The latest revelations out of Abu Ghraib are so mind-bogglingly horrifying that we need to act now, and act hard. What’s notable about this is that if we have any intention of getting the hearts and minds of the Arab world while said organs are still in their hosts’ bodies, we’re going to have to use Bush administration tactics.
We have to go into Commando Apology mode. Give it a neat-sounding mission name like “Operation Iron Contrition,” or “Operation Enduring Oops.” Dispatch specially-trained black ops forces to infiltrate Iraqi organizations, reveal themselves at strategic times, and whimper manfully for forgiveness. We need lightning-fast death squads that will sweep into town centers, form a tight, inwards-facing circle, aim, and fire. Crack abuse squads must enter our prisons, commit reprehensible acts of torture, sexual humiliation, and violence, videotape it all in hi-def with Dolby 5.1 Surround sound, and ship the resulting tapes to Baghdad for public viewing. We need said tortures to be something uniquely culturally humiliating to Americans, like… like… I don’t know. Maybe covering their faces and thus denying them any resulting fame and book rights. I’m no expert - I’m sure the boys in the Pentagon could come up with something. But it needs to be done. And fast.
Or the President of the United States could get up and offer a clear, unqualified, first-hand, and direct apology to the Iraqi people. That’d work too. But I think the first plan is more plausible.





23 comments
Bob
May 21, 2004 at 4:02 pm
1Setting the lefty/righty dichotomy aside for the moment, we as a nation hold two diametrically opposed views about how to deal with a serious problem:
1) Full disclosure, punishment of the guilty (and not just a few scapegoats), sunshine is the best disinfectant, etc.
2) Stonewall.
We are currently being led, if that’s the word, by proponents of approach (2). You can’t argue with the results, particularly since no one’s listening.
tatonka
May 21, 2004 at 4:23 pm
2Number 1) with high intensity UV.
littlebit
May 21, 2004 at 4:32 pm
3I want to turn away, turn off the radio. But we have to know, Step 1. High intensity UV knowledge administration to the culpable would be the cruelest of all and the most effective and wise. Nonetheless, they’re not likely to be the ones blinded by the light.
Murray
May 21, 2004 at 7:59 pm
4Adam, this too shall be spun.
tess
May 21, 2004 at 9:13 pm
5instead of just plain ol’ sunlight or uv lamps, i’m in favor of cleaning this all out the old fashioned way — jaeggermeister and a match.
Steve
May 21, 2004 at 9:17 pm
6And now it looks like Chalabi is an Iranian double agent. We’ve been snookered and snookered good.
Anonymous
May 21, 2004 at 9:46 pm
7> And now it looks like Chalabi is an Iranian double agent. We’ve been snookered and snookered good.
“Fool me once, shame … shame on … you.” Long, uncomfortable pause. “Fool me — can’t get fooled again!”
– GW
craig
May 21, 2004 at 9:51 pm
8Operation Enduring Oops
Adam, I think you’ve named W’s memoir.
Fishmael
May 21, 2004 at 10:30 pm
9“Specially-trained black ops forces to infiltrate Iraqi organizations …”. It’s my understanding that one of the initial problems was that there were very few people in the U.S. government (let alone the military) that could speak Iraqi. Further, the few translaters that there were around were often gay (something about the “love of language”?), and were “let go”. However, as Adam says, it’s still more likely that Bush convincingly apologizing.
As to torturing an American, how about repeated loud messages that “there are other people in the world besides Americans”, or “France is number one”?
tim
May 21, 2004 at 11:05 pm
10Bush’s new campaign slogan:
“We’re going to punish the American military for the Abu Ghraib abuses by giving them four more years of Rumsfeld!”
Don
May 21, 2004 at 11:47 pm
11I was going to commend you for “Operation Enduring Oops” until I saw that Craig had somewhat beaten me to it.
But it was still excellent, Adam.
Anyone who hasan’t read Geoffrey Nunberg’s new book Going Nucular should do so. (He does - among other things - the great linguistic commentaries on Terry Gross’ Fresh Air.)
The chapter entitled “A Name Too Far” deals with the practice of naming things like wars with the intent of capturing the support of the target audience. It is very good at pointing out the good and less than goos results of the practice.
sly
May 22, 2004 at 12:27 am
12Well, hey, Secretary Rumsfeld told us there would be worse stuff coming out. We should be grateful for the warning.
Also, we should put him in a prison, guarded by a few former Abu Ghraib prisoners. And a light stick.
Pat R.
May 22, 2004 at 8:29 am
13In the ever-deepening cesspool of revelations about Abu Ghraib, let’s not forget that there are other horrific happenings being inflicted on Iraqi civilians by U.S. forces:
http://tinyurl.com/yur45
Pat R.
May 23, 2004 at 5:24 pm
14Instead of the two options Adam posits, Rumsfeld & Co. are trying a third option: ban camera phones!
Mike
May 23, 2004 at 9:53 pm
15Sorry if this is a repeat, but to hear the actual Bush quote posted by GW in which Bush flubs the “fool me once…” maxim, you can go to the site of the Bush Action Figure. You can click on it and hear Bush tell a lie (using actual audio of his quotes) or choke on a pretzel. Enjoy.
http://www.kaicurry.com/gwbush/dishonestdubya.html
Jerry
May 24, 2004 at 6:16 am
16sly
Hearing the administration state that they expect a big or several smaller terrorist incidents here in the homeland just prior to the election is the damn scariest thing I’ve heard. I just feel this is something they have a “special” reason to be “rock solid” certain about even if it is just intel they intend to ignore because it would be convenient to do so.
julia
May 24, 2004 at 9:47 am
17Ever since this happened, I’ve wanted flags lowered to half-staff for two weeks straight, nationwide. We need to apologize, yes, but I don’t want to let some bastard from the administration screw that up like they’ve screwed up everything else…..
Julia
Ken... Just Ken
May 24, 2004 at 11:33 am
18Regarding the Bush “fool me once…” quote;
I heard someone come up with the idea that Bush was thinking faster than we usually give him credit.
What if he actually screwed the quote up on purpose? He started the phrase and half way through he decided it was better to mess up the saying rather than let anyone have a tape of him saying “shame on me”
Landis
May 24, 2004 at 2:07 pm
19Even given that… He still wasn’t thinking fast enough not to have begun it in the first place. Either way he doesn’t deserve much credit as a fast thinker - at least when it comes to public speaking.
Sara J
May 24, 2004 at 4:13 pm
20Mike: thanks for that! depressing but fun, if you know what I mean.
Fishmael
May 24, 2004 at 9:39 pm
21I’d think that pretzels should would have been outlawed by now, since they’re obviously a terrierist threat to the U.S. Commander in Cheese.
Teaflax
May 31, 2004 at 11:55 pm
22I’ve read people theorizing that Bush is just incapable of uttering the words “shame on me”. It certainly fits with everything we know about the man.
lisa*
June 4, 2004 at 1:28 am
23Straight out of Abu Gharib
Halloween 2004
Prisoner Costume:
Hood (with safety eye openings), collar, leash
and women’s panties. (shirts are optional)
poncho with electrical wires (x3), Black pointed hood,
BYOB (bring your own box)
Us Guard costume
Brown t-shirt, blue or black latex gloves and
one chemical light stick. just like the ones soldiers used to sodomize real prisoners
Sold in sets: 3 prisoners, 1 guard costume
Or separately.
Be the first person on your block
to hold an abu gharib party!
RATED XXX!! NO PARENTS ALLOWED!
ARE YOU SCARRED?