From President Bush’s radio address, marking the one year anniversary of the end of major combat operations in Iraq and his last known appearance in a flight suit:
“Good morning. A year ago, I declared an end to major combat operations in Iraq, after coalition forces conducted one of the swiftest, most successful and humane campaigns in military history…
“One year later, despite many challenges, life for the Iraqi people is a world away from the cruelty and corruption of Saddam’s regime. At the most basic level of justice, people are no longer disappearing into political prisons, torture chambers, and mass graves — because the former dictator is in prison, himself. And their daily life is improving…
_____________________________
I’m looking for something that sums up the Bush presidency. A defining moment, maybe, or a great metaphor. Unfortunately, it’s like looking for violence in a Roadrunner cartoon. Where to start?
A couple of weeks ago I’d have pointed to the recent Bush press conference and his now iconic inability to point to any mistakes he’s made in his entire administration. That was a good one - it conveyed the poor communication skills and lack of both foresight and hindsight that has transformed us from a beacon of hope around the globe into a nation known to possess the single largest and most prominent middle finger in the world.
But then I seized upon an earlier moment, something I’d dismissed as merely an amusing gaffe at the time: “There’s an old saying in Tennessee — I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee. Fool me once…shame on … shame on you…Fool me - can’t get fooled again.” That’s nice and compact - you get the hubristic headlong plunge into an adventure whose outcome hadn’t really been thought about, the inevitable stumble when resources proved to be insufficient, and the assured but utterly nonsensical conclusion wherein all of the original sense is lost. If memory serves, this was followed by a confident, even defiant glare that said, “That’s what I MEANT to say. There will be no going back, no corrections, no apologies. Mission accomplished.”
That’s a pretty good defining moment. But if I look back a little further, there are more weighty things. For instance, the behavior of an addict, which Bush admits that he was, back in the day. He “cured” his alcoholism with a double shot of Jesus, of course. But people who’ve actually been through long-term treatment will tell you that it’s not the substance, it’s the tendencies and behaviors that define the addict: The deep denial that there is a problem, the rationale that one can get it right next time without examining the last time, the insistence on doing the same thing again and again without introspection but with the unshakable conviction that the real problem is the behavior of others or sheer rotten luck…
That’s not bad either. But a little too psychoanalytical for my taste. Which drives me towards images and metaphors for the Bush presidency: The word processing program with no spellcheck and a busted “up” arrow; the football team moving the chains forward on an infinite gridiron with no end-zones; the adorable kitten poking its head out of an overturned grocery bag.
Okay, the kitten has nothing to do with Bush. I just like kittens. That’s why the image-and-metaphor thing doesn’t really work for me - sooner or later, I’m just going to start picturing extremely cute little animals getting up to adorable hijinks.
That’s when I start coming around full circle, and the fruitlessness of the quest becomes clear. In the end, the Bush presidency is defined by the Bush presidency. It has been amazingly consistent and self-defining in a way that will some day stun mathematicians: Every little tiny action of the administration is actually a complete representation of the administration itself. It is, in fact, a fractal presidency.
The “Fool me” moment was a mathematically complete miniature version of the argument for the Iraq war that Bush was promoting at that moment, and the Iraq war is a perfect miniature of the administration’s approach to diplomacy, and so on. If you examined a Bush spermatazoa under a microscope, it would doubtless strike out confidently in the wrong direction, stumble into a puddle of some horrible mutagen, and then insist that it’d been a slightly deformed blood cell all along. Mission accomplished.
But I’m lapsing back into metaphors again, and still this week’s radio address looms above me as a breathtaking piece of propaganda that I fear is actually believed by the propagandist himself.
Which brings me back to kittens. You have to admit that they can be extremely cute at times.





16 comments
Jack K.
May 3, 2004 at 5:04 pm
1…people are no longer disappearing into political prisons, torture chambers, and mass graves…
…hey, one out of three’s not that bad. Gee Dub is supposed to be a baseball guy at heart, so he would know that a .333 batting average is a darned fine number…
Anne
May 3, 2004 at 5:07 pm
2GW realized halfway into his “old saying” that, if he continued, satirists and critics would have “Shame on me” captured forever on videotape. Such a loss!
r
May 3, 2004 at 5:48 pm
3Man, I wish I’d come up with the ‘fractal presidency’ concept — that is a bona fide gem. Why doesn’t some high-profile national publication have you on staff cranking out fine, lucid commentary like this? (Could be, I suppose, that none of them are up to your level.)
And those darned kittens — they are adorable, aren’t they?
Linkmeister
May 3, 2004 at 5:49 pm
4I kinda like the paper bag idea. Remember all the fans (well, attendees) at New Orleans Saints games who used to put bags on their heads?
Pretty soon, if you’ve got an American passport you’ll have to hide it in a brown paper bag like a wino with Muscatel as you go through Customs somewhere.
Notapipe
May 3, 2004 at 6:40 pm
5Because now is such a good time to be talking about torture chambers.
Dee
May 3, 2004 at 7:38 pm
6Adam, Adam, Adam — it is futile to search for metaphor in a literal administration. There is no metaphor, there is no symbolism, because that would require some realization that the problems we face are complex and the answers are not always obvious.
But this administration is simple and single-minded. Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rice, all the way down to the clerks in the White House mailroom– there is only one position, only one answer to any question, issue or problem. And it was expressed by our President simply, without any room for interpretation or nuance — “You’re either with us, or against us.”
