30 pm
3Us Americans are like, totally smart. See voo plate this up your fwah grah, Frenchy! Yee-haw!
Bob
June 4, 2004 at 4:24 pm
4Thanks for sharing your affliction. -g-
Dee
June 4, 2004 at 4:40 pm
5“L’enfer, c’est les autres.”
Dugrless
June 4, 2004 at 4:52 pm
6I love it. I’m now signing all of my correspondence like this…
Afflicted for any confusion,
Dug
Linkmeister
June 4, 2004 at 5:29 pm
7Go check out M. or Mlle. or Mme. Yenayer’s blog. It’s been corrected to say he/she is dying of laughter from the joke (my high school French is good enough for that).
What a freakin’ riot.
Dubya
June 4, 2004 at 5:50 pm
8Pre-emptive press release (before that damn Felber guy leaks it)
The running of the U.S. is being contracted out to the firm of Nophuk & Klew (a wholly owned Halliburton subsidiary). We apologize to the American people in advance but are sure that they will understand that the administration cannot be expected to run three countries (America, Iraq, and Afghanistan) as well as our need to immediately draft the constitution of Mars.
However, the people can be assured that the running of the nation will continue in the same moral and ethical way that we have for the last four years. The plans we have put in motion will not only continue unabated but will be accelerated under the management of the fine company of Nophuk & Klew, who are experts in the management field being completely staffed by the (dregs) former management of Enron, the rape of the Health, Education, and welfare systems will be completed ahead of schedule. As a result of the new projections by Nophuk & Klew we will be able to give all Americans a Tax Break of $6.39 next year (which they should spend immediately on a half-gallon of gas) which will help our economy greatly.
The Constitution will be suspended for a period of not less than ten years and not more than 100 years so that Nophuk & Klew can quickly and easily implement any measures they see fit to bring about these changes, without having to worry about any legal issues or bleeding hearts.
But my felow Americans should not be dismayed as it will be replaced with the Ten Comandments.
Sincerely,
Your Commander-in-Chief,
President for Life,
His Highness G.W. Bush
Anonymous
June 4, 2004 at 5:51 pm
9HI
Lena
June 4, 2004 at 6:04 pm
10Adam - maybe it’s time you start attaching a brief summary in French to all your posts.
historyenne
June 4, 2004 at 6:17 pm
11The comments in response to that entry are almost better than the entry itself. Here’s my favorite, with translation (don’t worry, I do speak French)
“Sans aucun anti-américanisme, on a quand même réussi à faire croire à 45% des américains que Saddam pouvait attaquer les USA avec des missiles nucléaires. Ils sont quand même plus facilement manipulables !!”
“Not to be anti-american, but 45% of americans were led to believe that Saddam could attack the US with nuclear missiles. At any rate, they are easily manipulated”
This is from the original post’s author, apparently before s/he realized Adam was joking.
Still . . . it’s a good point.
Murray
June 4, 2004 at 8:56 pm
12Those crazy French.
They take the work of Adam, America’s best satirist, as literal news and Jerry Lewis as America’s funniest person. Go figure. It’s obvious that America doesn’t translate into French any better than bablefish does. So when we conquer France we need to rid them of the French language. That should fix everything.
Lena
June 4, 2004 at 10:06 pm
13Isn’t one of the problems with satire that you in many cases must know that the writer is a satirist to understand that it’s satire? And since Adam’s position as America’s best satirist maybe isn’t firmly established in France, well… and by the way, I have a challenge for all of you:
Find a copy of Candide in the original (written by Voltaire, a sort of 18:th century French Felber), read it carefully with the aid of a dictionary and a grammar, and see if you get it.
Bryan
June 4, 2004 at 11:27 pm
14French, good heavens. They have been translating “Harry Potter” because they didn’t think Americans would understand the original British English, and some of the editors’ word choices in the American version are, frankly, weird.
My main second language is Russian and if you carefully read some of the Soviet era authors you can’t always decide if it is standard “socialist realism” or a satire of SR designed to get by the censors.
I can forgive the French for their attachment to Jerry Lewis, but there is no excuse for mimes.
Of course, if President Chirac were to accidentially lead Dubya into a WWII mine field and lose him, it will be champagne and fois gras all around.
Mojo
June 5, 2004 at 3:08 am
15This is great news, Adam! When Jerry Lewis was misquoted in 1966 as saying, “Charles de Gaulle eats plumbers’ underpants” it caused problems, but was well worth it in the end. Sure, France pulled out of NATO, leading indirectly to a quarter century delay in the fall of the Soviet Union. But, on the plus side, the exposure led to a tremendous increase in Lewis’s popularity in France. Sure, you’ve got a tidy salary coming for the next 4-8 years when you’re elected President, but you can always use the extra income from foreign sales of FA merchandise!