Rusty
May 3, 2004 at 7:45 pm
7Oh man! What a brilliant insight. Reminds me of the Goedel, Escher, Bach book. Self-referencing systems can’t be mathematically proven, or something like that…. I can’t claim I understood it all.
Murray
May 3, 2004 at 8:06 pm
8Dee- Right on!
Adam- Brilliant post, intelligent, insightful and therefore incomprehensible by most Americans. Oh well, at least we can appreciate it.
Yes, this is an administration oblivious to the fact that its irony meter has been pegged from the start. And the public is just oblivious, period.
BTW, given the photos and the reaction within the Arab world, I think that the war may have passed the point of no return. Certainly as long as this administration is in power. I can’t see any good way out, other than declare victory and leave the country to civil war and anarchy. Not quite our goal in the first place.
Lets see we went to war to:
1. get retaliation for 9/11, OK maybe that wasn’t exactly right.
2. rid the country of those WMD that threatened us, OK that was wrong too.
3. rid the country of Sadam’s torture chambers,
Hmm.. didn’t quite work out as we wanted.
4. Give the Iraqis a stable free democratic government that would be the envy of every Arab state. OK that’s not going to happen either, but at least Halliburton made a nice profit.
Possibly if Kerry gets in and replaces the US with the UN a year from now it might not still be too late, but then again it may be.
tess
May 3, 2004 at 8:20 pm
9Dee:
you’re right, but if we don’t try to assign some sort of meaningful metaphor to explain the inexplicable, then many of us will have to lay our heads on railroad tracks and wait for the next train.
this administration is a giant non-sequitor, and the fact that normally fiscally conservative republicans are supporting giant spending measures, the EPA is headed by people with industry ties, and the whole gov’t is run like a giant atm for defense contractors just strikes me as whole-heartedly wrong. if we didn’t try to assign some sort of motive to the idiocy, some giant grand scheme or conspiracy, and are forced to chalk it up to a series of generally greedy little moves that created this collosal mess, i’m afraid that we’ll have more people dressed in rags on the streets of berkeley screaming at random passer-bys and drumming empty buckets on saturday nights.
speaking of which, when are you visiting the bay area, adam?
Daniel Loftus
May 3, 2004 at 8:32 pm
10Which brings us ’round to a photo op begging to happen-John Kerry and kittens. Didn’t I read somewhere he has a cat? Female maybe? You know where I’m going with this…..
Dugrless
May 3, 2004 at 10:27 pm
11I’ve been trying for quite some time to put George W. Bush in a nutshell, and here you’ve done it brilliantly, amusingly and geekily (bonus points for the third, btw). Kudos to you, sir.
Now we can only hope that he can’t find his way out.
Kerry
May 3, 2004 at 11:18 pm
12The fractal presidency. A brilliant observation, Adam. And Tess is spot on too with the “giant ATM for defense contractors.” It amazes me that the conservatives who are so stingy with our tax dollars when it comes to education, the environment, welfare, childcare and job training for Americans, are more than happy to drop over a hundred billion dollars on a foreign country. My head hurts just thinking about it.
I’m going to go buy that poster of the cute little kitten hanging on the rope with the caption “Hang in there baby!” Just seven months till November.
G-Man
May 4, 2004 at 1:36 am
13I appreciate all of your insightful comments and depth of thought. I really do. But your written words simply aren’t where it’s at.
Come ON people!! It’s all about body language! Now THAT’s the way to exchange complex thoughts and exhibit your grasp on world-changing issues. Body language! Damn right!
So, let’s all agree to disconnect our keyboards and stop this fruitless attempt to communicate using (ick) words. Adam, do you know some techy who can modify your website to accept all posts in the form of “streaming body language”?(you may want to consult General Ashcroft about using that phrase - sounds a bit dirty). And absolutely no audio - that’d be silly and might encourage verbal communcation, which, as we all know by now, is not what really matters.
brillig
May 4, 2004 at 9:04 am
14Oh, Kerry, I hope you’re right and we only have seven more months of the fractal POTUS and his Kognitive Dissonance Krew. I can’t take much more of their flat-out, poker-faced, unapologetic lying. It’s exhausting and disorienting, always having to double-check your own recollection of what was said and done, versus its polar opposite, which is what you’re now being assured was said and done. And they’re so good at it! It’s like we’re all Ingrid Bergman (don’t I wish) and we’re being relentlessly gaslighted by what’s-his-name.
Re fractals: So if we built a time machine, we could go back and find that damn butterfly and squash it before this fiasco is set off by one flap of its damn wings?
Ken... Just Ken
May 4, 2004 at 6:59 pm
15Adam,
I’m sure there can be found on the web image sources for a visual representation of a metaphor that is appropriate for the present administration:
Just search on the term “Cluster Fuck”
Although I’m afraid that the results might not be as family friendly as you’d like it to be.
But the up-side to this image is that you could add pictures of cute little Kitties and they might just fit right in…
Perhaps I should rephrase that.
Naw.
Fishmael
May 9, 2004 at 5:05 pm
16The metaphor that came to my mind, maybe somewhere around February of 2001, is that the “weasels are in Toad Hall”.
Another possibility is that the inmates are in charge of the asylum.
I also tend to think of the image of a maniacal engineer (and crew) speeding the/our train towards the obviously absent trestle.
And I think it was Charles Boyer who was doing the gaslighting, no?