Jerry
June 5, 2004 at 3:31 am
16…or if you trust the Google automatic translation of the translation, the last line of the original graf is, “You guys never carry forward that drank.” Curious, unless it should be ‘drunk,’ in which case it makes a certain sense!
But, “…they’re using it as evidence of how incredibly dumb and insensitive we are. Worse, it comes at a time when our President is making his way through Europe.” Yeah, like with Bush there, they’d NEVER think Americans are dumb and insensitive.
Speaking of which, did you see the Yellow Rose bow to the pope, and then get physically removed by the pope’s posse? Reminded me of Reagan’s retinue wrasslin’ him off-stage when he started to extemporize! Wonder if that bow will get him labeled ‘papist’ by his evangelical fundamentalist constituency?
Sarah
June 5, 2004 at 5:15 am
17Bwhahahaha! The trials of the internationally read man.
Ken... Just Ken
June 5, 2004 at 10:29 am
18Adam,
Now that you’re an internationally read Blogger… You can apply for a press pass to the Democratic Convention.
Click here for more info
It would get you in the door to further your presidential bid.
Yenayer
June 5, 2004 at 1:16 pm
19Lena wrote : “Adam - maybe it’s time you start attaching a brief summary in French to all your posts.”
Lol
Would you think I could be the official translator ?
Hystorinne :
“Not to be anti-american, but 45% of americans were led to believe that Saddam could attack the US with nuclear missiles. At any rate, they are easily manipulated” ..
I was this in french TV
Sol
June 5, 2004 at 5:51 pm
20Well once our government masters get wind of this it’s straight to Gitmo for you.
Anonymous
June 6, 2004 at 12:45 am
21‘You point out this Scott thing by I McClellan called about the thing d’abus of prisoner …’
Are you sure you used Babelfish? It sounds more like you selected president Bush as your editor…
Teaflax
June 7, 2004 at 3:10 am
22Adam’s been internationally read (and linked) for quite a while, from my little two-bit blog in Sweden.
Just to add to his credentials, y’know.
Pat R.
June 7, 2004 at 6:01 am
23Plea to Adam: please, please write something about the canonization of Ronald Reagan that’s currently underway. There is a desperate need for balance (with humor).
Yenayer
June 7, 2004 at 8:44 am
24Juan Cole wrote a good piece on Reagan !! Of course it’s not humouristic.
http://www.juancole.com/2004_06_01_juancole_archive.html#1086540494127 48319
Murray
June 7, 2004 at 9:50 am
25It’s hard for me break my news addiction just so that I don’t have to listen to everyone canonizing RR. It’s as bad as when Nixon died.
Reagan made ignorance, bigotry, and irresponsible spending fashionable. He invaded a country (Granada) that had done nothing to us, to punish terrorists that had killed 248 marines in Lebanon. He reined terror of his own on the environment with his choice of James Watts as interior Secretary, and Gorsuch as head of EPA. (Watts Nation Forest - denuded hills covered with oil derricks). He had by far the most corrupt administration with, I believe, more than 100 indicted or resigned, including Watts and Gorsuch. He needed 3X5 cards to cue him one what to say including small talk. The only way he could keep his secretaries names straight during meetings was to have cards that listed their names under the portraits of old presidents. Lincoln = George Shultz (former head of Bechtel). Every time he met his HEW secretary (I forget his name) RR would call him Mr. Mayor. He was black and black meant mayor.
His movies were more real for him than real life. So he would recount events of his life, like being in the war, which had happened only on a sound stage in Hollywood.
RR is supposed to be great because he had a simple message and believed it deeply. Quite simply his brain couldn’t handle nuance.
If any of this seems eerily familiar, you can understand, given the state of our country now, why I don’t want to be going down memory lane with RR.
Pat R.
June 7, 2004 at 11:32 am
26More than 130 members of the Reagan administration were either convicted or forced to resign their posts to avoid prosecution. I’ve been told, though I can’t verify this, that that number was more than the total of all other 20th century American presidential administrations combined.
Dee
June 7, 2004 at 12:56 pm
27Alzheimer’s disease is a terrible way to die, but I can’t help thinking “So is AIDS” which Reagan didn’t even MENTION until 1987.
And, if you’re Nicaraguan, so is having your family tortured and killed because you’re suspected of collaborating with the Sandanistas.
Bitter? Damned straight I’m bitter. So I’m not going to jump on the St. Ronnie bandwagon. I’m reminded of one of my favorite lines from Moms Mabley, speaking of an ex-husband:
“They say you should only say good things about the dead. He’s dead. Good.”
ellen barnett
June 8, 2004 at 4:38 pm
28Adam, you’re the greatest. I got soup coming out my nose over this one–
Ellen
CeeBee
June 10, 2004 at 4:14 pm
29The Chinese media reported some time ago that US Congress was on strike because they wanted a new building with retractable roof, like all those fancy sports stadiums.
Their reliable source was The Onion.